Multi-objective optimization and performance investigation of cementing materials with high thermal conductivity based on response surface methodology

Authors

• ZHAO Yongzhe, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China;CCTEG Xi’an Geothermal Energy Development Co., Ltd., Xi’an 712100, China;CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, ChinaFollow
• LI Wenhao, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China;CCTEG Xi’an Geothermal Energy Development Co., Ltd., Xi’an 712100, China;CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China
• WANG Yijie, CCTEG Xi’an Geothermal Energy Development Co., Ltd., Xi’an 712100, China;CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China
• HAN Yongliang, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China;CCTEG Xi’an Geothermal Energy Development Co., Ltd., Xi’an 712100, China;CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, ChinaFollow

Abstract

Objective Geothermal energy has emerged as a strategic clean energy for the low-carbon transformation of the world's energy mix. Correspondingly, its efficient exploitation and utilization are crucial to the early achievement of the goals of peak carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality. For geothermal resource exploitation, the thermal conductivity of cementing structures determines the efficiency of heat transfer from strata to geothermal well casings, establishing it as a key factor influencing the efficiency of geothermal energy extraction. Therefore, the research and development of cementing materials with high thermal conductivity can provide robust support for efficient geothermal resource exploitation.Methods The top three factors influencing the thermal conductivity of cementing materials with high thermal conductivity were determined using orthogonal experiments with water-cement ratio and the contents of graphite, iron powder, silicon carbide, and quartz sand as the factors. Furthermore, 3-factor and 3-level experiments were designed using response surface methodology (RSM), and regression models with thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and fluidity as response values were established. Accordingly, the impacts of various factors and their interactions on the performance of the cementing materials with high thermal conductivity were analyzed. Finally, the optimal mixing ratios of the cementing materials were determined using multi-objective optimization.Results and Conclusions Orthogonal experiment results indicate that the effects of factors influencing the thermal conductivity of cementing materials decreased in the order of graphite content (10%), water-cement ratio (0.57), iron powder content (30%), quartz sand content (30%), and silicon carbide content (10%). The regression models of thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and fluidity, developed with water-cement ratio, graphite content, and iron powder content as independent variables using RSM, yielded coefficients of determination (R²) of 0.986 7, 0.984 8, and 0.973 7, respectively, demonstrating high reliability of the models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results indicates that graphite content, water-cement ratio, and iron powder content produced extremely significant impacts on the thermal conductivity (P<0.01), followed by the interactions of water-cement ratio with graphite content and iron powder content (P <0.05). Water-cement ratio had extremely significant impacts on the compressive strength, while graphite content, iron powder content, and the interaction between water-cement ratio and graphite content exerted significant impacts on it. Furthermore, water-cement ratio and graphite content produced extremely significant impacts on the fluidity. Multi-objective optimization reveals that the optimal mixing ratios of cementing materials with high thermal conductivity consisted of a water-cement ratio of 0.573, a graphite content of 9.95%, and an iron powder content of 28.62%. Under the optimal mixing ratios, the thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and fluidity were 3.136 W/(m·K), 17.53 MPa, and 22.1 cm, respectively, with deviations of less than 5% against the predicted values. The optimal mixing ratios and regression models proposed in this study provide a reliable basis for the engineering application of geothermal well-oriented cementing materials with high thermal conductivity.

Keywords

geothermal energy, cementing material, orthogonal experiment, thermal conductivity, response surface methodology (RSM), optimal mix proportion

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.10.0771

Recommended Citation

ZHAO Yongzhe, LI Wenhao, WANG Yijie, et al. (2026) "Multi-objective optimization and performance investigation of cementing materials with high thermal conductivity based on response surface methodology," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54: Iss. 6, Article 19.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.10.0771
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss6/19

Reference

[1] KASSEM M A,MOSCARIELLO A. Geothermal energy:A sustainable and cost–effective alternative for clean energy production and climate change mitigation[J]. Sustainable Futures,2025,10:101247.

[2] LI Mingqi,SHI Yan,CHEN Hongxu,et al. Study on the heat transfer performance of coaxial casing heat exchanger for medium and deep geothermal energy in cold regions[J]. Renewable Energy,2024,237:121666.

[3] WANG Gaosheng,SONG Xianzhi,SHI Yu,et al. Comparison of production characteristics of various coaxial closed–loop geothermal systems[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2020,225:113437.

[4] 宋先知,张逸群,李根生,等. 雄安新区地热井同轴套管闭式循环取热技术研究[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2021,54(9):971−981 SONG Xianzhi,ZHANG Yiqun,LI Gensheng,et al. Performance study of the downhole coaxial closed–loop heat exchange technology in Xiong’an New Area[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology),2021,54(9):971−981

[5] ABID K,SRIVASTAVA S,TELLEZ M L R,et al. Experimental and machine learning study of thermal conductivity of cement composites for geothermal wells[J]. Geothermics,2023,110:102659.

[6] KOHL T，SALTON M，RYBACH L. Data analysis of the deep borehole heat exchanger plant Weissbad (Switzerland)[J]. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress，2000：3459–3464.

[7] 李瑞霞,王高升,宋先知,等. 固井水泥对同轴型换热系统取热效果影响数值分析[J]. 建筑科学,2018,34(4):36−40 LI Ruixia,WANG Gaosheng,SONG Xianzhi,et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of cement sheath on the heat extraction performance of coaxial borehole heat exchangers geothermal system[J]. Building Science,2018,34(4):36−40

[8] LIU He,ZHAO Xinpeng. Thermal conductivity analysis of high porosity structures with open and closed pores[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2022,183:122089.

[9] 刘嘉涵,徐世烺,曾强. 基于多尺度细观力学方法计算水泥基材料的导热系数[J]. 建筑材料学报,2018,21(2):293−298 LIU Jiahan,XU Shilang,ZENG Qiang. An investigation of thermal conductivity of cement–based composites with multi–scale micromechanical method[J]. Journal of Building Materials,2018,21(2):293−298

[10] SARGAM Y,WANG Kejin,ALLEMAN J E. Effects of modern concrete materials on thermal conductivity[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2020,32(4):04020058.

[11] DU He,CHEN Yuxuan,YAN Han,et al. Thermal conductivity of seawater cement–based materials:Effect of water–to–cement ratio,curing age,sand content,and porosity[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2023,35(9):04023301.

[12] 彭铖,陈宇恒,倪浩伟,等. 铜水泥基复合材料导热流动特性研究[J]. 环境与发展,2019,31(8):130−132 PENG Cheng,CHEN Yuheng,NI Haowei,et al. Thermal flow characteristics of copper cement composites[J]. Environment and Development,2019,31(8):130−132

[13] YANG Yu,WANG Kaipeng,ZHANG Hao,et al. Investigation on the preparation,properties,and microstructure of high thermal conductive cementing material in 3 500 m–deep geothermal well[J]. Geothermics,2022,100:102322.

[14] 张浩,徐拴海,杨雨,等. 地热井固井材料导热性能影响因素[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(2):195−201 ZHANG Hao,XU Shuanhai,YANG Yu,et al. Influencing factors of thermal conductivity of cementing materials for geothermal wells[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(2):195−201

[15] 方姚,张勇,冉真真. 中深层地热井固井导热水泥导热系数研究[J]. 材料导报,2020,34(10):20028−20033 FANG Yao,ZHANG Yong,RAN Zhenzhen. Thermal conductivity of cementing conductive cement in medium and deep geothermal well[J]. Materials Reports,2020,34(10):20028−20033

[16] WANG Sheng,LI Yujie,WU Liyu,et al. Investigation on thermal conductivity property and hydration mechanism of graphene–composite cement for geothermal exploitation[J]. Geothermics,2022,104:102477.

[17] SONG Xianzhi,ZHENG Rui,LI Ruixia,et al. Study on thermal conductivity of cement with thermal conductive materials in geothermal well[J]. Geothermics,2019,81:1−11.

[18] 王世东,虎维岳. 深部矿井煤岩体温度场特征及其控制因素研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2013,41(8):18−21 WANG Shidong,HU Weiyue. Research on coal and rock mass temperature fields characteristics and control factors in deep mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2013,41(8):18−21

[19] 沈玉旭,柴肇云,孙浩程,等. 纳米硅溶胶–EVA–粉煤灰水泥基复合浆材配比正交优化及对其物性的影响[J]. 煤炭学报,2024,49(6):2643−2659 SHEN Yuxu,CHAI Zhaoyun,SUN Haocheng,et al. Orthogonal optimization of the ratio of nano–silica sol–EVA–fly ash cement–based composite slurry and the effect on its physical properties[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(6):2643−2659

[20] 吴海宽,张航启,吴启红,等. 煤矸石–建筑固废砖填充材料正交试验及性能研究[J]. 材料导报,2024,38(增刊1):23110067 WU Haikuan,ZHANG Hangqi,WU Qihong,et al. Orthogonal experiment and performance study of coal gangue–building solid waste brick filling material[J]. Materials Reports,2024,38(Sup.1):23110067

[21] 郑伟鹏,黄建国,宋奔,等. 多元矿物材料对水泥性能影响的数学模型及多目标优化方法[J]. 硅酸盐学报,2024,52(9):3036−3046 ZHENG Weipeng,HUANG Jianguo,SONG Ben,et al. Mathematical model and multi–objective optimization of the influence of multiple mineral materials on cement properties[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2024,52(9):3036−3046

[22] HOU Dongshuai,CHEN Dongdong,WANG Xinpeng,et al. RSM–based modelling and optimization of magnesium phosphate cement–based rapid–repair materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2020,263:120190.

[23] YE Fukai,QIAO Hongxia,FENG Qiong,et al. Study on multi–performance optimization of basalt stone powder supplementary cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2023,80:108018.

[24] FODE T A,JANDE Y A C,KIVEVELE T. Modelling and optimization of multiple replacement of supplementary cementitious materials for cement composite by response surface method[J]. Cleaner Engineering and Technology,2024,19:100735.

[25] 张兰芳,刘丽娜,曹胜. 响应面方法优化碱激发矿渣–石粉水泥砂浆的研究[J]. 材料导报,2017,31(12):15−19 ZHANG Lanfang,LIU Lina,CAO Sheng. Optimization of alkali activated slag–limestone powder mortar by response surface methodology[J]. Materials Reports,2017,31(12):15−19

[26] LI Lixiao,WAN Yuejia,CHEN Shangxin,et al. Prediction of optimal ranges of mix ratio of self–compacting mortars (SCMs) based on response surface method (RSM)[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2022,319:126043.

[27] 王开强，零朝维，李迪，等. 响应面法优化3D打印砂浆建造性、开放时间与凝结时间[J/OL]. 建筑材料学报，2024：1–14(2026-01-15) [2024-01-09]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1764.TU.20240108.1706.010. WANG Kaiqiang，LING Chaowei，LI Di，et al. Optimizing the buildability，open time and setting time of 3D printing mortar using response surface methodology[J/OL]. Journal of Building Materials，2024：1–14(2026-01-15) [2024-01-09]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1764.TU.20240108.1706.010.

[28] WANG Shushuai,LI Yongliang,YANG Renshu,et al. Rheological behavior with time dependence and fresh slurry liquidity of cemented aeolian sand backfill based on response surface method[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2023,371:130768.

[29] SOTO–PÉREZ L,LÓPEZ V,HWANG S S. Response surface methodology to optimize the cement paste mix design:Time–dependent contribution of fly ash and nano–iron oxide as admixtures[J]. Materials & Design,2015,86:22−29.

[30] 郭凌志,周梅,王丽娟,等. 煤基固废地聚物注浆材料的制备及性能[J]. 建筑材料学报,2022,25(10):1092−1100 GUO Lingzhi,ZHOU Mei,WANG Lijuan,et al. Preparation and properties of coal–based solid waste geopolymer grouting materials[J]. Journal of Building Materials,2022,25(10):1092−1100

[31] LI Huayun,WU Yangfan,ZHOU Anxiang,et al. Experimental study on self–healing performance of tunnel lining concrete based on response surface methodology[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2024,425:136105.

[32] WANG Sheng,JIAN Liming,SHU Zhihong,et al. A high thermal conductivity cement for geothermal exploitation application[J]. Natural Resources Research,2020,29(6):3675−3687.

[33] 杨雨,徐拴海,张浩,等. 填料对地热井固井材料导热性能的影响[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(5):182−189 YANG Yu,XU Shuanhai,ZHANG Hao,et al. Effect of thermally conductive filler on thermal conductivity of cementing materials in geothermal wells[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(5):182−189

[34] 刘伟韬,吴海凤,申建军. 基于RSM的超细水泥注浆材料配比及性能优化模型[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2024,52(8):146−158 LIU Weitao,WU Haifeng,SHEN Jianjun. Based on Box–Behnken method superfine cement grouting material ratio and performance optimization model[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(8):146−158

[35] AÏTCIN P C. The importance of the water–cement and water–binder ratios[M]//AÏTCIN P C，FLATT R J. Science and technology of concrete admixtures. Amsterdam：Elsevier，2016：3–13.

[36] TAYEH B A,AL SAFFAR D M. Utilization of waste iron powder as fine aggregate in cement mortar[J]. Journal of Engineering Research and Technology,2018,5(2):22−27.

[37] ZHANG Hao,MU Song,CAI Jingshun,et al. The role of iron in cement hydration process:From perspective of chemical admixture[J]. Thermochimica Acta,2023,722:179457.

[38] YANG Junhao,HAN Song,WANG Qingwei,et al. The influence of graphene oxide on the hydration and mechanical properties of cement–based materials with low water–binder ratio[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites,2024,152:105640.

[39] ZHAO Yunpeng,ZHANG Jiaming,QIANG Sheng,et al. Effect of carbon fibers and graphite particles on mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of cement composite[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2024,94:110036.

[40] WANG Dengquan,WANG Qiang,HUANG Zongxian. Investigation on the poor fluidity of electrically conductive cement–graphite paste:Experiment and simulation[J]. Materials & Design,2019,169:107679.

[41] XU Shilang,LIU Jiahan,ZENG Qiang. Towards better characterizing thermal conductivity of cement–based materials:The effects of interfacial thermal resistance and inclusion size[J]. Materials & Design,2018,157:105−118.

[42] WANG Jialiang,DONG Sufen,PANG S D,et al. Pore structure characteristics of concrete composites with surface–modified carbon na notubes[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites,2022,128:104453.

[43] SARKAR P K,MITRA N. Thermal conductivity of cement paste:Influence of macro–porosity[J]. Cement and Concrete Research,2021,143:106385.

[44] MOUNANGA P,KHELIDJ A,BASTIAN G. Experimental study and modelling approaches for the thermal conductivity evolution of hydrating cement paste[J]. Advances in Cement Research,2004,16(3):95−103.

[45] KIM K H,JEON S E,KIM J K,et al. An experimental study on thermal conductivity of concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research,2003,33(3):363−371.

[46] UNWIN P R,GÜELL A G,ZHANG Guohui. Nanoscale electrochemistry of sp² carbon materials:From graphite and graphene to carbon nanotubes[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research,2016,49(9):2041−2048.

[47] ERCEG N,JELOVICA L,HREPIĆ Z,et al. University students’ conceptual understanding of microscopic models of electrical and thermal conduction in solids[J]. European Journal of Physics,2021,42(4):045702.

[48] LI Liangshun,WANG Yue,AN Mingzhe,et al. The influence of rehydration on the properties of Portland cement–based materials with low water/binder ratios:A review of existing research[J]. Materials,2023,16(3):970.

[49] ZHENG Shaojun,LIU Tianle,JIANG Guosheng,et al. Effects of water–to–cement ratio on pore structure evolution and strength development of cement slurry based on HYMOSTRUC^3D and micro–CT[J]. Applied Sciences,2021,11(7):3063.

[50] LI Min,GAO Peiwei,LI Guoqing,et al. Fabrication and electrical properties of carbon fiber,graphite and nano carbon black conductive cement–based composites[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering,2024,60:104834.