•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

Objective and Method To achieve rapid coalbed methane (CBM) extraction from broken-soft coal seams using surface horizontal wells, this study proposed a volume fracturing technology for coal seam roof using horizontal wells. Focusing coal seam 4-1 in a mining area, this study established a numerical model using finite element analysis (FEA) software Abaqus Using this model, the impacts of in-situ stress on the cross-layer propagation characteristics of multiple fractures were investigated. Through true triaxial hydraulic fracturing experiments, the multi-fracture propagation patterns under varying injection rates of fracturing fluids, perforation cluster numbers, and cluster spacings were analyzed. Using 3D fracturing design software Mshale, key parameters for volume fracturing, including perforation cluster number, cluster spacing, injection rate of fracturing fluids, average proppant ratio, and fracturing fluid volume, were optimized. Finally, the proposed technology with optimal parameters was applied to practical engineering.Results and Conclusions The in-situ stress state determined the morphology of fracture networks induced by volume fracturing. Specifically, when the vertical stress difference coefficient (k) ≤ 0, multiple fractures were prone to propagate along the direction of the minimum horizontal principal stress, ultimately forming horizontal fractures. In contrast, in the case of k ≥ 0.25, multiple fractures propagated rapidly across layers to form vertical fractures, with the cross-layer velocity increasing with k. Increasing interlayer stress difference increased the fracture length within the coal seam but decreased the fracture length within the coal seam roof. Meanwhile, the length difference between the middle fracture and fractures besides, as well as the average pressure for initial cracking, increased with the interlayer stress difference. Fractures in specimens preferentially propagated within the coal seam roof after initial cracking, with propagation patterns varying with the injection rate of fracturing fluids. A low injection rate caused insufficient fracture heights in the coal seam; a medium injection rate promoted fracture propagation in the coal seam, leading to the formation of interconnected fracture networks; a high injection rate, despite enabling fractures to extend to the specimen boundaries, increased the initial cracking. Regarding the impacts of perforation cluster number, two clusters generated I-shaped fractures, leading to uneven reservoir stimulation, while three clusters enabled fractures to interconnect within the coal seam, resulting in the formation of V-shaped fracture networks. In contrast, four clusters induced intense inter-fracture interference, leading to the formation of “凵”-shaped fracture networks within the roof. In this case, horizontal fractures prevented vertical fractures from propagating across different layers. Under excessively large cluster spacing, perforation clusters near the wellhead induced initial cracking first, leading to the formation of dominant channels. In contrast, it proved difficult for the remaining clusters to cause initial cracking. Therefore, excessively large cluster spacing is unfavorable for the formation of fracture networks. Furthermore, an excessive number of perforation clusters or too small cluster spacing can intensify inter-fracture interference, thereby inhibiting fracture propagation. Increasing the injection rate of fracturing fluids can enhance the net pressure within fractures, thus promoting the synchronous development of fracture length, width, and height. In contrast, an increase in fracturing fluid volume preferentially improves fracture length. Controlling the average proppant ratio within a range of 16%‒24% can avoid near-wellbore sand plugging while also ensuring effective far-field proppant placement. Accordingly, the optimal fracturing parameters were determined, including a fracturing section length of 60 m, a perforation cluster number of 3, a cluster spacing of 20 m, an injection rate of fracturing fluids of 20 m³/min, an average proppant ratio of 16% (maximum proppant ratio ≤ 24%), and a fracturing fluid volume of 3 500 m³. The proposed technology performed well in the field application. The field microseismic monitoring results indicate that the resulting fracture networks exhibited fracture half-lengths ranging from 212.5 m to 225.5 m (average: 219.0 m) and fracture heights from 25 m to 40 m (average: 32.5 m). The fracture networks penetrated the coal seam and extended into the coal seam floor, with the fracture propagation characteristics consistent with the theoretical research results. Within the same mining area, the expansion scale of the fracture networks created using this technology was significantly larger than that produced by the conventional multistage fracturing of coal seam floor using horizontal wells. The results of this study will provide technical support for efficient hydraulic-fracturing stimulation of CBM reservoirs in broken soft coal seams.

Keywords

broken soft coal seam, horizontal well in coal seam roof, volume fracturing, fracture network propagation, coalbed methane (CBM)

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.26.01.0049

Reference

[1] 袁亮. 我国深部煤与瓦斯共采战略思考[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(1):1−6

YUAN Liang. Strategic thinking of simultaneous exploitation of coal and gas in deep mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):1−6

[2] 赵伟,董虎子,闫志达,等. 深部煤层瓦斯含量分阶赋存规律及其与突出危险的关联[J]. 煤炭学报,2025,50(3):1555−1568

ZHAO Wei,DONG Huzi,YAN Zhida,et al. Hierarchical occurrence law of gas content in deep coal seams and its relationship with outburst prevention[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2025,50(3):1555−1568

[3] 李国富,季长江,李军军,等. 寺河东五盘区煤与煤层气共采技术与应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):291−303

LI Guofu,JI Changjiang,LI Junjun,et al. Technology and application of coal and CBM co–mining in east fifth panel of Sihe mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):291−303

[4] 张群,孙四清,降文萍. 碎软低渗煤层煤矿区煤层气勘探开发关键技术及发展方向[J]. 石油学报,2024,45(5):855−865

ZHANG Qun,SUN Siqing,JIANG Wenping. Key technologies and development direction of CBM exploration and development in coal mine area of fractured soft and low permeability coal seams[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(5):855−865

[5] 国家矿山安全监察局. 煤矿安全规程[S]. 北京:应急管理出版社,2022.

[6] 程志恒. 底抽巷穿层钻孔封孔深度与布孔间距优化研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2017,45(2):76−82

CHENG Zhiheng. Study on optimization of strata passing borehole sealing depth and borehole layout space in floor gas drainage gateway[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2017,45(2):76−82

[7] 张群,葛春贵,李伟,等. 碎软低渗煤层顶板水平井分段压裂煤层气高效抽采模式[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(1):150−159

ZHANG Qun,GE Chungui,LI Wei,et al. A new model and application of coalbed methane high efficiency production from broken soft and low permeable coal seam by roof strata–in horizontal well and staged hydraulic fracture[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(1):150−159

[8] 彭鹏,杨兆中,梅永贵,等. 煤层气体积压裂施工参数优化[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2015,5(6):68−72

PENG Peng,YANG Zhaozhong,MEI Yonggui,et al. Construction parameter optimization of coalbed methane volume fracturing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2015,5(6):68−72

[9] 安琦,杨帆,杨睿月,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地神府区块深部煤层气体积压裂实践与认识[J]. 煤炭学报,2024,49(5):2376−2393

AN Qi,YANG Fan,YANG Ruiyue,et al. Practice and understanding of deep coalbed methane massive hydraulic fracturing in Shenfu Block,Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(5):2376−2393

[10] 桑树勋,周效志,刘世奇,等. 应力释放构造煤煤层气开发理论与关键技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(7):2531−2543

SANG Shuxun,ZHOU Xiaozhi,LIU Shiqi,et al. Research advances in theory and technology of the stress release applied extraction of coalbed methane from tectonically deformed coals[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(7):2531−2543

[11] 桑树勋,皇凡生,单衍胜,等. 碎软低渗煤储层强化与煤层气地面开发技术进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2024,52(1):196−210

SANG Shuxun,HUANG Fansheng,SHAN Yansheng,et al. Technology processes of enhancement of broken soft and low permeability coal reservoir and surface development of coalbed methane[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(1):196−210

[12] 巫修平,张群. 碎软低渗煤层顶板水平井分段压裂裂缝扩展规律及控制机制[J]. 天然气地球科学,2018,29(2):268−276

WU Xiuping,ZHANG Qun. Research on controlling mechanism of fracture propagation of multi–stage hydraulic fracturing horizontal well in roof of broken soft and low permeability coal seam[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2018,29(2):268−276

[13] 罗平亚,朱苏阳. 中国建立千亿立方米级煤层气大产业的理论与技术基础[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1755−1763

LUO Pingya,ZHU Suyang. Theoretical and technical fundamentals of a 100 billion–cubic–meter–scale large industry of coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1755−1763

[14] 李浩哲,姜在炳,舒建生,等. 水力裂缝在煤岩界面处穿层扩展规律的数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(2):106−113

LI Haozhe,JIANG Zaibing,SHU Jiansheng,et al. Numerical simulation of layer–crossing propagation behavior of hydraulic fractures at coal–rock interface[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(2):106−113

[15] 李浩哲,姜在炳,范耀. 基于裂缝尖端应力强度因子的裂缝穿层行为分析[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,34(1):76−82

LI Haozhe,JIANG Zaibing,FAN Yao. Analysis of crack across–layer extension behavior based on stress intensity factor at crack tip[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2019,34(1):76−82

[16] LI Haozhe,ZHANG Qun,JIANG Zaibing,et al. Numerical study on the influence of coal–roof interface on vertical propagation of hydraulic fracture[J]. International Journal of Oil,Gas and Coal Technology,2022,29(3):258−284.

[17] 李浩,梁卫国,李国富,等. 碎软煤层韧性破坏–渗流耦合本构关系及其间接压裂工程验证[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(3):924−936

LI Hao,LIANG Weiguo,LI Guofu,et al. Ductile failure–seepage coupling constitutive equations of broken soft coal and its verification in indirect fracturing engineering[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(3):924−936

[18] 陈瑞杰,熊志文,王瑞,等. 煤层顶板水力压裂裂缝扩展规律实验研究[J]. 中国矿业,2024,33(12):208−216

CHEN Ruijie,XIONG Zhiwen,WANG Rui,et al. Experimental study on the expansion law of hydraulic fracturing cracks in coal seam roof[J]. China Mining Magazine,2024,33(12):208−216

[19] 张玉浩,杨永康,王晨龙. 碎软煤层顶板水力压裂多裂缝穿层扩展规律研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2024,55(12):63−71

ZHANG Yuhao,YANG Yongkang,WANG Chenlong. Study on the law of multi–fracture through–layer propagation of crushed soft coal seam roof by hydraulic fracturing[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2024,55(12):63−71

[20] 姜在炳,李浩哲,许耀波,等. 煤层顶板分段压裂水平井地质适应性分析与施工参数优化[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(3):183−192

JIANG Zaibing,LI Haozhe,XU Yaobo,et al. Geological adaptability analysis and operational parameter optimization for staged fracturing horizontal wells in coal seam roof[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(3):183−192

[21] 郭天魁,王云鹏,陈铭,等. 煤层顶板水平井穿层压裂适应性数值模拟[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(11):74−85

GUO Tiankui,WANG Yunpeng,CHEN Ming,et al. Numerical simulation of adaptability of horizontal well layer–penetrating fracturing in the roof of coal seam[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(11):74−85

[22] 李勇,陈涛,马啸天,等. 煤层顶板间接压裂裂缝扩展机制及影响因素[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2024,52(2):171−182

LI Yong,CHEN Tao,MA Xiaotian,et al. Extension mechanism and influencing factors of indirect fracturing fractures on coal seam roof[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(2):171−182

[23] 孙四清,张群,闫志铭,等. 碎软低渗高突煤层井下长钻孔整体水力压裂增透工程实践[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(9):2337−2344

SUN Siqing,ZHANG Qun,YAN Zhiming,et al. Practice of permeability enhancement through overall hydraulic fracturing of long hole in outburst–prone soft crushed coal seam with low permeability[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(9):2337−2344

[24] 汤宇,孔祥伟,杨婉婷,等. 基于射孔倾角的深煤岩水力裂缝扩展及压裂液参数影响研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2026,57(2):1−12

TANG Yu,KONG Xiangwei,YANG Wanting,et al. Research on hydraulic fracture propagation and fracturing fluid parameters of deep coal rock based on perforation angle[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2026,57(2):1−12

[25] 熊冬,贺甲元,马新仿,等. 深部煤及顶底板不同射孔位置条件下的压裂模拟:以鄂尔多斯盆地某气田8号深部煤层为例[J]. 煤炭学报,2024,49(12):4897−4914

XIONG Dong,HE Jiayuan,MA Xinfang,et al. Fracturing simulation with different perforation positions at deep coal seam and roof/floor rock:Case study at the No. 8 deep coal seam of a gas field in the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(12):4897−4914

[26] 庞涛,姜在炳,惠江涛,等. 煤系水平井定向射孔压裂裂缝扩展机制[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(4):68−75

PANG Tao,JIANG Zaibing,HUI Jiangtao,et al. Fracture propagation mechanism in directional perforation and hydraulic fracturing of coal seam horizontal wells[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(4):68−75

[27] 孙四清,张庆利,杨帆,等. 煤储层水力压裂裂缝扩展规律研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2026,54(1):303−319

SUN Siqing,ZHANG Qingli,YANG Fan,et al. Research progress on regulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in coal seams[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2026,54(1):303−319

[28] 孙四清,李文博,张俭,等. 煤矿井下长钻孔分段水力压裂技术研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(8):1−15

SUN Siqing,LI Wenbo,ZHANG Jian,et al. Research progress and development trend of staged hydraulic fracturing technology in long–borehole underground coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(8):1−15

[29] 安果涛,谢昕,孔祥伟,等. 射孔间距–倾角对深煤层水力裂缝扩展影响的离散元分析[J]. 科学技术与工程,2024,24(18):7623−7629

AN Guotao,XIE Xin,KONG Xiangwei,et al. Discrete meta–analysis on effect of shot hole spacing–inclination on hydraulic fracture extension in deep coal seams[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2024,24(18):7623−7629

[30] 姜玉龙,王开,蔡婷婷,等. 不同注液速率水力压裂多裂缝扩展规律研究[J]. 煤炭工程,2024,56(8):183−189

JIANG Yulong,WANG Kai,CAI Tingting,et al. Multi–fracture expansion law of hydraulic fracturing with different injection rates[J]. Coal Engineering,2024,56(8):183−189

[31] 潘林华,张士诚,程礼军,等. 水平井“多段分簇”压裂簇间干扰的数值模拟[J]. 天然气工业,2014,34(1):74−79

PAN Linhua,ZHANG Shicheng,CHENG Lijun,et al. A numerical simulation of the inter–cluster interference in multi–cluster staged fracking for horizontal wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(1):74−79

[32] 张广明,刘合,张劲,等. 水平井水力压裂的三维有限元数值模拟研究[J]. 工程力学,2011,28(2):101−106

ZHANG Guangming,LIU He,ZHANG Jin,et al. Three–dimensional finite element numerical simulation of horizontal well hydraulic fracturing[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2011,28(2):101−106

[33] LI Song,TANG Dazhen,PAN Zhejun,et al. Characterization of the stress sensitivity of pores for different rank coals by nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Fuel,2013,111:746−754.

[34] 李大鹏,崔传安,唐德高,等. 基于充分浮力理论的有效应力原理公式推导[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2012,39(1):24−30

LI Dapeng,CUI Chuan’an,TANG Degao,et al. Derivation of the formula of effective stress principle based on theory of adequate rising force[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,2012,39(1):24−30

[35] TERZAGHI K T. Theoretical soil mechanics[M]. New York:Wiley and Sons,1943.

[36] 陈勉,金衍,张广清. 石油工程岩石力学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2008.

[37] 孟召平,雷钧焕,王宇恒. 基于Griffith强度理论的煤储层水力压裂有利区评价[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(1):268−275

MENG Zhaoping,LEI Junhuan,WANG Yuheng. Evaluation of favorable areas for hydraulic fracturing of coal reservoir based on Griffith strength theory[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(1):268−275

[38] 许耀波,张培河,范宗洋,等. 碎软煤层顶板水平井穿层压裂裂缝扩展规律及敏感因素分析[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2023,40(2):420−428

XU Yaobo,ZHANG Peihe,FAN Zongyang,et al. Fracture propagation law and sensitive factors analysis of layer–penetrating fracturing in the horizontal well within roof strata of broken–soft coal seam[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2023,40(2):420−428

[39] 柳贡慧,庞飞,陈治喜. 水力压裂模拟实验中的相似准则[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(5):45−48

LIU Gonghui,PANG Fei,CHEN Zhixi. Development of scaling laws for hydraulic fracture simulation tests[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum,China (Edition of Natural Science),2000,24(5):45−48

[40] MEYER B R. Three–dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulation on personal computers:Theory and comparison studies[C]//SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. Morgantown:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1989:SPE–19329–MS.

[41] MEYER B R,BAZAN L W. A discrete fracture network model for hydraulically induced fractures–theory,parametric and case studies[C]//SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. The Woodlands:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2011:SPE–140514–MS.

[42] 杨睿月,刘奕文,李宇,等. 深部煤层气定向压裂孔/簇间流量及支撑剂分配特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2025,50(2):1127−1147

YANG Ruiyue,LIU Yiwen,LI Yu,et al. Inter–cluster and intra–cluster flow distribution and proppant allocation in deep coalbed methane orientation fracturing[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2025,50(2):1127−1147

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.