Joint inversion of borehole-surface direct-current resistivity data

Authors

• XU Kaijun, School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, ChinaFollow
• JIN Heran, School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
• CAO Danping, School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
• MOU Bin, Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute (Qingdao Geological Exploration Development Bureau), Qingdao 266000, China
• HU Zuzhi, BGP INC., China National Petroleum Corporation, Zhuozhou 072751, China

Abstract

Objective The conventional inversion of surface direct-current (DC) resistivity data faces challenges such as limited exploration accuracy and depth. This study aims to enhance the accuracy and reliability of exploration in complex engineering and geological settings through the joint inversion of borehole-surface DC resistivity data. Methods First, different geoelectric models were constructed through three-dimensional (3D) forward modeling of full-space DC resistivity. Then, the potential response characteristics under surface and borehole observation methods were systematically analyzed to determine the differences in detection sensitivity between surface and borehole observations. Accordingly, a joint 3D inversion technique for borehole-surface DC resistivity data was developed using the Gauss-Newton method. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the joint inversion technique were verified using theoretical models and actual data. Results and Conclusions The inversion of surface observations yielded high lateral resolution but a limited vertical resolution, while the inversion of borehole observations exhibited a high vertical resolution. In contrast, the joint inversion of borehole-surface data provided more accurate resistivity structures and physical property values. The effectiveness of the joint inversion technique was verified using both theoretical models and actual data. The verification results demonstrate that the joint inversion technique combines the advantages of the surface and borehole observation methods, thereby enhancing both the spatial resolution of inversion results and the capability for identifying deep anomalous body. Therefore, the developed joint inversion technique provides technical support for improving the exploration accuracy in complex engineering and geological settings.

Keywords

direct-current (DC) resistivity method, joint inversion, borehole observation, spatial resolution, deep anomalous body

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.05.0399

Recommended Citation

XU Kaijun, JIN Heran, CAO Danping, et al. (2026) "Joint inversion of borehole-surface direct-current resistivity data," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54: Iss. 4, Article 19.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.05.0399
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss4/19

Reference

[1] 刘斌,李术才,李树忱,等. 隧道含水构造直流电阻率法超前探测研究[J]. 岩土力学,2009,30(10):3093−3101

LIU Bin,LI Shucai,LI Shuchen,et al. Study of advanced detection of water–bearing geological structures with DC resistivity method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2009,30(10):3093−3101

[2] 汤洪志,乔鑫磊,张志勇,等. 三维直流电阻率反演在某废弃物填埋场渗漏探测中的应用研究[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版),2025,48(3):251−261

TANG Hongzhi,QIAO Xinlei,ZHANG Zhiyong,et al. Study on the application of 3D direct current resistivity inversion in leakage detection of a waste landfill[J]. Journal of East China University of Technology (Natural Science),2025,48(3):251−261

[3] 岳建华,杨海燕,冉华赓. 矿井电法勘探研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):259−276

YUE Jianhua,YANG Haiyan,RAN Huageng. Research status and development trend of mine electrical prospecting[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(1):259−276

[4] 周官群,赵宏达,张维鑫,等. 基于跨巷观测的三维直流电法底板水害精细化探测[J]. 煤矿安全,2025,56(6):192−201

ZHOU Guanqun,ZHAO Hongda,ZHANG Weixin,et al. Fine detection of floor water damage by three–dimensional direct current electric method based on cross–lane observation[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2025,56(6):192−201

[5] DOMENZAIN D,LIU Lichao,VELA I Y,et al. 3D DC inversion,visualization,and processing of dense time–lapse data in fine domains applied to remediation monitoring[J]. Geophysics,2023,88(5):E147−E158.

[6] 阮百尧,徐世浙. 二维直流电阻率测深曲线的快速反演[J]. 物探与化探,1996,20(6):455−460

RUAN Baiyao,XU Shizhe. Rapid inversion of two–dimensional D. C. resistivity sounding curve[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration,1996,20(6):455−460

[7] 毛先进，鲍光淑. 2.5维电阻率成像的新方法[J]. 物探与化探，1999，23(2)：150–152.

MAO Xianjin，BAO Guangshu. A new technique for 2.5 dimensional resistivity imagery[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration，1999，23(2)：150–152.

[8] DOMENZAIN D，BRADFORD J，MEAD J. Efficient inversion of 2.5D electrical resistivity data using the discrete adjoint method[J]. Geophysics，2021，86(3)：E225–E237.

[9] 吴小平,徐果明. 利用共轭梯度法的电阻率三维反演研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2000,43(3):420−427

WU Xiaoping,XU Guoming. Study on 3–D resistivity inversion using conjugate gradient method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2000,43(3):420−427

[10] 徐凯军,李桐林,张辉,等. 基于共轭梯度法的垂直有限线源三维电阻率反演[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(3):68−71

XU Kaijun,LI Tonglin,ZHANG Hui,et al. 3D resistivity inversion of vertical finite line source using conjugate gradients[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2006,34(3):68−71

[11] PIDLISECKY A,HABER E,KNIGHT R J. RESINVM3D:A 3D resistivity inversion package[J]. Geophysics,2007,72(2):H1−H10.

[12] 吴小平,刘洋,王威. 基于非结构网格的电阻率三维带地形反演[J]. 地球物理学报,2015,58(8):2706−2717

WU Xiaoping,LIU Yang,WANG Wei. 3D resistivity inversion incorporating topography based on unstructured meshes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2015,58(8):2706−2717

[13] 杜伟,吴小平. 基于GPU集群加速的电阻率三维数值模拟[J]. 物探化探计算技术,2018,40(1):126−133

DU Wei,WU Xiaoping. Multi–GPU clusters accelerated three–dimensional resistivity forward modeling[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2018,40(1):126−133

[14] 马欢,郭越,吴萍萍,等. 基于MPI并行算法的电阻率法多种装置数据的三维联合反演[J]. 地球物理学报,2018,61(12):5052−5065

MA Huan,GUO Yue,WU Pingping,et al. 3–D joint inversion of multi–array data set in the resistivity method based on MPI parallel algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2018,61(12):5052−5065

[15] MA Fengqun,TAN Handong,KONG Wenxin,et al. Three–dimensional anisotropic inversion for direct current resistivity method using unstructured tetrahedral discretization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2024,62:4512016.

[16] 马逢群,谭捍东,孔文新. 基于有限内存拟牛顿法的电阻率法三维主轴各向异性反演研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2022,37(2):637−647

MA Fengqun,TAN Handong,KONG Wenxin. Three–dimensional axial anisotropic resistivity inversion based on LBFGS method[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2022,37(2):637−647

[17] ROBINSON J,JOHNSON T,SLATER L. Evaluation of known–boundary and resistivity constraints for improving cross–borehole DC electrical resistivity imaging of discrete fractures[J]. Geophysics,2013,78(3):D115−D127.

[18] 程建远,颜羽,李宇腾,等. 煤矿钻孔物探的技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(6):1−21

CHENG Jianyuan,YAN Yu,LI Yuteng,et al. Technical advances and research directions of borehole geophysical prospecting for coal mines[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(6):1−21

[19] 李长伟,阮百尧,吕玉增,等. 点源场井–地电位测量三维有限元模拟[J]. 地球物理学报,2010,53(3):729−736

LI Changwei,RUAN Baiyao,LYU Yuzeng,et al. Three–dimensional FEM modeling of point source borehole–ground electrical potential measurements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2010,53(3):729−736

[20] 刘英. 孔中电阻率法三维超前探测数值与物理模拟[J]. 工程地球物理学报,2019,16(5):706−712

LIU Ying. Numerical and physical simulation of three–dimensional advanced detection by borehole resistivity method[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics,2019,16(5):706−712

[21] 刘磊,范涛,李博凡. 煤矿井下孔中直流电法超前探测数值模拟研究[J]. 物探化探计算技术,2020,42(2):239−243

LIU Lei,FAN Tao,LI Bofan. Numerical simulation of advanced detection by direct current method in borehole of coal mine[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2020,42(2):239−243

[22] 蒋林城,肖宏跃,丁尚见,等. 跨孔电阻率法装置灵敏度分析及分辨率讨论[J]. 地球物理学进展,2018,33(2):815−822

JIANG Lincheng,XIAO Hongyue,DING Shangjian,et al. Analysis of sensitivity of arrays and resolution discussion of cross–hole resistivity method[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2018,33(2):815−822

[23] 张文俊,李术才,苏茂鑫,等. 基于井间电阻率成像的城市地铁溶洞探测方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版),2014,44(3):75−82

ZHANG Wenjun,LI Shucai,SU Maoxin,et al. Detection method of karst caves in city subway based on the cross–hole resistivity tomography[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science),2014,44(3):75−82

[24] FERNÁNDEZ–MARTÍNEZ J L,FERNÁNDEZ–MUÑIZ Z,XU Shan,et al. Efficient uncertainty analysis of the 3D electrical tomography inverse problem[J]. Geophysics,2019,84(3):E209−E223.

[25] GAO Shijie,TAN Handong,MA Huan,et al. 3D electrical resistance tomography for finite–volume targets using unstructured FEM and L–BFGS[J]. Applied Geophysics,2025,22(2):1−18.

[26] 高级,张海江,秦臻. 基于共轭梯度的全通道3D井地井电阻率成像研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2017,32(1):135−141

GAO Ji,ZHANG Haijiang,QIN Zhen. 3D full channel well–surface–well resistivity tomography based on conjugate gradient[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(1):135−141

[27] 高卫富,翟培合,肖乐乐,等. 环工作面三维直流电阻率法研究及应用[J]. 地球物理学报,2020,63(9):3534−3544

GAO Weifu,ZHAI Peihe,XIAO Lele,et al. Research and application of the 3D DC resistivity method with around working face[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2020,63(9):3534−3544

[28] 李果,庞贵艮,吕情绪. 定向钻孔中直流电法探测技术在宽工作面中的应用[J]. 物探化探计算技术,2023,45(2):235−241

LI Guo,PANG Guigen,LYU Qingxu. Application of direct current detection technology in directional drilling in wide working face[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2023,45(2):235−241

[29] 李术才,苏茂鑫,薛翊国,等. 城市地铁跨孔电阻率CT超前地质预报方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(5):913−920

LI Shucai,SU Maoxin,XUE Yiguo,et al. Study on computed tomography of cross–hole resistivity in urban subway geological prediction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(5):913−920

[30] ZHANG J,REVIL A. Cross–well 4–D resistivity tomography localizes the oil–water encroachment front during water flooding[J]. Geophysical Journal International,2015,201(1):343−354.