•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

Objective Deep coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs are characterized by ultra-low porosity, ultra-low permeability, and super saturation, rendering it impractical to copy the productivity models of shallow coalbed methane and shale gas. Furthermore, the production performance of deep CBM varies significantly across different well sections. However, the impacts of different factors on the productivity of deep CBM remain poorly understood. This study conducted a numerical simulation analysis of the productivity of deep CBM in the Daning-Jixian block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin based on the geological characteristics of the block, aiming to explore the impacts of various key factors on the productivity of deep CBM. Notably, it is critical to determine the appropriate cluster spacing value and scientific drainage system. Methods Based on the geological characteristics of deep CBM reservoirs in the Daning-Jixian block, this study comprehensively considered the transformation of CBM occurrence state, multiphase fluid seepage, and the stress-strain constitutive relationships of reservoirs. To reflect the multi-physical field coupling mechanisms involved in coal reservoir deformations and fluid migration during gas drainage, this study introduced the dual-pathway gas migration pattern that combined the seepage-diffusion of free gas and the desorption-diffusion of adsorbed gas. Accordingly, a mathematical model of CBM productivity, which accounted for the coupling effects of gas-liquid two-phase flow and coal deformations, was developed. By solving the model using the COMSOL Multiphysics software and comparing the simulation results with the actual field data in the study area, this study sufficiently validated the accuracy of the model. Furthermore, major factors governing the productivity of deep CBM were analyzed using grey correlation analysis. Based on the analytical results and predicted productivity, this study revealed the influential patterns of varying well spacing values and depressurization rates on productivity. Results and Conclusions The simulation results indicate that the adsorbed gas production is directly proportional to the initial permeability ratio (k0), Langmuir volume (VL), Langmuir strain coefficient (εL), and modulus of elasticity (E) but is inversely proportional to the initial water saturation (Sw0), Langmuir pressure (pL), and Poisson’s ratio (v). In contrast, the free gas production is directly proportional to k0, pL, εL, and E but is inversely proportional to Sw0, VL, and v, with VL producing less influence on the free gas production. εL and k0 are identified as the major factors influencing the productivity of deep CBM in the study area. Analyses of the production of adsorbed gas, free gas, and water under different cluster spacing values reveal that the optimal cluster spacing and depressurization rate in the Daning-Jixian block are 20 m and 0.18 MPa/d, respectively.

Keywords

eastern margin of the Ordos Basin, deep coalbed methane(CBM), cbm productivity, fluid-solid coupling, numerical simulation, production scheme

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.05.0348

Reference

[1] 徐凤银,熊先钺,侯伟,等. 深部煤层气产业升级与“八个一体化”体系的建立[J]. 石油学报,2025,46(2):289−305

XU Fengyin,XIONG Xianyue,HOU Wei,et al. Upgrading of deep coalbed methane industry and establishment of the “Eight–in–One” system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2025,46(2):289−305

[2] 石军太,曹敬添,徐凤银,等. 深部煤层气游离气饱和度计算模型及其应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):134−146

SHI Juntai,CAO Jingtian,XU Fengyin,et al. A calculation model of free gas saturation in deep coalbed methane reservoirs and its application[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):134−146

[3] 郗兆栋,唐书恒,刘忠,等. 宁武盆地南部深部煤层气临界深度与成藏特征[J]. 天然气工业,2024,44(1):108−118

XI Zhaodong,TANG Shuheng,LIU Zhong,et al. Critical depth and accumulation characteristics of deep coalbed methane in the southern Ningwu Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(1):108−118

[4] 曹毅民,丁蓉,赵启阳,等. 煤层气可采储量计算方法的评价与应用[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(增刊1):50−56

CAO Yimin,DING Rong,ZHAO Qiyang,et al. Evaluation and application of recoverable reserves calculation methods for coalbed methane[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(Sup.1):50−56

[5] LU Hongfang,MA Xin,AZIMI M. US natural gas consumption prediction using an improved kernel–based nonlinear extension of the Arps decline model[J]. Energy,2020,194:116905.

[6] 汤达祯,赵俊龙,许浩,等. 中–高煤阶煤层气系统物质能量动态平衡机制[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(1):40−48

TANG Dazhen,ZHAO Junlong,XU Hao,et al. Material and energy dynamic balance mechanism in middle–high rank coalbed methane (CBM) systems[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):40−48

[7] 赵海峰,王治奇,王腾飞. 深部煤储层水平井组缝网压裂数值模拟研究[J/OL]. 煤炭科学技术,2025:1–11 [2025-12-02]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.td.20251201.1548.012.html.

ZHAO Haifeng,WANG Zhiqi,WANG Tengfei. Numerical simulation study on network fracturing in horizontal well groups of deep coal reservoirs[J/OL]. Coal Science and Technology,2025:1–11 [2025-12-02]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.td.20251201.1548.012.html.

[8] THARAROOP P,KARPYN Z T,ERTEKIN T. Development of a multi–mechanistic,dual–porosity,dual–permeability,numerical flow model for coalbed methane reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2012,8:121−131.

[9] 张先敏. 复杂介质煤层气运移模型及数值模拟研究[D]. 东营:中国石油大学(华东),2010.

ZHANG Xianmin. Migration models of fluids in complicated coalbed methane reservoirs and their numerical simulations[D]. Dongying:China University of Petroleum (East China),2010.

[10] WEI Zhijie,ZHANG Dongxiao. Coupled fluid–flow and geomechanics for triple–porosity/dual–permeability modeling of coalbed methane recovery[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2010,47(8):1242−1253.

[11] THARAROOP P,KARPYN Z T,ERTEKIN T. Development of a coal shrinkage–swelling model accounting for water content in the micropores[J]. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering,2009,1(4):346−364.

[12] 邹明俊. 三孔两渗煤层气产出建模及应用研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.

ZOU Mingjun. Triple porosity/dual permeability model study and application for coalbed methane reservoir simulation[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2014.

[13] 陈俊国. 煤层气储层孔裂隙多尺度渗透率预测和流固耦合模型[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2016.

CHEN Junguo. The fluid–structure interaction model and permeability prediction for pore–fissure in multi–scale in coalbed methane reservoir[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2016.

[14] MA Tianran,RUTQVIST J,OLDENBURG C M,et al. Fully coupled two–phase flow and poromechanics modeling of coalbed methane recovery:Impact of geomechanics on production rate[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2017,45:474−486.

[15] LI Sheng,FAN Chaojun,HAN Jun,et al. A fully coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical model with two–phase flow for coalbed methane extraction[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016,33:324−336.

[16] MENG Shangzhi,LI Yong,WANG Lei,et al. A mathematical model for gas and water production from overlapping fractured coalbed methane and tight gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,171:959−973.

[17] YANG Rui,MA Tianran,XU Hao,et al. A model of fully coupled two–phase flow and coal deformation under dynamic diffusion for coalbed methane extraction[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2019,72:103010.

[18] LIU Ting,LIN Baiquan,YANG Wei,et al. Dynamic diffusion–based multifield coupling model for gas drainage[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2017,44:233−249.

[19] 李志强,刘勇,许彦鹏,等. 煤粒多尺度孔隙中瓦斯扩散机理及动扩散系数新模型[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(3):633−643

LI Zhiqiang,LIU Yong,XU Yanpeng,et al. Gas diffusion mechanism in multi–scale pores of coal particles and new diffusion model of dynamic diffusion coefficient[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(3):633−643

[20] WANG Chengwang,ZHAO Haifeng,LIU Zhan,et al. A fully coupled gas–water–solids mathematical model for vertical well drainage of coalbed methane[J]. Energies,2024,17(6):1497.

[21] 赵海峰,王成旺,席悦,等. 深层煤层水平井压裂动态应力场研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2025,15(2):310−323

ZHAO Haifeng,WANG Chengwang,XI Yue,et al. Study on dynamic stress field of fracturing in horizontal wells of deep coal seams:A case study of Daning–Jixian Block in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2025,15(2):310−323

[22] 梁海杰. 韩城区块煤层气直井产能数值模拟研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京),2022.

LIANG Haijie. Numerical simulation of CBM vertical well productivity in Hancheng Block[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2022.

[23] FICK A. Ueber diffusion[J]. Annalen der Physik,1855,170(1):59−86.

[24] 胡林杰,冯增朝,周动,等. 煤层气原位注热开采的数值模拟研究及工程实践[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(12):4473−4486

HU Linjie,FENG Zengchao,ZHOU Dong,et al. Numerical simulation study and engineering practice of in situ heat injection mining of coalbed methane[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(12):4473−4486

[25] NEUMAN S P. Theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law[J]. Acta Mechanica,1977,25(3):153−170.

[26] LANGMUIR I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass,mica and platinum[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society,1918,40(9):1361−1403.

[27] PALMER I,MANSOORI J. How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds:A new model[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,1998,1(6):539−544.

[28] WANG J G,HU Bowen,LIU Hua,et al. Effects of ‘soft–hard’ compaction and multiscale flow on the shale gas production from a multistage hydraulic fractured horizontal well[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,170:873−887.

[29] 吕玉民. 欠饱和煤层气藏储渗动态及产能响应:以韩城煤层气田为例[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013.

LYU Yumin. Permeability dynamic effect and productivity response of undersaturated coalbed methane reservoirs:A case from Hancheng coalbed methane field[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2013.

[30] 张旺,赵海峰,药文杰,等. 基于储层改造指数的深部煤层压裂参数优化方法[J/OL]. 特种油气藏,1-12.

ZHANG Wang,ZHAO Haifeng,YAO Wenjie,et al. Optimization method for deep coal seam fracturing parameters based on reservoir stimulation index[J/OL]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,1-12.

[31] 刘川庆,魏晓琛,白坤森,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层多轮次压裂改造特征及关键技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2025,50(9):4416−4431

LIU Chuanqing,WEI Xiaochen,BAI Kunsen,et al. Characteristics and key technologies of multi–round fracturing transformation of deep coal in Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2025,50(9):4416−4431

[32] 刘之的,韩鸿来,王成旺,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁–吉县区块深部煤层含气饱和度测井计算方法及分布特征[J]. 天然气地球科学,2024,35(2):193−201

LIU Zhidi,HAN Honglai,WANG Chengwang,et al. Calculation method of gas saturation and distribution characteristics of deep coal seam in Daning–Jixian Block using logging data[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(2):193−201

[33] 张雷,边利恒,侯伟,等. 深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及其勘探意义:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1867−1878

ZHANG Lei,BIAN Liheng,HOU Wei,et al. Pore structure characteristics and exploration significance of deep coal reservoirs:A case study of Daning–Jixian Block in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1867−1878

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.