•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

Objective Under the strategic background of reaching the goals of peak CO2 emissions and carbon neutrality, there is an urgent need to address the core issue of geologic CO2 storage (GCS) siting in the advancement of large-scale GCS deployment. Establishing a decision support platform based on a global GCS case database can provide key data and historical experience references for GCS siting, reduce storage risks and costs, and accelerate industrial layout. Furthermore, the platform can offer a scientific basis for formulating related policies and conducting technological R&D.Methods This study proposed and developed a comprehensive evaluation system for GCS siting. This system integrates three core techniques: a case analogy algorithm based on improved cosine similarity, a suitability assessment model relying on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and a method for selecting favorable geobodies by combining 3D geological models. By constructing a quantitative case database and linking multi-source parameters, this study established a unified spatial database model. Using the ArcGIS platform, it developed a range of functional modules integrating the comparison and selection of similar cases, the suitability assessment of storage sites, and the selection of favorable geobodies. Consequently, a systematic technical support system for GCS siting was formed.Results and Conclusions Using the resulting framework, this study developed a decision support platform for quantitative selection of optimal GCS targets, which integrated an improved cosine similarity algorithm, a suitability assessment model based on a random forest algorithm, and 3D geological modeling. Through algorithm-driven systematic scanning of the entire data volume, this platform significantly enhances the case matching accuracy from qualitative to quantitative and improves the objectivity of geobody evaluation, effectively reducing the subjective bias and limited vision inherent in traditional manual methods. This platform enables a unified quantitative evaluation and hierarchical ranking of various trap types such as anticlines and fault blocks, substantially improving both the efficiency of GCS target identification and the comparability of results. The practical application in the Gaoyou Sag within the Subei Basin demonstrates that this platform can provide precise, efficient digital solutions that provide direct support for GCS siting, thereby significantly enhancing the scientific rigor and prospective planning for large-scale CO2 storage deployment.

Keywords

geologic CO2 storage (GCS), carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) case database, cosine similarity, suitability assessment, favorable geobody

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.12.0933

Reference

[1] 魏恒飞,方杰,时俊杰,等. 深部地下储存空间利用理论、技术及前景[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(2):67−83

WEI Hengfei,FANG Jie,SHI Junjie,et al. Theories,technologies,and prospects for the utilization of deep underground storage space[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(2):67−83

[2] 刘世奇,皇凡生,杜瑞斌,等. CO2地质封存与利用示范工程进展及典型案例分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(2):158−174

LIU Shiqi,HUANG Fansheng,DU Ruibin,et al. Progress and typical case analysis of demonstration projects of the geological sequestration and utilization of CO2[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(2):158−174

[3] HANSON E,NWAKILE C,HAMMED V O. Carbon capture,utilization,and storage (CCUS) technologies:Evaluating the effectiveness of advanced CCUS solutions for reducing CO2 emissions[J]. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces,2025,18:100381.

[4] WANG Guofeng,LYU Weifeng,CUI Kai,et al. Technical progress and application of global carbon dioxide capture,utilization and storage cluster[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2025,52(2):536−547.

[5] 孙杰,刘亢,谭克龙,等. CO2地质封存GIS基础数据平台建设初探[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(7):2936−2948

SUN Jie,LIU Kang,TAN Kelong,et al. Preliminary exploration on the construction of GIS basic data platform for CO2 geological storage[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(7):2936−2948

[6] 李阳. 碳中和与碳捕集利用封存技术进展[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2021.

[7] 王光付,李阳,王锐,等. 二氧化碳地质封存与利用新进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2024,45(4):1168−1179

WANG Guangfu,LI Yang,WANG Rui,et al. Recent advances in geological carbon dioxide storage and utilization[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2024,45(4):1168−1179

[8] YUAN Qianqian,JIA Haiyue,WANG Ke. To adopt the CCUS technology or not? An evolutionary game analysis between coal–to–hydrogen plants and oil–fields[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2024,96:1159−1170.

[9] 刘元媛,陈露露. 碳中和目标下氢能与CCUS技术耦合研究[J]. 能源与节能,2022(2):15−17

LIU Yuanyuan,CHEN Lulu. Inter–connection between hydrogen energy and CCUS technology targeting goal of carbon neutrality[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation,2022(2):15−17

[10] ZHANG Xuelai,WANG Wei,GU Xiaobin,et al. Advance in storage and utilization of CO2 for CCUS[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2025,13(6):120446.

[11] 苗玲,冯连勇. CCUS技术的碳投入回报评价方法研究[J]. 现代化工,2025,45(10):1−5

MIAO Ling,FENG Lianyong. Study on assessment method for CCUS technology from perspective of carbon return on investment[J]. Modern Chemical Industry,2025,45(10):1−5

[12] 敬民. 全球CCUS,谁主沉浮[J]. 中国石油石化,2025(20):40−41

[13] 白洋,赵艺芳. 碳捕集、利用与封存纳入碳市场的国际实践及对中国的启示[J]. 学术交流,2025(6):120−136

[14] 刘晋昊. 海洋碳封存技术现状与进展[J]. 当代化工研究,2025(12):17−19

LIU Jinhao. Status and progress of ocean carbon sequestration technologies[J]. Modern Chemical Research,2025(12):17−19

[15] 刘新宇. 用好CCUS这个降碳利器[J]. 中国石油石化,2025(20):8

[16] YUAN Shiyi,MA Desheng,LI Junshi,et al. Progress and prospects of carbon dioxide capture,EOR–utilization and storage industrialization[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(4):955−962.

[17] VULIN D,MOČILAC I K,JUKIĆ L,et al. Development of CCUS clusters in Croatia[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2023,124:103857.

[18] CARR T R,IQBAL A,CALLAGHAN N,et al. A national look at carbon capture and storage:National carbon sequestration database and geographical information system (NatCarb)[J]. Energy Procedia,2009,1(1):2841−2847.

[19] 方杰,雷宏武,时俊杰,等. CO2地质封存与利用技术发展态势与展望[J]. 热力发电,2025,54(6):157−167

FANG Jie,LEI Hongwu,SHI Junjie,et al. Research on carbon dioxide geological storage and utilization:Progress and prospects[J]. Thermal Power Generation,2025,54(6):157−167

[20] GAUS I,AZAROUAL M,CZERNICHOWSKI–LAURIOL I. Reactive transport modelling of the impact of CO2 injection on the clayey cap rock at Sleipner (North Sea)[J]. Chemical Geology,2005,217(3/4):319−337.

[21] 桑树勋,王冉,周效志,等. 论煤地质学与碳中和[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(1):1−11

SANG Shuxun,WANG Ran,ZHOU Xiaozhi,et al. Review on carbon neutralization associated with coal geology[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(1):1−11

[22] 王猛,马如英,代旭光,等. 煤矿区碳排放的确认和低碳绿色发展途径研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(5):63−69

WANG Meng,MA Ruying,DAI Xuguang,et al. Confirmation of carbon emissions in coal mining areas and research on low–carbon green development path[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(5):63−69

[23] 桑树勋,刘世奇,朱前林,等. CO2地质封存潜力与能源资源协同的技术基础研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(7):2700−2716

SANG Shuxun,LIU Shiqi,ZHU Qianlin,et al. Research progress on technical basis of synergy between CO2 geological storage potential and energy resources[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(7):2700−2716

[24] IDING M,RINGROSE P. Evaluating the impact of fractures on the long–term performance of the In Salah CO2 storage site[J]. Energy Procedia,2009,1(1):2021−2028.

[25] 夏劲松. 基于度量学习的少样本图像分类的研究与应用[D]. 成都:电子科技大学,2020.

XIA Jinsong. Research and application of few–shot image classification based on metric learning[D]. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,2020.

[26] WANG Jinyong,ZHANG Ce. Optimization selection method for software reliability growth model based on cosine similarity[J]. Journal of Systems and Software,2025,228:112474.

[27] 周银邦,王锐,赵淑霞,等. CO2封存过程中“适应性”地质建模方法及案例[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(6):1−8

ZHOU Yinbang,WANG Rui,ZHAO Shuxia,et al. “Fit to purpose” geological modeling methods and cases in the process of CO2 storage[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(6):1−8

[28] 周银邦,王锐,程传捷,等. 阿尔及利亚In Salah油田CO2地质封存示范工程的启示[J]. 地球科学与环境学报,2023,45(6):1368−1379

ZHOU Yinbang,WANG Rui,CHENG Chuanjie,et al. Enlightenment of CO2 geological storage demonstration project in In Salah oilfield,Algeria[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2023,45(6):1368−1379

[29] 周银邦,王锐,何应付,等. 咸水层CO2地质封存典型案例分析及对比[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2023,30(2):162−167

ZHOU Yinbang,WANG Rui,HE Yingfu,et al. Analysis and comparison of typical cases of CO2 geological storage in saline aquifer[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(2):162−167

[30] CAVANAGH A J,HASZELDINE R S. The Sleipner storage site:Capillary flow modeling of a layered CO2 plume requires fractured shale barriers within the Utsira Formation[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2014,21:101−112.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.