An experimental study on nonlinear seepage characteristics in coal seams during CH₄ displacement through N₂ and CO₂ flooding

Authors

LI Zefeng, Changqing Downhole Technology Operating Company, Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Xi’an 710021, China; National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-Permeability Oil & Gas Field, Xi’an 710021, ChinaFollow
HUANG Mengru, College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
ZHANG Hongzhong, Changqing Downhole Technology Operating Company, Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Xi’an 710021, China; National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-Permeability Oil & Gas Field, Xi’an 710021, China
LAN Jianping, Changqing Downhole Technology Operating Company, Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Xi’an 710021, China; National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-Permeability Oil & Gas Field, Xi’an 710021, China
SONG Jinsuo, College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
FAN Shixing, College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, ChinaFollow

Abstract

Background Coal seams in China are generally characterized by low porosity (<5%) and low permeability (0.001×10^–3μm²), leading to low coalbed methane (CBM, dominated by CH₄) drainage efficiency. Gas flooding-enhanced CBM drainage technology plays a significant role in surface CBM drainage, underground CBM pre-drainage, and deep geologic CO₂ storage. Methods This study investigated four common types of gases: N₂ and CO₂ for flooding, CH₄ to be displaced, and He for blank control. Based on the physical properties of these gases and employing methods including the quasi-static method, the gas flow rate method, and the Reynolds number, this study explored the seepage behavior and characteristics of the four types of gases in coal cores measuring 100 mm, 200 mm, and 300 mm in length. Furthermore, it analyzed the impacts of the threshold pressure gradient, viscous resistance, and adsorption force on the seepage characteristics of He, N₂, CO₂, and CH₄. Results and Conclusions The results indicate that the resistance to the migration of the four types of gases in coal cores decreased in the order of F_He, $F_{\mathrm{CO_2}} $, $F_{\mathrm{CH_4}} $, and $F_{\mathrm{N_2}} $. The magnitude of the resistance was associated with the average effective diameter of gas molecules, the dynamic viscosity of gas, and gas phase change. The increases in the density and viscous resistance of supercritical gas led to significantly elevated resistance to gas migration. The threshold pressure gradients of the four types of gases decreased in the order of λ_He, $\lambda _{\mathrm{CO_2}} $, and $\lambda _{\mathrm{CH_4}} $ (approximately equal to $\lambda _{\mathrm{N_2}} $), and they were inversely proportional to the coal core length. The threshold pressure gradients were affected by the dynamic viscosity of gases, the pore characteristics of coal cores, and adsorptivity. The viscous resistance was generated by the interactions between the gases and pore walls and adsorption layers. The Reynolds numbers for the four types of gases decreased in the order of $Re _{\mathrm{CO_2}} $, $Re _{\mathrm{N_2}} $, $Re _{\mathrm{CH_4}} $, and Re_He, increasing with the injection pressure and pore size. The adsorption of coal matrix for gas significantly affected the permeability and seepage velocity. N₂ exhibited a high permeability due to the weak adsorption of coals for it and small pore changes, with gas permeability in coal cores decreasing in the order of k_He, $k _{\mathrm{N_2}} $, $k _{\mathrm{CO_2}} $, and $k _{\mathrm{CH_4}} $. Due to the strong adsorption of CO₂, it will cause the expansion of coal matrix, resulting in low permeability of coal core. There existed a critical pressure for gas migration in coal cores. When the injection pressure was less than the critical pressure, gas seepage exhibited nonlinear characteristics under the influence of adsorption and slippage effects. Otherwise, the gas seepage tended to be stable and gradually approached linear flow. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the process parameter optimization, efficiency enhancement, and engineering applications of CH₄ displacement through gas flooding.

Keywords

N2/CO2, gas flooding, CH4, nonlinear seepage, coal adsorption, threshold pressure gradient

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.10.0751

Recommended Citation

LI Zefeng, HUANG Mengru, ZHANG Hongzhong, et al. (2026) "An experimental study on nonlinear seepage characteristics in coal seams during CH₄ displacement through N₂ and CO₂ flooding," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54: Iss. 1, Article 11.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.10.0751
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss1/11

Reference

[1] 谢和平,周宏伟,薛东杰,等. 我国煤与瓦斯共采:理论、技术与工程[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(8):1391−1397

XIE Heping,ZHOU Hongwei,XUE Dongjie,et al. Theory,technology and engineering of simultaneous exploitation of coal and gas in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(8):1391−1397

[2] MOORE T A. Coalbed methane:A review[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,101:36−81.

[3] 李树刚,丁洋,安朝峰,等. 近距离煤层重复采动覆岩裂隙形态及其演化规律实验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2016,33(5):904−910

LI Shugang,DING Yang,AN Zhaofeng,et al. Experimental research on the shape and dynamic evolution of repeated mining–induced fractures in short–distance coal seams[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2016,33(5):904−910

[4] LIU Huang,YAO Desong,YANG Bowen,et al. Experimental investigation on the mechanism of low permeability natural gas extraction accompanied by carbon dioxide sequestration[J]. Energy,2022,253:124114.

[5] 李国富,李超,张碧川,等. 我国煤矿瓦斯抽采与利用发展历程、技术进展及展望[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(1):77−91

LI Guofu,LI Chao,ZHANG Bichuan,et al. Gas drainage and utilization in coal mines in China:History,technological advances,and prospects[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(1):77−91

[6] 程远平,付建华,俞启香. 中国煤矿瓦斯抽采技术的发展[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2009,26(2):127−139

CHENG Yuanping,FU Jianhua,YU Qixiang. Development of gas extraction technology in coal mines of China[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2009,26(2):127−139

[7] 辛新平,杨程涛,魏建平,等. 强突出煤层“内保护层”构建理论及工程实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2023,51(12):267−281

XIN Xinping,YANG Chengtao,WEI Jianping,et al. Theory and engineering practice of constructing “inner protection layer” for strongly prominent coal seams[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(12):267−281

[8] 王晓强,樊世星. 松软低渗突出煤层定向水力压裂增透消突实践[J]. 矿业研究与开发,2024,44(4):123−129

WANG Xiaoqiang,FAN Shixing. Practice of directional hydraulic fracturing in soft and low–permeability coal seam for permeability enhancement and outburst elimination[J]. Mining Research and Development,2024,44(4):123−129

[9] 张宏图,周甜,王登科,等. 基于应力–扩散–渗流耦合模型的低渗煤层水力割缝增透效果分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(6):156−168

ZHANG Hongtu,ZHOU Tian,WANG Dengke,et al. Analyzing the permeability enhancement effect of hydraulic slotting for low–permeability coal seams based on a stress–diffusion–seepage coupling model[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(6):156−168

[10] LIN Baiquan,YAN Fazhi,ZHU Chuanjie,et al. Cross–borehole hydraulic slotting technique for preventing and controlling coal and gas outbursts during coal roadway excavation[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,26:518−525.

[11] 刘明举,孔留安,郝富昌,等. 水力冲孔技术在严重突出煤层中的应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2005,30(4):451−454

LIU Mingju,KONG Liuan,HAO Fuchang,et al. Application of hydraulic flushing technology in severe outburst coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2005,30(4):451−454

[12] 何满潮,马新根,牛福龙,等. 中厚煤层复合顶板快速无煤柱自成巷适应性研究与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(12):2641−2654

HE Manchao,MA Xingen,NIU Fulong,et al. Adaptability research and application of rapid gob–side entry retaining formed by roof cutting and pressure releasing with composite roof and medium thick coal seam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2018,37(12):2641−2654

[13] ZHANG Zhehao,NIE Baisheng,LI Changxing. Investigation on the evolution of shock wave energy in the fracturing process via high voltage electric pulse[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2024,57(10):8741−8757.

[14] 郭德勇,张超,朱同功. 地应力对煤层深孔聚能爆破致裂增透的作用[J]. 工程科学学报,2022,44(11):1832−1843

GUO Deyong,ZHANG Chao,ZHU Tonggong. Effect of in– situ stress on the cracking and permeability enhancement in coal seams by deep–hole cumulative blasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering,2022,44(11):1832−1843

[15] 樊世星,文虎,程小蛟,等. 井下高压液态CO₂压裂增透煤岩成套装备研制与应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(增刊2):801−812

FAN Shixing,WEN Hu,CHENG Xiaojiao,et al. Research and application of a complete set equipment of permeability enhancements induced by high–pressure L–CO₂ fracturing[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(Sup.2):801−812

[16] 涂乙,谢传礼,李武广,等. 煤层对CO₂、CH₄和N₂吸附/解吸规律研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2012,40(2):70−72

TU Yi,XIE Chuanli,LI Wuguang,et al. Study on CO₂,CH₄ and N₂ adsorption and desorption law of seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2012,40(2):70−72

[17] 梁卫国,张倍宁,黎力,等. 注能(以CO₂为例)改性驱替开采CH₄理论与实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(10):2839−2847

LIANG Weiguo,ZHANG Beining,LI Li,et al. Theory and experimental study of CBM recovery driven by energy boosting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(10):2839−2847

[18] 杨宏民,鲁小凯,陈立伟. 不同注源气体置换–驱替煤层甲烷突破时间的差异性分析[J]. 重庆大学学报,2018,41(2):96−102

YANG Hongmin,LU Xiaokai,CHEN Liwei. Analysis on the difference of breakthrough time for different injection gases to replace–displace methane in coal seams[J]. Journal of Chongqing University,2018,41(2):96−102

[19] 王晋,王延斌,郭慧,等. 围压对注CO₂置换煤层CH₄效果的影响研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2015,43(8):129−134

WANG Jin,WANG Yanbin,GUO Hui,et al. Study on surrounding pressure affected to effect of CO₂ injection to replace CH₄ of coal seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2015,43(8):129−134

[20] 刘操,杨硕,魏建平. 深部煤层注CO₂驱替CH₄入侵渗流动力学建模及地质封存机理研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2025,54(5):1037−1052

LIU Cao,YANG Shuo,WEI Jianping. Modeling of capillary displacement and invasion percolation of immiscible fluids during CO₂ sequestration and enhanced methane recovery[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2025,54(5):1037−1052

[21] 梁卫国,张倍宁,贺伟,等. 不同阶煤超临界CO₂驱替开采CH₄试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(1):197−203

LIANG Weiguo,ZHANG Beining,HE Wei,et al. Experimental research on supercritical CO₂ enhanced coalbed methane recovery in different rank coals[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(1):197−203

[22] 林海飞,黄猛,李志梁,等. 注气驱替抽采瓦斯技术在高瓦斯突出矿井煤巷掘进中的试验[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2016,43(3):10−12

LIN Haifei,HUANG Meng,LI Zhiliang,et al. Test of forced gas drainage technology by air injection for gas replacement in coal roadway driving of high gassy and outburst mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2016,43(3):10−12

[23] 杨宏民,夏会辉,王兆丰. 注气驱替煤层瓦斯时效特性影响因素分析[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2013,30(2):273−277

YANG Hongmin,XIA Huihui,WANG Zhaofeng. Influencing factors on time–varying characteristics of displacement coalbed methane by gas injection[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2013,30(2):273−277

[24] FAN Nan,WANG Jiren,DENG Cunbao,et al. Numerical study on enhancing coalbed methane recovery by injecting N₂/CO₂ mixtures and its geological significance[J]. Energy Science & Engineering,2020,8(4):1104−1119.

[25] FAN Chaojun,YANG Lei,XIAO Bin,et al. Reasonable start time of carbon dioxide injection in enhanced coalbed methane recovery involving thermal–hydraulic–mechanical couplings[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science,2023,17(3):832−843.

[26] MAVOR M J，GUNTER W D. Secondary porosity and permeability of coal vs. gas composition and pressure[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering，2006，9(2)：SPE–90255–PA.

[27] KANG Junqiang,FU Xuehai,LIANG Shun,et al. Experimental study of changes in fractures and permeability during nitrogen injection and sealing of low–rank coal[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2018,57:21−30.

[28] DE SILVA P N K,RANJITH P G. Advanced core flooding apparatus to estimate permeability and storage dynamics of CO₂ in large coal specimens[J]. Fuel,2013,104:417−425.

[29] WANG Liguo,CHENG Yuanping,WANG Yongkang. Laboratory study of the displacement coalbed CH₄ process and efficiency of CO₂ and N₂ injection[J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014(1):242947.

[30] 龙泳翰,张磊,李菁华,等. 注气驱替机理研究现状及展望[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2023,50(1):103−108

LONG Yonghan,ZHANG Lei,LI Jinghua,et al. Research status and prospect of gas injection displacement mechanism[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2023,50(1):103−108

[31] 杨宏民,冯朝阳,陈立伟. 煤层注氮模拟实验中的置换–驱替效应及其转化机制分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(9):2246−2250

YANG Hongmin,FENG Zhaoyang,CHEN Liwei. Analysis of replacement–displacement effect and its change mechanism in simulation experiment of nitrogen injection into coal seam[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(9):2246−2250

[32] 杨宏民,冯朝阳,陈立伟. 不同注氮压力置驱煤层甲烷试验中的机理分析[J]. 煤矿安全,2017,48(2):145−148

YANG Hongmin,FENG Zhaoyang,CHEN Liwei. Mechanism analysis on experiment of injecting nitrogen to displace coal seam methane under different pressure[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2017,48(2):145−148

[33] 杨宏民,许东亮,陈立伟. 注CO₂置换/驱替煤中甲烷定量化研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(5):38−42

YANG Hongmin,XU Dongliang,CHEN Liwei. Quantitative study on displacement–replacement of methane in coal through CO₂ injection[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(5):38−42

[34] 王环玲，徐卫亚. 致密岩石渗透测试与渗流力学特性[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2015.

[35] 吴凡,孙黎娟,乔国安,等. 气体渗流特征及启动压力规律的研究[J]. 天然气工业,2001,21(1):82−84

WU Fan,SUN Lijuan,QIAO Guo’an,et al. A research on gas flow property and starting pressure phenomenon[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2001,21(1):82−84

[36] 林瑞泰. 多孔介质传热传质引论[M]. 北京：科学出版社，1995.

[37] 李洋. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘煤层原地应力测试研究[D]. 西安：西安工业大学，2014.

LI Yang. Eastern margin of the coal in situ stress measurement of the Ordos Basin[D]. Xi’an：Xi’an Technological University，2014.