Impacts of boundary conditions and parameter heterogeneity on the simulation and prediction of water inflow in coal mines

Authors

JI Qiang, School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaFollow
WU Zhenjiang, School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
YAO Yingying, School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaFollow

Abstract

Background Accurate prediction of water inflow in coal mines is essential for ensuring safe mining operations. Three-dimensional (3D) groundwater numerical models can be used to characterize hydrogeological conditions in mining areas and simulate the dynamic processes of water inflow, providing a theoretical basis for scientifically predicting mining-induced water inflow. However, there is a lack of a clear understanding of the impacts of the boundary conditions with surface water-groundwater interactions and the heterogeneity of aquifer permeability coefficients (K) on the simulation and prediction of water inflow during coal mining. Methods This study developed a 3D transient groundwater numerical model for a typical coal mine. Through multi-scenario simulation experiments, this study quantitatively analyzed the impacts of rainfall infiltration recharge, infiltration process in the unsaturated zone, and river boundary configurations on the simulations of water inflow. Employing geostatistical methods, this study established 3D heterogeneous permeability coefficient fields to explore the impact of parameter heterogeneity.Results and Conclusions The simulations using the initial model revealed that the average water inflow in the mining area decreased by 25.48% in the case where only the heterogeneity of rainfall infiltration recharge was considered. When the impact of vertical kinematic wave infiltration in the unsaturated zone was incorporated, the average water inflow increased by 18.68% and the water inflow was more prone to undergo periodic fluctuations compared to the initial model. Assuming that rivers were connected to the aquiclude via a tectonic fracture zone, the average water inflow in the mining face rose by 7.51% compared to the initial model, showing an accelerated growth trend. An increase in K heterogeneity corresponded to rapidly increasing water inflow. Meanwhile, the ratio of water inflow in the mining face to the average water inflow in the mining area increased to 85%-88% gradually, resulting in concentrated water inflow in the mining area. However, extreme K heterogeneity led to dispersed water inflow. Compared to the homogeneous generalized parameters, the random, heterogeneous K distribution was associated with more gentle growth trends in water inflow. Among all scenarios, the scenario where river channels lay the phreatic aquifer manifested a minimal impact on water inflow. In contrast, significant water inflow deviations from the initial model were observed under scenarios such as river channels passing through a locally fractured aquiclude, low-heterogeneity parameters, and vertical infiltration from the unsaturated zone. This study provides a critical reference for accurately simulating groundwater dynamics under complex mining conditions.

Keywords

water inflow in a coal mine, numerical simulation, boundary condition, heterogeneity, influence pattern, Modflow

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.01.0077

Recommended Citation

JI Qiang, WU Zhenjiang, YAO Yingying, et al. (2025) "Impacts of boundary conditions and parameter heterogeneity on the simulation and prediction of water inflow in coal mines," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 7, Article 6.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.01.0077
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss7/6

Reference

[1] 胡健. 全球煤炭资源利用现状、供需格局及发展趋势[J]. 中国煤炭，2024，50(11)：153−162.

HU Jian. The utilization status，supply and demand pattern，and development trend of global coal resources[J]. China Coal，2024，50(11)：153−162.

[2] 袁亮. 我国煤炭主体能源安全高质量发展的理论技术思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊，2023，38(1)：11−22.

YUAN Liang. Theory and technology considerations on high–quality development of coal main energy security in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences，2023，38(1)：11−22.

[3] 王峰，喻岳钰，方惠军，等. 中国石油中–深层煤炭地下气化理论与技术研究进展[J]. 石油学报，2024，45(12)：1863−1876.

WANG Feng，YU Yueyu，FANG Huijun，et al. Research progress in the theory and technology of middle–deep coal underground gasification in CNPC[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2024，45(12)：1863−1876.

[4] MA Dan，DUAN Hongyu，ZHANG Jixiong，et al. A state–of–the–art review on rock seepage mechanism of water inrush disaster in coal mines[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology，2022，9(1)：50.

[5] 乔伟，刘梦楠，孟祥胜，等. 煤矿采动覆岩离层水害致灾因素勘查与预测评价[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(4)：2031−2044.

QIAO Wei，LIU Mengnan，MENG Xiangsheng，et al. Exploration and prediction evaluation on causative factors of water inrush from separation layers of mining overburden in coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(4)：2031−2044.

[6] 曾一凡，朱慧聪，武强，等. 我国不同类别煤层顶板水害致灾机理与防控路径[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(3)：1539−1555.

ZENG Yifan，ZHU Huicong，WU Qiang，et al. Disaster–causing mechanism and prevention and control path of different types of coal seam roof water disasters in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(3)：1539−1555.

[7] 王强民. 榆神矿区煤层开采地下水演变及其生态效应[D]. 北京：煤炭科学研究总院，2024.

WANG Qiangmin. Groundwater evolution induced by coal mining and its ecological effects in Yushen mining area[D]. Beijing：China Coal Research Institute，2024.

[8] LI Xiang，DU Song，HU Shihang，et al. Simulation of surface water–groundwater interaction in coal mining subsidence areas：A case study of the Kuye River Basin in China[J]. Journal of Hydrology，2025，659：133243.

[9] HUANG Zhen，JIANG Zhenquan，TANG Xin，et al. In situ measurement of hydraulic properties of the fractured zone of coal mines[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2016，49(2)：603−609.

[10] 贾建称，贾茜，桑向阳，等. 我国煤矿地质保障系统建设30年：回顾与展望[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(1)：86−106.

JIA Jiancheng，JIA Qian，SANG Xiangyang，et al. Review and prospect of coal mine geological guarantee system in China during 30 years of construction[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(1)：86−106.

[11] 王海宾，贾传伟，张思华，等. 彬长矿区矿井涌水量与开采参数关联性分析及预测研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2025，42(1)：73−84.

WANG Haibin，JIA Chuanwei，ZHANG Sihua，et al. Analysis and prediction of the correlation between mine water inflow and mining parameters in the Binchang mining area[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering，2025，42(1)：73−84.

[12] 王孝东，杨懿杰，吕玉琪，等. 改进多变量时序模型的露天涌水量预测[J]. 安全与环境学报，2024，24(8)：2994−3004.

WANG Xiaodong，YANG Yijie，LYU Yuqi，et al. Prediction of open air water inflow based on improved multivariate time series model[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment，2024，24(8)：2994−3004.

[13] 王晓蕾. 煤矿开采矿井涌水量预测方法现状及发展趋势[J]. 科学技术与工程，2020，20(30)：12255−12267.

WANG Xiaolei. Present situation and development trend of coal mine discharge forecast method[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2020，20(30)：12255−12267.

[14] 潘泳兴，卢丹美，陈盟，等. 盘龙铅锌矿区充水条件分析与基于GM(1，1)–Markov模型的涌水量预测[J]. 安全与环境工程，2023，30(3)：90−99.

PAN Yongxing，LU Danmei，CHEN Meng，et al. Analysis of water–filling condition and water inflow prediction based on GM(1，1)–Markov model in Panlong lead–zinc mine area[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering，2023，30(3)：90−99.

[15] FAN Kaifang，LI Wenping，WANG Qiqing，et al. Formation mechanism and prediction method of water inrush from separated layers within coal seam mining：A case study in the Shilawusu mining area，China[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis，2019，103：158−172.

[16] 周全超，王丹丹，党志伟，等. 矿井涌水量预测方法及对比分析：以新疆东沟煤矿为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2024，52(增刊1)：211−220.

ZHOU Quanchao，WANG Dandan，DANG Zhiwei，et al. Research and comparative analysis of mine water inflow prediction method：A case study of Donggou Coal Mine in Xinjiang[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2024，52(Sup.1)：211−220.

[17] 陈迪，闫海涛，乔翔宇，等. 巨厚非均质含水层中超深孔涌水量预测[J]. 地质科技通报，2024，43(4)：302−310.

CHEN Di，YAN Haitao，QIAO Xiangyu，et al. Prediction of ultradeep pore water inflow in giant thick heterogeneous aquifers[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology，2024，43(4)：302−310.

[18] LU Yinlong，WANG Lianguo. Numerical simulation of mining–induced fracture evolution and water flow in coal seam floor above a confined aquifer[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2015，67：157−171.

[19] 董书宁. 人工智能技术在煤矿水害防治智能化发展中的应用[J]. 煤矿安全，2023，54(5)：1−12.

DONG Shuning. Application of artificial intelligence technology in intelligent development of coal mine water disaster prevention and control[J]. Safety in Coal Mines，2023，54(5)：1−12.

[20] 姚辉，尹慧超，梁满玉，等. 机器学习方法在矿井水防治理论体系研究中的应用思考[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(5)：107−117.

YAO Hui，YIN Huichao，LIANG Manyu，et al. Some reflections on the application of machine learning to research into the theoretical system of mine water prevention and control[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(5)：107−117.

[21] SHI Junwei，WANG Shiqi，QU Pengfei，et al. Time series prediction model using LSTM–Transformer neural network for mine water inflow[J]. Scientific Reports，2024，14(1)：18284.

[22] 姚东泽. 基于深度学习Self–Attention的矿井涌水量预测模型研究[D]. 杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2024.

YAO Dongze. Research on mine water inflow prediction model based on deep learning Self–Attention[D]. Yangling：Northwest A & F University，2024.

[23] BIAN Jiaxin，HOU Tao，REN Dengjun，et al. Predicting mine water inflow volumes using a decomposition–optimization algorithm–machine learning approach[J]. Scientific Reports，2024，14(1)：17777.

[24] HARBAUGH A W. MODFLOW–2005：The U. S. geological survey modular ground–water model：The ground–water flow process[R]. Virginia：U. S. Geological Survey，2005.

[25] DIERSCH H J G. FEFLOW：Finite element modeling of flow，mass and heat transport in porous and fractured media[M]. Heidelberg：Springer Berlin，2013.

[26] 刘中培，李鑫，陈莹，等. 基于MODFLOW与气候模式的矿区地下水流模拟[J]. 中国农村水利水电，2021(5)：113−117.

LIU Zhongpei，LI Xin，CHEN Ying，et al. Groundwater flow simulation in mining area based on MODFLOW and climate model[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower，2021(5)：113−117.

[27] 张磊. 采动覆岩巨厚含水层渗透特性时空演化规律研究[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2023.

ZHANG Lei. Temporal and spatial evolution of overburden ultra thick aquifer permeability during coal seam extraction[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2023.

[28] 薛佩佩，文章，梁杏. 地质统计学在含水层参数空间变异研究中的应用进展与发展趋势[J]. 地质科技通报，2022，41(1)：209−222.

XUE Peipei，WEN Zhang，LIANG Xing. Application and development trend of geostatistics in the research of spatial variation of aquifer parameters[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology，2022，41(1)：209−222.

[29] LIU Bin，LIU Guanghui，SHA Jinxia，et al. Numerical simulation of the interaction between mine water drainage and recharge：A case study of Wutongzhuang Coal Mine in Hebei Province，China[J]. Ecological Indicators，2024，158：111568.

[30] 孙刚友，胡清珍，康钦容，等. 基于大井法和地下水模型系统数值模拟方法的某矿坑涌水量预测对比分析[J]. 科学技术与工程，2023，23(21)：9024−9031.

SUN Gangyou，HU Qingzhen，KANG Qinrong，et al. Comparative analysis of water inflow prediction of a mine based on large well method and GMS numerical simulation method[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2023，23(21)：9024−9031.

[31] 黄金廷，宁博涵，孙魁，等. 神南矿区直罗组含水层对矿井涌水贡献量预测分析[J]. 西北地质，2023，56(6)：176−185.

HUANG Jinting，NING Bohan，SUN Kui，et al. Contribution of groundwater in Zhiluo aquifer to mine water in Shennan mining area：Numerical simulation[J]. Northwestern Geology，2023，56(6)：176−185.

[32] HARBAUGH A W，BANTA E R，HILL M C，et al. MODFLOW–2000，The U. S. geological survey modular ground–water model：User guide to modularization concepts and the ground–water flow process[R]. Virginia：U. S. Geological Survey，2000.

[33] WESTENBROEK S M，ENGOTT J A，KELSON V A，et al. SWB Version 2.0：A soil–water–balance code for estimating net infiltration and other water–budget components[R]. Virginia：U. S. Geological Survey，2018.

[34] NISWONGER R G，PRUDIC D E，REGAN R S. Documentation of the Unsaturated–Zone Flow (UZF1) package for modeling unsaturated flow between the land surface and the water table with MODFLOW–2005[R]. Virginia：U. S. Geological Survey，2006.

[35] PRUDIC D E. Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream–aquifer relations using a modular，finite–difference，ground–water flow model[R]. Nevada：U. S. Geological Survey，1989.

[36] DEUTSCH C V，JOURNEL A G. GSLIB：Geostatistical software library and user’s guide (Second Edition)[M]. New York：Oxford University Press，1997.

[37] CUSANO D，LEPORE D，ALLOCCA V，et al. Control of soil mantle thickness and land cover types on groundwater recharge of karst aquifers in Mediterranean areas[J]. Journal of Hydrology，2024，630：130770.

[38] MORAES F D S，MOTE T L，RASMUSSEN T C. The role of physical geography on Puerto Rico’s water budget[J]. Journal of Hydrology：Regional Studies，2023，47：101382.

[39] MILLER J E. Basic concepts of kinematic–wave models[R]. Virginia：U. S. Geological Survey，1984.

[40] YAO Yingying，ANDREWS C，ZHENG Yan，et al. Development of fresh groundwater lens in coastal reclaimed islands[J]. Journal of Hydrology，2019，573：365−375.

[41] TADONO T，ISHIDA H，ODA F，et al. Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM[J]. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry，Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences，2014，II–4(4)：71–76.