Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
Background The exploitation of the Carboniferous-Permian coalfields in China is gradually transitioning toward coal seams in lower formations. In this context, issues including the confined water hazards in the floor and karst water preservation become increasingly pronounced. During the advanced surface treatment of karst water hazards in coal seam floors, the unclear patterns of matching between grout selection and grouting pressure control lead to empirical parameter selection, thereby yielding poor performance of grouting reinforcement. Methods This study aims to deal with the phenomena of rapid pressure rise with a limited grout volume in the low-permeability argillaceous limestones within the top part of the Ordovician limestones in the Xin’an Coalfield, Western Henan. It investigated three typical grout types applied in surface treatment engineering of the Mengjin Coal Mine in the Xin’an Coalfield: pure cement grout, clay grout, and clay-cement grout through a range of experiments on the grouting pressure at the borehole head, static rheological characteristics, liquid-phase particle size distribution, zeta potential, electrical conductivity, microscopic morphology, and element distribution of the three grout types. Based on the flocculation mechanisms of cement and clay particles, this study analyzed pressure rise differences of three grout types from the physical and chemical perspectives. Results and Conclusions Positively-charged cement particles and negatively-charged clay particles were prone to form three-dimensional reticular flocs due to strong electrostatic attraction. Consequently, the clay-cement grout exhibited large particles (sizes: > 600 µm). Furthermore, particles with sizes greater than 100 µm accounted for 78% of the total. These particles easily blocked up fractures. Compared to the cement grout, the clay-cement grout showed decreased electrical conductivity of 1.87 mS/cm. As a result, clay particles were observed to encapsulate cement particles post-mixing. The cement grout, characterized by small particle sizes, lower static yield stress, and low viscosity, can easily pass through narrow fractures, ensuring stable grouting pressure. In contrast, the clay-cement grout featured a static yield stress 4.5 times higher and a static viscosity 4.0 times compared to the cement grout. Therefore, such grout was prone to block fractures, and the pressure rise rate was approximately 10 times greater than that of the cement grout. An alternating grouting technique using clay-cement grout and cement grout was proposed following the principle of stepwise and gradual pressure rise, consisting of low-pressure filling, medium-pressure diffusion, and high-pressure fracture reinforcement (also referred to as the “three-stage” alternating grouting technique). This technique can significantly enhance the treatment efficiency, providing a valuable reference for grouting treatment of low-permeability limestones under similar conditions.
Keywords
water hazard in coal mines, karst water hazard in coal seam floor, regional treatment technology, grouting material, flocculation mechanism, mechanism underlying pressure rise difference, alternating grouting, Mengjin Coal Mine in western Henan
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.04.0288
Recommended Citation
FAN Zhenli, CAO Lutong, CUI Yong,
et al.
(2025)
"Mechanisms behind grouting pressure jumping in low-permeability limestones and techniques for grouting pressure control,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53:
Iss.
7, Article 14.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.04.0288
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss7/14
Reference
[1] 武强,朱慧聪,胡辰睿,等. 我国煤层水害基本架构及发展情势[J]. 煤炭工程,2024,56(10):12−21.
WU Qiang,ZHU Huicong,HU Chenrui,et al. The basic structure and development situation of coal seam water disaster in China[J]. Coal Engineering,2024,56(10):12−21.
[2] 王皓,董书宁,尚宏波,等. 国内外矿井水处理及资源化利用研究进展[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):222−236.
WANG Hao,DONG Shuning,SHANG Hongbo,et al. Domestic and foreign progress of mine water treatment and resource utilization[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(1):222−236.
[3] 曾一凡,朱慧聪,武强,等. 我国不同类别煤层顶板水害致灾机理与防控路径[J]. 煤炭学报,2024,49(3):1539−1555.
ZENG Yifan,ZHU Huicong,WU Qiang,et al. Disaster–causing mechanism and prevention and control path of different types of coal seam roof water disasters in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(3):1539−1555.
[4] 樊振丽,张玉军,张风达,等. 承压水弱面突破与控水采煤[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2022.
[5] 赵庆彪. 奥灰岩溶水害区域超前治理技术研究及应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(6):1112−1117.
ZHAO Qingbiao. Ordovician limestone karst water disaster regional advanced governance technology study and application[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(6):1112−1117.
[6] 董书宁,刘其声,王皓,等. 煤层底板水害超前区域治理理论框架与关键技术[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):185−195.
DONG Shuning,LIU Qisheng,WANG Hao,et al. Theoretical framework and key technology of advance regional control of water inrush in coal seam floor[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(1):185−195.
[7] 彭苏萍,毕银丽. 黄河流域煤矿区生态环境修复关键技术与战略思考[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(4):1211−1221.
PENG Suping,BI Yinli. Strategic consideration and core technology about environmental ecological restoration in coal mine areas in the Yellow River Basin of China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(4):1211−1221.
[8] 董书宁,郭小铭,刘其声,等. 华北型煤田底板灰岩含水层超前区域治理模式与选择准则[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(4):1−10.
DONG Shuning,GUO Xiaoming,LIU Qisheng,et al. Model and selection criterion of zonal preact grouting to prevent mine water disasters of coal floor limestone aquifer in North China type coalfield[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(4):1−10.
[9] 虎维岳,赵春虎,吕汉江. 煤层底板水害区域注浆治理影响因素分析与高效布孔方式[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(11):134−143.
HU Weiyue,ZHAO Chunhu,LYU Hanjiang. Main influencing factors for regional pre–grouting technology of water hazard treatment in coal seam floor and efficient hole arrangement[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(11):134−143.
[10] 郭艳,桂和荣,魏久传,等. 煤层底板区域注浆浆液扩散数值模拟及影响因素分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(6):30−39.
GUO Yan,GUI Herong,WEI Jiuchuan,et al. Numerical simulation of grout diffusion under coal seam floor and analysis of influencing factors[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(6):30−39.
[11] 郑士田,马荷雯,姬亚东. 煤层底板水害区域超前治理技术优化及其应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(5):167−173.
ZHENG Shitian,MA Hewen,JI Yadong. Optimization of regional advanced coal floor water hazard prevention and control technology and its application[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(5):167−173.
[12] 董书宁,柳昭星,王皓,等. 导水断层破碎带注浆浆液扩散机制试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2022,39(1):174−183.
DONG Shuning,LIU Zhaoxing,WANG Hao,et al. Experimental study on serum diffusion mechanism during grouting in water conducting fault fracture zone[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2022,39(1):174−183.
[13] 徐斌,董书宁,徐路路,等. 水泥基注浆材料浆液稳定性及其析水规律试验[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(5):24−31.
XU Bin,DONG Shuning,XU Lulu,et al. Stability of cement–based grouting slurry and test of its bleeding law[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(5):24−31.
[14] 柳昭星,董书宁,王皓. 奥陶系灰岩顶部超前区域注浆浆液选配分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(3):910−924.
LIU Zhaoxing,DONG Shuning,WANG Hao. Analysis on grout selection and control of reformation grouting material in advance area of Ordovician limestone top[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2022,18(3):910−924.
[15] 曹路通,樊振丽,赵秋阳,等. 煤层底板注浆水泥基浆液稳定性特征试验[J]. 能源与环保,2024,46(6):254−260.
CAO Lutong,FAN Zhenli,ZHAO Qiuyang,et al. Experimental study on stability characteristics of cement–based slurry for coal seam floor grouting[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection,2024,46(6):254−260.
[16] 赵庆彪,毕超,虎维岳,等. 裂隙含水层水平孔注浆“三时段”浆液扩散机理研究及应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(5):1212−1218.
ZHAO Qingbiao,BI Chao,HU Weiyue,et al. Study and application of three–stage seriflux diffusion mechanism in the fissure of aquifer with horizontal injection hole[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(5):1212−1218.
[17] 郑士田. 两淮煤田煤层底板灰岩水害区域超前探查治理技术[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(4):142−146.
ZHENG Shitian. Advanced exploration and control technology of limestone water hazard in coal seam floor in Huainan and Huaibei coalfields[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2018,46(4):142−146.
[18] 樊振丽,曹路通,张风达,等. 奥灰顶部注浆改造材料配比优选试验[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(5):277−290.
FAN Zhenli,CAO Lutong,ZHANG Fengda,et al. Optimal selection test of material ratio in the top of Ordovician limestone grouting reconstruction[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(5):277−290.
[19] 冯宇迪,陈世江,雷旺,等. 不同粗糙度单裂隙渗流规律研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2022,49(2):46−51.
FENG Yudi,CHEN Shijiang,LEI Wang,et al. Study on seepage law of single fracture with different roughness[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2022,49(2):46−51.
[20] 李文昕,贾东秀,陈建刚,等. 灰岩含水层定向钻孔注浆效果智能评价方法研究[J]. 煤炭工程,2024,56(1):63−69.
LI Wenxin,JIA Dongxiu,CHEN Jiangang,et al. Intelligent evaluation method of directional drilling grouting effect in limestone aquifer[J]. Coal Engineering,2024,56(1):63−69.
[21] 张嘉凡,黄思聪,刘洋,等. 基于黏度时变性的裂隙动水注浆扩散规律分析[J]. 煤矿安全,2023,54(4):119−125.
ZHANG Jiafan,HUANG Sicong,LIU Yang,et al. Analysis of diffusion law of dynamic water grouting in crack based on time–varying viscosity[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2023,54(4):119−125.
[22] 张勇,高岗荣,高晓耕,等. 考虑时变性的黏土水泥浆扩散规律理论分析[J]. 煤炭工程,2022,54(5):164−168.
ZHANG Yong,GAO Gangrong,GAO Xiaogeng,et al. Theoretical analysis of clay–cement slurry diffusion mechanism considering time–dependent behavior of rheology parameters[J]. Coal Engineering,2022,54(5):164−168.
[23] 石银斌,杨志斌,李文平,等. 煤矿区复合地层等厚度水泥土截水帷幕性能的影响因素试验研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2024,55(7):198−205.
SHI Yinbin,YANG Zhibin,LI Wenping,et al. Experimental study on influencing factors of performance of equal thickness soil–cement cut–off curtain in composite strata of coal mine area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2024,55(7):198−205.
[24] 李嘉伟,张玉军,肖杰,等. 水–力耦合作用下砂岩力学及裂隙–渗流特征试验研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2025,56(4):183−194.
LI Jiawei,ZHANG Yujun,XIAO Jie,et al. Experimental study on mechanical and fracture–seepage characteristics of sandstone under hydro–mechanical coupling[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2025,56(4):183−194.
[25] 姚海飞. 蒙西矿区黄砂灌浆成胶原理及配比实验研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2020,47(5):7−12.
YAO Haifei. Experimental study on the principle and proportion of yellow sand grouting into glue in Mengxi mining area[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2020,47(5):7−12.
[26] 范铭今,陈军涛,古海龙,等. 西部矿区可注断层破碎带注浆加固特性试验研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2025,56(1):155−163.
FAN Mingjin,CHEN Juntao,GU Hailong,et al. Experimental study on grouting reinforcement characteristics of groutable fault fracture zone in western mining area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2025,56(1):155−163.
[27] 李振,王大富. 旋转黏度计测定水泥浆体静态屈服应力和黏弹性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报,2017,36(6):1818−1822.
LI Zhen,WANG Dafu. Static yield stress and viscoelasticity of fresh cement paste measured by rotational viscometer[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2017,36(6):1818−1822.
[28] 苗贺朝,王海,王晓东,等. 粉煤灰基防渗注浆材料配比优选及其性能试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(9):230−239.
MIAO Hechao,WANG Hai,WANG Xiaodong,et al. Study on ratio optimization and performance test of fly ash–based impermeable grouting materials[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(9):230−239.
[29] 樊振丽. 离层充填开采注浆液运移通道与溶质扩散特征研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2017,45(7):172−179.
FAN Zhenli. Grouting liquid migration pathway and solute diffusion characteristics of abscission layer mining with filling[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2017,45(7):172−179.
[30] 张晓悟,徐金海,黄宁,等. 水化学侵蚀条件下砂岩力学特性及能量损伤特征演化规律[J]. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报,2022,4(6):063036.
ZHANG Xiaowu,XU Jinhai,HUANG Ning,et al. Mechanical properties and energy damage characteristics of sandstone subjected to hydrochemical erosion[J]. Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering,2022,4(6):063036.
[31] 苏海健,张路晴,吴辰,等. 注浆加固孔洞砂岩断裂特性与变形演化规律研究[J]. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报,2025,7(3):033042.
SU Haijian,ZHANG Luqing,WU Chen,et al. Fracture characteristics and deformation evolution of sandstone in grout reinforced holes[J]. Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering,2025,7(3):033042.
[32] 宫经伟,谢刚川,秦灿,等. 基于电阻率和ζ–电位法的低热硅酸盐水泥早期水化特性[J]. 材料导报,2023,37(4):21050113.
GONG Jingwei,XIE Gangchuan,QIN Can,et al. Early hydration characteristics of low–heat Portland cement based on resistivity and ζ–potential method[J]. Materials Reports,2023,37(4):21050113.
[33] 王勇,何富强,黄海,等. 水泥浆体Zeta电位与流变参数的相关性分析[J]. 厦门理工学院学报,2024,32(5):82−89.
WANG Yong,HE Fuqiang,HUANG Hai,et al. Study on the correlation between Zeta potential and rheological parameters of cement paste[J]. Journal of Xiamen University of Technology,2024,32(5):82−89.
[34] 周鑫,刘赞群,赵倚琳,等. 磷酸二氢铵对硅酸盐水泥早期水化的影响[J]. 硅酸盐学报,2024,52(2):614−623.
ZHOU Xin,LIU Zanqun,ZHAO Yilin,et al. Effect of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate on early hydration of Portland cement[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2024,52(2):614−623.
[35] SRINIVASAN S,BARBHUIYA S A,CHARAN D,et al. Characterising cement–superplasticiser interaction using Zeta potential measurements[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2010,24(12):2517−2521.
[36] 莫云川,左双英,付丽,等. AMD渗流对裂隙灰岩溶蚀作用及降渗机理研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2022,49(5):89−94.
MO Yunchuan,ZUO Shuangying,FU Li,et al. Study on the mechanism of AMD seepage on corrosion and permeability decline of fractured limestone[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2022,49(5):89−94.
[37] 李连崇,李鑫睿,牟文强,等. 长钻孔近断层注浆浆液劈裂偏转扩散诱导机理研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2025,56(5):159−171.
LI Lianchong,LI Xinrui,MU Wenqiang,et al. Study on induced mechanism of slurry splitting deviation and diffusion in long hole grouting near faults[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2025,56(5):159−171.
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons