Mechanisms underlying differential helium enrichment in shale gas of varying structural styles in the southeastern Sichuan Basin

Authors

XIN Zhiyuan, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; College of Geosciences, China University of PetroleumFollow
CHEN Jianfa, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; College of Geosciences, China University of PetroleumFollow
WANG Jie, Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, China
MA Yong, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum

Abstract

Objective Shale gas reservoirs hold considerable helium reserves despite relatively low helium abundance, establishing them as a critical replacement for helium production growth. The southeastern Sichuan Basin exhibits diverse structural styles with varying preservation conditions, leading to an unclear understanding of the distribution characteristics and enrichment patterns of helium in shale gas. Determining the mechanisms behind the differential helium enrichment in shale gas is significant for the effective utilization of helium in shale gas.Methods Focusing on the typical shale gas reservoirs of different structural styles in the southeastern Sichuan Basin, this study explored the mechanisms underlying differential helium accumulation in shale gas in different structural styles and determined the potential play fairways for the exploration of helium in shale gas. Results and Conclusions The Wulong residual syncline, Baima fault-fold deformation zone, and the shallowly buried Dingshan faulted anticline, featuring unfavorable structural preservation conditions and normal formation pressure, have relatively high helium abundance, averaging 524×10^–6, 606×10^–6, and 534×10^–6, respectively and reaching the industrial helium extraction standards. In contrast, the Jiaoshiba broad gentle anticline, Baima syncline, and deeply buried Dingshan faulted anticline, with favorable structural preservation conditions and formation overpressure, show relatively low helium abundance, averaging 335×10^–6, 381×10^–6, and 250×10^–6, respectively. The shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of different structural styles in the southeastern Sichuan Basin primarily holds crust-derived helium, exhibiting great helium-generating potential. However, shales of different structural styles show nonsignificantly different helium-generating potential. The calculations of helium production based on the uranium and thorium decay theories, as well as the helium and argon isotope analyses, demonstrate that the helium in shale gas reservoirs in the southeastern Sichuan Basin is primarily of an endogenous origin, suggesting self-sourced helium reservoirs. The differences in shale gas dilution intensity, caused by the differential preservation conditions of different structural styles and resulting differential dissipation behavior of the shale gas-helium system, serve as a key factor in helium accumulation of varying structural styles in the southeastern Sichuan Basin. Additionally, the synergistic effects of the diffusion and enrichment effects of helium in micro/nano pores and the physical clogging of migration pathways with methane molecules are identified as another significant factor governing helium enrichment in shale gas. Based on the investigation of the mechanisms behind helium enrichment in shale gas of different structural styles in the southeastern Sichuan Basin, it is predicted that secondary low-pressure zones with low shale gas grades outside the basin—such as the Qijiang, Wulong, Baima, and Pengshui blocks—are potential play fairways for helium enrichment in shale gas. This study is expected to open up an entirely new direction for the exploration and production of helium in shale gas.

Keywords

helium, shale gas, southeastern Sichuan Basin, structural style, preservation condition, differential accumulation

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.09.0489

Recommended Citation

XIN Zhiyuan, CHEN Jianfa, WANG Jie, et al. (2025) "Mechanisms underlying differential helium enrichment in shale gas of varying structural styles in the southeastern Sichuan Basin," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 6, Article 6.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.09.0489
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss6/6

Reference

[1] 陈践发，刘凯旋，董勍伟，等. 天然气中氦资源研究现状及我国氦资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学，2021，32(10)：1436−1449.

CHEN Jianfa，LIU Kaixuan，DONG Qingwei，et al. Research status of helium resources in natural gas and prospects of helium resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2021，32(10)：1436−1449.

[2] 马勇，陈践发，辛志源，等. 非常规天然气中氦资源潜力及富集机制[J]. 石油学报，2025，46(2)：440−455.

MA Yong，CHEN Jianfa，XIN Zhiyuan，et al. Helium resource potential and enrichment mechanism of unconventional gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2025，46(2)：440−455.

[3] 秦胜飞，窦立荣，陶刚，等. 氦气富集理论及富氦资源勘探思路[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2024，51(5)：1160−1174.

QIN Shengfei，DOU Lirong，TAO Gang，et al. Helium enrichment theory and exploration ideas for helium–rich gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2024，51(5)：1160−1174.

[4] 朱东亚，刘全有，李朋朋，等. 富氦气藏源储关系及富集机理[J]. 地质学报，2024，98(11)：3182−3201.

ZHU Dongya，LIU Quanyou，LI Pengpeng，et al. Configuration relationship of source and reservoir and enrichment mechanism of helium–rich gas reservoirs[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica，2024，98(11)：3182−3201.

[5] 刘凯旋，陈践发，付娆，等. 富氦天然气藏成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报，2022，43(11)：1652−1663.

LIU Kaixuan，CHEN Jianfa，FU Rao，et al. Accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors of helium–rich gas reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2022，43(11)：1652−1663.

[6] LIU Kaixuan，CHEN Jianfa，FU Rao，et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of helium–rich gas reservoirs[J]. Gas Science and Engineering，2023，110：204885.

[7] 陈燕燕，温志新，陶士振，等. 页岩气和煤层气中氦气富集机理与资源潜力：以川南页岩气和鄂东缘煤层气为例[J/OL]. 地学前缘，2024：1–22 [2024-12-16]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.11.85

CHEN Yanyan，WEN Zhixin，TAO Shizhen，et al. Enrichment mechanism and resource potential of helium in shale gas and coalbed methane plays：A case study of shale gas in southern Sichuan Basin and coalbed methane in eastern Ordos Basin[J/OL]. Earth Science Frontiers，2024：1–22 [2024-12-16]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.11.85.

[8] 聂海宽，刘全有，党伟，等. 页岩型氦气富集机理与资源潜力：以四川盆地五峰组–龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国科学：地球科学，2023，53(6)：1285–1294.

NIE Haikuan，LIU Quanyou，DANG Wei ，et al. Enrichment mechanism and resource potential of shale–type helium：A case study of Wufeng Formation–Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Science China：Earth Sciences，2023，53(6)：1285–1294.

[9] 陈燕燕，陶士振，杨秀春，等. 页岩气和煤层气中氦气的地球化学特征和富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学，2023，34(4)：684−696.

CHEN Yanyan，TAO Shizhen，YANG Xiuchun，et al. The geochemical characteristics and enrichment of helium in shale gas and coalbed methane[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2023，34(4)：684−696.

[10] 陈新军，陈刚，边瑞康，等. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田氦气资源潜力与成因机理[J]. 天然气地球科学，2023，34(3)：469−476.

CHEN Xinjun，CHEN Gang，BIAN Ruikang，et al. The helium resource potential and genesis mechanism in Fuling shale gas field，Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2023，34(3)：469−476.

[11] 蒙炳坤，周世新，李靖，等. 上扬子地区不同类型岩石生氦潜力评价及泥页岩氦气开采条件理论计算[J]. 矿物岩石，2021，41(4)：102−113.

MENG Bingkun，ZHOU Shixin，LI Jing，et al. Helium potential evaluation of different types of rocks in the Upper Yangtze region and theoretical calculation of helium recovery conditions for shale in Upper Yangtze region[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology，2021，41(4)：102−113.

[12] 邹才能，董大忠，王社教，等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2010，37(6)：641−653.

ZOU Caineng，DONG Dazhong，WANG Shejiao，et al. Geological characteristics，formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2010，37(6)：641−653.

[13] DAI Jinxing，NI Yunyan，GONG Deyu，et al. Geochemical characteristics of gases from the largest tight sand gas field (Sulige) and shale gas field (Fuling) in China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology，2017，79：426−438.

[14] 秦胜飞，赵姿卓，吴伟，等. 煤层气与页岩气含氦性及氦气富集条件[J]. 天然气地球科学，2024，35(5)：890−901.

QIN Shengfei，ZHAO Zizhuo，WU Wei，et al. Helium content and helium enrichment conditions of coalbed methane and shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2024，35(5)：890−901.

[15] WANG Xiaofeng，LIU Quanyou，LIU Wenhui，et al. Helium accumulation in natural gas systems in Chinese sedimentary basins[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology，2023，150：106155.

[16] 邹玉涛，段金宝，赵艳军，等. 川东高陡断褶带构造特征及其演化[J]. 地质学报，2015，89(11)：2046−2052.

ZOU Yutao，DUAN Jinbao，ZHAO Yanjun，et al. Tectonic characteristics and evolution of the high and steep fault folding belt in east Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica，2015，89(11)：2046−2052.

[17] 刘芷含，陈亚琳，徐松，等. 川东及周缘地区五峰组–龙马溪组海相页岩气保存条件评价[J]. 地质科学，2024，59(5)：1185−1197.

LIU Zhihan，CHEN Yalin，XU Song，et al. Evaluation of the preservation conditions of marine shale gas in Wufeng–Longmaxi Formations in eastern Sichuan Basin and peripheral areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology，2024，59(5)：1185−1197.

[18] 周杨帆，罗良，曾联波，等. 涪陵页岩气田白马构造带变形特征及页岩气成藏模式[J]. 石油科学通报，2024，9(2)：183−195.

ZHOU Yangfan，LUO Liang，ZENG Lianbo，et al. Deformation characteristics and shale gas accumulation model of the Baima structural belt in the Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin，2024，9(2)：183−195.

[19] 聂海宽，汪虎，何治亮，等. 常压页岩气形成机制、分布规律及勘探前景：以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组–龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报，2019，40(2)：131−143.

NIE Haikuan，WANG Hu，HE Zhiliang，et al. Formation mechanism，distribution and exploration prospect of normal pressure shale gas reservoir：A case study of Wufeng Formation–Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2019，40(2)：131−143.

[20] 徐向，辛志源，刘超，等. 深层常压页岩气富集机制研究：以涪陵页岩气田白马区块为例[J]. 石油地质与工程，2024，38(3)：53−60.

XU Xiang，XIN Zhiyuan，LIU Chao，et al. Enrichment law of deep atmospheric shale gas：A case study of Baima syncline in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering，2024，38(3)：53−60.

[21] 关琳琳，王庆之，高全芳，等. 重庆市武隆地区五峰–龙马溪组常压页岩气勘探潜力分析[J/OL]. 地质通报，2024：1–12 [2024-05-09]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4648.P.20240508.1652.004.html.

GUAN Linlin，WANG Qingzhi，GAO Quanfang，et al. The potential of normal–pressure shale gas exploration of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Wulong area，Chongqing[J/OL]. Geological Bulletin of China，2024：1–12 [2024-05-09]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4648.P.20240508.1652.004.html.

[22] 胡东风，魏志红，刘若冰，等. 川东南盆缘复杂构造区綦江页岩气田的发现与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2023，44(6)：1418−1429.

HU Dongfeng，WEI Zhihong，LIU Ruobing，et al. Discovery of the Qijiang shale gas field in a structurally complex region on the southeastern margin of the Sichuan Basin and its implications[J]. Oil & Gas Geology，2023，44(6)：1418−1429.

[23] BALLENTINE C J，LOLLAR B S. Regional groundwater focusing of nitrogen and noble gases into the Hugoton–Panhandle giant gas field，USA[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta，2002，66(14)：2483−2497.

[24] 徐永昌，沈平，陶明信，等. 东部油气区天然气中幔源挥发份的地球化学：Ⅰ. 氦资源的新类型：沉积壳层幔源氦的工业储集[J]. 中国科学(D辑)，1996，26(1)：1–8

[25] BROWN A A. ^PSFormation of high helium gases：A guide for explorationists[C]//2010 AAPG Convention and Exhibition. New Orleans：AAPG，2010：80115.

[26] 刘文汇，徐永昌. 天然气中氦氩同位素组成的意义[J]. 科学通报，1993，38(9)：818–821

[27] CAO Chunhui，ZHANG Mingjie，TANG Qingyan，et al. Noble gas isotopic variations and geological implication of Longmaxi shale gas in Sichuan Basin，China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology，2018，89：38−46.

[28] ZHANG Wen，LI Yuhong，ZHAO Fenghua，et al. Granite is an effective helium source rock：Insights from the helium generation and release characteristics in granites from the north Qinling orogen，China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition)，2020，94(1)：114−125.

[29] 腾格尔，陶成，胡广，等. 排烃效率对页岩气形成与富集的影响[J]. 石油实验地质，2020，42(3)：325−334.

TENGER B，TAO Cheng，HU Guang，et al. Effect of hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency on shale gas formation and enrichment[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment，2020，42(3)：325−334.

[30] WANG Xiaofeng，LIU Wenhui，LI Xiaobin，et al. Radiogenic helium concentration and isotope variations in crustal gas pools from Sichuan Basin，China[J]. Applied Geochemistry，2020，117：104586.

[31] GHANIZADEH A，GASPARIK M，AMANN–HILDENBRAND A，et al. Experimental study of fluid transport processes in the matrix system of the European organic–rich shales：I. Scandinavian Alum Shale[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology，2014，51：79−99.

[32] BHANDARI A R，FLEMINGS P B，POLITO P J，et al. Anisotropy and stress dependence of permeability in the Barnett shale[J]. Transport in Porous Media，2015，108(2)：393−411.

[33] SOEDER D J. Porosity and permeability of eastern Devonian gas shale[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation，1988，3(1)：116−124.

[34] BUSTIN R M，BUSTIN A M M，CUI X，et al. Impact of shale properties on pore structure and storage characteristics[C]//SPE Shale Gas Production Conference. Fort Worth：SPE，2008：SPE–119892–MS.

[35] 万云强，陈践发，陈聪，等. 四川盆地涪陵气田白马向斜五峰组–龙马溪组页岩气成藏地质条件及成藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学，2024，35(9)：1656−1670.

WAN Yunqiang，CHEN Jianfa，CHEN Cong，et al. Geological conditions and accumulation patterns of shale gas accumulation in Wufeng–Longmaxi Formations of Baima syncline，Fuling gas field，Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2024，35(9)：1656−1670.

[36] 丁佳彤，陈孔全，汤济广，等. 页岩气富集与保存条件差异研究：以焦石坝–武隆地区为例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2023，58(6)：1472−1480.

DING Jiatong，CHEN Kongquan，TANG Jiguang，et al. A study on differences of shale gas enrichment and preservation conditions：Taking the Jiaoshiba–Wulong area as an example[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting，2023，58(6)：1472−1480.

[37] 高全芳. 武隆向斜五峰组–龙马溪组优质页岩特征及水平井靶窗优选[J]. 非常规油气，2019，6(3)：99−105.

GAO Quanfang. The high–quality shale characteristics of Wufeng Formation–Longmaxi Formation in Wulong syncline and the best target of horizontal well[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2019，6(3)：99−105.

[38] 冉琦，陈勇，齐晴，等. 丁山地区龙马溪组页岩气保存条件分析[J]. 石油地质与工程，2017，31(4)：22−25.

RAN Qi，CHEN Yong，QI Qing，et al. Preservation conditions of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation of Dingshan area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering，2017，31(4)：22−25.

[39] ZHONG Ying，SHE Jiping，ZHANG Hao，et al. Experimental and numerical analyses of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in gas shales[J]. Fuel，2019，258：116123.

[40] 张文. 关中和柴北缘地区战略性氦气资源成藏机理研究[D]. 北京：中国矿业大学(北京)，2019.

ZHANG Wen. Accumulation mechanism of helium，a strategic resources，in Guanzhong and north Qaidam Basin[D]. Beijing：China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing)，2019.

[41] 李玉宏，张文，王利，等. 亨利定律与壳源氦气弱源成藏：以渭河盆地为例[J]. 天然气地球科学，2017，28(4)：495−501.

LI Yuhong，ZHANG Wen，WANG Li，et al. Henry’s Law and accumulation of crust–derived helium：A case from Weihe Basin，China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2017，28(4)：495−501.

[42] 蔡勋育，周德华，赵培荣，等. 中国石化深层、常压页岩气勘探开发进展与展望[J]. 石油实验地质，2023，45(6)：1039−1049.

CAI Xunyu，ZHOU Dehua，ZHAO Peirong，et al. Development progress and outlook of deep and normal pressure shale gas of SINOPEC[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment，2023，45(6)：1039−1049.

[43] NIE Haikuan，LIU Quanyou，DANG Wei，et al. Enrichment mechanism and resource potential of shale–type helium：A case study of Wufeng Formation–Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Science China：Earth Sciences，2023，66(6)：1279−1288.

[44] 魏祥峰，刘珠江，王强，等. 川东南丁山与焦石坝地区五峰组–龙马溪组页岩气富集条件差异分析与思考[J]. 天然气地球科学，2020，31(8)：1041−1051.

WEI Xiangfeng，LIU Zhujiang，WANG Qiang，et al. Analysis and thinking of the difference of Wufeng–Longmaxi shale gas enrichment conditions between Dingshan and Jiaoshiba areas in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2020，31(8)：1041−1051.