Diffusion mechanisms of coal-measure helium and their implications for helium accumulation: A case study of the Taiyuan Formation, northern Qinshui Basin, China

Authors

MA Yong, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, ChinaFollow
XIN Zhiyuan, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
CHEN Jianfa, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
LI Yuhong, Xi’an Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Xi’an 710054, China
ZHANG Xiutao, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
JIANG Haojie, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
CHEN Zeya, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Abstract

Objective The global helium-rich gas reservoirs are dominated by conventional natural gas reservoirs. In recent years, helium-bearing natural gas has been discovered in the Carboniferous-Permian coal measures in the Ordos Basin and surrounding regions, revealing the resource potential of coal-measure helium. However, there is almost a total lack of studies on mechanisms underlying the diffusion and migration of coal-measure helium. This severely restricts further research on the accumulation patterns of coal-measure helium.Methods This study investigated a coal seam in the Taiyuan Formation in the northern Qinshui Basin and mudstones in the coal seam roof. Using physical diffusion experiments on coal-measure helium under different water saturations and gas concentrations, as well as the simulation of the regional sedimentary, burial, and hydrocarbon generation histories, this study calculated the helium diffusion fluxes in the coals and mudstones. Accordingly, the mechanisms behind the enrichment of coal-measure helium gas were determined.Results and Conclusions Under experimental temperature (20 ℃) and pressure (1 MPa), helium diffusion was dominated by Knudsen diffusion in pores with sizes less than or equal to 13.5 nm, with similar diffusion rates observed in the coals and mudstones. In contrast, helium diffusion shifted to Fick diffusion in pores with sizes greater than 13.5 nm. The diffusion of coal-measure helium gas was primarily affected by pore structure, water content, and gas concentration. Poorer pore connectivity, higher water saturation, and a lower helium concentration corresponded to slower helium diffusion and a higher sealing capacity. The coals exhibited a developed cleavage-fracture system, which contributed to high connectivity. As a result, the coals had a higher helium diffusion coefficient (1.1 × 10^–8 m²/s) than the mudstones (5.8 × 10^–9 m²/s). High water content reduced the helium diffusion rate by blocking pore pathways and changing the behavior of the gas-liquid interface. The influence of the gas concentration on the helium diffusion rate was principally related to both the partial pressures of gases and differences in physical properties between helium and methane. In combination with the physical and numerical simulation results, this study established a prediction model for the helium diffusion flux throughout geological history. The prediction results indicate that the helium diffusion fluxes in the coals and mudstones were 13.24 cm³/m² and 5.05 cm³/m², respectively under standard temperature and pressure conditions. Furthermore, the helium diffusion occurred predominantly in the early hydrocarbon generation stage with high gas concentrations, while the amount of helium escaping in the later stage can be ignored. Given the relatively weak helium generation capacity of the coal measures, the enrichment and accumulation of coal-measure helium resulted from the dynamic balance between exogenetic recharge and preservation. Deep faults facilitate the upward migration of deep helium. Meanwhile, the low gas concentration gradient, high water saturation, and low connectivity enhance the helium storage capacity by suppressing diffusion. Therefore, it is necessary to highlight the connectivity of deep fault systems and the sealing performance of cap rocks in the exploration of coal-measure helium.

Keywords

coal-measure helium, diffusion mechanism, diffusion flux, enrichment mechanism, prediction model

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0098

Recommended Citation

MA Yong, XIN Zhiyuan, CHEN Jianfa, et al. (2025) "Diffusion mechanisms of coal-measure helium and their implications for helium accumulation: A case study of the Taiyuan Formation, northern Qinshui Basin, China," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 6, Article 5.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0098
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss6/5

Reference

[1] 陈践发，刘凯旋，董勍伟，等. 天然气中氦资源研究现状及我国氦资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学，2021，32(10)：1436−1449.

CHEN Jianfa，LIU Kaixuan，DONG Qingwei，et al. Research status of helium resources in natural gas and prospects of helium resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2021，32(10)：1436−1449.

[2] 彭威龙，刘全有，张英，等. 中国首个特大致密砂岩型(烃类)富氦气田：鄂尔多斯盆地东胜气田特征[J]. 中国科学：地球科学，2022，52(6)：1078−1085.

PENG Weilong，LIU Quanyou，ZHANG Ying，et al. The first extra–large helium–rich gas field identified in a tight sandstone of the Dongsheng gas field，Ordos Basin，China[J]. Science China：Earth Sciences，2022，52(6)：1078−1085.

[3] BALLENTINE C J，LOLLAR B S. Regional groundwater focusing of nitrogen and noble gases into the Hugoton–Panhandle giant gas field，USA[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta，2002，66(14)：2483−2497.

[4] 陶小晚，李建忠，赵力彬，等. 我国氦气资源现状及首个特大型富氦储量的发现：和田河气田[J]. 地球科学，2019，44(3)：1024−1041.

TAO Xiaowan，LI Jianzhong，ZHAO Libin，et al. Helium resources and discovery of first supergiant helium reserve in China：Hetianhe gas field[J]. Earth Science，2019，44(3)：1024−1041.

[5] 刘祥柏，陶士振，杨秀春，等. 煤系氦气富集机理与资源潜力：以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(9)：49−66.

LIU Xiangbai，TAO Shizhen，YANG Xiuchun，et al. Accumulation mechanisms and resource potential of helium in coal measures：A case study of the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(9)：49−66.

[6] 刘超，孙蓓蕾，曾凡桂，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘石西区块含氦天然气的发现及成因初探[J]. 煤炭学报，2021，46(4)：1280−1287.

LIU Chao，SUN Beilei，ZENG Fangui，et al. Discovery and origin of helium–rich gas on the Shixi area，eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2021，46(4)：1280−1287.

[7] CHEN Biying，STUART F M，XU Sheng，et al. Evolution of coal–bed methane in southeast Qinshui Basin，China：Insights from stable and noble gas isotopes[J]. Chemical Geology，2019，529：119298.

[8] CHENG Anran，LOLLAR B S，GLUYAS J G，et al. Primary N₂–He gas field formation in intracratonic sedimentary basins[J]. Nature，2023，615(7950)：94−99.

[9] KRISHNA R，WESSELINGH J A. The Maxwell–Stefan approach to mass transfer[J]. Chemical Engineering Science，1997，52(6)：861−911.

[10] 刘晓强，尤兵，陈践发，等. 石英纳米孔中氦气与甲烷竞争扩散的分子模拟[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版)，2024，21(3)：86−94.

LIU Xiaoqiang，YOU Bing，CHEN Jianfa，et al. The competitive diffusion mechanism of helium and methane in quartz nanopore by molecular simulation[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition)，2024，21(3)：86−94.

[11] 宋丹丹，关平，任嘉豪，等. 含氦气藏盖层孔喉密封性的分子模拟研究[J/OL]. 天然气地球科学，2025：1–29 [2025-02-10]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1177.TE.20250210.1337.004.html.

SONG Dandan，GUAN Ping，REN Jiahao，et al. Molecular simulation study on the sealing effect of caprock pore throats on helium[J/OL]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2025：1–29 [2025-02-10]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1177.TE.20250210.1337.004.html.

[12] QIAN Jianhao，WU Heng’an，WANG Fengchao. A generalized Knudsen theory for gas transport with specular and diffuse reflections[J]. Nature Communications，2023，14(1)：7386.

[13] GRUENER S，HUBER P. Knudsen diffusion in silicon nanochannels[J]. Physical Review Letters，2008，100(6)：064502.

[14] KEERTHI A，GEIM A K，JANARDANAN A，et al. Ballistic molecular transport through two–dimensional channels[J]. Nature，2018，558(7710)：420−424.

[15] TISON S A. Experimental data and theoretical modeling of gas flows through metal capillary leaks[J]. Vacuum，1993，44(11/12)：1171−1175.

[16] YUAN Lin，STANLEY A，DEHGHANPOUR H，et al. Measurement of helium diffusion in Lotsberg Salt cores：A proxy to evaluate hydrogen diffusion[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2024，52：686−702.

[17] 宋岩，马行陟，柳少波，等. 沁水煤层气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报，2019，40(5)：621−634.

SONG Yan，MA Xingzhi，LIU Shaobo，et al. Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies in Qinshui coalbed methane field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2019，40(5)：621−634.

[18] 陈凤杰，张小东，刘润斌，等. 沁水盆地东北部上古生界深部煤系致密砂岩孔隙结构特征及其储层地质意义[J/OL]. 煤炭科学技术，2024：1–16 [2024-11-12]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.td.20241111.1527.007.html.

CHEN Fengjie，ZHANG Xiaodong，LIU Runbin，et al. Pore structure characteristics of deep Upper Paleozoic coal measure tight sandstone reservoirs in northeast Qinshui Basin and its reservoir geological significance[J/OL]. Coal Science and Technology，2024：1–16 [2024-11-12]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.td.20241111.1527.007.html.

[19] 梁建设，王存武，柳迎红，等. 沁水盆地致密气成藏条件与勘探潜力研究[J]. 天然气地球科学，2014，25(10)：1509−1519.

LIANG Jianshe，WANG Cunwu，LIU Yinghong，et al. Study on the tight gas accumulation conditions and exploration potential in the Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2014，25(10)：1509−1519.

[20] ZHANG Tongwei，KROOSS B M. Experimental investigation on the carbon isotope fractionation of methane during gas migration by diffusion through sedimentary rocks at elevated temperature and pressure[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta，2001，65(16)：2723−2742.

[21] KROOSS B M，SCHAEFER R G. Experimental measurements of the diffusion parameters of light hydrocarbons in water–saturated sedimentary rocks：I. A new experimental procedure[J]. Organic Geochemistry，1987，11(3)：193−199.

[22] KROOSS B M，LEYTHAEUSER D. Experimental measurements of the diffusion parameters of light hydrocarbons in water–saturated sedimentary rocks：II. Results and geochemical significance[J]. Organic Geochemistry，1988，12(2)：91−108.

[23] ZHONG Ying，SHE Jiping，ZHANG Hao，et al. Experimental and numerical analyses of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in gas shales[J]. Fuel，2019，258：116123.

[24] 李玉宏，张文，王利，等. 亨利定律与壳源氦气弱源成藏：以渭河盆地为例[J]. 天然气地球科学，2017，28(4)：495−501.

LI Yuhong，ZHANG Wen，WANG Li，et al. Henry’s Law and accumulation of crust–derived helium：A case from Weihe Basin，China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2017，28(4)：495−501.

[25] 李相臣，康毅力，周来诚，等. 水饱和煤岩储层甲烷运移动态特征[J]. 石油学报，2015，36(7)：876−881.

LI Xiangchen，KANG Yili，ZHOU Laicheng，et al. Dynamic characteristics of methane transport in water saturated coal[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2015，36(7)：876−881.

[26] SI Leilei，ZHANG Hongtu，WEI Jianping，et al. Modeling and experiment for effective diffusion coefficient of gas in water–saturated coal[J]. Fuel，2021，284：118887.

[27] 马勇，陈践发，辛志源，等. 非常规天然气中氦资源潜力及富集机制[J]. 石油学报，2025，46(2)：440−455.

MA Yong，CHEN Jianfa，XIN Zhiyuan，et al. Helium resource potential and enrichment mechanism of unconventional gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2025，46(2)：440−455.

[28] 段毅，吴保祥，郑朝阳，等. 山西沁水盆地煤生烃动力学研究[J]. 科学通报，2005，50(13)：1405−1411.

[29] 陈燕燕，陶士振，杨秀春，等. 页岩气和煤层气中氦气的地球化学特征和富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学，2023，34(4)：684−696.

CHEN Yanyan，TAO Shizhen，YANG Xiuchun，et al. The geochemical characteristics and enrichment of helium in shale gas and coalbed methane[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2023，34(4)：684−696.

[30] 张乔，周俊林，李玉宏，等. 渭河盆地南缘花岗岩中生氦元素(U、Th)赋存状态及制约因素研究：以华山复式岩体为例[J]. 西北地质，2022，55(3)：241−256.

ZHANG Qiao，ZHOU Junlin，LI Yuhong，et al. The occurrence state and restraint factors of helium–produced elements (U，Th) in the granites from the southern margin of Weihe Basin：Evidences from Huashan complex[J]. Northwestern Geology，2022，55(3)：241−256.

[31] 何发岐，王付斌，张威，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘勘探思路转变与天然气领域重大突破[J]. 中国石油勘探，2020，25(6)：39−49.

HE Faqi，WANG Fubin，ZHANG Wei，et al. Transformation of exploration ideas and major breakthrough in natural gas discovery in the northern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration，2020，25(6)：39−49.

[32] DAI Shifeng，REN Deyi，CHOU Chenlin，et al. Geochemistry of trace elements in Chinese coals：A review of abundances，genetic types，impacts on human health，and industrial utilization[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology，2012，94：3−21.

[33] 张宇轩，吕鹏瑞，牛亚卓，等. 全球氦气资源成藏背景、地质特征与产能格局初探[J]. 西北地质，2022，55(4)：11−32.

ZHANG Yuxuan，LYU Pengrui，NIU Yazhuo，et al. Preliminary study on the geological characteristics，resource potential and production capacity pattern of global helium resources[J]. Northwestern Geology，2022，55(4)：11−32.

[34] MARDON S M，EBLE C F，HOWER J C，et al. Organic petrology，geochemistry，gas content and gas composition of Middle Pennsylvanian age coal beds in the eastern Interior (Illinois) Basin：Implications for CBM development and carbon sequestration[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology，2014，127：56−74.

[35] 司庆红，曾威，刘行，等. 临汾–运城盆地氦气富集要素及成藏条件[J]. 西北地质，2023，56(1)：129−141.

SI Qinghong，ZENG Wei，LIU Xing，et al. Analysis of helium enrichment factors and reservoir forming conditions in Linfen–Yuncheng Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology，2023，56(1)：129−141.

[36] 徐永昌，沈平，陶明信，等. 幔源氦的工业储聚和郯庐大断裂带[J]. 科学通报，1990，35(12)：932−935.

[37] 张云鹏，李玉宏，卢进才，等. 柴达木盆地北缘富氦天然气的发现：兼议成藏地质条件[J]. 地质通报，2016，35(2/3)：364−371.

ZHANG Yunpeng，LI Yuhong，LU Jincai，et al. The discovery and origin of helium–rich gas on the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China，2016，35(2/3)：364−371.