Dominant geological and engineering factors controlling the productivity of horizontal wells for deep coalbed methane in the southern Shenfu block

Authors

GUO Guangshan, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, ChinaFollow
LIU Yancheng, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, ChinaFollow
ZHAO Gang, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China
CHEN Zhaohui, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China
LI Chen, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China
KANG Lifang, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China; Provincial Center of Technology Innovation Center of Coal Measure Gas Co-production, Taiyuan 030008, China
WANG Yuchuan, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China; Provincial Center of Technology Innovation Center of Coal Measure Gas Co-production, Taiyuan 030008, China
WANG Jianan, China United Coalbed Mathane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China; Provincial Center of Technology Innovation Center of Coal Measure Gas Co-production, Taiyuan 030008, China

Abstract

Objective The southern Shenfu block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin hosts one of the rare gas fields with reserves of over 100 billion cubic meters (bcm) in China, serving as a pilot demonstration area for the exploration and production of deep coalbed methane (CBM) conducted by the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC). In this block, the gas production of horizontal wells is 2-10 times that of vertical wells. However, the horizontal wells are challenged by significantly different and rapidly declining gas production. Determining dominant factors controlling the productivity of horizontal wells for deep CBM is the key to elevated overall production efficiency and commercial development. Methods This study investigated 16 horizontal wells in the southern Shenfu block using the dynamic and static data of 17 CBM assessment wells. Specifically, fine-scale assessments of in-situ stress and coal brittleness index were conducted using the wellbore collapse method and acoustic logging. Accordingly, an assessment system for engineering sweet spots (ESSs) was developed, followed by the fracability assessment of coal seams. Following the principle of one strategy for one well, this study delved into the drilling quality of horizontal wells and the technical indicators for large-scale volume fracturing. Then, three drilling quality parameters and seven fracturing stimulation parameters were selected for assessment. Based on the fine-scale characterization of factors influencing geological and engineering dual sweet spots (GESSs) within the influence range of horizontal wells, this study proposed the concept of the GESS coefficient, using which the productivity of horizontal wells for deep CBM was predicted. Through a systematic assessment of parameters for well drilling and completion and large-scale volume fracturing, this study performed quantitative assessments of 16 geological and engineering factors extracted. Consequently, dominant factors controlling the productivity of horizontal wells for deep CBM in the southern Shenfu block were determined. Results and Conclusions Dominant factors controlling geological sweet spots (GSSs) include the ash content of coals within the influence range of a horizontal well, gamma ray (GR) value while drilling, and peak gas-logging-derived value. Based on these factors, the assessment criteria for GSSs were developed. In the case where the horizontal segment of a horizontal well exhibits Class I GSS sections exceeding 500 m in length and a GSS coefficient of greater than 0.4, the peak and stable gas production can reach over 20 000 m³/d and 15 000 m³/d, respectively. Dominant factors controlling ESSs in a horizontal well include the horizontal in-situ stress difference and the brittleness index of coals. Given the weak heterogeneity of the horizontal in-situ stress differences in the study area (5.1 MPa to 5.5 MPa), this study constructed the GESS coefficient using the brittleness index. A GESS coefficient of greater than 0.52 suggests that the commercial development of horizontal wells for deep CBM can be achieved. Dominant factors controlling the production of horizontal wells include the length of GESS sections and the scale of fracturing stimulation. When the total length of Classes I and II GESS sections in the horizontal segment of a horizontal well accounts for 50% of the well’s total length, 80% of the horizontal well productivity can be achieved through large-scale volume fracturing. Dominant factors controlling the horizontal well productivity were quantitatively determined based on Kendall's rank correlation coefficients and Pearson correlation coefficients. The results indicate that the top six factors consist of the GSS coefficient, peak gas-logging-derived value, ESS coefficient, injection rate of fracturing fluids, fracturing pressure, and average proppant concentration. The results of this study will provide strong support for the differential design of both clusters in fracturing sections and fracturing scale for deep CBM production.

Keywords

Ordos Basin, southern Shenfu block, deep coalbed methane (CBM), horizontal well productivity, geological and engineering sweet spot (GESS), dominant controlling factor, correlation coefficient method

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0117

Recommended Citation

GUO Guangshan, LIU Yancheng, ZHAO Gang, et al. (2025) "Dominant geological and engineering factors controlling the productivity of horizontal wells for deep coalbed methane in the southern Shenfu block," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 5, Article 7.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0117
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss5/7

Reference

[1] 吴裕根，门相勇，娄钰. 我国“十四五”煤层气勘探开发新进展与前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探，2024，29(1)：1−13.

WU Yugen，MEN Xiangyong，LOU Yu. New progress and prospect of coalbed methane exploration and development in China during the 14^th Five–Year Plan period[J]. China Petroleum Exploration，2024，29(1)：1−13.

[2] 聂志宏，徐凤银，时小松，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气开发先导试验效果与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：1−12.

NIE Zhihong，XU Fengyin，SHI Xiaosong，et al. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：1−12.

[3] 徐凤银，聂志宏，孙伟，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气高效开发理论技术体系[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(1)：528−544.

XU Fengyin，NIE Zhihong，SUN Wei，et al. Theoretical and technological system for highly efficient development of deep coalbed methane in the eastern edge of Erdos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(1)：528−544.

[4] 朱光辉，季洪泉，米洪刚，等. 神府深部煤层气大气田的发现与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(8)：12−21.

ZHU Guanghui，JI Hongquan，MI Honggang，et al. Discovery of a large gas field of deep coalbed methane in the Shenfu block and its implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(8)：12−21.

[5] 兰浩，杨兆彪，仇鹏，等. 新疆准噶尔盆地白家海凸起深部煤层气勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：13−22.

LAN Hao，YANG Zhaobiao，CHOU Peng，et al. Exploration and exploitation of deep coalbed methane in the Baijiahai uplift，Junggar Basin：Progress and its implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：13−22.

[6] 王红岩，段瑶瑶，刘洪林，等. 煤层气水平井开发的理论技术初探：兼论煤层气和页岩气开发条件对比[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(4)：47−59.

WANG Hongyan，DUAN Yaoyao，LIU Honglin，et al. Preliminarily exploring the theories and technologies for coalbed methane production using horizontal wells：Comparison of conditions for coalbed methane and shale gas exploitation[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(4)：47−59.

[7] 郭广山，徐凤银，刘丽芳，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地府谷地区深部煤层气富集成藏规律及有利区评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：81−91.

GUO Guangshan，XU Fengyin，LIU Lifang，et al. Enrichment and accumulation patterns and favorable area evaluation of deep coalbed methane in the Fugu area，Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：81−91.

[8] 张聪，李可心，贾慧敏，等. 郑庄北中深部煤层气水平井产能影响因素及开发技术优化[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(6)：21−32.

ZHANG Cong，LI Kexin，JIA Huimin，et al. Factors influencing the productivity and technology optimization of horizontal wells for moderately deep coalbed methane in the northern Zhengzhuang block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(6)：21−32.

[9] 熊先钺，季亮，张正朝，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘韩城区块煤层气高产井地质主控因素[J]. 天然气工业，2024，44(3)：64−71.

XIONG Xianyue，JI Liang，ZHANG Zhengchao，et al. Main geological factors controlling high productivity of CBM wells in the Hancheng block at the eastern edge of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2024，44(3)：64−71.

[10] 吕玉民，柳迎红，陈桂华，等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气水平井产能影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2020，48(10)：225−232.

LYU Yumin，LIU Yinghong，CHEN Guihua，et al. Analysis of factors affecting productivity of CBM in horizontal wells in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2020，48(10)：225−232.

[11] 鲜保安，高德利，徐凤银，等. 中国煤层气水平井钻完井技术研究进展[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1974−1992.

XIAN Bao’an，GAO Deli，XU Fengyin，et al. Research progress of coalbed methane horizontal well drilling and completion technology in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1974−1992.

[12] 申鹏磊，吕帅锋，白建平，等. 沁水盆地深部煤层气开发井完井技术进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2025，53(2)：255−265.

SHEN Penglei，LYU Shuaifeng，BAI Jianping，et al. Progress in completion technology of deep coalbed methane development wells in Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2025，53(2)：255−265.

[13] 李曙光，王红娜，徐博瑞，等. 大宁–吉县区块深层煤层气井酸化压裂产气效果影响因素分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(3)：165−172.

LI Shuguang，WANG Hongna，XU Borui，et al. Influencing factors on gas production effect of acid fractured CBM wells in deep coal seam of Daning–Jixian block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(3)：165−172.

[14] 曾雯婷，葛腾泽，王倩，等. 深层煤层气全生命周期一体化排采工艺探索：以大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(9)：78−85.

ZENG Wenting，GE Tengze，WANG Qian，et al. Exploration of integrated technology for deep coalbed methane drainage in full life cycle：A case study of Daning–Jixian block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(9)：78−85.

[15] 陈明，王大猛，余莉珠，等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气井排采制度研究与实践[J/OL]. 煤炭学报，2024：1–11 [2025-05-09]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j. cnki.jccs.2024.0318

CHEN Ming，WANG Dameng，YU Lizhu，et al. Drainage system research and application of deep coalbed methane gas reservoirs in the Daning–Jixian block[J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024：1–11 [2025-05-09]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j. cnki.jccs.2024.0318.

[16] 郭广山，王海侨，刘松楠，等. 沁水盆地古交区块煤层气水平井产能影响因素分析[J]. 中国海上油气，2024，36(2)：110−118.

GUO Guangshan，WANG Haiqiao，LIU Songnan，et al. Analysis of factors influencing the productivity of horizontal wells in Gujiao coalbed methane block of Qinshui Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas，2024，36(2)：110−118.

[17] 闫霞，熊先钺，李曙光，等. 深层煤岩气水平井各段产出贡献及其主控因素：以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 天然气工业，2024，44(10)：80−92.

YAN Xia，XIONG Xianyue，LI Shuguang，et al. Production contributions of deep CBM horizontal well sections and their controlling factors：A case study of Daning–Jixian area，eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2024，44(10)：80−92.

[18] 周龙刚. 鄂尔多斯盆地神府南区深部煤层气有利区预测[J]. 山东煤炭科技，2023，41(6)：173−176.

ZHOU Longgang. Prediction of deep coalbed methane favorable area in south Shenfu area of Ordos Basin[J]. Shandong Coal Science and Technology，2023，41(6)：173−176.

[19] 安琦，杨帆，杨睿月，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地神府区块深部煤层气体积压裂实践与认识[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(5)：2376−2393.

AN Qi，YANG Fan，YANG Ruiyue，et al. Practice and understanding of deep coalbed methane massive hydraulic fracturing in Shenfu block，Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(5)：2376−2393.

[20] 王宇红，孙天玉，李鹏. 沁水盆地深部煤层气水平井定向钻进地质导向技术[J]. 煤矿安全，2023，54(6)：41−46.

WANG Yuhong，SUN Tianyu，LI Peng. Geological steering technology for directional drilling of deep CBM horizontal wells in Qinshui Basin[J]. Safety in Coal Mines，2023，54(6)：41−46.

[21] 谢正龙，刘之的，韩鸿来，等. 大吉区块深部(层)煤层气储层地应力测井预测研究[J]. 物探与化探，2024，48(2)：356−365.

XIE Zhenglong，LIU Zhidi，HAN Honglai，et al. Log–based in situ stress prediction of deep coalbed methane reservoirs in the Daji block[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration，2024，48(2)：356−365.

[22] 于国栋，鞠玮，杨兆彪. 大宁–吉县地区5号煤层现今地应力预测及其对煤层气开发的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程，2024，24(13)：5286−5295.

YU Guodong，JU Wei，YANG Zhaobiao. Prediction of present–day in–situ stress in the No. 5 coal seam of Daning–Jixian area：Implications for coalbed methane development[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2024，24(13)：5286−5295.

[23] 孔祥伟，谢昕，王存武，等. 基于灰色关联方法的深层煤层气井压后产能影响地质工程因素评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发，2023，13(4)：433−440.

KONG Xiangwei，XIE Xin，WANG Cunwu，et al. Evaluation of geological engineering factors for productivity of deep CBM well after fracturing based on grey correlation method[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development，2023，13(4)：433−440.

[24] 张晨，何萌，肖宇航，等. 影响煤层气单支压裂水平井产量关键要素及提产对策：以郑庄区块开发实践为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2024，52(10)：158−168.

ZHANG Chen，HE Meng，XIAO Yuhang，et al. Analysis of key elements affecting production and technical countermeasures to increase production of CBM fractured single horizontal wells：A case study of Zhengzhuang block[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2024，52(10)：158−168.

[25] 李亭，张金发，管英柱，等. 水平井分段压裂各段产能评价技术研究进展[J]. 科学技术与工程，2023，23(21)：8916−8927.

LI Ting，ZHANG Jinfa，GUAN Yingzhu，et al. Progress on each section productivity evaluation technology of horizontal well staged fracturing[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2023，23(21)：8916−8927.

[26] 刘晓. 不同压裂规模下煤储层缝网形态对比研究：以延川南煤层气田为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发，2024，14(3)：510−518.

LIU Xiao. Comparison of seam network morphology in coal reservoirs under different fracturing scales：A case of Yanchuannan CBM gas field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development，2024，14(3)：510−518.