•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

Objective Seismic-while-mining (SWM) data are usually acquired using multiple stations, each of which is equipped with multiple data acquisition traces. However, the SWM data received by these stations exhibit time differences due to the lack of GPS signals underground and the fact that current network synchronization technologies are confined by network delays underground. Given that the time synchronization accuracy directly affects the quality of data processing and imaging, the time difference correction of real-time SWM data is essential for accurate SWM detection. Methods Since current high-precision timing systems on the surface suffer from signal loss underground, this study proposed an adaptive time difference correction method based on SWM data. First, using an adaptive velocity analysis method characterized by separate scanning and combined analysis of data from various stations, the impacts of time differences between the stations on the velocity analysis were eliminated. Then, the model seismic traces of various stations were established based on the velocity analysis results. Accordingly, the time differences between the stations were derived, thereby achieving the automatic correction of time differences between SWM data. Results and Conclusions The testing results of a theoretical model indicate that the time differences obtained using the new method were highly accurate and scarcely affected by noise. This method was applied to the measured coherent single-shot SWM records of a coal mine’s working face. The application results reveal that the time differences of corrected SWM records between the stations were eliminated. Furthermore, the correction of time differences between various seismic traces with low signal-to-noise ratios was free from noise, demonstrating high adaptability. The travel time of seismic waves is a key attribute in SWM records. The accurate correction of time differences ensures the temporal consistency of the SWM data recorded by various stations, significantly enhancing the data accuracy.

Keywords

seismic-while-mining (SWM), time difference correction, real-time data acquisition, cross correlation

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.08.0508

Reference

[1] ANDREW K,LUO Xun. Methodology for tomographic imaging ahead of mining using the shearer as a seismic source[J]. Geophysics,2009,74(2):M1−M8.

[2] TAYLOR N,MERRIAM J,GENDZWILL D,et al. The mining machine as a seismic source for in–seam reflection mapping[C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2001. San Antonio:Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2001.

[3] LU Bin,CHENG Jianyuan,HU Jiwu,et al. Seismic features of vibration induced by mining machines and feasibility to be seismic sources[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science,2011,3:76−85.

[4] 王保利,程建远,金丹,等. 煤矿井下随掘地震震源特征及探测性能研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(1):10−19.

WANG Baoli,CHENG Jianyuan,JIN Dan,et al. Characteristics and detection performance of the source of seismic while excavating in underground coal mines[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(1):10−19.

[5] 赵会波,覃思,陈超,等. 随掘地震地质构造精细监测在山西王坡煤矿的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(6):137−144.

ZHAO Huibo,QIN Si,CHEN Chao,et al. Geological structures fine monitoring using seismic–while–tunneling technique in Wangpo Mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(6):137−144.

[6] 刘翔宇,杨仁树,杨立云,等. 竖井巷道掘进超前地质探测研究进展与展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2024,52(增刊1):145−152.

LIU Xiangyu,YANG Renshu,YANG Liyun,et al. Research progress and prospect of advanced geological exploration in shaft and roadway driving[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2024,52(Sup.1):145−152.

[7] 程久龙,程鹏,李亚豪. 基于IABC–ICA的随掘地震去噪方法[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(1):413−422.

CHENG Jiulong,CHENG Peng,LI Yahao. Denoising method of mine seismic while drilling data based on IABC–ICA[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(1):413−422.

[8] 程建远,王保利,范涛,等. 煤矿地质透明化典型应用场景及关键技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(7):1−12.

CHENG Jianyuan,WANG Baoli,FAN Tao,et al. Typical application scenes and key technologies of coal mine geological transparency[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(7):1−12.

[9] 窦文武,卫金善,焦阳,等. 矿井分布式地震超前探测系统研究与应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(2):228−234.

DOU Wenwu,WEI Jinshan,JIAO Yang,et al. Research and application of mine distributed seismic advance detection system[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(2):228−234.

[10] 程建远,王盼,吴海,等. 地震勘探仪的发展历程与趋势[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2013,41(1):30−35.

CHENG Jianyuan,WANG Pan,WU Hai,et al. Progress and development tendency of seismic exploration instrument[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2013,41(1):30−35.

[11] 李彩华,滕云田,周健超,等. 分布式地震数据采集器的高精度时间同步系统研制[J]. 地震学报,2022,44(6):1111−1120.

LI Caihua,TENG Yuntian,ZHOU Jianchao,et al. Design on high–precision time–synchronization system for distributed seismic data acquisition[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,2022,44(6):1111−1120.

[12] 易碧金,袁宗军,甘志强,等. 浅谈节点地震仪器原理及一体化采集站设计要点[J]. 物探装备,2021,31(5):281−286.

YI Bijin,YUAN Zongjun,GAN Zhiqiang,et al. Introduction to the principle of node seismic instruments and the design points of integrated acquisition stations[J]. Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting,2021,31(5):281−286.

[13] 白珊珊,李从庆,郭磊,等. 节点地震采集系统发展现状[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2019,40(6):130−138.

BAI Shanshan,LI Congqing,GUO Lei,et al. A review of the development of nodal seismic acquisition systems[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2019,40(6):130−138.

[14] 刘成斋. 胜利油田三维地震数据连片处理[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(5):579−585.

LIU Chengzhai. Data processing joining several 3–D seismic surveying blocks together in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2004,39(5):579−585.

[15] 左海,魏庚雨,何小松. 三维地震资料叠前连片处理技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(增刊1):29−35.

ZUO Hai,WEI Gengyu,HE Xiaosong. Block-jointed together processing technique of 3-D prestick seismic data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2008,43(Sup.1):29−35.

[16] 段云卿. 匹配滤波与子波整形[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(2):156−159.

DUAN Yunqing. Matched filtering and wave shaping[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2006,41(2):156−159.

[17] 赵明秋,牛建国. 连接不同震源数据的匹配滤波技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2007,42(增刊1):136−139.

ZHAO Mingqiu,NIU Jianguo. A matchde filtering technique linking different sources data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2007,42(Sup.1):136−139.

[18] 张凯,李振春,曹景忠,等. 速度扫描法共聚焦点道集偏移速度分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(9):1265−1269.

ZHANG Kai,LI Zhenchun,CAO Jingzhong,et al. Migration velocity analysis of common focus point gathers based on velocity scanning[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2005,33(9):1265−1269.

[19] 刘守伟,王华忠,程玖兵,等. 时空移动成像条件及偏移速度分析[J]. 地球物理学报,2008,51(6):1883−1891.

LIU Shouwei,WANG Huazhong,CHENG Jiubing,et al. Space–time–shift imaging condition and migration velocity analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2008,51(6):1883−1891.

[20] 朱金平,周强,李若禹,等. 一种基于Q层析技术的速度建模方法及应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2023,58(5):1124−1132.

ZHU Jinping,ZHOU Qiang,LI Ruoyu,et al. A velocity modeling method based on Q tomography and its application[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2023,58(5):1124−1132.

[21] 高福建,邹志辉,王永红. 基于地震层析速度模型分析海滩地下结构:以青岛石老人海水浴场为例[J]. 地学前缘,2022,29(5):275−284.

GAO Fujian,ZOU Zhihui,WANG Yonghong. Subsurface structure of seabeach revealed by seismic tomographic velocity model:An example of the Qingdao Shilaoren beach[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2022,29(5):275−284.

[22] 王连坤,方伍宝,段心标,等. 全波形反演初始模型建立策略研究综述[J]. 地球物理学进展,2016,31(4):1678−1687.

WANG Liankun,FANG Wubao,DUAN Xinbiao,et al. Review of full waveform inversion initial model building strategy[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2016,31(4):1678−1687.

[23] 段超然,韩立国. 主成分分析波场重构反演与全波形反演联合速度重构[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2016,51(6):1134−1140.

DUAN Chaoran,HAN Liguo. A joint velocity reconstruction method:principal component analysis based wavefield-reconstruction inversion combined with full waveform inversion[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(6):1134−1140.

[24] 李江,李庆春,唐文. 角度道集匹配相关速度分析方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2019,54(5):962−969.

LI Jiang,LI Qingchun,TANG Wen. Matching correlation–function velocity analysis based on ADCIG[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2019,54(5):962−969.

[25] 伍国富,肖明图,王华忠,等. Bayes决策理论下的速度谱智能化解释及建模方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2023,58(3):590−625.

WU Guofu,XIAO Mingtu,WANG Huazhong,et al. Intelligent interpretation and modeling methodof velocity semblance based on Bayesian decision theory[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2023,58(3):590−625.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.