Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
Background High-sulfate mine water poses a major aquatic environmental challenge in coal mining areas across China. Accordingly, the cost-effective and efficient treatment of such water has become an urgent need for the sustainable development of the mining industry. Despite its considerable promise, microbial remediation based on sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) shows limited efficiency due to the scarcity of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in mine water.Methods The application of external slow-release carbon source (SRC) materials for SRB faces a range of challenges, such as the potentially excessive release of organic carbon in the initial stage, the unclear release mechanisms of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and the difficulty of quantifying the utilization rate of SRB. To address these issues, this study conducted experiments on three SRC materials (i.e., bagasse, corncob, and sawdust), involving their carbon release kinetics under soaking and availability for SRB. Accordingly, the carbon release patterns, DOM release mechanisms, and availability for SRB of the three SRC materials were explored. Results and Conclusions The results indicate that the carbon release processes of the three SRC materials all followed the second-order kinetic and Ritger-Peppas equations, with rapid release occurring within 0‒8 h, followed by slow release from 8 h to 120 h. The cumulative carbon release amounts within 120 h of bagasse, corncob, and sawdust were determined at 218.44 mg/(g·L), 77.72 mg/(g·L), and 39.87 mg/(g·L), respectively. Three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix (3D-EEM) fluorescence spectra indicate that the DOM released from bagasse was dominated by fulvic-like and humic-like acids, characterized by high molecular weights. In contrast, the DOM released from corncob and sawdust consisted primarily of tryptophan-like and tyrosine-like compounds, along with products from microbial degradation, suggesting better bioavailability. Facilitated by bagasse, corncob, and sawdust, the SRB exhibited enzymatic rates for ${\mathrm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ degradation of 3.88 mmol/(L·d), 3.21 mmol/(L·d), and 2.67 mmol/(L·d), respectively. Therefore, corncob exhibited appropriate carbon release capacity and high enzymatic rate, establishing it as the most suitable SRC material. The results of this study can provide a theoretical basis for both the selection of SRC materials and the microbial remediation of high-sulfate mine water.
Keywords
high-sulfate mine water, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), slow-release carbon source (SRC), dissolved organic matter (DOM), microbial remediation
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.08.0641
Recommended Citation
XIAHOU Ming’an, ZHANG Li, XU Zhimin,
et al.
(2025)
"An experimental study on the selection of slow-release carbon source materials for sulfate-reducing bacteria-based remediation of high-sulfate mine water in coal mines,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53:
Iss.
12, Article 20.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.08.0641
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss12/20
Reference
[1] 顾大钊,李井峰,曹志国,等. 我国煤矿矿井水保护利用发展战略与工程科技[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(10):3079−3089
GU Dazhao,LI Jingfeng,CAO Zhiguo,et al. Technology and engineering development strategy of water protection and utilization of coal mine in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(10):3079−3089
[2] 孙亚军,郭娟,徐智敏,等. 我国煤矿区矿井水水质空间分布特征及矿井水处理技术思路[J]. 煤炭学报,2025,50(1):584−599
SUN Yajun,GUO Juan,XU Zhimin,et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of mine water quality in coal mining areas of China and technological approaches for mine water treatment[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2025,50(1):584−599
[3] BROWN A M,BASS A M,GARNETT M H,et al. Sources and controls of greenhouse gases and heavy metals in mine water:A continuing climate legacy[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2024,906:167371.
[4] 孙文洁,任顺利,武强,等. 新常态下我国煤矿废弃矿井水污染防治与资源化综合利用[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(6):2161−2169
SUN Wenjie,REN Shunli,WU Qiang,et al. Waterpollution’s prevention and comprehensive utilization of abandoned coal mines in China under the new normal life[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(6):2161−2169
[5] 尹会永,孙德辉,董方营,等. 华北型煤田封闭采区地下水回升渗流特征与水质演化规律[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(7):177−190
YIN Huiyong,SUN Dehui,DONG Fangying,et al. Groundwater rebound and seepage characteristics and water quality evolution in a sealed mining area in North China type coalfield[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(7):177−190
[6] MOSAI A K,NDLOVU G,TUTU H. Improving acid mine drainage treatment by combining treatment technologies:A review[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2024,919:170806.
[7] 王晓青,冯启言,宫敏,等. 高硫酸盐矿山废水的处理方法研究进展[J]. 应用化工,2022,51(8):2355−2361
WANG Xiaoqing,FENG Qiyan,GONG Min,et al. Research progress on treatment methods of wastewater with high sulfate mines[J]. Applied Chemical Industry,2022,51(8):2355−2361
[8] WANG Zhaoliang,XU Yongxin,ZHANG Zhixiang,et al. Review:Acid mine drainage (AMD) in abandoned coal mines of Shanxi,China[J]. Water,2021,13(1):8.
[9] VIRPIRANTA H,SOTANIEMI V H,LEIVISKÄ T,et al. Continuous removal of sulfate and metals from acidic mining–impacted waters at low temperature using a sulfate–reducing bacterial consortium[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2022,427:132050.
[10] AYANGBENRO A S,OLANREWAJU O S,BABALOLA O O. Sulfate–reducing bacteria as an effective tool for sustainable acid mine bioremediation[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2018,9:1986.
[11] HWANG S Y,JHO E H. Heavy metal and sulfate removal from sulfate–rich synthetic mine drainages using sulfate reducing bacteria[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2018,635:1308−1316.
[12] 王亚鑫,吴玉,张洪琳,等. 微生物硫代谢及其驱动下建立的生物生态关系[J]. 微生物学报,2022,62(3):930−948
WANG Yaxin,WU Yu,ZHANG Honglin,et al. Microbial sulfur metabolism and the bioecological relationships driven by sulfur metabolism[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2022,62(3):930−948
[13] MIRANDA E M,SEVERSON C,REEP J K,et al. Continuous–mode acclimation and operation of lignocellulosic sulfate–reducing bioreactors for enhanced metal immobilization from acidic mining–influenced water[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2022,425:128054.
[14] MARQUES J P,RODRIGUES V G S. A systematic literature review of treatment approaches with sulfate–reducing bacteria for acid mine drainage[J]. Water,Air & Soil Pollution,2025,236(5):271.
[15] GIBERT O,DE PABLO J,CORTINA J L,et al. Chemical characterisation of natural organic substrates for biological mitigation of acid mine drainage[J]. Water Research,2004,38(19):4186−4196.
[16] MAGOWO W E,SHERIDAN C,RUMBOLD K. Global co–occurrence of acid mine drainage and organic rich industrial and domestic effluent:Biological sulfate reduction as a co–treatment–option[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering,2020,38:101650.
[17] 王淼,李泽兵,孙晓宇,等. 硫酸盐还原菌处理酸性矿山废水研究进展[J]. 有色金属(矿山部分),2022,74(6):10−18
WANG Miao,LI Zebing,SUN Xiaoyu,et al. Research progress on the treatment of acid mine drainage by sulfate–reducing bacteria[J]. Nonferrous Metals (Mining Section),2022,74(6):10−18
[18] 周鹏,刘鹰,苏鑫,等. 可生物降解聚合物作为固相反硝化碳源的研究进展[J]. 环境化学,2024,43(6):2047−2057
ZHOU Peng,LIU Ying,SU Xin,et al. Research progress in biodegradable polymers as the carbon sources of solid–phase denitrification process[J]. Environmental Chemistry,2024,43(6):2047−2057
[19] SATO Y,HAMAI T,HORI T,et al. Year–round performance of a passive sulfate–reducing bioreactor that uses rice bran as an organic carbon source to treat acid mine drainage[J]. Mine Water and the Environment,2018,37(3):586−594.
[20] RODRIGUES C,NÚÑEZ–GÓMEZ D,SILVEIRA D D,et al. Chitin as a substrate for the biostimulation of sulfate–reducing bacteria in the treatment of mine–impacted water (MIW)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2019,375:330−338.
[21] DOVOROGWA H,HARDING K. Exploring the use of tobacco waste as a metal ion adsorbent and substrate for sulphate–reducing bacteria during the treatment of acid mine drainage[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(21):14333.
[22] 丁蕊. 新型碳源作为硫酸盐还原菌电子供体处理AMD研究[J]. 甘肃科技纵横,2020,49(11):29−31
[23] XING Yunxiao,ZHANG Dan,CAI Li,et al. An innovative double–layer microsphere used as slow–release carbon source for biological denitrification[J]. Water,Air & Soil Pollution,2020,231(3):135.
[24] TANG Jing,LIN Zhihong,LI Weitan,et al. Effect of pretreatment on carbon release performance of corncobs as a solid carbon source[J]. Water,Air & Soil Pollution,2023,234(9):570.
[25] 蔡昌凤,杨茜,方剑平,等. SRB固态发酵条件优选及动力学方程建立[J]. 环境工程学报,2014,8(11):4586−4592
CAI Changfeng,YANG Qian,FANG Jianping,et al. Optimization of solid fermentation of sulfate reducing bacteria and establishment of kinetic equation[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2014,8(11):4586−4592
[26] 严子春,杨明霞,高建军. 薯渣缓释碳源强化反硝化滤池生物脱氮效果[J]. 环境科学与技术,2022,45(8):46−52
YAN Zichun,YANG Mingxia,GAO Jianjun. Enhancement of denitrification effect of denitrifying biological filter by potato pulp sustained–release carbon source[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2022,45(8):46−52
[27] 李亚南,何友文,刘遇瑶,等. 利用工业园区酒糟固废制备复合缓释碳源及其性能评估[J]. 环境工程学报,2024,18(3):696−708
LI Yanan,HE Youwen,LIU Yuyao,et al. Preparation of composite slow–release carbon source from industrial park vinasse solid waste and its performance evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2024,18(3):696−708
[28] 周向阳,刘佳玥,孙尚贵,等. 几种原料生物炭溶解性有机质(DOM)的光谱特征研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2023,39(6):819−826
ZHOU Xiangyang,LIU Jiayue,SUN Shanggui,et al. Spectral characteristics of dissolved organic matter released from biochar made from different biomass[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2023,39(6):819−826
[29] XIE Linhua,WANG Shuxin,SUN Yue,et al. Preparation of slow–release carbon source fillers from agricultural solid waste for efficient nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater:Removal performance,microbial community and mechanisms[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering,2024,65:105819.
[30] LI Congyu,WANG Haiyan,YAN Guokai,et al. Initial carbon release characteristics,mechanisms and denitrification performance of a novel slow release carbon source[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences,2022,118:32−45.
[31] 祝贵兵. 陆地和淡水生态系统新型微生物氮循环研究进展[J]. 微生物学报,2020,60(9):1972−1984
ZHU Guibing. Novel nitrogen cycles in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2020,60(9):1972−1984
[32] FAN Jiarui,DU Rui,LIU Qingtao,et al. Microbial response and spatial profiling of nitrite–producing denitrification granular sludge in– situ exposed to high nitrite stress[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2024,481:148404.
[33] ZHAO Yingxin,WANG Qian,YANG Zhifan,et al. Bio–capture of Cr (VI) in a denitrification system:Electron competition,long–term performance,and microbial community evolution[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2022,432:128697.
[34] 黄亚玲,李悦,陈志平,等. 三沙湾营养盐时空分布特征及其潜在影响因素识别[J]. 海洋环境科学,2023,42(3):440−448
HUANG Yaling,LI Yue,CHEN Zhiping,et al. Spatiotemporal distributions of nutrients and their potential influencing factors in Sansha Bay[J]. Marine Environmental Science,2023,42(3):440−448
[35] 吴元强,金伟,化柯,等. 典型藻型湖湾中溶解有机质及其生物可降解性的时空变化[J]. 环境科学,2025,46(3):1406−1416
WU Yuanqiang,JIN Wei,HUA Ke,et al. Spatial and temporal variation of dissolved organic matter and its biodegradability in typical algal bay[J]. Environmental Science,2025,46(3):1406−1416
[36] QIN Xiaoquan,YAO Bo,JIN Liang,et al. Characterizing soil dissolved organic matter in typical soils from China using fluorescence EEM–PARAFAC and UV–visible absorption[J]. Aquatic Geochemistry,2020,26(1):71−88.
[37] 王志鹏,车子良,马新雨,等. 酶促反应动力学教学刍议:米氏方程衍生公式与图像[J]. 化学教育(中英文),2021,42(8):105−110
WANG Zhipeng,CHE Ziliang,MA Xinyu,et al. Discussion on teaching enzyme kinetics:Plots of Michaelis–Menten equation derivatives and their figures[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Education,2021,42(8):105−110
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons