•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Authors

LIU Tong, School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology on Coal and Rock Dynamic Disaster Prevention and Control National Mine Safety Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, ChinaFollow
JIAO Baizhuo, School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology on Coal and Rock Dynamic Disaster Prevention and Control National Mine Safety Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
LIN Baiquan, School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology on Coal and Rock Dynamic Disaster Prevention and Control National Mine Safety Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
SANG Shuxun, School of Mineral Resource and Geoscience, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
YANG Wei, School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology on Coal and Rock Dynamic Disaster Prevention and Control National Mine Safety Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
LIU Shiqi, School of Mineral Resource and Geoscience, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
LIU Ting, School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology on Coal and Rock Dynamic Disaster Prevention and Control National Mine Safety Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
LI He, School of Resource, Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
YANG Mingxing, School of Public Administration, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

Abstract

Objective and Method The diffusivity of methane (CH4) in coal seams significantly influences the surface extraction of coalbed methane (CBM) and underground gas drainage. However, the visualized characterization of the diffusion and migration processes of CH4 in coals remains challenging. To address this issue, this study systematically demonstrated the similarity between krypton (Kr) and CH4 in their adsorption and diffusion behavior in coals. Utilizing Kr—a gas with high X-ray attenuation—as a tracer substitute for CH4, this study achieved the transparent observation of the dynamic gas migration process in low-porosity, low-permeability, and heterogeneous coals using a self-developed experimental system of 4D visualization via in situ computed tomography (CT). Based on the three-dimensional nanopore structure of the coal matrix, reconstructed using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), this study conducted numerical simulations of CH4 diffusion within actual nanopores. Accordingly, the key role of nano-scale pore-throat structures in controlling gas migration was revealed.Results and Conclusions Low-permeability matrix zones were widely distributed in the low-porosity, low-permeability coals, significantly hindering CH4 diffusion. Pore fracture in the low-permeability matrix zones occurred as microfractures and micro- and nano-scale pore clusters. Consequently, Kr diffused and migrated from fractures into the low-permeability matrix at extremely low rates, exhibiting heterogeneous, step-wise diffusion. The low-permeability matrix featured narrow nano-scale pore throats (diameters: <30 nm mostly) and poor interpore connectivity (coordination numbers: 3-5). These narrow pore throats led to abrupt drops in the CH4 concentration curves. As the pore diameter decreased, the Knudsen diffusion effect intensified, resulting in significantly decreasing effective diffusion coefficients and notably increasing contribution rates of surface diffusion. Under a pore diameter of 7 nm, the ratio of surface to bulk diffusion coefficients reached up to 0.24, with surface diffusion gradually predominating in gas migration within micropores. Within the complex micropore clusters in the low-permeability matrix, the movement of gas molecules was strongly constrained by the interaction potential between them and pore walls. This phenomenon further increased the diffusion resistance, leading to a step-wise and sluggish CH4 diffusion behavior. In future research, it is recommended to develop an in situ CT experimental platform that incorporates multi-process coupling of adsorption, desorption, seepage, and displacement by integrating advanced dynamic 4D visualization via dynamic CT. This will enable transparent visualization and precise characterization of dynamic CH4 diffusion patterns under varying stresses induced by engineering disturbance, thereby providing deep insights into the trans-scale migration mechanisms of CH4 during CBM recovery and gas drainage.

Keywords

CH4 diffusion, krypton(Kr), low porosity and low permeability, coal matrix, nanopore, in situ computed tomography(CT), 4D visualization

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.12.0896

Reference

[1] 桑树勋,刘世奇,韩思杰,等. 中国煤炭甲烷管控与减排潜力[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):159−175

SANG Shuxun,LIU Shiqi,HAN Sijie,et al. Coal methane control and its emission reduction potential in China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(1):159−175

[2] ZHAO Changxin,CHENG Yuanping,LI Wei,et al. A theoretical investigation of coal fracture evolution with hydrostatic pressure and its validation by CT[J]. Natural Resources Research,2024,33(5):2237−2260.

[3] 林柏泉,杨威,刘统. 深部高突煤层典型特征、诱突机制及防治对策[J]. 煤炭学报,2025,50(1):311−325

LIN Baiquan,YANG Wei,LIU Tong. Typical characteristics of deep coal seams with high outburst risk,outburst inducing mechanism and prevention measures[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2025,50(1):311−325

[4] ZHAO Changxin,CHENG Yuanping,LI Wei,et al. Critical stress related to coalbed methane migration pattern:Model development and experimental validation[J]. Energy,2023,284:128681.

[5] 赵伟,程远平,王凯. 煤中瓦斯扩散理论与应用[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2020.

[6] 李志强,刘勇,许彦鹏,等. 煤粒多尺度孔隙中瓦斯扩散机理及动扩散系数新模型[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(3):633−643

LI Zhiqiang,LIU Yong,XU Yanpeng,et al. Gas diffusion mechanism in multi–scale pores of coal particles and new diffusion model of dynamic diffusion coefficient[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(3):633−643

[7] 袁军伟. 颗粒煤瓦斯扩散时效特性研究[D]. 北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2014.

YUAN Junwei. Study on time–related characteristics of gas diffusion from particles coal[D]. Beijing:China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing),2014.

[8] RAMANDI H L,MOSTAGHIMI P,ARMSTRONG R T,et al. Porosity and permeability characterization of coal:A micro–computed tomography study[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,154:57−68.

[9] WITHJACK E M. Computed tomography for rock–property determination and fluid–flow visualization[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation,1988,3(4):696−704.

[10] GHOUS A,SENDEN T J,SOK R M,et al. 3D characterisation of microporosity in carbonate cores[C]//SPWLA Middle East Regional Symposium. Abu Dhabi:Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts (SPWLA),2007:SPWLA–MERS–2007–E.

[11] LU X,MIAO P,WATSON A T,et al. X–ray computed tomography studies of gas storage and transport in Devonian shales[J]. AIChE Journal,1994,40(7):1246−1253.

[12] 石钰,马玉华,李树刚,等. 基于CT扫描技术的煤样三维重构及气体表观渗透率研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2024,51(1):27−35

SHI Yu,MA Yuhua,LI Shugang,et al. Three–dimensional reconstruction of coal based on CT scan technology and the study on gas apparent permeability[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2024,51(1):27−35

[13] WATSON A T,MUDRA J. Characterization of Devonian shales with X–ray computed tomography[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation,1994,9(3):209−212.

[14] VEGA B,DUTTA A,KOVSCEK A R. CT imaging of low–permeability,dual–porosity systems using high X–ray contrast gas[J]. Transport in Porous Media,2014,101(1):81−97.

[15] TIDWELL V C,MEIGS L C,CHRISTIAN–FREAR T,et al. Effects of spatially heterogeneous porosity on matrix diffusion as investigated by X–ray absorption imaging[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,42(2/3/4):285−302.

[16] 张官亮,卢博文,苏金长,等. 利用CT技术研究层内非均质储层窜流机理[J]. 非常规油气,2025,12(5):51−57

ZHANG Guanliang,LU Bowen,SU Jinzhang,et al. Experimental study on channeling mechanism of intra–layer heterogeneous reservoir by CT scanning[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2025,12(5):51−57

[17] KOESTEL J,LARSBO M. Imaging and quantification of preferential solute transport in soil macropores[J]. Water Resources Research,2014,50(5):4357−4378.

[18] FOGDEN A,OLSON T,CHENG Qianhao,et al. Dynamic micro–CT imaging of diffusion in unconventionals[C]//SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. San Antonio:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2015:URTEC–2154822–MS.

[19] CAVÉ L,AL T,XIANG Yan,et al. A technique for estimating one–dimensional diffusion coefficients in low–permeability sedimentary rock using X–ray radiography:Comparison with through–diffusion measurements[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2009,103(1/2):1−12.

[20] GUERRERO–ACONCHA U,KANTZAS A. Diffusion of hydrocarbon gases in heavy oil and bitumen[C]//Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Cartagena de Indias:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2009:SPE–122783– MS.

[21] LIU Yu,TENG Ying,LU Guohuan,et al. Experimental study on CO2 diffusion in bulk n–decane and n–decane saturated porous media using micro–CT[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria,2016,417:212−219.

[22] ZHANG Miao,CHAKRABORTY N,KARPYN Z,et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of diffusion and sorption kinetics effects in Marcellus shale gas transport[C]//SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference. Galveston:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2019:SPE–193843–MS.

[23] ZHANG Yulai,MOSTAGHIMI P,FOGDEN A,et al. Time–lapsed visualization and characterization of shale diffusion properties using 4D X–ray microcomputed tomography[J]. Energy & Fuels,2018,32(3):2889−2900.

[24] ZHANG Yulai,MOSTAGHIMI P,ARMSTRONG R T. Multiscale characterization of shale diffusivity using time–lapsed X–ray computed tomography and pore–level simulations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,182:106271.

[25] ZHANG Yulai,MOSTAGHIMI P,FOGDEN A,et al. Local diffusion coefficient measurements in shale using dynamic micro–computed tomography[J]. Fuel,2017,207:312−322.

[26] 陈彬,武山,方随,等. 甲烷与氪共吸附条件下脱附行为的实验研究[J]. 低温与特气,2020,38(3):12−16

CHEN Bin,WU Shan,FANG Sui,et al. Study on the desorption behaviors of methane and krypton under co–adsorption conditions[J]. Low Temperature and Specialty Gases,2020,38(3):12−16

[27] BERENS A R,HOPFENBERG H B. Diffusion of organic vapors at low concentrations in glassy PVC,polystyrene,and PMMA[J]. Journal of Membrane Science,1982,10(2/3):283−303.

[28] LU Xiaochun,PEPIN G P,MOSS R M,et al. Determination of gas storage in Devonian shales with X–ray–computed tomography[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Washington,D. C:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1992:SPE–24810–MS.

[29] 国家安全生产监督管理总局. 煤矿瓦斯抽放规范:AQ 1027–2006[S]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,2006.

[30] LIU Tong,LIN Baiquan,SANG Shuxun,et al. Control mechanisms of macromolecular compositions and structures of coals on the evolution of nanopores during coalification[J]. Energy & Fuels,2024,38(14):13002−13018.

[31] ZHANG Liehui,SHAN Baochao,ZHAO Yulong,et al. Review of micro seepage mechanisms in shale gas reservoirs[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2019,139:144−179.

[32] SONG Haosheng,LI Bobo,YE Pingping,et al. A shale apparent gas diffusion model under the influence of adsorption effects to analyze microscopic gas diffusion behavior[J]. Physics of Fluids,2024,36(7):072021.

[33] WU Keliu,CHEN Zhangxin,LI Xiangfang,et al. A model for multiple transport mechanisms through nanopores of shale gas reservoirs with real gas effect–adsorption–mechanic coupling[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2016,93:408−426.

[34] SHI Yu,LIN Baiquan,LIU Ting,et al. Study on the influence of stress constraint conditions on multi–scale gas emission characteristics in in situ coal[J]. Energy,2024,290:130160.

[35] HUANG Meihua,HAN Dong,WU Yifan,et al. Study on the mechanism of gas diffusion in coal particles under the coupled effects of gas pressure and temperature[J]. ACS Omega,2025,10(1):1780−1788.

[36] 吴克柳,陈掌星. 页岩气纳米孔气体传输综述[J]. 石油科学通报,2016,1(1):91−127

WU Keliu,CHEN Zhangxing. Review of gas transport in nanopores in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin,2016,1(1):91−127

[37] HE Jiahao,LIN Baiquan,LIU Tong,et al. Study on the characteristics of coal pore structure changes during hot flue gas displacement and their impact on the gas displacement effect[J]. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment,2025,42:100673.

[38] PENG Zhigao,LIU Shenggui,LI Yingjun,et al. Pore–scale lattice Boltzmann simulation of gas diffusion–adsorption kinetics considering adsorption–induced diffusivity change[J]. Energies,2020,13(18):4927.

[39] ZHANG Xiaoyu,ZHANG Runxu,KANG Tianhe,et al. Experimental and mechanistic research on methane adsorption in anthracite modified by electrochemical treatment using selected electrode materials[J]. Scientific Reports,2019,9:17163.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.