Investigating surface-borehole transient electromagnetic responses from veined orebodies considering induced polarization effects

Authors

LI Jianhui, School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, ChinaFollow
WANG Yao, School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China
WANG Wenchuang, School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China
XIE Shaojian, School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China
ZHU Siwei, School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China

Abstract

Objective The observational data derived using the surface-borehole transient electromagnetic (TEM) method tend to feature complex curve morphologies, a problem posing significant challenges to data processing and interpretation. This study aims to ascertain the mechanisms behind the generation of such complex responses using forward modeling.Methods Using the vector finite element-based spectral method and the Cole-Cole model, this study developed a 3D forward modeling technique incorporating the induced polarization (IP) effect. By constructing a typical theoretical model of low-resistivity veined orebodies, it systematically analyzed the electromotive force (EMF) responses excited by transmitter loops at different orientations. Results and Conclusions The results indicate that the induced EMF curves from surface-borehole TEM responses were characterized by complex morphologies, with multiple sign reversals commonly observed. These characteristics were jointly controlled by the relative locations between transmitter loops and survey points, the resistivity contrast between veined orebodies and surrounding rocks, and the IP effect. The sign reversals in the late delay stage arose primarily from the individual or combined effects of the IP effect and the resistivity contrast between veined orebodies and surrounding rocks, representing a significant indicator for identifying concealed veined orebodies. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the mechanistic analysis and geological interpretation of complex TEM responses.

Keywords

transient electromagnetic (TEM) method, surface-borehole configuration, 3D forward modeling, induced polarization (IP) effect, veined orebody

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.06.0422

Recommended Citation

LI Jianhui, WANG Yao, WANG Wenchuang, et al. (2025) "Investigating surface-borehole transient electromagnetic responses from veined orebodies considering induced polarization effects," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 11, Article 3.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.06.0422
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss11/3

Reference

[1] 孙怀凤，张莹莹，赵友超，等. 钻孔瞬变电磁法研究现状综述[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(7)：85−97.

SUN Huaifeng，ZHANG Yingying，ZHAO Youchao，et al. Present study situation review of borehole transient electromagnetic method[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(7)：85−97.

[2] CHEN Weiying，KHAN M Y，XUE Guoqiang. Response of surface–to–borehole SOTEM method on 2D earth[J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering，2017，14(4)：987−997.

[3] 苏本玉，于景邨，王扬州，等. 顶板离层水地–孔瞬变电磁响应特征及应用[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2023，40(3)：572−577.

SU Benyu，YU Jingcun，WANG Yangzhou，et al. Characteristics and application of ground–borehole transient electromagnetic response to coal seam roof separated layer water[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering，2023，40(3)：572−577.

[4] 孟庆鑫，潘和平. 地–井瞬变电磁响应特征数值模拟分析[J]. 地球物理学报，2012，55(3)：1046−1053.

MENG Qingxin，PAN Heping. Numerical simulation analysis of surface–hole TEM responses[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics，2012，55(3)：1046−1053.

[5] 李建慧，刘树才，焦险峰，等. 地–井瞬变电磁法三维正演研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2015，50(3)：556−564.

LI Jianhui，LIU Shucai，JIAO Xianfeng，et al. Three–dimensional forward modeling for surface–borehole transient electromagnetic method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting，2015，50(3)：556−564.

[6] 徐正玉，杨海燕，邓居智，等. 基于异常场的地–井瞬变电磁法正演研究[J]. 物探与化探，2015，39(6)：1176−1182.

XU Zhengyu，YANG Haiyan，DENG Juzhi，et al. Research on forward simulation of down–hole TEM based on the abnormal field[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration，2015，39(6)：1176−1182.

[7] 武军杰，李貅，智庆全，等. 电性源地–井瞬变电磁法三分量响应特征分析[J]. 地球物理学进展，2017，32(3)：1273−1278.

WU Junjie，LI Xiu，ZHI Qingquan，et al. Analysis of three component TEM response characteristic of electric source dill hole TEM[J]. Progress in Geophysics，2017，32(3)：1273−1278.

[8] 陈卫营，韩思旭，薛国强. 电性源地–井瞬变电磁法全分量响应特性与探测能力分析[J]. 地球物理学报，2019，62(5)：1969−1980.

CHEN Weiying，HAN Sixu，XUE Guoqiang. Analysis on the full–component response and detectability of electric source surface–to–borehole TEM method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics，2019，62(5)：1969−1980.

[9] WANG Luyuan，YIN Changchun，LIU Yunhe，et al. Three–dimensional forward modeling for the SBTEM method using an unstructured finite–element method[J]. Applied Geophysics，2021，18(1)：101−116.

[10] LI Haojin，MAO Yurong，WANG Xinyu，et al. Characterization of surface–borehole transient electromagnetic response in electrical anisotropic media[J]. Minerals，2023，13(5)：674.

[11] 张杰. 地–井瞬变电磁异常特征分析及矢量交会解释方法研究[D]. 北京：中国地质大学(北京)，2009.

ZHANG Jie. Analysis of anomalous character and study vector intersection for downhole transient electromagnetic method[D]. Beijing：China University of Geosciences (Beijing)，2009.

[12] DAI Xueping，CHENG Lizhen，MARESCHAL J C，et al. New method for denoising borehole transient electromagnetic data with discrete wavelet transform[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics，2019，168：41−48.

[13] 苏超，姚伟华，李明星. 地孔瞬变电磁超前探测异常体定位技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2021，49(7)：154−161.

SU Chao，YAO Weihua，LI Mingxing. Anomaly body advance detection technology of down–hole transient electromagnetic[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2021，49(7)：154−161.

[14] 武军杰，李貅，智庆全，等. 电性源地–井瞬变电磁全域视电阻率定义[J]. 地球物理学报，2017，60(4)：1595−1605.

WU Junjie，LI Xiu，ZHI Qingquan，et al. Full field apparent resistivity definition of borehole TEM with electric source[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics，2017，60(4)：1595−1605.

[15] WANG Luyuan，LIU Yunhe，YIN Changchun，et al. Three–dimensional dual–mesh inversions for sparse surface–to–borehole TEM data[J]. Remote Sensing，2023，15(7)：1845.

[16] 张杰，邓晓红，郭鑫，等. 地–井TEM在危机矿山深部找矿中的应用实例[J]. 物探与化探，2013，37(1)：30−34.

ZHANG Jie，DENG Xiaohong，GUO Xin，et al. Typical cases of applying borehole TEM to deep prospecting in crisis mines[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration，2013，37(1)：30−34.

[17] 杨毅，邓晓红，王丽妍，等. 地–井TEM典型特征分析与异常解释：以新疆白石泉铜镍矿zk506孔为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2018，46(4)：186−190.

YANG Yi，DENG Xiaohong，WANG Liyan，et al. Typical characteristics analysis and anomalies interpretation of borehole TEM：Taking Xinjiang Baishiquan Cu–Ni ore zk506 borehole as an example[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2018，46(4)：186−190.

[18] ZHI Qingquan，WU Junjie，WANG Xingchun，et al. Deep anomaly localization using surface–borehole TEM and its application in the Wulong Gold deposit[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics，2025，232：105577.

[19] LEE T. Transient electromagnetic response of a polarizable ground[J]. Geophysics，1981，46(7)：1037−1041.

[20] ZHOU Fuhao，GAO Shuheng，LIU Rui，et al. On the coupling mechanism between vortex and polarization currents with consideration of transmitting–current waveforms：Insights from forward modelling[J]. Geophysical Journal International，2025，242(1)：ggaf179.

[21] DIAS C A. Analytical model for a polarizable medium at radio and lower frequencies[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research，1972，77(26)：4945−4956.

[22] ZHDANOV M. Generalized effective–medium theory of induced polarization[J]. Geophysics，2008，73(5)：F197−F211.

[23] COLE K S，COLE R H. Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics，1941，9(4)：341−351.

[24] PELTON W H，WARD S H，HALLOF P G，et al. Mineral discrimination and removal of inductive coupling with multifrequency IP[J]. Geophysics，1978，43(3)：588−609.

[25] FLIS M F，NEWMAN G A，HOHMANN G W. Induced–polarization effects in time–domain electromagnetic measurements[J]. Geophysics，1989，54(4)：514−523.

[26] QI Youzheng，EL–KALIOUBY H，REVIL A，et al. Three–dimensional modeling of frequency– and time–domain electromagnetic methods with induced polarization effects[J]. Computers & Geosciences，2019，124：85−92.

[27] CAO Huake，ZHOU Jianmei，XIE Jianghai，et al. Model order reduction method for 3–D transient electromagnetic modeling with induced polarization effects[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing，2024，62：2006811.

[28] MARCHANT D，HABER E，OLDENBURG D W. Three–dimensional modeling of IP effects in time–domain electromagnetic data[J]. Geophysics，2014，79(6)：E303−E314.

[29] CAI Hongzhu，HU Xiangyun，XIONG Bin，et al. Finite–element time–domain modeling of electromagnetic data in general dispersive medium using adaptive Padé series[J]. Computers & Geosciences，2017，109：194−205.

[30] JI Yanju，WU Yanqi，GUAN Shanshan，et al. 3D numerical modeling of induced–polarization electromagnetic response based on the finite–difference time–domain method[J]. Geophysics，2018，83(6)：E385−E398.

[31] ZHANG Xinchong，YIN Changchun，WANG Luyuan，et al. 3–D time–domain airborne EM forward modeling with IP effect based on implicit difference discretization of Caputo operator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing，2022，60：5924110.

[32] SHU Chenchen，QI Yanfu，YANG Shuangyan，et al. 3–D forward modeling of semi–airborne TEM method with IP effect based on goal–oriented adaptive finite element algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing，2024，62：5926211.

[33] ZHAO Qi，SUN Huaifeng，LIU Shangbin，et al. A fast and efficient method for 3–D transient electromagnetic modeling considering IP effect[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing，2024，62：5912918.

[34] LI Jianhui，FARQUHARSON C G，HU Xiangyun. 3D vector finite–element electromagnetic forward modeling for large loop sources using a total–field algorithm and unstructured tetrahedral grids[J]. Geophysics，2017，82(1)：E1−E16.

[35] JIN Jianming. The finite element method in electromagnetics[M]. Hoboken：Wiley–IEEE Press，2002.

[36] AMESTOY P R，GUERMOUCHE A，L’EXCELLENT J Y，et al. Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems[J]. Parallel Computing，2006，32(2)：136−156.

[37] ANDERSON W L. Fourier cosine and sine transforms using lagged convolutions in double–precision (subprograms DLAGF0/DLAGF1)[Z]. U. S. Geological Survey，1983.

[38] SEIDEL M，TEZKAN B. 1D Cole–Cole inversion of TEM transients influenced by induced polarization[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics，2017，138：220−232.

[39] 景旭，曹华科，周建美，等. 树网格离散优化三维瞬变电磁有限体积正演算法[J]. 地球物理学报，2023，66(8)：3524−3539.

JING Xu，CAO Huake，ZHOU Jianmei，et al. 3D finite–volume forward modeling of transient electromagnetic using octree meshes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics，2023，66(8)：3524−3539.

[40] DENTITH M，MUDGE S T. Geophysics for the mineral exploration geoscientist[M]. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press，2014.