Numerical simulations of dynamic rock damage under laser-induced shock waves

Authors

XU Yuelin, School of Intelligent Equipment, Suzhou Vocational Institute of Industrial Technology, Suzhou 215104, ChinaFollow
QIN Enwei, School of Intelligent Equipment, Suzhou Vocational Institute of Industrial Technology, Suzhou 215104, ChinaFollow
LI Wei, School of Intelligent Equipment, Suzhou Vocational Institute of Industrial Technology, Suzhou 215104, China
WANG Ying, School of Intelligent Equipment, Suzhou Vocational Institute of Industrial Technology, Suzhou 215104, China

Abstract

Objective Traditional laser thermal rock breaking technologies suffer from high energy consumption and a limited damage depth. To overcome these challenges, this study proposed a novel mechanical rock breaking method based on high-pressure plasma shock waves induced by short pulsed lasers, aiming to transform a thermodynamics-dominated rock breaking mechanism into a dynamics-dominated mechanism. Methods and Results Under the Abaqus/Explicit explicit dynamics framework, this study constructed a finite element model to simulate the interactions between nanosecond laser-induced shock waves and rocks. The accurate loading of shock wave pressure in the spatial and temporal domains was achieved using the VDLOAD user subroutine. Under the typical parameter combination—a peak pressure of 3 GPa, a pulse width of 20 ns, and a spot diameter of 4 mm, this study systematically simulated and revealed the dynamic behavior of the propagation of laser-induced shock waves in rocks, along with the two-stage mechanisms of dynamic rock damage. Specifically, in the shock wave loading stage, an instantaneous high stress (Mises stress: up to 2 706 MPa) was generated on the rock surface; in the stress wave propagation stage, the reflection and superposition of the waves within rocks led to cumulative damage and ultimately rock material scaling. Furthermore, multiple comparative simulations were designed by systematically adjusting the peak pressure (1‒5 GPa), pulse width (20‒200 ns), and spot diameter (2‒6 mm). With the damage volume as the assessment metric, the sensitivity of these parameters to the rock-breaking effect was investigated. The results reveal that under the typical parameter combination, a single laser shock led to the formation of a nearly conical damage zone on the rock surface, with a diameter of 4.3 mm, a depth of 5.8 mm, and a damage volume of 27.8 mm³. The parameter sensitivity analysis indicates that the peak pressure exhibited a limited impact on the damage volume (increase rate: below 5.5%). In contrast, the pulse width and spot diameter exerted significant influence, representing dominant factors controlling the rock-breaking efficiency. Conclusions The rock-breaking efficiency of laser-induced shock waves depends predominantly on the spatiotemporal distribution and control of the stress wave energy. The collaborative optimization of the pulse width and spot diameter can effectively regulate the rock damage under similar single-pulse energy, thereby achieving low energy consumption and high efficiency in rock breaking. Overall, this study provides a novel approach for the exploitation of deep hard rock resources.

Keywords

pulsed laser shock, rock, dynamic damage, explicit dynamics

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.08.0583

Recommended Citation

XU Yuelin, QIN Enwei, LI Wei, et al. (2025) "Numerical simulations of dynamic rock damage under laser-induced shock waves," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 11, Article 12.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.08.0583
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss11/12

Reference

[1] 祝效华，李瑞，刘伟吉，等. 深层页岩气水平井高效破岩提速技术发展现状[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)，2023，45(4)：1−18.

ZHU Xiaohua，LI Rui，LIU Weiji，et al. Development status of high–efficiency rock–breaking and speed–increasing technologies for deep shale gas horizontal wells[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition)，2023，45(4)：1−18.

[2] 谭宾，张斌，陶怀志. 深地勘探钻井技术现状及发展思考[J]. 钻采工艺，2024，47(2)：70−82.

TAN Bin，ZHANG Bin，TAO Huaizhi. Current situation and development of deep exploration key drilling technology[J]. Drilling & Production Technology，2024，47(2)：70−82.

[3] AKHTER M，TANG Xin，MALLAMS J，et al. Shockwave and plasma assisted rock cracking for geothermal drilling[J]. Renewable Energy，2025，241：122351.

[4] 赵海峰，杨紫怡，梁为，等. 深部煤层近井激光热裂机理及工艺参数优化[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：161−170.

ZHAO Haifeng，YANG Ziyi，LIANG Wei，et al. Mechanisms and technological parameter optimization of near–wellbore laser thermal fracturing for deep coal seams[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：161−170.

[5] 王义江，郁东旭，孙立鹏，等. 激光照射岩石热裂特性与裂隙分布研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2024，46(9)：1809−1819.

WANG Yijiang，YU Dongxu，SUN Lipeng，et al. Thermal–breaking characteristics and crack distribution of rock irradiated by laser beams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2024，46(9)：1809−1819.

[6] 郭辰光，孙瑜，岳海涛，等. 激光辐照热裂破岩规律及力学性能[J]. 煤炭学报，2022，47(4)：1734−1742.

GUO Chenguang，SUN Yu，YUE Haitao，et al. Law and mechanics of thermal cracking of rock by laser irradiation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2022，47(4)：1734−1742.

[7] 杨磊，杨本高，刘军军，等. 激光热裂砂岩可钻性及力学参数特征研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(8)：171−180.

YANG Lei，YANG Bengao，LIU Junjun，et al. Drillability and mechanical parameters of laser hot cracking sandstones[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(8)：171−180.

[8] 陈登红，袁永强，汤允迎. 微波技术辐射岩石实验探讨与成孔应用研究进展[J]. 科学技术与工程，2022，22(22)：9447−9455.

CHEN Denghong，YUAN Yongqiang，TANG Yunying. Research progress on experimental discussion and pore–forming application of microwave radiation rock[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2022，22(22)：9447−9455.

[9] 徐鹏，盛茂，田克钧，等. 磨料水射流破岩射孔孔道形成机制[J]. 爆炸与冲击，2025，45(8)：083305.

XU Peng，SHENG Mao，TIAN Kejun，et al. On formation mechanism of perforation channel during rock breaking by abrasive water jet[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves，2025，45(8)：083305.

[10] 齐志冲，吕旦，贺飞，等. 水刀辅助破岩技术的搭载及应用[J]. 隧道建设(中英文)，2023，43(8)：1404−1412.

QI Zhichong，LYU Dan，HE Fei，et al. Carrying and application of water jet cutter–assisted rock breaking technology[J]. Tunnel Construction，2023，43(8)：1404−1412.

[11] 祝效华，刘伟吉，张有建. 电极结构对高压电脉冲破岩机理的影响[J]. 特种油气藏，2025，32(3)：126−132.

ZHU Xiaohua，LIU Weiji，ZHANG Youjian. Effect of electrode structure on high–voltage electric pulse rock fragmentation mechanism[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs，2025，32(3)：126−132.

[12] 徐尤来，刘毅，黄仕杰，等. 脉冲电爆炸协同破岩技术研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束，2025，37(5)：055001.

XU Youlai，LIU Yi，HUANG Shijie，et al. Research on pulse electric explosion synergistic rock breaking technology[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams，2025，37(5)：055001.

[13] 姜昌浪，康民强，刘记立，等. 面向钻井提速的激光破岩机理研究进展[J]. 激光与光电子学进展，2023，60(17)：1700007.

JIANG Changlang，KANG Minqiang，LIU Jili，et al. Research progress in laser rock–breaking mechanism for drilling acceleration[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress，2023，60(17)：1700007.

[14] 官兵，李士斌，张立刚，等. 激光破岩技术的研究现状及进展[J]. 中国光学，2020，13(2)：229−248.

GUAN Bing，LI Shibin，ZHANG Ligang，et al. Research progress on rock removal by laser technology[J]. Chinese Optics，2020，13(2)：229−248.

[15] WONG L N Y，LIU Zihan. Thermal shock in rocks：A review of mechanisms，impacts，and applications in underground engineering[J/OL]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2025：1–26 [2025-03-22]. https：//doi. org/10. 1016/j. jrmge. 2025. 01. 036.

[16] 曹晓蝶，李莹华，杨玉奇，等. 激光冲击强化机理及其在航空构件上的应用[J]. 表面技术，2025，54(8)：1−15.

CAO Xiaodie，LI Yinghua，YANG Yuqi，et al. Laser shock processing mechanism and its applications in aeronautical components[J]. Surface Technology，2025，54(8)：1−15.

[17] MASSE J E，BARREAU G. Laser generation of stress waves in metal[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology，1995，70(2/3)：231−234.

[18] DING K，YE L. Laser shock peening performance and process simulation[M]. Boca Raton：CRC Press，2006.

[19] 覃恩伟，李文利，陆海峰，等. 低能量激光冲击强化马氏体不锈钢的有限元模拟研究[J]. 应用激光，2023，43(9)：84−92.

QIN Enwei，LI Wenli，LU Haifeng，et al. The finite element method simulation on the low–energy laser shock peening in martensitic stainless steel[J]. Applied Laser，2023，43(9)：84−92.

[20] MALEKI E，UNAL O，GUAGLIANO M，et al. The effects of shot peening，laser shock peening and ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification on the fatigue strength of Inconel 718[J]. Materials Science and Engineering：A，2021，810：141029.

[21] LUO Xuekun，DANG Ning，WANG Xin. The effect of laser shock peening，shot peening and their combination on the microstructure and fatigue properties of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy[J]. International Journal of Fatigue，2021，153：106465.

[22] QIN Enwei，LI Wenli，SHI Feifei，et al. The finite element analysis on the effects of overlapping rate in low–energy laser shock peening[J]. Advanced Materials Research，2023，1178：33−44.

[23] MONTROSS C S，FLOREA V，BOLGER J A. Laser–induced shock wave generation and shock wave enhancement in basalt[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，1999，36(6)：849−855.

[24] BERTHE L，FABBRO R，PEYRE P，et al. Shock waves from a water–confined laser–generated plasma[J]. Journal of Applied Physics，1997，82(6)：2826−2832.

[25] FAIRAND B P，CLAUER A H. Laser generation of high–amplitude stress waves in materials[J]. Journal of Applied Physics，1979，50(3)：1497−1502.

[26] HONG Xin，WANG Shengbo，GUO Dahao，et al. Confining medium and absorptive overlay：Their effects on a laser–induced shock wave[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering，1998，29(6)：447−455.

[27] SANO Y，OBATA M，KUBO T，et al. Retardation of crack initiation and growth in austenitic stainless steels by laser peening without protective coating[J]. Materials Science and Engineering：A，2006，417(1/2)：334−340.

[28] FABBRO R，PEYRE P，BERTHE L，et al. Physics and applications of laser–shock processing[J]. Journal of Laser Applications，1998，10(6)：265−279.

[29] BERTHE L，FABBRO R，PEYRE P，et al. Wavelength dependent of laser shock–wave generation in the water–confinement regime[J]. Journal of Applied Physics，1999，85(11)：7552−7555.