An analytical method for the desorption superposition effect in commingled production of coalbed methane and its application: A case study of the Xiaotun mine field in western Guizhou Province, China

Authors

GUO Chen, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China; Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Geological Support for Coal Green Exploitation, Xi’an 710054, China; Geological Research Institute for Coal Green Mining, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, ChinaFollow
JI Yan, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
ZHAO Chenyi, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
LU Lingling, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China; Aerophoto Grammetry and Remote Sensing Bureau, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Xi’an 710199, China
YU Xinhang, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
GAO Junzhe, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
LI Houqiang, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
ZHANG Xuyang, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
WANG Xiang, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
HE Hongbin, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
ZHANG Runhan, College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

Abstract

Objective The commingled production of coalbed methane (CBM) serves as a significant means to increase single-well production. However, production practices reveal that the commingled production of CBM exhibits complex and varied effects and controlling factors, facing technical challenges of identifying gas-producing contributions, predicting gas-producing potential, and optimizing pay interval combinations. The superposition of desorption for gas production among different coal seams determines whether high CBM production can be achieved using commingled production. Methods This study proposed an analytical method for the desorption superposition effect in the commingled production of CBM, involving determining desorption sequences, analyzing the superposition of desorption intervals and the matching of desorption stages, and predicting well-controlled desorption capacities. The proposed method was applied to the Xiaotun mine field in western Guizhou Province, China. Results and conclusions The results indicate that coal reservoirs in the Xiaotun mine field feature high adsorption capacities, low gas saturation, and low critical desorption pressures. The CBM pay intervals can be categorized into the upper and lower desorption systems. The upper desorption system manifested a desorption sequence of the No.6 upper, No.7, No.6 middle, and No.6 lower coal seams, while the lower desorption system displayed a desorption sequence of the No.34 and No.33 coal seams. Using changes in the working fluid during the production process as an indicator, this study analyzed the desorption processes of coal seams during the commingled production of CBM. The analytical results reveal that the synchronous desorption of the No.6 upper, No.7, No.6 middle, and No.6 lower coal seams can be achieved within a working fluid of 45 m and the synchronous desorption of the No.33 and No.34 coal seams can be gained within a working fluid of 92 m. Isothermal adsorption curves discovered the matching of the coal seams' desorption stages. The low critical desorption pressures allowed various coal seams to directly enter the sensitive desorption stage after desorption, suggesting high desorption efficiency and effective matching. This creates favorable conditions for high CBM production. However, limitations like insufficient pressure drop space and long drainage periods impose high requirements for coal seam stimulation and CBM production. The well-controlled desorption capacities and their time-varying curves indicate that gas desorption capacities peaked in the case of the synchronous desorption of all pay intervals within the respective desorption systems. In this case, the upper and the lower desorption systems yielded well-controlled desorption capacities of 378.09×10⁴ m³ (daily average: 4.20×10⁴ m³) and 199.11×10⁴ m³ (daily average: 1.08×10⁴ m³), respectively. Both desorption systems demonstrated satisfactory desorption superposition effect, each forming a favorable pay interval combination for the commingled production of CBM. The proposed method will provide a reference for identifying gas-producing contributions, predicting gas-producing potential, and optimizing pay interval combinations for the commingled production of CBM.

Keywords

commingled production of coalbed methane (CBM), desorption superposition, desorption stage, working fluid, production layer combination

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.10.0647

Recommended Citation

GUO Chen, JI Yan, ZHAO Chenyi, et al. (2025) "An analytical method for the desorption superposition effect in commingled production of coalbed methane and its application: A case study of the Xiaotun mine field in western Guizhou Province, China," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 1, Article 12.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.10.0647
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss1/12

Reference

[1] 郭涛. 贵州省织金区块岩脚向斜煤层气富集高产规律研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2021，49(2)：62−69.

GUO Tao. The enrichment and high yield law of CBM in Yanjiao syncline in Zhijin Block，Guizhou Province[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2021，49(2)：62−69.

[2] 郭晨，李瑞腾，秦勇，等. 煤层气井产出水演化路径及产量判识意义：以黔西地区织金区块为例[J]. 石油学报，2024，45(3)：517−530.

GUO Chen，LI Ruiteng，QIN Yong，et al. Evolution path of water produced from coalbed methane wells and its significance evolution path of water produced from coalbed methane wells and its significance in judging productivity：A case study of Zhijin Block in western Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2024，45(3)：517−530.

[3] 杨兆彪，高为，秦勇，等. 贵州深部煤层气地质特征及其资源潜力[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(增刊1)：348–361.

YANG Zhaobiao，GAO Wei，QIN Yong，et al. Geological characteristics and resource potential of deep coalbed methane in Guizhou[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(Sup.1)：348–361.

[4] 金军，杨兆彪，秦勇，等. 贵州省煤层气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 煤炭学报，2022，47(11)：4113−4126.

JIN Jun，YANG Zhaobiao，QIN Yong，et al. Progress，potential and prospects of CBM development in Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2022，47(11)：4113−4126.

[5] 杨兆彪，张争光，秦勇，等. 多煤层条件下煤层气开发产层组合优化方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2018，45(2)：297−304.

YANG Zhaobiao，ZHANG Zhengguang，QIN Yong，et al. Optimization methods of production layer combination for coalbed methane development in multi-coal seams[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2018，45(2)：297−304.

[6] 秦勇，吴建光，申建，等. 煤系气合采地质技术前缘性探索[J]. 煤炭学报，2018，43(6)：1504−1516.

QIN Yong，WU Jianguang，SHEN Jian，et al. Frontier research of geological technology for coal measure gas joint-mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2018，43(6)：1504−1516.

[7] 秦勇，吴建光，李国璋，等. 煤系气开采模式探索及先导工程示范[J]. 煤炭学报，2020，45(7)：2513−2522.

QIN Yong，WU Jianguang，LI Guozhang，et al. Patterns and pilot project demonstration of coal measures gas production[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2020，45(7)：2513−2522.

[8] 李国璋. 煤系气合采产层贡献及其预测模型：以鄂尔多斯盆地临兴—神府地区为例[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2020.

LI Guozhang. Contribution and prediction model of production strata for joint CMG mining：A case study from Linxing-Shenfu area in Ordos Basin，China[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2020.

[9] RIPEPI N，LOUK K，AMANTE J，et al. Determining coalbed methane production and composition from individual stacked coal seams in a multi-zone completed gas well[J]. Energies，2017，10(10)：1533.

[10] WANG Ziwei，QIN Yong. Physical experiments of CBM coproduction：A case study in Laochang district，Yunnan Province，China[J]. Fuel，2019，239：964−981.

[11] GUO Chen，QIN Yong，SUN Xueyang，et al. Physical simulation and compatibility evaluation of multi-seam CBM co-production：Implications for the development of stacked CBM systems[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2021，204：108702.

[12] 李炯，乌效鸣，李瑞，等. 煤层气井流体原位实时监测仪[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2015，43(3)：99−101.

LI Jiong，WU Xiaoming，LI Rui，et al. In-situ and real-time monitor of fluid in CBM well[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2015，43(3)：99−101.

[13] 吴川，乌效鸣，文国军，等. 基于电导率的煤层气气泡形态井下实时探测装置[J]. 煤炭学报，2015，40(9)：2137−2143.

WU Chuan，WU Xiaoming，WEN Guojun，et al. Real-time detection on CBM bubble based on electrical conductivity[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2015，40(9)：2137−2143.

[14] 秦勇，吴建光，张争光，等. 基于排采初期生产特征的煤层气合采地质条件分析[J]. 煤炭学报，2020，45(1)：241−257.

QIN Yong，WU Jianguang，ZHANG Zhengguang，et al. Analysis of geological conditions for coalbed methane co-production based on production characteristics in early stage of drainage[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2020，45(1)：241−257.

[15] 秦勇，张政，白建平，等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气井产出水源解析及合层排采可行性判识[J]. 煤炭学报，2014，39(9)：1892−1898.

QIN Yong，ZHANG Zheng，BAI Jianping，et al. Source apportionment of produced-water and feasibility discrimination of commingling CBM production from wells in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2014，39(9)：1892−1898.

[16] 郭晨，秦勇，夏玉成，等. 基于氢、氧同位素的煤层气合排井产出水源判识：以黔西地区比德–三塘盆地上二叠统为例[J]. 石油学报，2017，38(5)：493−501.

GUO Chen，QIN Yong，XIA Yucheng，et al. Source discrimination of produced water from CBM commingling wells based on the hydrogen and oxygen isotopes：A case study of the upper Permian，Bide-Santang Basin，western Guizhou area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2017，38(5)：493−501.

[17] 郭晨，秦勇，易同生，等. 基于生产特征曲线的煤层气合采干扰判识方法：以黔西地区织金区块为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2022，49(5)：977−986.

GUO Chen，QIN Yong，YI Tongsheng，et al. A method for identifying coalbed methane co-production interference based on production characteristic curves：A case study of the Zhijin Block，western Guizhou，China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2022，49(5)：977−986.

[18] 郭晨，秦勇，易同生，等. 煤层气合采地质研究进展述评[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(3)：42−57.

GUO Chen，QIN Yong，YI Tongsheng，et al. Review of the progress of geological research on coalbed methane co-production[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(3)：42−57.

[19] 杨兆彪，秦勇，张争光，等. 基于聚类分析的多煤层煤层气产层组合选择[J]. 煤炭学报，2018，43(6)：1641−1646.

YANG Zhaobiao，QIN Yong，ZHANG Zhengguang，et al. Production layer combination selection for coalbed methane development in multi-coal seams based on cluster analysis[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2018，43(6)：1641−1646.

[20] 申建，秦勇，张兵，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块煤系叠置含气系统及其兼容性[J]. 煤炭学报，2018，43(6)：1614−1619.

SHEN Jian，QIN Yong，ZHANG Bing，et al. Superimposing gas-bearing system in coal measures and its compatibility in Linxing block，east Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2018，43(6)：1614−1619.

[21] 张政，秦勇，WANG Guoxiong，等. 基于等温吸附实验的煤层气解吸阶段数值描述[J]. 中国科学：地球科学，2013，43(8)：1352−1358.

ZHANG Zheng，QIN Yong，WANG Guoxiong，et al. Numerical description of desorption stage of coalbed methane based on isothermal adsorption experiment[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae)，2013，43(8)：1352−1358.

[22] 郭晨. 多层叠置含煤层气系统及其开发模式优化—以黔西比德-三塘盆地上二叠统为例[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2015.

GUO Chen. Multi-layer superposed CBM system and drainage model optimization：In the case of the Upper Permian Bide-Santang Basin[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2015.

[23] 程泽虎，袁航，匡玉凤. 织金区块煤层气排采制度对产气特征的影响[J]. 中国煤层气，2021，18(5)：14−18.

CHENG Zehu，YUAN Hang，KUANG Yufeng. Influence of CBM drainage system on gas production characteristics in Zhijin Block[J]. China Coalbed Methane，2021，18(5)：14−18.

[24] 孟美辰，王运海，袁航，等. 织金区块煤层气井产气量影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2019，47(4)：187−192.

MENG Meichen，WANG Yunhai，YUAN Hang，et al. Influence factor analysis for coalbed methane production in Zhijin Block[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2019，47(4)：187−192.

[25] 秦勇，郑长东，王博洋，等. 基于等温吸附曲线的煤储层产气潜力定量评价：以黔北地区长岗矿区为例[J]. 天然气工业，2018，38(9)：40−47.

QIN Yong，ZHENG Changdong，WANG Boyang，et al. Quantitative evaluation on the gas production potential of coal reservoirs based on isothermal adsorption curves：A case study of the Changgang field，northern Guizhou，China[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2018，38(9)：40−47.