Predicting the “sweet spot” of deep coalbed methane based on resource conditions and fracability

Authors

ZHAO Zhigang, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, ChinaFollow
ZHU Xueshen, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, ChinaFollow
WANG Cunwu, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
ZHU Yanhe, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
LYU Yumin, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
CHEN Silu, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
QI Yu, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
TIAN Yongjing, CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China

Abstract

Objective China has made breakthroughs in the exploration of large-scale deep coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin. However, effectively converting the reserves of these reservoirs into production and achieving their efficient exploitation remain unclear. Methods Based on the geological, tests, fracturing, and production performance data, this study conducted research into the assessment of geological-engineering dual “sweet spots” of deep CBM in the southern Shenfu block by focusing on the resource conditions and fracability of deep CBM reservoirs. [Results and Conclusions] Key findings are as follows: (1) The study area hosts suitable coal-forming facies zones dominated by deltaic sediments. In this block, the Nos. 8 and 9 coal seams exhibit substantial thicknesses, stable distributions, and thermal maturity ranging from 0.7% to 1.5%, suggesting favorable hydrocarbon generation conditions. Furthermore, both coal seams feature well-developed pore-fracture systems, providing superior reservoir space for CBM. The roofs of both coal seams, composed primarily of mudstones with a high sealing capacity, are located in groundwater stagnation zones, creating favorable conditions for CBM preservation in the southern Shenfu block. With excellent gas-bearing properties, both coal seams show the coexistence of free gas and adsorbed gas. (2) This study characterizes the distributions of the brittleness, horizontal principal stress differences, and fractures of the coal seams using geophysical techniques that integrate logs and seismic data. Based on this, it constructs an indicator system for identifying the geological-engineering dual “sweet spots” of deep CBM, and accordingly, identifies three types of geological-engineering dual “sweet spots” in the southern Shenfu block: type I located in the eastern portion, type II in the west-central portion, and type III in the northwestern portion. (3) Considering the substantial burial depths, low porosity and permeability, and well-developed cleats and fractures of coal seams in the study area, this study develops a volume fracturing technique that centers on injection of a large volume of fracturing fluids at high rates, fracturing and proppant transport via slickwater of varying viscosities, high- intensity proppant injection, and propping of fractures on various scales. As indicated by the assessment of post-fracturing production tests, wells put into production in type I “sweet spots” have witnessed a rapid increase in CBM production, with stable production ranging from 7 000 to 8 000m³/d, peaking at approximately 8 000 m³/d. The results of this study have effectively guided and advanced both the selection of the optimal areas for the exploration and production of deep CBM in the Shenfu block and the implementation of plans for pilot test areas, thereby holding positive significance for the large-scale production capacity construction of deep CBM in the block.

Keywords

deep coalbed methane(CBM), accumulation characteristics, resources condition, fracturability, geological and engineering “dual sweet-spots”

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0042

Recommended Citation

ZHAO Zhigang, ZHU Xueshen, WANG Cunwu, et al. (2024) "Predicting the “sweet spot” of deep coalbed methane based on resource conditions and fracability," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 52: Iss. 8, Article 4.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0042
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol52/iss8/4

Reference

[1] 郭旭升，胡宗全，李双建，等. 深层—超深层天然气勘探研究进展与展望[J]. 石油科学通报，2023，8(4)：461−474.

GUO Xusheng，HU Zongquan，LI Shuangjian，et al. Progress and prospect of natural gas exploration and research in deep and ultra-deep strata[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin，2023，8(4)：461−474.

[2] 李勇，徐立富，张守仁，等. 深煤层含气系统差异及开发对策[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(2)：900−917.

LI Yong，XU Lifu，ZHANG Shouren，et al. Gas bearing system difference in deep coal seams and corresponded development strategy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(2)：900−917.

[3] 徐凤银，王成旺，熊先钺，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1764−1780.

XU Fengyin，WANG Chengwang，XIONG Xianyue，et al. Evolution law of deep coalbed methane reservoir formation and exploration and development practice in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1764−1780.

[4] 李曙光，王成旺，王红娜，等. 大宁–吉县区块深层煤层气成藏特征及有利区评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(9)：59−67.

LI Shuguang，WANG Chengwang，WANG Hongna，et al. Reservoir forming characteristics and favorable area evaluation of deep coalbed methane in Daning-Jixian Block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(9)：59−67.

[5] 熊先钺，闫霞，徐凤银，等. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1812−1826.

XIONG Xianyue，YAN Xia，XU Fengyin，et al. Analysis of multi-factor coupling control mechanism，desorption law and development effect of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1812−1826.

[6] 陈世达，汤达祯，侯伟，等. 深部煤层气地质条件特殊性与储层工程响应[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1993−2006.

CHEN Shida，TANG Dazhen，HOU Wei，et al. Geological particularity and reservoir engineering response of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1993−2006.

[7] 张懿，朱光辉，郑求根，等. 中国煤层气资源分布特征及勘探研究建议[J]. 非常规油气，2022，9(4)：1−8.

ZHANG Yi，ZHU Guanghui，ZHENG Qiugen，et al. Distribution characteristics of coalbed methane resources in China and recommendations for exploration research[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2022，9(4)：1−8.

[8] 刘建忠，朱光辉，刘彦成，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策：以临兴—神府区块为例[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1827−1839.

LIU Jianzhong，ZHU Guanghui，LIU Yancheng，et al. Breakthrough，future challenges and countermeasures of deep coalbed methane in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin：A case study of Linxing-Shenfu Block[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1827−1839.

[9] 黄道军，李新虎，刘燕，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部本溪组致密砂岩储层特征及有利层段优选[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2023，43(1)：109−118.

HUANG Daojun，LI Xinhu，LIU Yan，et al. Characteristics and favorable intervals selection of tight sandstone reservoirs in Benxi Formation，central-eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2023，43(1)：109−118.

[10] 李勇，吴鹏，高计县，等. 煤成气多层系富集机制与全含气系统模式：以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块为例[J]. 天然气工业，2022，42(6)：52−64.

LI Yong，WU Peng，GAO Jixian，et al. Multilayer coal-derived gas enrichment mechanism and whole gas bearing system model：A case study on the Linxing Block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2022，42(6)：52−64.

[11] 范萌萌，卜军，袁珍，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部延安组古环境恢复[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2023，43(5)：912−922.

FAN Mengmeng，BU Jun，YUAN Zhen，et al. Paleoenvironment restoration of Yan’an Formation in the central and eastern part of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2023，43(5)：912−922.

[12] 邵龙义，董大啸，李明培，等. 华北石炭—二叠纪层序–古地理及聚煤规律[J]. 煤炭学报，2014，39(8)：1725−1734.

SHAO Longyi，DONG Daxiao，LI Mingpei，et al. Sequence-paleogeography and coal accumulation of the Carboniferous Permian in the North China Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2014，39(8)：1725−1734.

[13] 孟选刚，徐帅康. 浅湖细粒沉积特征及砂体叠加样式：以鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系延长组为例[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2021，41(2)：307−315.

MENG Xuangang，XU Shuaikang. Sedimentary characteristics of fine-grained shallow lakes and superimposition patterns of sandbodies：A case study of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Northern Shaanxi，Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2021，41(2)：307−315.

[14] 尹帅，孙晓光，邬忠虎，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘上古生界构造演化及裂缝耦合控气作用[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版)，2022，53(9)：3724−3737.

YIN Shuai，SUN Xiaoguang，WU Zhonghu，et al. Coupling control of tectonic evolution and fractures on the Upper Paleozoic gas reservoirs in the northeastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology)，2022，53(9)：3724−3737.

[15] 徐凤银，张伟，李子玲，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地保德区块煤层气藏描述与提高采收率关键技术[J]. 天然气工业，2023，43(1)：96−112.

XU Fengyin，ZHANG Wei，LI Ziling，et al. Coalbed methane reservoir description and enhanced recovery technologies in Baode Block，Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2023，43(1)：96−112.

[16] 晋香兰，张培河，吴敏杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地低煤阶煤储层孔隙特征及地质意义[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2012，40(10)：22−26.

JIN Xianglan，ZHANG Peihe，WU Minjie. Pore features and geological significance of low rank coal reservoirs in Erdos Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2012，40(10)：22−26.

[17] 张慧，魏小燕，杨庆龙，等. 海相页岩储层矿物质孔隙的形貌–成因类型[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2018，46(4)：72−78.

ZHANG Hui，WEI Xiaoyan，YANG Qinglong，et al. The morphology-origin types of mineral pores in the marine shale reservoir[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2018，46(4)：72−78.

[18] 朱光辉，李本亮，李忠城，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘非常规天然气勘探实践及发展方向：以临兴–神府气田为例[J]. 中国海上油气，2022，34(4)：16−29.

ZHU Guanghui，LI Benliang，LI Zhongcheng，et al. Practices and development trend of unconventional natural gas exploration in eastern margin of Ordos Basin：Taking Linxing-Shenfu gas field as an example[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas，2022，34(4)：16−29.

[19] 张兵，李勇，贾雨婷，等. 薄—超薄煤层特征及天然气合层开发突破：以沁水盆地潘河区块为例[J]. 天然气工业，2023，43(10)：83−93.

ZHANG Bing，LI Yong，JIA Yuting，et al. Characteristics and commingled natural gas production breakthrough of thin and ultra-thin coal beds in the Panhe Block of the Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2023，43(10)：83−93.

[20] 康永尚，孙良忠，张兵，等. 中国煤储层渗透率主控因素和煤层气开发对策[J]. 地质论评，2017，63(5)：1401−1418.

KANG Yongshang，SUN Liangzhong，ZHANG Bing，et al. The controlling factors of coalbed reservoir permeability and CBM development strategy in China[J]. Geological Review，2017，63(5)：1401−1418.

[21] 李金平，潘军，李勇，等. 基于流动物质平衡理论的煤层气井定量化排采新方法[J]. 天然气工业，2023，43(6)：87−95.

LI Jinping，PAN Jun，LI Yong，et al. A new CBM well quantitative production method based on the flow material balance theory[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2023，43(6)：87−95.

[22] 张玉亭. 煤层分层地应力预测模型研究[J]. 非常规油气，2023，10(2)：115−120.

ZHANG Yuting. Prediction model study of coalbed layered in situ stress[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2023，10(2)：115−120.

[23] 李勇，汤达祯，许浩，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地柳林地区煤储层地应力场特征及其对裂隙的控制作用[J]. 煤炭学报，2014，39(增刊1)：164−168.

LI Yong，TANG Dazhen，XU Hao，et al. Characteristic of in situ stress field in Liulin area，Ordos Basin and its control on coal fractures[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2014，39(Sup.1)：164−168.

[24] 宋岩，柳少波，马行陟，等. 中高煤阶煤层气富集高产区形成模式与地质评价方法[J]. 地学前缘，2016，23(3)：1−9.

SONG Yan，LIU Shaobo，MA Xingzhi，et al. Research on formation model and geological evaluation method of the middle to high coal rank coalbed methane enrichment and high production area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers，2016，23(3)：1−9.

[25] 高建国，王林栋. 煤层气富集规律及影响因素[J]. 中国煤炭，2019，45(8)：96−99.

GAO Jianguo，WANG Lindong. Enrichment rules and influencing factors of coalbed methane[J]. China Coal，2019，45(8)：96−99.

[26] 王玫珠，王勃，孙粉锦，等. 沁水盆地煤层气富集高产区定量评价[J]. 天然气地球科学，2017，28(7)：1108−1114.

WANG Meizhu，WANG Bo，SUN Fenjin，et al. Quantitative evaluation of CBM enrichment and high yield of Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2017，28(7)：1108−1114.

[27] 王勃，姚红星，王红娜，等. 沁水盆地成庄区块煤层气成藏优势及富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2018，39(2)：366−372.

WANG Bo，YAO Hongxing，WANG Hongna，et al. Favorable and major geological controlling factors for coalbed methane accumulation and high production in the Chengzhuang Block，Qinshui Baisn[J]. Oil & Gas Geology，2018，39(2)：366−372.

[28] 侯海海，李强强，梁国栋，等. 准噶尔盆地南缘西山窑组与八道湾组煤层气成藏富集条件对比研究[J]. 非常规油气，2022，9(1)：18−24.

HOU Haihai，LI Qiangqiang，LIANG Guodong，et al. Comparative study of CBM accumulation conditions between the Xishanyao Formation and the Badaowan Formation in the Southern Junggar Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2022，9(1)：18−24.

[29] 陈跃，马东民，方世跃，等. 构造和水文地质条件耦合作用下煤层气富集高产模式[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2019，39(4)：644−655.

CHEN Yue，MA Dongmin，FANG Shiyue，et al. Enrichment and high-yield models of coalbed methane influenced by geologic structures and hydrologic conditions[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2019，39(4)：644−655.

[30] 竟亚飞，倪小明，张径硕，等. 不同水力压裂顺序下煤层气井组应力干扰效应研究：以沁水盆地柿庄南区块为例[J]. 地质与勘探，2023，59(6)：1336−1346.

JING Yafei, NI Xiaoming, ZHANG Jingshuo，et al. Stress interference effects of coalbed methane well groups under different hydraulic fracturing sequences: Taking the Shizhuangnan block in Qinshui Basin as an example[J]. Geology and Exploration，2023，59(6)：1336−1346.

[31] 孙粉锦，王勃，李梦溪，等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油学报，2014，35(6)：1070−1079.

SUN Fenjin，WANG Bo，LI Mengxi，et al. Major geological factors controlling the enrichment and high yield of coalbed methane in the Southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2014，35(6)：1070−1079.

[32] 李勇，徐立富，刘宇，等. 深部煤层气水赋存机制、环境及动态演化[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：40−51.

LI Yong，XU Lifu，LIU Yu，et al. Occurrence mechanism，environment and dynamic evolution of gas and water in deep coal seams[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：40−51.