Impacts of the caking property of tar-rich coals on their pore structure evolution and seepage during pyrolysis

Authors

CHANG Zhibing, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaFollow
WANG Chuchu, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
KUANG Wenhao, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
TANG Ying, CNOOC Gas & Power Group, Research & Development Center, Beijing 100028, China; China National Offshore Oil Corporation, Key Laboratory of Liquefied Natural Gas and Low Carbon Technology, Beijing 100028, China
WU Xiaodan, CNOOC Gas & Power Group, Research & Development Center, Beijing 100028, China
LIU Shuqin, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Abstract

Objective The in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coals stands as a technique whereby coal seams are heated underground to produce tar and gas products. During the in-situ pyrolysis, the injection of heating media and the production of tar and gas are affected by the pore structure and permeability of coal seams. Since pyrolysis of caking tar-rich coals is accompanied by the formation of colloids, the pore structure and permeability of caking tar-rich coals differ from those of non-caking tar-rich coals. Methods Caking tar-rich coals were pyrolyzed at 300, 400, 500, and 600 ℃. During the pyrolysis, the pore parameters of the semi-coke were tested using the saturated fluid method and nitrogen adsorption method, and the pore structure of the semi-coke was characterized using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Meanwhile, using equivalent pore network models established in this study, the laws of changes in parameters such as the pore number, pore radius, and coordination number were analyzed, and the seepage characteristics of high-temperature nitrogen in the pore network were simulated. Results and Conclusions The results revealed small numbers of fissures in the coal samples after the pyrolysis at 300 ℃, with a total porosity maintained at about 5%. After pyrolysis at temperatures ranging from 400 ℃ to 600 ℃, the total porosity gradually increased to about 50%, while micropores became more abundant only after degassing at 600 ℃. When the pyrolysis temperature rose from 300 ℃ to 400 ℃, the number of pores and throats increased significantly due to the formation and expansion of colloids, whereas the average pore and pore-throat radii were maintained at about 160 μm and 88 μm, respectively. As the pyrolysis temperature increased further from 400 ℃ to 600 ℃, the precipitation of volatile constituents promoted the pore connectivity. Accordingly, pores and throats gradually decreased in number, with equivalent radii trending upward in terms of probability distribution. Specifically, the average pore and pore-throat radii increased to 292.81 μm and 170.60 μm, respectively, and the average coordination number of pores increased from 5.82 to 6.60 (500 ℃) and 6.33 (600 ℃). The increasing porosity and coordination number led to a significant increase in the average simulated permeability of the semi-coke from 246.75 μm² to 1377.49 μm². The findings of this study can serve as a reference for the R&D of the in-situ pyrolysis process of caking tar-rich coals.

Keywords

tar-rich coal, pyrolysis, micro CT, 3D characterization, pore structure, permeability

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0048

Recommended Citation

CHANG Zhibing, WANG Chuchu, KUANG Wenhao, et al. (2024) "Impacts of the caking property of tar-rich coals on their pore structure evolution and seepage during pyrolysis," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 52: Iss. 7, Article 7.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0048
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol52/iss7/7

Reference

[1] 王双明，师庆民，王生全，等. 富油煤的油气资源属性与绿色低碳开发[J]. 煤炭学报，2021，46(5)：1365−1377.

WANG Shuangming，SHI Qingmin，WANG Shengquan，et al. Resource property and exploitation concepts with green and low-carbon of tar-rich coal as coal-based oil and gas[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2021，46(5)：1365−1377.

[2] 王双明，王虹，任世华，等. 西部地区富油煤开发利用潜力分析和技术体系构想[J]. 中国工程科学，2022，24(3)：49−57.

WANG Shuangming，WANG Hong，REN Shihua，et al. Potential analysis and technical conception of exploitation and utilization of tar-rich coal in Western China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE，2022，24(3)：49−57.

[3] 尚建选，张喻，闵楠，等. 陕西煤业化工集团煤化工产业高质量发展研究[J]. 中国煤炭，2022，48(8)：14−19.

SHANG Jianxuan，ZHANG Yu，MIN Nan，et al. Research on high-quality development of coal chemical industry in Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group[J]. China Coal，2022，48(8)：14−19.

[4] 付德亮，段中会，杨甫，等. 富油煤钻井式地下原位热解提取煤基油气资源的几个关键问题[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(4)：1759−1772.

FU Deliang，DUAN Zhonghui，YANG Fu，et al. Key problems in in situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal drilling for extraction of coal-based oil and gas resources[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(4)：1759−1772.

[5] 唐颖，吴晓丹，李乐忠，等. 富油煤原位热解地下加热技术及其高效工艺[J]. 洁净煤技术，2023，29(12)：42−50.

TANG Ying，WU Xiaodan，LI Lezhong，et al. Heating technology of in situ pyrolysis for tar-rich coal and its high efficiency process[J]. Clean Coal Technology，2023，29(12)：42−50.

[6] 毛崎森，王长安，侯育杰，等. 富油煤原位热解对流加热过程传热规律数值模拟[J]. 洁净煤技术，2023，29(8)：19−29.

MAO Qisen，WANG Chang’an，HOU Yujie，et al. Numerical simulation of heat transfer during in situ convection heating pyrolysis of tar-rich coal[J]. Clean Coal Technology，2023，29(8)：19−29.

[7] 董光顺，朱超凡，厉家宗，等. 黄陵矿区富油煤对流加热原位转化开发效果数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(4)：57−67.

DONG Guangshun，ZHU Chaofan，LI Jiazong，et al. Numerical simulation on development effect of tar-rich coal through in situ conversion by convective heating in Huangling Mining Area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(4)：57−67.

[8] 李改改，姜鹏飞，黄佳齐，等. 富油煤热解过程动力学参数变化规律研究[J]. 煤炭技术，2023，42(10)：52−56.

LI Gaigai，JIANG Pengfei，HUANG Jiaqi，et al. Study on change of kinetic parameters of tar-rich coal during pyrolysis[J]. Coal Technology，2023，42(10)：52−56.

[9] 张蕾，韩智坤，舒浩，等. 陕北富油煤低温热解提油基础特性[J]. 煤炭工程，2022，54(9)：124−128.

ZHANG Lei，HAN Zhikun，SHU Hao，et al. Basic characteristics of tar extraction in low temperature pyrolysis of tar-rich coal from Northen Shaanxi[J]. Coal Engineering，2022，54(9)：124−128.

[10] 师庆民，米奕臣，王双明，等. 富油煤热解流体滞留特征及其机制[J]. 煤炭学报，2022，47(3)：1329−1337.

SHI Qingmin，MI Yichen，WANG Shuangming，et al. Trap characteristic and mechanism of volatiles during pyrolysis of tar-rich coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2022，47(3)：1329−1337.

[11] 郭威，刘召，孙友宏，等. 富油煤原位热解开发地下体系封闭方法探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(1)：107−114.

GUO Wei，LIU Zhao，SUN Youhong，et al. Discussion on underground system sealing methods in in situ pyrolysis exploitation of tar-rich coal[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(1)：107−114.

[12] 王双明，孙强，胡鑫，等. 煤炭原位开发地质保障[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2024，44(1)：1−11.

WANG Shuangming，SUN Qiang，HU Xin，et al. Geological guarantee for in situ development of coal[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2024，44(1)：1−11.

[13] 申艳军，王旭，赵春虎，等. 榆神府矿区富油煤多尺度孔隙结构特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2021，49(3)：33−41.

SHEN Yanjun，WANG Xu，ZHAO Chunhu，et al. Experimental study on multi-scale pore structure characteristics of tar-rich coal in Yushenfu mining area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2021，49(3)：33−41.

[14] 黄笑乐，杨甫，韩磊，等. 富油煤(长焰煤)孔隙结构三维表征及渗流模拟[J]. 化工学报，2022，73(11)：5078−5087.

HUANG Xiaole，YANG Fu，HAN Lei，et al. 3D characterization of pore structure and seepage simulation of tar-rich coal (long flame coal)[J]. CIESC Journal，2022，73(11)：5078−5087.

[15] 耿济世，王双明，孙强，等. 富油煤热解特性及其孔裂隙结构演化规律[J/OL]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024：1–9[2024-04-18]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1155.P.20240416.0917.004.html.

GENG Jishi，WANG Shuangming，SUN Qiang，et al. Study on pyrolysis characteristics and pore-fracture evolutions of tar-rich coal[J/OL]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024：1–9[2024-04-18]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1155.P.20240416.0917.004.html.

[16] 李海琪，冯子军. 高温水蒸汽作用后长焰煤细观结构的显微CT研究[J]. 煤矿安全，2021，52(6)：47−51.

LI Haiqi，FENG Zijun. Micro CT study of microstructure of long flame coal after high temperature steam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines，2021，52(6)：47−51.

[17] 许涛，陈杰，伍永平，等. 富油煤地下热解过程中纳米孔隙结构特性演化规律[J/OL]. 煤炭学报，2024：1–11[2024-07-01]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1390.

XU Tao，CHEN Jie，WU Yongping，et al. The evolution law of nanopore properties during underground in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal[J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024：1–11[2024-07-01]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1390.

[18] 康志勤，李翔，杨涛，等. 基于传导、对流不同加热模式的油页岩孔隙结构变化的对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(11)：2565−2575.

KANG Zhiqin，LI Xiang，YANG Tao，et al. Comparisons of pore structures of oil shale upon conduction and convection heating[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(11)：2565−2575.

[19] 王磊，杨栋，康志勤. 高温水蒸汽作用后油页岩渗透特性及各向异性演化的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2021，40(11)：2286−2295.

WANG Lei，YANG Dong，KANG Zhiqin. Experimental study on permeability characteristics and anisotropy evolution of oil shale after high-temperature water vapor treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2021，40(11)：2286−2295.

[20] 李鹏，刘元杰，王会芳，等. 烟煤破黏技术研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术，2020，26(增刊1)：7−13.

LI Peng，LIU Yuanjie，WANG Huifang，et al. Research progress of bituminous coal viscosity breaking technology[J]. Clean Coal Technology，2020，26(Sup.1)：7−13.

[21] 臧立彬，崔虎锋，李庆春. 弱氧化气氛下烟煤热解特性及热解产物组成[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2020，48(5)：34−39.

ZANG Libin，CUI Hufeng，LI Qingchun. Pyrolysis characteristics and pyrolysis product composition of bituminous coal under weak oxidizing atmosphere[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2020，48(5)：34−39.

[22] 王毅，赵阳升，冯增朝. 长焰煤热解过程中孔隙结构演化特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(9)：1859−1866.

WANG Yi，ZHAO Yangsheng，FENG Zengchao. Study of evolution characteristics of pore structure during flame coal pyrolysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(9)：1859−1866.

[23] 张琦，解京选，田江漫，等. 热解条件对白音华褐煤半焦孔隙结构的影响[J]. 煤炭转化，2013，36(3)：1−4.

ZHANG Qi，XIE Jingxuan，TIAN Jiangman，et al. Effect of pyrolysis condition on the pore structure of baiyinhua coal char[J]. Coal Conversion，2013，36(3)：1−4.

[24] 胡召永，解桂林，郭志航，等. 热解温度对高水分印尼褐煤半焦孔隙特性及燃烧特性的影响[J]. 热力发电，2014，43(10)：74−78.

HU Zhaoyong，XIE Guilin，GUO Zhihang，et al. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on pore structure and combustion characteristics of high-moisture Indonesia lignite semi-coke[J]. Thermal Power Generation，2014，43(10)：74−78.

[25] 申春梅，吴少华，林伟刚，等. 煤拔头中低温快速热解烟煤半焦的孔隙结构[J]. 过程工程学报，2010，10(3)：522−529.

SHEN Chunmei，WU Shaohua，LIN Weigang，et al. Pore structure of low temperature and fast pyrolysis bituminous semi-char from coal topping process[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering，2010，10(3)：522−529.

[26] 赵世永，吴沛沛，李鑫，等. 神府煤中低温热解前后表面官能团和孔隙变化规律的研究[J]. 煤炭工程，2015，47(12)：114−117.

ZHAO Shiyong，WU Peipei，LI Xin，et al. Study on variation law of surface functional groups and pore of Shenfu coal after low-middle temperature pyrolysis[J]. Coal Engineering，2015，47(12)：114−117.

[27] 冯子军，赵阳升. 煤的热解破裂过程：孔裂隙演化的显微CT细观特征[J]. 煤炭学报，2015，40(1)：103−108.

FENG Zijun，ZHAO Yangsheng. Pyrolytic cracking in coal：Meso-characteristics of pore and fissure evolution observed by micro-CT[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2015，40(1)：103−108.

[28] 王双明，孙强，胡鑫，等. 不同气氛下富油煤受热裂隙演化及热解动力学参数变化[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2024，52(1)：15−24.

WANG Shuangming，SUN Qiang，HU Xin，et al. Fissure evolution and variation of pyrolysis kinetics parameters of tar-rich coal during heat treatment under different atmosphere[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2024，52(1)：15−24.

[29] 公维宽，王伟强. CT三维重构煤体结构及瓦斯渗流数值模拟[J]. 煤矿安全，2020，51(11)：19−23.

GONG Weikuan，WANG Weiqiang. Three-dimensional reconstruction of coal structure and numerical simulation of gas seepage by CT[J]. Safety in Coal Mines，2020，51(11)：19−23.

[30] 元永国，王瑞，范楠. 基于micro-CT扫描的孔裂隙结构表征及渗流模拟[J]. 煤矿安全，2021，52(8)：15−20.

YUAN Yongguo，WANG Rui，FAN Nan. Characterization of pore-fracture structure and seepage simulation based on micro-CT scanning[J]. Safety in Coal Mines，2021，52(8)：15−20.

[31] 唐颖，吴晓丹，孙景耀，等. 黏结性富油煤热解油气析出规律及物性演变特征[J]. 洁净煤技术，2024，30(1)：58−65.

TANG Ying，WU Xiaodan，SUN Jingyao，et al. Tar and gas production rules and physical property evolution characteristics during the pyrolysis of cohesive tar-rich coal[J]. Clean Coal Technology，2024，30(1)：58−65.

[32] 石钰，马玉华，李树刚，等. 基于CT扫描技术的煤样三维重构及气体表观渗透率研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保，2024，51(1)：27−35.

SHI Yu，MA Yuhua，LI Shugang，et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of coal based on CT scan technology and the study on gas apparent permeability[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection，2024，51(1)：27−35.

[33] 车禹恒. 基于X-ray μCT扫描的煤孔隙瓦斯微观渗流各向异性特征研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保，2021，48(4)：12−17.

CHE Yuheng. Research on the anisotropic characteristics of gas microscopic seepage in coal pores based on X-ray μCT scanning[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection，2021，48(4)：12−17.