Numerical simulations of the evolutionary patterns of multi-physical fields during the in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coals

Authors

YANG Fu, Shaanxi Coal Geology Group Co. Ltd., Xi’an 710021, China; Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi’an 710021, ChinaFollow
CHENG Xiangqiang, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
LI Mingjie, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaFollow
WU Zhiqiang, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
WEI Jinjia, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
CAO Husheng, Shaanxi Coal Geology Group Co. Ltd., Xi’an 710021, China; Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi’an 710021, China

Abstract

Objective The in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coals, an emerging technology for coal resource utilization characterized by cleanliness, high efficiency, and safety, is still in its initial development stage. This technology is greatly influenced by the evolutionary patterns of multi-physical fields and critical process parameters. Methods A numerical simulation model involving multi-physical fields was established by coupling fluid flow, heat transfer, and chemical reactions, and its reliability was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results with the pyrolysis experimental results of cylindrical coal samples. Based on the pilot test conditions, the impacts of permeability, heat-carrier flow rate, and fracture zone height on the heat and mass transfer in the pyrolysis process were investigated using homogeneous and `heterogeneous permeability models. Results and Conclusions The results indicate that increasing the permeability can facilitate the rapid production of coals. For the homogeneous permeability model, the pyrolysis reaction can be completed in only 38 days under permeability of 1 μm², and impact-induced fracturing is recommended to achieve coal seam permeability of a Darcy level. For the heterogeneous permeability model, increasing the heat-carrier flow rate in the preheating stage can enhance the mass and heat transfer rates. Under a heat-carrier flow rate of 0.12 kg/s, the pyrolysis reaction in the central high-permeability zone was completed in only about 12 days. In the later stage, the reaction and seepage rates decelerated as the pyrolysis of coals in the central high-permeability zone was completed, and increasing the heat-carrier flow rate produced minor impacts on the reaction rate. Therefore, it is recommended that a high heat-carrier flow rate (0.12 kg/s) be adopted in the early production stage to accelerate the pyrolysis in the high-permeability zone and produce tar more quickly and that the heat-carrier flow rate be reduced in the later stage to save costs. Increasing the fracture zone height can enhance the pyrolysis reaction rate. With a fracture zone height of 6 m, the pyrolysis reaction can be completed in about 130 days. Additionally, it is necessary to consider the costs of impact-caused fracturing and pyrolysis time in actual production.

Keywords

tar-rich coals, in-situ pyrolysis, numerical simulation, multi-physical field

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0085

Recommended Citation

YANG Fu, CHENG Xiangqiang, LI Mingjie, et al. (2024) "Numerical simulations of the evolutionary patterns of multi-physical fields during the in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coals," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 52: Iss. 7, Article 4.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0085
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol52/iss7/4

Reference

[1] 王双明，师庆民，王生全，等. 富油煤的油气资源属性与绿色低碳开发[J]. 煤炭学报，2021，46(5)：1365−1377.

WANG Shuangming，SHI Qingmin，WANG Shengquan，et al. Resource property and exploitation concepts with green and low-carbon of tar-rich coal as coal-based oil and gas[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2021，46(5)：1365−1377.

[2] 马丽，拓宝生. 陕西富油煤资源量居全国之首 榆林可“再造一个大庆油田”[J]. 陕西煤炭，2020，39(1)：220−222.

MA Li，TUO Baosheng. Shaanxi’s oil-rich coal resources rank first in China，and Yulin can “rebuild a Daqing oilfield”[J]. Shaanxi Coal，2020，39(1)：220−222.

[3] 郭树才，胡浩权. 煤化工工艺学[M]. 北京：化学工业出版社，2012.

[4] 师庆民，米奕臣，王双明，等. 富油煤热解流体滞留特征及其机制[J]. 煤炭学报，2022，47(3)：1329−1337.

SHI Qingmin，MI Yichen，WANG Shuangming，et al. Trap characteristic and mechanism of volatiles during pyrolysis of tar-rich coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2022，47(3)：1329−1337.

[5] 王双明，崔世东，王绪正，等. 一种富油煤原位热解及CO₂地质封存一体化的方法：CN113775376A[P]. 2021-12-10.

[6] 田宇，寇鹏，梁得亮，等. 一种富油煤原位开采的温度控制方法及系统：CN113982589A[P]. 2022-01-28.

[7] 黄垒，张翔，赵卓雅，等. 富油煤利用热解气化耦合装置和油气净化装置生产煤焦油及合成气的方法：CN105018155B[P]. 2017-06-16.

[8] 王双明，孙强，薛圣泽，等. 一种富油煤热解实时监测的装置和方法：CN113884577A[P]. 2022-01-04.

[9] 王长安，毛崎森，周磊，等. 一种富油煤原位热解与碳捕集耦合的系统：CN113738325B[P]. 2022-05-20.

[10] 王长安，毛崎森，周磊，等. 一种富油煤地下热解热能循环利用系统：CN113738336B[P]. 2022-06-07.

[11] 肖国春，梁得亮，焦在滨，等. 一种富油煤原位热解的氮气电加热方法及系统：CN113685161B[P]. 2022-10-25.

[12] 尚建选，张喻，闵楠，等. 陕西煤业化工集团煤化工产业高质量发展研究[J]. 中国煤炭，2022，48(8)：14−19.

SHANG Jianxuan，ZHANG Yu，MIN Nan，et al. Research on high-quality development of coal chemical industry in Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group[J]. China Coal，2022，48(8)：14−19.

[13] 毛崎森，刘嘉晔，王长安，等. 不同布井模式下富油煤原位热解传热规律数值模拟[J]. 煤炭转化，2022，45(6)：7−19.

MAO Qisen，LIU Jiaye，WANG Chang’an，et al. Numerical simulation of in situ pyrolysis heat transfer of Tar-rich coal under different well distribution modes[J]. Coal Conversion，2022，45(6)：7−19.

[14] WANG Zhendong，YE Qianhao，LI Mingjie，et al. Rapid prediction of the in situ pyrolysis performance of tar-rich coal using the POD method[J]. Processes，2023，11(10)：2994.

[15] YE Qianhao，LI Mingjie，HAO Jingyuan，et al. Multi-physics simulation of tar-rich coal in situ pyrolysis with a multiregion homogenization treatment[J]. ACS Omega，2023(8)：32565–32579.

[16] 高攀明. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区长7页岩油烃源岩特征及生排烃潜力[J]. 非常规油气，2024，11(3)：10−18.

GAO Panming. Characteristics and hydrocarbon generation and expulsion potential of Chang7 shale oil source rocks in Wuqi Area，Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2024，11(3)：10−18.

[17] 王磊，赵阳升，杨栋. 注水蒸汽原位热解油页岩细观特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(8)：1634−1647.

WANG Lei，ZHAO Yangsheng，YANG Dong. Investigation on meso-characteristics of in situ pyrolysis of oil shale by injecting steam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(8)：1634−1647.

[18] 姜鹏飞，唐胜利. U形井注气加热原位裂解油页岩工艺及其数值模拟[J]. 煤炭技术，2019，38(4)：27−29.

JIANG Pengfei，TANG Shengli. Technology and numerical simulation of oil shale in situ pyrolysis by gas injection in U shape wells[J]. Coal Technology，2019，38(4)：27−29.

[19] PEI Shufeng，WANG Yanyong，ZHANG Liang，et al. An innovative nitrogen injection assisted in situ conversion process for oil shale recovery：Mechanism and reservoir simulation study[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2018，171：507−515.

[20] PEI Shufeng，CUI Guodong，WANG Yanyong，et al. Air assisted in situ upgrading via underground heating for ultra heavy oil：Experimental and numerical simulation study[J]. Fuel，2020，279：118452.

[21] PEI Shufeng，CUI Guodong，ZHANG Liang，et al. Performance and important engineering aspects of air injection assisted in situ upgrading process for heavy oil recovery[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2021，202：108554.

[22] 周科. 热氮气地下原位裂解油页岩温度场数值模拟及野外试验[D]. 长春：吉林大学，2017.

ZHOU Ke. Numerical simulation of temperature field and field test of in-situ pyrolysis of oil shale with hot nitrogen[D]. Changchun：Jilin University，2017.

[23] YANG Hao，DUAN Yunxing. A feasibility study on in situ heating of oil shale with injection fluid in China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2014，122：304−317.

[24] 李姿. 油页岩注蒸汽原位开采数值模拟研究[D]. 东营：中国石油大学(华东)，2017.

LI Zi. Numerical simulation of oil shale in-situ upgrading by steam injection[D]. Dongying：China University of Petroleum (Huadong)，2017.

[25] 王国营，杨栋，康志勤，等. 原位注蒸汽开采横观各向同性油页岩储层的数值研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报，2020，51(1)：81−90.

WANG Guoying，YANG Dong，KANG Zhiqin，et al. Numerical study on in situ injecting superheated steam thermal recovery of transversely isotropic oil shale reservoir[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology，2020，51(1)：81−90.

[26] GÜR M，CANBAZ E D. Analysis of syngas production and reaction zones in hydrogen oriented underground coal gasification[J]. Fuel，2020，269：117331.

[27] JIANG Liangliang，CHEN Zhangxin，FAROUQ ALI S M. Thermal-hydro-chemical-mechanical alteration of coal pores in underground coal gasification[J]. Fuel，2020，262：116543.

[28] GAO Wu，ZAGORŠČAK R，THOMAS H R. Insights into solid-gas conversion and cavity growth during Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) through Thermo-Hydraulic-Chemical (THC) modelling[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology，2021，237：103711.

[29] 席建奋. 煤炭地下气化过程特征场演化规律研究[D]. 北京：中国矿业大学(北京)，2016.

XI Jianfen. Study on the evolution law of characteristic fields in the context of underground coal gasification[D]. Beijing：China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing)，2016.

[30] 王双明，孙强，胡鑫，等. 煤炭原位开发地质保障[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2024，44(1)：1−11.

WANG Shuangming，SUN Qiang，HU Xin，et al. Geological guarantee for in situ development of coal[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2024，44(1)：1−11.

[31] 黄温钢，王作棠. 煤炭地下气化变权–模糊层次综合评价模型[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2017，37(4)：500−507.

HUANG Wengang，WANG Zuotang. Comprehensive evaluation model of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with variable weight for underground coal gasification[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2017，37(4)：500−507.

[32] YANG Fu，CHENG Xiangqiang，LI Mingjie，et al. Numerical investigation of the heat and mass transfer during the in situ pyrolysis process of oil-rich coal[J]. Processes，2023，11(11)：3226.

[33] 许越. 化学反应动力学[M]. 北京：化学工业出版社，2005.