Distributions of products from the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals for tar extraction in northern Shaanxi Province, China

Authors

YU Zunyi, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, ChinaFollow
GUO Wei, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, China
YANG Panxi, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, China
GAO Kun, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, China
YANG Fu, Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural and Resources, Xi’an 710021, China; Shaanxi Coal Geology GroupCo., Ltd., Xi’an 710021, China
MA Li, Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural and Resources, Xi’an 710021, China; Shaanxi Coal Geology GroupCo., Ltd., Xi’an 710021, China; School of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
WANG Jing, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, China
LI Hongqiang, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, China
YANG Bolun, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, China
WU Zhiqiang, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; Shaanxi Province Energy and Chemical Process Strengthening Key Laboratory, Xi’an 710049, ChinaFollow

Abstract

Objective Tar-rich coals stand as a special type of coal resource that integrates coal, oil, and gas properties. These coals, boasting abundant hydrogen-rich structures such as side chains and bridge bonds with aliphatic structures, are prone to crack and produce tar and gas during pyrolysis. These establish tar-rich coals as ideal raw materials that produce oil and gas through thermal conversion. Presently, the research into tar extraction from tar-rich coals through pyrolysis remains in its initial stage, and exploring the impacts of technological conditions, including heat carrier, heating type, and pyrolysis temperature, on the pyrolysis process holds critical significance for optimizing the pyrolysis for oil and gas extraction. Methods Focusing on the tar-rich coals from the Shenmu mining area in northern Shaanxi Province, this study delved into the production characteristics of oil and gas from the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals under gaseous heat carriers CO₂ and N₂. Using the response surface methodology, this study constructed regression models to explore the impacts of several critical factors on both tar yield and light tar yield obtained from the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals. Using these regression models, this study investigated the impacts of the interactions among the heating type, gaseous heat carrier type, and pyrolysis temperature on the tar yield and light tar yield, along with the optimal reaction conditions for the maximum yields. Results and Conclusions The results of this study are as follows: (1) In the case of slow pyrolysis, under the N₂ atmosphere, the tar yield increased first and then decreased as the temperature rose, reaching a maximum of 10.50% at 550 ℃, while the light tar yield kept increasing, reaching 60.67% at 600 ℃. In contrast, under the CO₂ atmosphere, both the tar yield and the gas yield were elevated. Meanwhile, the light tar yield further increased under the CO₂ atmosphere, reaching a maximum of 63.67%, with the contents of aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygen-containing compounds in the tar also increasing. (2) In the case of rapid pyrolysis, the tar yield obtained under both gaseous heat carriers rose, reaching a maximum of 11.71% at 600 ℃ under the CO₂ atmosphere, with the carbolic and anthracene oil contents in the tar increasing. In contrast, the light tar yield decreased, with the contents of phenols, aliphatic hydrocarbons, and oxygen-containing compounds in the tar increasing. Additionally, the H₂ and CH₄ concentrations in the gas products decreased somewhat. (3) The response surface methodology reveals that the impacts of the three factors on both tar yield and light tar yield decrease in the order of pyrolysis temperature, gaseous heat carrier type, and heating type. The optimization using the regression models allows for the identification of two optimal pyrolysis processes for the maximum tar yield and light tar yield: rapid pyrolysis at 595 ℃ in the CO₂ atmosphere and slow pyrolysis at 558 ℃ in the CO₂ atmosphere, with the optimal tar yield and light tar yield predicted at 11.72% and 60.75%, respectively. Experimental verification indicates that the tar yield and light tar yield under the optimal conditions were 11.94% and 60.67%, respectively, roughly aligning with the predicted results.

Keywords

tar-rich coal, gaseous heat carrier type, heating type, tar extraction through pyrolysis, response surface methodology

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0061

Recommended Citation

YU Zunyi, GUO Wei, YANG Panxi, et al. (2024) "Distributions of products from the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals for tar extraction in northern Shaanxi Province, China," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 52: Iss. 7, Article 18.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0061
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol52/iss7/18

Reference

[1] 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2022年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[J]. 中国统计，2023(3)：12–29.

National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical bulletin of the People’s Republic of China on national economic and social development[J]. China Statistics，2023(3)：12–29.

[2] 尚建选，张喻，闵楠，等. 陕西煤业化工集团煤化工产业高质量发展研究[J]. 中国煤炭，2022，48(8)：14−19.

SHANG Jianxuan，ZHANG Yu，MIN Nan，et al. Research on high-quality development of coal chemical industry in Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group[J]. China Coal，2022，48(8)：14−19.

[3] 王双明. 对我国煤炭主体能源地位与绿色开采的思考[J]. 中国煤炭，2020，46(2)：11−16.

WANG Shuangming. Thoughts about the main energy status of coal and green mining in China[J]. China Coal，2020，46(2)：11−16.

[4] 王双明，孙强，胡鑫，等. 煤炭原位开发地质保障[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2024，44(1)：1−11.

WANG Shuangming，SUN Qiang，HU Xin，et al. Geological guarantee for in situ development of coal[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2024，44(1)：1−11.

[5] OKOYE-CHINE C G，OTUN K，SHIBA N，et al. Conversion of carbon dioxide into fuels：A review[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization，2022，62：102099.

[6] YU Zunyi，GUO Wei，YANG Panxi，et al. In-situ infrared and kinetic characteristics analysis on pyrolysis of tar-rich coal and macerals[J]. Fuel，2023，348：128601.

[7] 王双明，王虹，任世华，等. 西部地区富油煤开发利用潜力分析和技术体系构想[J]. 中国工程科学，2022，24(3)：49−57.

WANG Shuangming，WANG Hong，REN Shihua，et al. Potential analysis and technical conception of exploitation and utilization of tar-rich coal in western China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE，2022，24(3)：49−57.

[8] 《矿产资源工业要求手册》编委会. 矿产资源工业要求手册[M]. 北京：地质出版社，2014.

[9] YANG Fu，GAO Kun，YU Zunyi，et al. Thermodynamic analysis of in situ underground pyrolysis of tar-rich coal：Primary reactions[J]. ACS Omega，2023，8(21)：18915−18929.

[10] FU Deliang，YU Zunyi，GAO Kun，et al. Thermodynamic analysis on in situ underground pyrolysis of tar-rich coal：Secondary reactions[J]. ACS Omega，2023，8(14)：12805−12819.

[11] 郭威，刘召，孙友宏，等. 富油煤原位热解开发地下体系封闭方法探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(1)：107−114.

GUO Wei，LIU Zhao，SUN Youhong，et al. Discussion on underground system sealing methods in in-situ pyrolysis exploitation of tar-rich coal[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(1)：107−114.

[12] 董光顺，朱超凡，厉家宗，等. 黄陵矿区富油煤对流加热原位转化开发效果数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(4)：57−67.

DONG Guangshun，ZHU Chaofan，LI Jiazong，et al. Numerical simulation on development effect of tar-rich coal through in situ conversion by convective heating in Huangling mining area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(4)：57−67.

[13] 董付科. 油页岩原位注热开采污染物迁移规律的研究[D]. 太原：太原理工大学，2019.

DONG Fuke. Study on the law of pollutant migration during in-situ heat injection to exploit oil shale[D]. Taiyuan：Taiyuan University of Technology，2019.

[14] CRAWFORD P M，BIGLARBIGI K，DAMMER A R，et al. Advances in world oil shale production technologies[J]. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition，2008，6：4101−4111.

[15] DAMER，ANTON R，KILLEN，et al. Secure fuels from domestic resources：The continuing evolution of America’s oil shale and tasands industries[R]. United States Department of Energy，Office of Petroleum Reserves，Office of Naval and Oil Shale Reserves，2007.

[16] 王月伦，安会会，张雪纯，等. 甲醇气氛下低阶煤热解气中CO加氢制芳烃机理研究[J]. 燃料化学学报，2022，50(12)：1611−1618.

WANG Yuelun，AN Huihui，ZHANG Xuechun，et al. Mechanism of hydrogenation of CO to aromatics from coal pyrolysis gas of low rank under methanol atmosphere[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology，2022，50(12)：1611−1618.

[17] WANG Mingyi，JIN Lijun，LI Yang，et al. In-situ catalytic upgrading of coal pyrolysis tar coupled with CO₂ reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts[J]. Fuel Processing Technology，2018，177：119−128.

[18] SONOYAMA N，NOBUTA K，KIMURA T，et al. Production of chemicals by cracking pyrolytic tar from Loy Yang coal over iron oxide catalysts in a steam atmosphere[J]. Fuel Processing Technology，2011，92(4)：771−775.

[19] JIN Lijun，ZHAO Haibin，WANG Mingyi，et al. Effect of temperature and simulated coal gas composition on tar production during pyrolysis of a subbituminous coal[J]. Fuel，2019，241：1129−1137.

[20] YANG Panxi，GUO Wei，YU Zunyi，et al. Modified network kinetic model for coal pyrolysis with high-value products and low carbon emissions[J]. Applied Energy，2023，351：121763.

[21] 马世才. 基于响应曲面法的煤炭产业链价值决策优化研究[D]. 北京：中国地质大学(北京)，2019.

MA Shicai. Research on value decision optimization of coal industry chain based on response surface methodology[D]. Beijing：China University of Geosciences (Beijing)，2019.

[22] 杨洋，郭芸菲，邓骥，等. 基于响应面法的煤气化工艺优化[J]. 洁净煤技术，2014，20(2)：60−63.

YANG Yang，GUO Yunfei，DENG Ji，et al. Optimization of coal gasification process based on response surface method[J]. Clean Coal Technology，2014，20(2)：60−63.

[23] 张媛媛，王永刚，田亚峻，等. 市场不确定条件下煤制烯烃技术经济分析方法[J]. 化工学报，2017，68(11)：4288−4300.

ZHANG Yuanyuan，WANG Yonggang，TIAN Yajun，et al. Techno-economic analysis method of coal to olefins process with market uncertainty[J]. CIESC Journal，2017，68(11)：4288−4300.

[24] 张雨涵，赵雪淞，李婷婷，等. 基于响应面法的煤矸石氯化焙烧除铁工艺参数优化[J]. 煤炭转化，2024，47(1)：81−90.

ZHANG Yuhan，ZHAO Xuesong，LI Tingting，et al. Optimization of process parameters for iron removal by chlorination roasting of coal gangue based on response surface methodology[J]. Coal Conversion，2024，47(1)：81−90.

[25] 杨蛟洋. 基于响应面法的煤泥分级调浆浮选强化研究[J]. 煤炭工程，2021，53(8)：172−177.

YANG Jiaoyang. Classified flotation strengthening of coal slime through pulp conditioning optimized by response surface method[J]. Coal Engineering，2021，53(8)：172−177.

[26] ARENILLAS A，RUBIERA F，PIS J J. Simultaneous thermogravimetric–mass spectrometric study on the pyrolysis behaviour of different rank coals[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis，1999，50(1)：31−46.

[27] VAN HEEK K H，HODEK W. Structure and pyrolysis behaviour of different coals and relevant model substances[J]. Fuel，1994，73(6)：886−896.

[28] CHEN Tianju，ZHANG Ke，ZHENG Mo，et al. Thermal properties and product distribution from pyrolysis at high heating rate of Naomaohu coal[J]. Fuel，2021，292：120238.

[29] SATHE C，PANG Yanyuan，LI Chunzhu. Effects of heating rate and ion-exchangeable cations on the pyrolysis yields from a Victorian brown coal[J]. Energy & Fuels，1999，13(3)：748−755.

[30] HAYASHI J I，TAKAHASHI H，DOI S，et al. Reactions in brown coal pyrolysis responsible for heating rate effect on tar yield[J]. Energy & Fuels，2000，14(2)：400–408.

[31] 张蕾，韩智坤，舒浩，等. 陕北富油煤低温热解提油基础特性[J]. 煤炭工程，2022，54(9)：124−128.

ZHANG Lei，HAN Zhikun，SHU Hao，et al. Basic characteristics of tar extraction in low temperature pyrolysis of tar-rich coal from northen Shaanxi[J]. Coal Engineering，2022，54(9)：124−128.

[32] LI Xiaorong，JIN Xin，WANG Meijun，et al. Effect of volatiles’ reaction on coking of tar during pyrolysis of Naomaohu coal in a downer-bed reactor[J]. Fuel Processing Technology，2021，212：106623.

[33] DONG Lin，HAN Song，YU Wenhao，et al. Effect of volatile reactions on the yield and quality of tar from pyrolysis of Shenhua bituminous coal[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis，2019，140：321−330.

[34] OKUMURA Y. Effect of heating rate and coal type on the yield of functional tar components[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute，2017，36(2)：2075−2082.

[35] 杨赫，谢周伟，尚妍，等. 淖毛湖煤热解产物中不同大小芳核的数量分布及变化规律[J]. 燃料化学学报，2021，49(11)：1667−1675.

YANG He，XIE Zhouwei，SHANG Yan，et al. The distribution and variation of aromatic nuclei in the pyrolysis products of Naomaohu coal[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology，2021，49(11)：1667−1675.

[36] MAHADEVAN R，ADHIKARI S，SHAKYA R，et al. Effect of alkali and alkaline earth metals on in situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass：A microreactor study[J]. Energy & Fuels，2016，30(4)：3045−3056.

[37] JAMIL K，HAYASHI J I，LI Chunzhu. Pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal and gasification of nascent char in CO₂ atmosphere in a wire-mesh reactor[J]. Fuel，2004，83(7/8)：833−843.

[38] WANG Qinhui，LI Kaikun，GUO Zhihang，et al. Effects of CO₂ atmosphere on slow pyrolysis of high-ash lignite[J]. Carbon Resources Conversion，2018，1(1)：94−103.

[39] CHEN Zhaohui，SHI Yong，LAI Dengguo，et al. Coal rapid pyrolysis in a transport bed under steam-containing syngas atmosphere relevant to the integrated fluidized bed gasification[J]. Fuel，2016，176：200−208.

[40] MORGAN T J，KANDIYOTI R. Pyrolysis of coals and biomass：Analysis of thermal breakdown and its products[J]. Chemical Reviews，2014，114(3)：1547−1607.

[41] 郝成浩，朱生华，白永辉，等. CO₂气氛对胜利褐煤热解过程的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报，2017，45(3)：272−278.

HAO Chenghao，ZHU Shenghua，BAI Yonghui，et al. Effect of CO₂ on pyrolysis behavior of Shengli lignite[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology，2017，45(3)：272−278.

[42] 穆合塔尔·斯依提，王勤辉，唐健，等. CO₂气氛影响烟煤流化床热解特性的实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报，2018，38(13)：3881−3888.

MUHETAER Siyiti，WANG Qinhui，TANG Jian，et al. Experimental research on the influence of CO₂ on fluidized bed pyrolysis of bituminous coal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE，2018，38(13)：3881−3888.

[43] 牛帅星，周亚杰，张文静，等. 气氛对煤热解行为影响的研究进展[J]. 应用化工，2019，48(3)：639−645.

NIU Shuaixing，ZHOU Yajie，ZHANG Wenjing，et al. Research progress of the influence of atmosphere on coal pyrolysis behavior[J]. Applied Chemical Industry，2019，48(3)：639−645.

[44] LUO Kang，ZHANG Chun，ZHU Shenghua，et al. Tar formation during coal pyrolysis under N₂ and CO₂ atmospheres at elevated pressures[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis，2016，118：130−135.

[45] LUO Ying，BEN Haoxi，WU Zhihong，et al. Impact of CO₂ on pyrolysis products of bituminous coal and platanus sawdust[J]. Polymers (Basel)，2019，11(8)：E1370.

[46] ZHU Shenghua，BAI Yonghui，HAO Chenghao，et al. Investigation into the structural features and gasification reactivity of coal chars formed in CO₂ and N₂ atmospheres[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization，2017，19：9−15.

[47] 李建涛，刘向荣，杨杰，等. 响应曲面法模拟优化细菌降解光–氧氧化褐煤工艺条件[J]. 煤炭转化，2020，43(5)：75−81.

LI Jiantao，LIU Xiangrong，YANG Jie，et al. Simulation and optimization of process conditions for pseudomonas putida degrading photooxidation lignite using response surface methodology[J]. Coal Conversion，2020，43(5)：75−81.