•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

[Objective] Xinjiang boasts abundant deep coalbed methane (CBM) resources, with Jurassic coal seams in the Baijiahai uplift of the Junggar Basin identified as a favorable target area for deep CBM exploration and exploitation. The pore and seepage system of deep CBM directly determines its recoverability. [Methods] Based on appraisal well Caimei 2-004H drilled the most recently in the Xinjiang oilfield in 2023, this study investigated in detail the pore and seepage system of coals in the Jurassic Xishanyao Formation in the Baijiahai uplift using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption, and carbon dioxide adsorption, low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), CT scanning, and porosity and permeability experiments under varying temperature and pressure conditions, as well as mathematical modeling. [Results and Conclusions] Key findings are as follows: (1) Pores in deep coal reservoirs in the study area are dominated by plant tissue pores and other pores, along with fissures, which are mostly tabular and slit-shaped. These pores and fissures feature high connectivity and are open pores mostly. (2) The characterization results of full pore size distribution show that ultramicropores are the most developed in the deep coal reservoirs in the study area, followed by mesopores and transitional pores. Various types of pores are relatively uniformly distributed, with a larger total specific surface area of pores and a high total pore volume. Therefore, the deep coal reservoirs are similar to lean coals and anthracites, suggesting high adsorption and reservoir capacities. This occurs primarily because the coal seams comprise coals with ultra-low ash content (average: around 5%), macerals in the coals are dominated by fusinite and homotelinite, and faults are found in coal reservoirs in structural high parts. (3) Given the impacts of temperature and effective stress on porosity and permeability, this study determined the relationships between both porosity and permeability of the study area and the burial depth. Compared to deep coals in the Daning-Jixian block in the Ordos Basin, the deep coal reservoirs in the Baijiahai uplift exhibit high porosity and permeability, as revealed by whether conventional porosity and permeability results or the simulation results of the pore and seepage system under in-situ reservoir conditions. Specifically, the deep coal reservoirs exhibit porosity ranging from 8.60% to 10.21% and permeability from 0.04×10−3 μm2 to 0.21×10−3 μm2 under in-situ reservoir conditions. Therefore, the pore and seepage system in deep coal reservoirs in the study area boasts both a high CBM storage capacity and excellent conductivity.

Keywords

Junggar Basin, Baijiahai uplift, deep coalbed methane (CBM), characterization of full pore size distribution, pore and seepage system

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.02.0141

Reference

[1] 戴金星,倪云燕,董大忠,等. “十四五” 是中国天然气工业大发展期:对中国“十四五” 天然气勘探开发的一些建议[J]. 天然气地球科学,2021,32(1):1−16.

DAI Jinxing,NI Yunyan,DONG Dazhong,et al. 2021-2025 is a period of great development of China’s natural gas industry:Suggestions on the exploration and development of natural gas during the 14th Five-Year Plan in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,32(1):1−16.

[2] 邹才能,何东博,贾成业,等. 世界能源转型内涵、路径及其对碳中和的意义[J]. 石油学报,2021,42(2):233−247.

ZOU Caineng,HE Dongbo,JIA Chengye,et al. Connotation and pathway of world energy transition and its significance for carbon neutral[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(2):233−247.

[3] 张道勇,朱杰,赵先良,等. 全国煤层气资源动态评价与可利用性分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(6):1598−1604.

ZHANG Daoyong,ZHU Jie,ZHAO Xianliang,et al. Dynamic assessment of coalbed methane resources and availability in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(6):1598−1604.

[4] 申建. 我国主要盆地深部煤层气资源量预测[R]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2021.

[5] 秦勇. 中国煤层气产业化面临的形势与挑战(Ⅲ):走向与前瞻性探索[J]. 天然气工业,2006,26(3):1−5.

QIN Yong. Situation and challenges for coal-bed methane industrialization in China(Ⅲ))-trend and pioneer research[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(3):1−5.

[6] 罗平亚,朱苏阳. 中国建立千亿立方米级煤层气大产业的理论与技术基础[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1755−1763.

LUO Pingya,ZHU Suyang. Theoretical and technical fundamentals of a 100 billion-cubic-meter-scale large industry of coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1755−1763.

[7] 闫霞,熊先钺,李曙光,等. 深部煤层气水平井各段产出贡献及其主控因素:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁−吉县区块为例[J/OL]. 天然气工业. https://link. cnki.net/urlid /51.1179.TE.20240416.1430.002.

YAN Xia,XIONG Xianyue,LI Shuguang,et al. Production contributions of deep CBM horizontal well sections and their controlling factors:A case study of Daning–Jixian area,eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,https://link. cnki.net/urlid /51.1179.TE.20240416.1430.002.

[8] 李瑞明,周梓欣. 新疆煤层气产业发展现状与思考[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(3):23−29.

LI Ruiming,ZHOU Zixin. Development status and thoughts on coalbed methane industry in Xinjiang[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(3):23−29.

[9] 侯海海,李强强,梁国栋,等. 准噶尔盆地南缘西山窑组与八道湾组煤层气成藏富集条件对比研究[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(1):18−24.

HOU Haihai,LI Qiangqiang,LIANG Guodong,et al. Comparative study of CBM accumulation conditions between the Xishanyao Formation and the Badaowan Formation in the southern Junggar Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(1):18−24.

[10] 郭绪杰,支东明,毛新军,等. 准噶尔盆地煤岩气的勘探发现及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探,2021,26(6):38−49.

GUO Xujie,ZHI Dongming,MAO Xinjun,et al. Discovery and significance of coal measure gas in Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2021,26(6):38−49.

[11] 兰浩,杨兆彪,仇鹏,等. 新疆准噶尔盆地白家海凸起深部煤层气勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):13−22.

LAN Hao,YANG Zhaobiao,CHOU Peng,et al. Exploration and exploitation of deep coalbed methane in the Baijiahai uplift,Junggar Basin:Progress and its implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):13−22.

[12] 徐凤银,王成旺,熊先钺,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1764−1780.

XU Fengyin,WANG Chengwang,XIONG Xianyue,et al. Evolution law of deep coalbed methane reservoir formation and exploration and development practice in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1764−1780.

[13] 许浩,汤达祯,陶树,等. 深、浅部煤层气地质条件差异性及其形成机制[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):33−39.

XU Hao,TANG Dazhen,TAO Shu,et al. Differences in geological conditions of deep and shallow coalbed methane and their formation mechanisms[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):33−39.

[14] 秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1791−1811.

QIN Yong. Progress on geological research of deep coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1791−1811.

[15] 张兵,周龙刚,王应斌,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区致密储层产出水赋存特征及开发启示[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(1):90−97.

ZHANG Bing,ZHOU Longgang,WANG Yingbin,et al. Occurrence characteristics and development enlightenment of produced water in tight reservoir in Linxing Area,eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(1):90−97.

[16] 杨焦生,冯鹏,唐淑玲,等. 大宁−吉县区块深部煤层气相态控制因素及含量预测模型[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1879−1891.

YANG Jiaosheng,FENG Peng,TANG Shuling,et al. Phase control factors and content prediction model of deep coalbed methane in Daning-Jixian Block[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1879−1891.

[17] 李勇,高爽,吴鹏,等. 深部煤层气游离气含量预测模型评价与校正:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层为例[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1892−1902.

LI Yong,GAO Shuang,WU Peng,et al. Evaluation and correction of prediction model for free gas content in deep coalbed methane:A case study of deep coal seams in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1892−1902.

[18] 石军太,曹敬添,徐凤银,等. 深部煤层气游离气饱和度计算模型及其应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):134−146.

SHI Juntai,CAO Jingtian,XU Fengyin,et al. A calculation model of free gas saturation in deep coalbed methane reservoirs and its application[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):134−146.

[19] 熊先钺,闫霞,徐凤银,等. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1812−1826.

XIONG Xianyue,YAN Xia,XU Fengyin,et al. Analysis of multi-factor coupling control mechanism,desorption law and development effect of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1812−1826.

[20] 聂志宏,徐凤银,时小松,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气开发先导试验效果与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):1−12.

NIE Zhihong,XU Fengyin,SHI Xiaosong,et al. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):1−12.

[21] 曾雯婷,徐凤银,张雷,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气排采工艺技术进展与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):23−32.

ZENG Wenting,XU Fengyin,ZHANG Lei,et al. Deep coalbed methane production technology for the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin:Advances and their implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):23−32.

[22] 方正,陈勉,王溯,等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷页岩水平井水力压裂裂缝形态[J]. 新疆石油地质,2024,45(1):72−80.

FANG Zheng,CHEN Mian,WANG Su,et al. Geometry of hydraulic fractures in fractured horizontal wells in shale reservoirs of Jimsar Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2024,45(1):72−80.

[23] 陈刚,秦勇,胡宗全,等. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起深部含煤层气系统储层组合特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(1):80−86.

CHEN Gang,QIN Yong,HU Zongquan,et al. Characteristics of reservoir assemblage of deep CBM-bearing system in Baijiahai dome of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):80−86.

[24] 唐勇,雷德文,曹剑,等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系全油气系统与源内天然气勘探新领域[J]. 新疆石油地质,2022,43(6):654−662.

TANG Yong,LEI Dewen,CAO Jian,et al. Total petroleum system and inner-source natural gas exploration in Permian strata of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2022,43(6):654−662.

[25] LI Geng,QIN Yong,WANG Boyang,et al. Fluid seepage mechanism and permeability prediction model of multi-seam interbed coal measures[J]. Fuel,2024,356:129556.

[26] 严继民,张启元,高敬琮. 吸附与凝聚:固体的表面与孔[M]. 2版. 北京:科学出版社,1986:113–137.

[27] 曾平,张东明,严先华,等. 原生煤和构造煤对甲烷的吸附扩散特性研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2023,50(4):36−41.

ZENG Ping,ZHANG Dongming,YAN Xianhua,et al. Study on gas adsorption and diffusion characteristics of intact coal and tectonic coal[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2023,50(4):36−41.

[28] 彭辉. 滇东黔西中−高煤阶储层微观尺度下流体流动性研究[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2019.

[29] 蒋长宝,魏文辉,刘晓冬,等. 应力−应变−渗流耦合条件下煤岩渗流特性及其可视化研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2022,49(5):59−63.

JIANG Changbao,WEI Wenhui,LIU Xiaodong,et al. Study on seepage characteristics and visualization of coal and rock under coupled stress-strain-seepage conditions[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2022,49(5):59−63.

[30] 唐淑玲,汤达祯,杨焦生,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁−吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1854−1866.

TANG Shuling,TANG Dazhen,YANG Jiaosheng,et al. Pore structure characteristics and gas storage potential of deep coal reservoirs in Daning-Jixian Block of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1854−1866.

[31] 周晋辉,郭晓阳,赵博,等. 煤岩体系微观组分及孔隙结构对甲烷吸附的影响研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2024,51(1):51−60.

ZHOU Jinhui,GUO Xiaoyang,ZHAO Bo,et al. Study on the influence of microscopic components and pore structure of coal-rock system on methane adsorption[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2024,51(1):51−60.

[32] FAN Long,LIU Shimin. Numerical prediction of in situ horizontal stress evolution in coalbed methane reservoirs by considering both poroelastic and sorption induced strain effects[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2018,104:156−164.

[33] SHI J Q,DURUCAN S. Drawdown induced changes in permeability of coalbeds:A new interpretation of the reservoir response to primary recovery[J]. Transport in Porous Media,2004,56(1):1−16.

[34] 郭海军,唐寒露,王凯,等. 含瓦斯煤气固耦合作用在顺层双钻孔瓦斯抽采中的应用[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2021,41(2):221−229.

GUO Haijun,TANG Hanlu,WANG Kai,et al. Application of gas-solid coupling effect in the gas drainage with double boreholes along coal seam[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2021,41(2):221−229.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.