Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
Prediction and control of two-phase flow chokeling in tight gas wellbores are essential for the normal operation and hydrate control of high-pressure gas wells producing water. The thermodynamic differential equations of energy, kinetic energy and temperature and models of chokeling field for two-phase energy, system heat, mass balance and flow were developed under the conditions of isentropic adiabatic, isobaric heat capacity, constant volume heat capacity, and chokeling energy. A methodology on predicting characteristics and control of two-phase flow before and after chokeling was proposed for gas-water two phase flow. It provided a theoretical basis for optimizing the structural parameters of downhole throttle and its nozzle and ensuring the flow safety. The dynamic variations of two-phase flow chokeling with nozzle size and its depth, water content, pressure and temperature were analyzed on numerical simulation and verification of Daning-Jixian oilfield in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin. The results show that the mass flow rate increases exponentially with the decreased pressure ratio, and it reaches the maximum while pressure ratio drops to the threshold of 0.55. The temperature will be enhanced after chokeling and the formation of hydrates will be inhibited while the nozzle depth and water content are increased and pressure and temperature are reduced before chokeling. The effects of nozzle inner diameter, water content, pressure, temperature and nozzle depth on the critical mass flow gradually decreases during chokeling. The increase of water content will enhance the critical mass flow rate and decrease gas production of high-pressure gas wells producing water. The well site analysis on Daning-Jixian oilfield shows that the mass flow rates increase 179.3% and 27.8%, respectively, while nozzle inner diameters enhance from 3.0 mm to 5.0 mm and pressures on chokeling process increase from 14 MPa to 18 MPa. The mass flow rate varies with a small drop of 5.15%. Increasing the nozzle inner diameter, its depth and the pressure while reducing the temperature is beneficial to improve the mass flow rate during the chokeling process of two-phase fluid and increase the gas production in high-pressure gas wellbores producing water.
Keywords
high-pressure gas well producing water, gas-water two-phase flow, downhole chokeling, critical mass flow rate, hydrate inhibition
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.06.0371
Recommended Citation
LIU Xinfu, LIU Chunhua, LI Qingping,
et al.
(2024)
"Two-phase flow chokeling results and control in high-pressure gas wells producing water,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 52:
Iss.
3, Article 6.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.06.0371
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol52/iss3/6
Reference
[1] 周慧,朱建鲁,李玉星,等. 纯氢与掺氢天然气节流特性及节流系数预测新方法[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(4):139−148.
ZHOU Hui,ZHU Jianlu,LI Yuxing,et al. Throttling characteristics and throttling coefficient prediction of pure hydrogen and hydrogen–blended natural gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(4):139−148.
[2] LIU Xinfu,LIU Chunhua,WU Jianjun. A modern approach to analyzing the flowing pressures of a two–phase CBM and water column in producing wellbores[J]. Geofluids,2019,2019(5):3093707.
[3] 周劲辉,张云,熊至宜,等. 煤层气井底节流阀节流效应数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(6):144−151.
ZHOU Jinhui,ZHANG Yun,XIONG Zhiyi,et al. Numerical simulation of throttling effect on throttle valve at well bottom hole[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),2021,45(6):144−151.
[4] SABERI A,ALAMDARI A,RASOOLZADEH A,et al. Insights into kinetic inhibition effects of MEG,PVP,and L–tyrosine aqueous solutions on natural gas hydrate formation[J]. Petroleum Science,2021,18(2):495−508.
[5] DONG Lin,LI Yanlong,LIU Changling,et al. Mechanical properties of methane hydrate–bearing interlayered sediments[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China,2019,18(6):1344−1350.
[6] 贺登辉,陈森林,白博峰. V锥节流装置内气液分层流动特性数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(3):151−158.
HE Denghui,CHEN Senlin,BAI Bofeng. Numerical simulation of stratified gas–liquid flow inside V–cone throttle device[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),2019,43(3):151−158.
[7] SHAO Huaishuang,JIANG Lei,LIU Lei,et al. Modeling of multiphase flow through chokes[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation,2018,60(4):44−50.
[8] CARSTENSEN C M,ONESUBSEA S K K. Multiphase flow through chokes:An evaluation of frozen,equilibrium,and nonequilibrium flow models[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering,2022,215(8):110402.
[9] 王振嘉,郑海亮,刘永建,等. 苏里格气田井下节流气井积液量预测方法及应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2019,42(4):115−120.
WANG Zhenjia,ZHENG Hailiang,LIU Yongjian,et al. Methods to predict liquid loading in gas wells with downhole choke and its application to Sulige gasfield[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2019,42(4):115−120.
[10] 安永生,曹孟京,兰义飞,等. 井下节流气井的生产动态模拟新方法[J]. 天然气工业,2016,36(4):55−59.
AN Yongsheng,CAO Mengjing,LAN Yifei,et al. A new production behavior simulation method for gas wells equipped with a downhole throttling device[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(4):55−59.
[11] 曾焱,陈伟,段永刚,等. 井下节流气井的生产动态预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(6):110−112.
ZENG Yan,CHEN Wei,DUAN Yonggang,et al. Production performance prediction of downhole throttling gas well[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2009,31(6):110−112.
[12] NASERI S,TATAR A,SHOKROLLAHI A. Development of an accurate method to prognosticate choke flow coefficients for natural gas flow through nozzle and orifice type chokes[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation,2016,48(4):1−7.
[13] 王荧光,裴红,刘文伟,等. 苏里格气田井下节流综合预测[J]. 天然气工业,2010,30(2):97−101.
WANG Yingguang,PEI Hong,LIU Wenwei,et al. An integrated forecast for downhole throttling at the Sulige gas field[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(2):97−101.
[14] 赵金洲,彭瑀,李勇明,等. 基于双层非稳态导热过程的井筒温度场半解析模型[J]. 天然气工业,2016,36(1):68−75.
ZHAO Jinzhou,PENG Yu,LI Yongming,et al. A semi–analytic model of wellbore temperature field based on double–layer unsteady heat conducting process[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(1):68−75.
[15] 王雪瑞,孙宝江,刘书杰,等. 基于水化反应动力学的深水固井井筒温度与压力耦合预测模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):809−818.
WANG Xuerui,SUN Baojiang,LIU Shujie,et al. A coupled model of temperature and pressure based on hydration kinetics during well cementing in deep water[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):809−818.
[16] 吴栋梁. 低温节流特性可视化实验系统研制及液氮节流参数化研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2020.
WU Dongliang. Development of visual system for cryogenic throttling experiment and parametric study of liquid nitrogen throttling[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2020.
[17] SEIDI S,SAYAHI T. A new correlation for prediction of sub–critical two–phase flow pressure drop through large–sized wellhead chokes[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering,2015,26(9):264−278.
[18] LEPORINI M,TERENZI A,MARCHETTI B. Improvement of a multiphase flow model for wellhead chokes under critical and subcritical conditions using field data[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration & Production Technology,2021,11(3):1487−1503.
[19] PERKINS T K. Critical and subcritical flow of multiphase mixtures through chokes[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion,1993,8(4):271−276.
[20] NASRIANI H R,KALANTARIASL A. Choke performance in high–rate gas condensate wells under subcritical flow condition[J]. Energy Sources,2015,37(2):192−199.
[21] LEE S Y,SCHROCK V E. Critical two–phase flow in pipes for subcooled stagnation states with a cavity flooding incipient flashing model[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer,1990,112(4):1032−1040.
[22] BOGDANOVIC–JOVANOVIC J B,STAMENKOVIC Z M. Experimental and CFD analysis of MHD flow around smooth sphere and sphere with dimples in subcritical and critical regimes[J]. Thermal Science,2021,25(3):1781−1794.
[23] 张新宾,宋党育,李云波,等. 超临界态甲烷密度研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(1):137−142.
ZHANG Xinbin,SONG Dangyu,LI Yunbo,et al. Study on density of the supercritical methane[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(1):137−142.
[24] 蒋代君,陈次昌,钟孚勋,等. 天然气井下节流临界状态的判别方法[J]. 天然气工业,2006,26(9):115−117.
JIANG Daijun,CHEN Cichang,ZHONG Fuxun,et al. Discriminance of the flow state in downhole choke of natural gas wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(9):115−117.
[25] 顾浩,郑松青,张冬丽,等. 超深油藏物质平衡方程修正及应用[J]. 石油学报,2022,43(11):1623−1631.
GU Hao,ZHENG Songqing,ZHANG Dongli,et al. Modification and application of material balance equation for ultra–deep reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(11):1623−1631.
[26] 周海,王晓冬,吴明涛. 页岩气水两相物质平衡方程及其生产预测[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2020,39(1):18−23.
ZHOU Hai,WANG Xiaodong,WU Mingtao. Shale gas and water two–phase material balance equation and its production prediction[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science),2020,39(1):18−23.
[27] 武男,石石,郑世琪,等. 基于物质平衡反演法的致密砂岩气藏地层压力计算[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(9):115−121.
WU Nan,SHI Shi,ZHENG Shiqi,et al. Formation pressure calculation of tight sandstone gas reservoir based on material balance inversion method[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(9):115−121.
[28] 胡素明,李相方,胡小虎,等. 考虑煤层气藏地解压差的物质平衡储量计算方法[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2012,40(1):14−19.
HU Suming,LI Xiangfang,HU Xiaohu,et al. Reserves calculation method with a material balance equation considering the difference between initial coal seam pressure and critical desorption pressure[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2012,40(1):14−19.
[29] 张士宏,徐文灿. 测定气动元件的有效截面积(S值和A值)确定临界压力比(b值)的方法研究[J]. 液压气动与密封,2013,33(3):63−65.
ZHANG Shihong,XU Wencan. Study on critical pressure ratio (b) by determinations of effective area (S and A)[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals,2013,33(3):63−65.
[30] 司冀,王永盛,史维祥. 关于气动阀临界压力比b及其流量公式的探讨[J]. 液压气动与密封,2011,31(2):47−51.
SI Ji,WANG Yongsheng,SHI Weixiang. An approach to critical pressure ratio b and its flow–rate formulas for pneumatic valve[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals,2011,31(2):47−51.
[31] 周国发,李鸣,屈娅嘉. 由喷管临界压力比确定安全阀临界压力比的计算公式[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版),2000,22(2):72−76.
ZHOU Guofa,LI Ming,QU Yajia. The formula of the critical pressure ratio for safety valve by the critical pressure ratio for nozzle[J]. Journal of Nanchang University (Engineering & Technology),2000,22(2):72−76.
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons