Propagation of hydraulic fractures in thin interbedded tight sandstones

Authors

YANG Fan, China United Coalbed Methane Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100016, ChinaFollow
MEI Wenbo, China United Coalbed Methane Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100016, China
LI Liang, China United Coalbed Methane Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100016, China
SUN Zening, China United Coalbed Methane Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100016, China
AN Qi, China United Coalbed Methane Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100016, China
YANG Qi, China United Coalbed Methane Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100016, China
LU Meiquan, National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
YANG Ruiyue, National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, ChinaFollow

Abstract

Thin interbedded tight sandstone reservoirs are characterized by strong vertical heterogeneity due to the superimposed pattern of the deposited sandstones and mudstones. As a result, hydraulic fractures are difficult to propagate vertically to effectively connect the reservoirs. Given this, ascertaining the vertical propagation patterns of hydraulic fractures in thin interbeds is of great significance for the development of thin interbedded tight sandstones. With the thin interbedded tight sandstone reservoirs of the lower Shihezi Formation in the Linxing block, Ordos Basin as a case study, this study built the fracture propagation model of these sandstones. Accordingly, it analyzed the effects of geological factors (i.e., the stress difference between reservoirs and interlayers, the thicknesses of reservoirs and interlayers, and rock mechanical properties) and engineering factors (i.e., the viscosity and injection rate of fracturing fluids) on the propagation of hydraulic fractures. Moreover, this study verified the reliability and accuracy of the model based on field hydraulic fracturing performance and microseismic monitoring data. The results of this study are as follows: (1) The stress difference between reservoirs and interlayers and the thicknesses of reservoirs and interlayers were the major geological factors affecting the vertical propagation of hydraulic fractures, which was restrained when the stress difference was greater than 4 MPa. (2) The interlayers with high elastic moduli were conducive to the vertical fracture propagation. (3) Poisson’s ratio almost had no effect on vertical fracture propagation. (4) The viscosity of fracturing fluids had little effect on the propagation. (5) The injection rate of fracturing fluids promoted vertical fracture propagation, which, however, slowed down when the injection rate increased to a certain extent. Different stress differences corresponded to different optimal displacements. Therefore, factors that can effectively promote vertical fracture propagation during the hydraulic fracturing of thin interbedded tight sandstones include small thicknesses of reservoirs and interlayers, small stress differences between reservoirs and interlayers, high elastic modulus, and high injection rate. The results of this study will provide a theoretical basis for the hydraulic fracturing design of similar sandstone reservoirs.

Keywords

thin interbed, tight sandstone, hydraulic fracturing, fracture propagation, numerical simulation

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.10.0788

Recommended Citation

YANG Fan, MEI Wenbo, LI Liang, et al. (2023) "Propagation of hydraulic fractures in thin interbedded tight sandstones," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 51: Iss. 7, Article 8.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.10.0788
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol51/iss7/8

Reference

[1] 贾爱林,位云生,郭智,等. 中国致密砂岩气开发现状与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(1):83−92.

JIA Ailin,WEI Yunsheng,GUO Zhi,et al. Development status and prospect of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(1):83−92.

[2] 徐凤银,闫霞,林振盘,等. 我国煤层气高效开发关键技术研究进展与发展方向[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(3):1−14.

XU Fengyin,YAN Xia,LIN Zhenpan,et al. Research progress and development direction of key technologies for efficient coalbed methane development in China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(3):1−14.

[3] 高英. 薄互层低渗透油藏压裂开发裂缝扩展规律及产能预测研究[D]. 北京：北京科技大学，2015.

GAO Ying. Productivity prediction of fractured well and propagation law of hydraulic fractures in thin inter–bedded low permeability reservoirs[D]. Beijing：University of Science and Technology Beijing，2015.

[4] 黄中伟,李国富,杨睿月,等. 我国煤层气开发技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(9):3212−3238.

HUANG Zhongwei,LI Guofu,YANG Ruiyue,et al. Review and development trends of coalbed methane exploitation technology in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(9):3212−3238.

[5] 孟尚志,侯冰,张健,等. 煤系“三气”共采产层组压裂裂缝扩展物模试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(1):221−227.

MENG Shangzhi,HOU Bing,ZHANG Jian,et al. Experimental research on hydraulic fracture propagation through mixed layers of shale,tight sand and coal seam[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):221−227.

[6] 高杰,侯冰,谭鹏,等. 砂煤互层水力裂缝穿层扩展机理[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(增刊2):428−433.

GAO Jie,HOU Bing,TAN Peng,et al. Propagation mechanism of hydraulic fracture in sand coal interbedding[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(Sup.2):428−433.

[7] 高杰,侯冰,陈勉,等. 岩性差异及界面性质对裂缝起裂扩展的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(增刊2):4108−4114.

GAO Jie,HOU Bing,CHEN Mian,et al. Effects of rock strength and interfacial property on fracture initiation and propagation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2018,37(Sup.2):4108−4114.

[8] 毛少文. 致密砂岩储层水力裂缝垂向扩展规律研究[D]. 北京：中国石油大学(北京)，2019.

MAO Shaowen. A study on hydraulic fracture vertical propagation in tight sandstone reservoirs[D]. Beijing：China University of Petroleum (Beijing)，2019.

[9] 付世豪,侯冰,夏阳,等. 多岩性组合层状储层一体化压裂裂缝扩展试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(增刊1):377−384.

FU Shihao,HOU Bing,XIA Yang,et al. Experimental research on hydraulic fracture propagation in integrated fracturing for layered formation with multi–lithology combination[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(Sup.1):377−384.

[10] 马阔,王雷,许文俊,等. 湖相页岩水力压裂裂缝穿层扩展规律物理模拟[J]. 中国科技论文,2022,17(5):539−545.

MA Kuo,WANG Lei,XU Wenjun,et al. Physical simulation of fracture propagation in lacustrine shale during hydraulic fracturing[J]. China Sciencepaper,2022,17(5):539−545.

[11] 姜伟,张军,仲劼,等. 大倾角煤层水力裂缝扩展物理模拟实验[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(3):45−50.

JIANG Wei,ZHANG Jun,ZHONG Jie,et al. Physical simulation experiment investigation on hydraulic fracture propagation in high−dip coal seam[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(3):45−50.

[12] 李扬. 致密砂岩储层水力压裂数值模拟研究[D]. 北京：中国石油大学(北京)，2017.

LI Yang. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in tight sand reservoir[D]. Beijing：China University of Petroleum (Beijing)，2017.

[13] 李浩哲,姜在炳,舒建生,等. 水力裂缝在煤岩界面处穿层扩展规律的数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(2):106−113.

LI Haozhe,JIANG Zaibing,SHU Jiansheng,et al. Numerical simulation of layer–crossing propagation behavior of hydraulic fractures at coal–rock interface[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(2):106−113.

[14] 李连崇,梁正召,李根,等. 水力压裂裂缝穿层及扭转扩展的三维模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(增刊1):3208−3215.

LI Lianchong,LIANG Zhengzhao,LI Gen,et al. Three–dimensional numerical analysis of traversing and twisted fractures in hydraulic fracturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(Sup.1):3208−3215.

[15] 刘洋,徐苗,景岷雪,等. 考虑分形效应下水力压裂裂缝拟三维延伸研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2012,35(4):60−63.

LIU Yang,XU Miao,JING Minxue,et al. Pseudo–3D extension for fracture after hydraulic fracturing under fractal effect[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2012,35(4):60−63.

[16] WENG Xiaowei,KRESSE O,COHEN C,et al. Modeling of hydraulic–fracture–network propagation in a naturally fractured formation[J]. SPE Production & Operations,2011,26(4):368−380.

[17] GU Hongren,WENG Xiaowei,LUND J B,et al. Hydraulic fracture crossing natural fracture at nonorthogonal angles:A criterion and its validation[J]. SPE Production & Operations,2012,27(1):20−26.

[18] 徐延勇,韩旭,张兵,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块盒8段致密砂岩储层天然气低产原因剖析[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2022,41(1):52−58.

XU Yanyong,HAN Xu,ZHANG Bing,et al. Reasons for low productivity of the dense sandstone gas reservoir in the 8th Member of the Shihezi Formation in the Linxing Block,Eastern Erdos Basin[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science),2022,41(1):52−58.

[19] 杜佳,朱光辉,李勇,等. 鄂尔多斯盆缘致密砂岩气藏勘探开发挑战与技术对策:以临兴–神府气田为例[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(1):114−124.

DU Jia,ZHU Guanghui,LI Yong,et al. Exploration and development challenges and technological countermeasures for tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Ordos Basin Margin:A case study of Linxing–Shenfu Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(1):114−124.

[20] 桑树勋,郑司建,易同生,等. 煤系叠合型气藏及其勘探开发技术模式[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(9):13−21.

SANG Shuxun,ZHENG Sijian,YI Tongsheng,et al. Coal measures superimposed gas reservoir and its exploration and development technology modes[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(9):13−21.

[21] 潘林华,程礼军,陆朝晖,等. 页岩储层水力压裂裂缝扩展模拟进展[J]. 特种油气藏,2014,21(4):1−6.

PAN Linhua,CHENG Lijun,LU Zhaohui,et al. Simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in shale reservoir[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2014,21(4):1−6.

[22] 吴锐,邓金根,蔚宝华,等. 临兴区块石盒子组致密砂岩气储层压裂缝高控制数值模拟研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(9):2393−2401.

WU Rui,DENG Jingen,YU Baohua,et al. Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracture containment of tight gas reservoir in Shihezi Formation,Linxing Block[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(9):2393−2401.

[23] DETOURNAY E. Propagation regimes of fluid–driven fractures in impermeable rocks[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics,2004,4(1):35−45.