A simulation study on the suspension and transport patterns of proppants in long distance pipelines for integrated well and ground fracturing

Authors

LI Haozhe, CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, ChinaFollow
JIANG Zaibing, CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, ChinaFollow
SUN Siqing, CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China
ZHU Chuanyong, College of New Energy, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266000, China
FAN Yao, CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China
GUO Yong, College of New Energy, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266000, China
CHENG Bin, CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China

Abstract

Integrated well and ground fracturing is a developmental trend for the staged fracturing of underground long boreholes in coal mines. Using the integrated fracturing technology, the fracturing fluids, after being pressurized using a ground fracturing pump, enter long boreholes in underground coal mines through ground penetrating wells and long distance pipelines, aiming to achieve fracturing with high injection rates of fracturing fluids. The suspension and transport patterns of proppants in long distance pipelines hold critical significance for optimizing parameters related to proppant adding and avoiding sand plugging in pipelines. This study evaluated the rheological properties and proppant carrying capacity of fracturing fluids through laboratory experiments. Based on the Euler-Euler-based granular flow theory, this study constructed a numerical simulation model to investigate the suspension and transport patterns of proppants in horizontal pipelines and their influencing factors. Moreover, this study explored the flow regimes in which fracturing fluids carry proppants and the calculation model of critical settling velocities. The results are as follows: (1) Adding 1% of friction reducer can increase the viscosity of active water-based fracturing fluids by 3‒5 times. A lower proppant density, a higher fracturing fluid viscosity, and a higher proppant concentration result in a lower proppant settling velocity in fracturing fluids. (2) The flow of proppants in horizontal pipelines is subjected to multiple factors. A lower flow rate of fracturing fluids, as well as a higher density and larger particle size of proppants, can lead to more severe proppant settling at the pipeline bottom and a low proppant carrying capacity. (3) With an increase in the pipeline diameter, the position where the proppant volume fraction at the pipeline outlet cross-section peaks would shift from the middle to lower part of the pipeline to the bottom of the pipeline, accompanied by aggravated pipeline wear caused by proppant flow. (4) A larger proppant concentration corresponds to stronger interactions between proppants, which can reduce the proppant carrying capacity of fracturing fluids. (5) The model recommended by the Technical Code of Dredging Engineering was employed to calculate the critical settling velocity of proppants when active water-based fracturing fluids were adopted. The calculation results show that the critical injection rate of fracturing liquids required for proppant carrying increases exponentially with the pipeline diameter and that the critical injection rate can be reduced by increasing the fracturing fluid viscosity. The model of the critical injection rate of fracturing fluids built in this study and the proppant transport patterns obtained in this study can assist in the optimization of and the matching between pipeline diameter and the injection rate of fracturing fluids, thus providing theoretical support for integrated well and ground fracturing.

Keywords

integrated well and ground fracturing, long distance pipeline, proppant suspension and transport, proppant carrying capacity, Euler-granular flow, critical settling velocity, coal mine

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.04.0190

Recommended Citation

LI Haozhe, JIANG Zaibing, SUN Siqing, et al. (2023) "A simulation study on the suspension and transport patterns of proppants in long distance pipelines for integrated well and ground fracturing," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 51: Iss. 11, Article 5.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.04.0190
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol51/iss11/5

Reference

[1] 孙四清,李文博,张俭,等. 煤矿井下长钻孔分段水力压裂技术研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(8):1−15.

SUN Siqing,LI Wenbo,ZHANG Jian,et al. Research progress and development trend of staged hydraulic fracturing technology in long–borehole underground coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(8):1−15.

[2] 贾秉义,李树刚,陈冬冬,等. 煤矿井下高压端连续水力加砂压裂增透技术与装备研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(8):54−61.

JIA Bingyi,LI Shugang,CHEN Dongdong,et al. Study of technologies and equipment of continuous hydraulic sand fracturing for permeability enhancement at high pressure side of coal mine downhole[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(8):54−61.

[3] 刘乐,张俭,方秦月,等. 碎软低渗煤层顶板定向长钻孔水力加砂分段压裂工程应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(8):91−100.

LIU Le,ZHANG Jian,FANG Qinyue,et al. Application of hydraulic sand staged fracturing in directional long drilling of roof in broken soft and low permeability coal seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(8):91−100.

[4] 张俭,刘乐,赵继展,等. 煤层顶板定向长钻孔水力加砂分段压裂技术与装备[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(8):37−44.

ZHANG Jian,LIU Le,ZHAO Jizhan,et al. Research on hydraulic fracturing technology and equipment of directional long drilling with sand in coal seam roof[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(8):37−44.

[5] 姜在炳，张群，范耀，等. 碎软低渗煤层井上下联合压裂区域瓦斯高效抽采方法：CN202010380658. 5[P]. 2020-08-14.

[6] 赵学良. 井地联合压裂长钻孔技术实践[J]. 煤矿安全,2019,50(2):169−172.

ZHAO Xueliang. Practice of integrated well and ground fracturing long drilling technology[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2019,50(2):169−172.

[7] OROSKAR A R,TURIAN R M. The critical velocity in pipeline flow of slurries[J]. AIChE Journal,1980,26(4):550−558.

[8] GILLIES R G,SHOOK C A,XU Jihuai. Modelling heterogeneous slurry flows at high velocities[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering,2004,82(5):1060−1065.

[9] EKAMBARA K,SANDERS R S,NANDAKUMAR K,et al. Hydrodynamic simulation of horizontal slurry pipeline flow using ANSYS–CFX[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2009,48(17):8159−8171.

[10] SWAMY M,DÍEZ N G,TWERDA A. Numerical modelling of the slurry flow in pipelines and prediction of flow regimes[J]. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences,2015,89:311−322.

[11] 温庆志,高金剑,邵俊杰,等. 滑溜水压裂支撑剂在水平井筒内沉降规律研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,30(4):73−78.

WEN Qingzhi,GAO Jinjian,SHAO Junjie,et al. Study on settlement law of proppant within horizontal wellbore in slickwater fracturing[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2015,30(4):73−78.

[12] 吕其超,李兆敏,李宾飞,等. 新型聚合物压裂液管内携砂性能研究[J]. 特种油气藏,2015,22(2):101−104.

LYU Qichao,LI Zhaomin,LI Binfei,et al. Research on proppant carrying capacity of new polymer fracturing fluid in tube[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(2):101−104.

[13] 曾思睿,董长银,卫然,等. 水平井不同倾角井筒临界携砂流速对比实验及其拟合应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2018,37(6):54−59.

ZENG Sirui,DONG Changyin,WEI Ran,et al. Comparing experiments and their matching application of the borehole critical sand–carrying velocity in the horizontal well with different pitching angles[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2018,37(6):54−59.

[14] 刘巨保,姚利明,李星月,等. 缩扩管内携砂压裂液的压力损失实验与数值模拟[J]. 石油学报,2019,40(1):86−98.

LIU Jubao,YAO Liming,LI Xingyue,et al. Pressure loss experiment and numerical simulation of sand–carrying fracturing fluid in contraction–expansion pipe[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(1):86−98.

[15] 杨思齐,樊建春,张来斌. 高压弯管压裂液两相流模拟及流固耦合分析[J]. 石油机械,2020,48(3):128−133.

YANG Siqi,FAN Jianchun,ZHANG Laibin. Numerical simulation of two–phase flow and analysis of fluid–structure interaction of fracturing fluid in high pressure elbow[J]. China Petroleum Machinery,2020,48(3):128−133.

[16] 刘芳,金阿芳,热依汗古丽·木沙. 欧拉颗粒流模型下的近床面风沙跃移速度分布特征[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(6):2157−2163.

LIU Fang,JIN Afang,REYIHANGULI M. Velocity distribution of aeolian saltation on sand bed surface in Euler–granular model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(6):2157−2163.

[17] 左伟芹,谢坤容,韩红凯,等. 清洁压裂液携带作用下支撑剂运移铺置规律研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2022,53(12):42−47.

ZUO Weiqin,XIE Kunrong,HAN Hongkai,et al. Study on proppant transport and placement under sand–carrying action of clean fracturing fluid[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2022,53(12):42−47.

[18] 张涛,郭建春,刘伟. 清水压裂中支撑剂输送沉降行为的CFD模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报 (自然科学版),2014,36(1):74−82.

ZHANG Tao,GUO Jianchun,LIU Wei. CFD simulation of proppant transportation and settling in water fracture treatments[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2014,36(1):74−82.

[19] ZHOU Mengmeng,KUANG Shibo,LUO Kun,et al. Modeling and analysis of flow regimes in hydraulic conveying of coarse particles[J]. Powder Technology,2020,373:543−554.

[20] RAVELET F,BAKIR F,KHELLADI S,et al. Experimental study of hydraulic transport of large particles in horizontal pipes[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science,2013,45:187−197.

[21] MIEDEMA S A. The heterogeneous to homogeneous transition for slurry flow in pipes[J]. Ocean Engineering,2016,123:422−431.

[22] RAMSDELL R C，MIEDEMA S A. An overview of flow regimes describing slurry transport[J]. World Organisation of Dredging Associations，2013：15.

[23] TURIAN R M,YUAN T F. Flow of slurries in pipelines[J]. AIChE Journal,1977,23(3):232−243.

[24] ZANDI I. Advances in solid–liquid flow in pipes and its application[M]. Elsevier，2013.

[25] 中华人民共和国交通部. 疏浚工程技术规范：JTJ 319—99[S]. 北京：中国标准出版社，1999.