Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
Huainan mining area is characterized by a high phreatic water level, as well as a wide range and large area of coal mining subsidence areas, with the water quality monitoring data missing and prominent water environment. Therefore, the evaluation of water quality monitoring and identification of pollution factors in large subsidence area is of great significance to regional water environmental governance. Specifically, the water quality of the subsidence area was evaluated with the Nemerow pollution index method by testing the water samples collected from 175 sampling points in the study area. Meanwhile, the eutrophication state of water bodies was evaluated with the comprehensive trophic status index method. The results show that: (1) For the open subsidence areas, the water quality level is evaluated to be excellent in terms of Cu, As and Cr, good in terms of DO, COD, NH3-N, Hg and F−, and relatively good in terms of TN and TP. For the closed subsidence area, the water quality level is evaluated to be excellent in terms of Cu and Cr, good in terms of the NH3-N, Hg, As and DO, relatively good in terms of COD and TN, and poor in terms of TP and F− according to Level-III standard of surface water. However, the water quality level is evaluated to be excellent in terms of NH3-N, Hg, As, Cu and Cr, good in terms of DO, COD, TP and TN, and relatively good in terms of F− according to Level-V standard of surface water. (2) The comprehensive trophic status index of the study area is ranged within 40‒90, and the average trophic status index is sized 68.61. Therefore, the study area is in moderate eutrophication, which shows that the water body in the subsidence area is at moderate trophic level. Among the 175 water samples, 8.57% of the samples are in light eutrophication, 51.43% in moderate eutrophication, 2.29% in medium nutrition, and 37.71% in severe eutrophication. (3) According to the Standard for Environmental Quality of Surface Water, few samples have DO and NH3-N exceeding the level-V value, but most samples have COD, TP and TN exceeding the level-V value, and there are no excessive heavy metals in all waters of the study area, with excellent test results. Besides, a large number of samples have the inorganic anion index F− greater than the level-V value. Generally, the water quality of open subsidence area is better than that of the closed subsidence area. (4) For the water, TP and F− are poor for Zhangji and Panyi subsidence areas. For the closed water, the TP of Pan Yi, Pan San, Guqiao, Gubei and Zhangji subsidence areas are poor. The distribution of F− pollution shows the geographical characteristics, which is generally poor in north of Huai River and good in south. The indexes of Cr, Cu, Hg, As, NH3-N, TN, COD and DO in all waters are in the “excellent- relatively good” range. The F− and TP indexes of all the open subsidence areas are also in the “excellent-relatively good” range. But the F− of the closed water in Panji area and TP in Fengtai-Yingshang area are in the “poor” range. The regional pollution level is shown as Fengtai-Yingshang area>Panji area>old Mining area. (4) In order to protect the ecological environment of coal mining area, the pollution factors of coal mining subsidence area in Huainan mining area are determined to be COD, TP, TN and F−, with comprehensive consideration to the characteristics of two identification methods of pollution factors. The results provide important support for local ecological and environmental protection.
Keywords
mining subsidence area, high phreatic water level, evaluation of water quality, identification of pollution factors, eutrophication evaluation, Huainan mining area
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0099
Recommended Citation
HU Lin, CHEN Yongchun, XU Yanfei,
et al.
(2023)
"Evaluation of water quality and identification of pollution factors in mining subsidence area with high phreatic water level,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 51:
Iss.
11, Article 10.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0099
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol51/iss11/10
Reference
[1] 童柳华,刘劲松. 潘集矿区塌陷水域水质评价及其综合利用[J]. 中国环境监测,2009,25(4):76−80.
TONG Liuhua,LIU Jinsong. Water quality evaluation of subsided water area and its comprehensive utilization in Panji Mining Area[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China,2009,25(4):76−80.
[2] 谷得明,严家平,范廷玉,等. 淮南潘集采煤沉陷区地表水中氮、磷特征[J]. 环境化学,2014,33(9):1495−1500.
GU Deming,YAN Jiaping,FAN Tingyu,et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface water of coal mine subsidence area in Panji of Huainan[J]. Environmental Chemistry,2014,33(9):1495−1500.
[3] 易齐涛,徐鑫,曲喜杰,等. 两淮采煤沉陷积水区水体初级生产特征[J]. 中国环境科学,2014,34(8):2101−2110.
YI Qitao,XU Xin,QU Xijie,et al. Characterization of primary productivity in the aquatic zones around the Huainan and Huaibei coalmine subsidence areas[J]. China Environmental Science,2014,34(8):2101−2110.
[4] 刘杰,易齐涛,严家平. 淮北濉萧矿区采煤塌陷区水污染特征及评价[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2018,30(5):53−60.
LIU Jie,YI Qitao,YAN Jiaping. Coal mining subsided area water pollution features and assessment in Suixi–Xiaoxian Mining Area,Huaibei Coalfield[J]. Coal Geology of China,2018,30(5):53−60.
[5] 李兵,陈晨,安世凯,等. 淮南潘谢采煤沉陷区水生态环境评价与功能区划[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2020,32(3):15−20.
LI Bing,CHEN Chen,AN Shikai,et al. Coal mining subsidence area water ecological environment assessment and functional zoning in Panxie Mining Area,Huainan[J]. Coal Geology of China,2020,32(3):15−20.
[6] 王铎,吴权佳,董佳甜,等. 沛北采煤塌陷区水质特征及风险评价[J]. 能源环境保护,2022,36(6):159−165.
WANG Duo,WU Quanjia,DONG Jiatian,et al. Water quality characteristics and risk evaluation of coal mining subsidence area in northern Peixian County[J]. Energy and Environmental Protection,2022,36(6):159−165.
[7] 纪磊,李晓明,邓道贵. 淮北煤矿区塌陷湖大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价[J]. 水生生物学报,2016,40(1):147−156.
JI Lei,LI Xiaoming,DENG Daogui. Community structure of macrozoobenthos and bioassessment of water quality in collapse lakes in Huaibei mining areas[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,2016,40(1):147−156.
[8] 孔若楠,苏敬华,黄沈发. 崇明岛主要河道水质评价及时空变化特征[J]. 人民长江,2022,53(12):44−49.
KONG Ruonan,SU Jinghua,HUANG Shenfa. Water quality evaluation and temporal–spatial variation characteristics of main rivers in Chongming Eco–Island,Shanghai City[J]. Yangtze River,2022,53(12):44−49.
[9] 毛艳,郎锋祥,徐鹏,等. 近年来吉安市大型水库水质时空变化趋势分析[J]. 人民长江,2022,53(增刊2):20−23.
MAO Yan,LANG Fengxiang,XU Peng,et al. Spatial–temporal variation of water quality in large reservoirs in Ji’an in recent years[J]. Yangtze River,2022,53(Sup.2):20−23.
[10] 陈雨艳,杨媛媛,石翔宇,等. 基于改进的内梅罗污染指数法的茫溪河水质分析[J]. 四川环境,2022,41(6):144−147.
CHEN Yuyan,YANG Yuanyuan,SHI Xiangyu,et al. Water quality analysis of Mangxi River based on the improved Nemero pollution index method[J]. Sichuan Environment,2022,41(6):144−147.
[11] 程琛,刘佳俊,杨凝,等. 宿州煤矿塌陷水域水质评价及污染来源解析[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(4):24−31.
CHENG Chen,LIU Jiajun,YANG Ning,et al. Quality evaluation and contaminants source apportionment for subsidence water area of coal mine in Suzhou[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Natural Science),2017,37(4):24−31.
[12] 王梅,秦于晴,左其亭,等. 黄河水质与沿线城市社会适应能力耦合协调分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2022,33(6):1−9.
WANG Mei,QIN Yuqing,ZUO Qiting,et al. Coupling coordination analysis between river water quality and social adaptability of cities along the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering,2022,33(6):1−9.
[13] 蔡金王,刘骏. 南充市仪陇河流域水质时空变化特征及污染源解析[J]. 吉林水利,2022(12):27−30.
CAI Jinwang,LIU Jun. Spatial and temporal variation of water quality and pollution sources in Yilong River Basin,Nanchong City[J]. Jilin Water Resources,2022(12):27−30.
[14] 胡昊,王健,吴丹丹,等. 涡阳县城区典型河流水质多评价方法对比分析[J]. 安徽建筑大学学报,2022,30(6):68−75.
HU Hao,WANG Jian,WU Dandan,et al. Comparison and analysis of multiple evaluation methods for water quality of typical rivers in the urban area of Guoyang County[J]. Journal of Anhui Jianzhu University,2022,30(6):68−75.
[15] 木晓丽. 金沙江流域–丽江段水环境质量时空变化趋势及保护思路[J]. 环境科学导刊,2022,41(6):69−72.
MU Xiaoli. Temporal and spatial variation trend and protection ideas of water environment quality in the Jinsha River Basin,Lijiang[J]. Environmental Science Survey,2022,41(6):69−72.
[16] 孙晓杰,赵立,邢益毓,等. 山西省地下水2016–2020年水质变化趋势及污染因子分析[J]. 环境科学导刊,2022,41(6):73−79.
SUN Xiaojie,ZHAO Li,XING Yiyu,et al. Analysis of groundwater quality change trend and pollution factors in Shanxi Province from 2016 to 2020[J]. Environmental Science Survey,2022,41(6):73−79.
[17] 张海柱,蔡斌琴,杨永安,等. 观音湖水域水环境质量现状分析及评价[J]. 四川环境,2021,40(5):173−178.
ZHANG Haizhu,CAI Binqin,YANG Yong’an,et al. Analysis and evaluation of water environment quality of Guanyin Lake[J]. Sichuan Environment,2021,40(5):173−178.
[18] 付博超. 基于内梅罗综合污染指数法的秦皇岛水质评价[J]. 水利科学与寒区工程,2022,5(11):32−34.
FU Bochao. Assessment of water quality in Qinhuangdao based on the Nemerow composite pollution index[J]. Hydro Science and Cold Zone Engineering,2022,5(11):32−34.
[19] 淮南市生态环境局. 2021年淮南市环境质量状况公报[R]. 淮南:淮南市生态环境局,2022.
[20] ZHOU Yu,WANG Xinmin,LI Weiying,et al. Water quality evaluation and pollution source apportionment of surface water in a major city in Southeast China using multi–statistical analyses and machine learning models[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2023,20(1):881.
[21] BOUSSAADA N,BOUALEM B,BENHAMIDA S A,et al. Geochemistry and water quality assessment of continental intercalary aquifer in Ouargla Region (Sahara,Algeria)[J]. Journal of Ecological Engineering,2023,24(2):279−294.
[22] PETERS K,WAGNER P D,PHYO E W,et al. Spatial and temporal assessment of human–water interactions at the Inle Lake,Myanmar:A socio–hydrological DPSIR analysis[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2022,195(1):220.
[23] 刘基,杨建,王强民,等. 榆林市矿区浅层含水层水质现状及水化学特征研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2018,46(12):61−66.
LIU Ji,YANG Jian,WANG Qiangmin,et al. Study on water quality status and hydro−chemical characteristics of shallow aquifer in mining area of Yulin City[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(12):61−66.
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons