Development characteristics and enlightenment of Eagle Ford deep shale gas reservoirs in North America

Authors

YU Rongze, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, ChinaFollow
WANG Chenghao, Shenyang Sub-Company of North Pipeline Co., Ltd., Pipe China Corporation, Shenyang 113001, China
ZHANG Xiaowei, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, China
HU Zhiming, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, China
SUN Yuping, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, China
GUO Wei, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, China
DUAN Xianggang, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, China
WANG Meizhu, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China; National Energy Shale Gas (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China; CNPC Unconventional Oil & Gas Key Laboratory, Langfang 065007, China

Abstract

The large-scale development of shale gas with a buried depth of less than 3 500 m within the overpressure Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation has been realized in Sichuan Basin, and the effective development of shale gas resources with a buried depth of 3 500-4 000 m is being explored currently. Eagle Ford is an emerging deep shale oil & gas reservoir, which is comparable to the domestic medium-deep development regions and deep exploration regions, and its development technology policy and learning curve are available for reference. The parameters of drilling, fracturing, production and cost of 6 223 wells are analyzed in the dry gas production region of Eagle Ford from 2009 to 2019 based on the Shale Gas Cloud Data Intelligent Platform. The research indicates that the medium-shallow shale gas development shows a better performance than that of deep shale gas in the Eagle Ford dry gas production region. The medium-shallow shale gas well has an average measured depth of 6 013 m, a lateral length of 2 558 m, a drilling cycle of 25.3 d, a stage-spacing of 50.0 m, a sanding intensity of 3.81 t/m, a fracturing fluid intensity of 24.2 m³/m, a EUR per 100-meter lateral length of 677×10⁴ m³, the single-well drilling-fracturing cost of 617×10⁴ USD, and the fracturing cost per 100-meter lateral length of 13.4×10⁴ USD. The deep shale gas well has an average measured depth of 6 394 m, a lateral length of 2 423 m, a drilling cycle of 33.3 d, a stage-spacing of 50.0 m, a sanding intensity of 4.03 t/m, a fracturing fluid intensity of 26.9 m³/m, a EUR per 100-meter lateral length of 520×10⁴ m³, the single-well drilling-fracturing cost of 697×10⁴ USD, and the fracturing cost per 100-meter lateral length of 16.1×10⁴ USD. The Eagle Ford dry gas production region is highly efficient in the engineering organization and construction, with the main horizontal well construction circle of 100-150 d and the current single-well construction cycle of 100 d. The relation between lateral length and cumulative gas production per unit drilling-fracturing cost shows a triangular distribution. The reasonable lateral lengths for the medium-shallow and deep wells are 2 300 m and 1 600 m respectively. It is recommended to explore a reasonable lateral length to maximum benefit for domestic medium-shallow scale-development zones, and control the lateral length of deep shale gas wells in the early stage of deep exploration zones.

Keywords

shale gas development characteristic, deep shale gas reservoir, Eagle Ford shale in North America, EUR per 100-meter lateral length, enlightenment

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.12.0815

Recommended Citation

YU Rongze, WANG Chenghao, ZHANG Xiaowei, et al. (2022) "Development characteristics and enlightenment of Eagle Ford deep shale gas reservoirs in North America," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 50: Iss. 9, Article 5.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.12.0815
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol50/iss9/5

Reference

[1] 邹才能,杨智,何东博,等. 常规–非常规天然气理论、技术及前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):575−587

ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,HE Dongbo,et al. Theory,technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(4):575−587

[2] 邹才能,潘松圻,荆振华,等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报,2020,41(1):1−12

ZOU Caineng,PAN Songqi,JING Zhenhua,et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(1):1−12

[3] 金之钧,白振瑞,高波,等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):451−458

JIN Zhijun,BAI Zhenrui,GAO Bo,et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):451−458

[4] 邹才能,潘松圻,赵群. 论中国“能源独立”战略的内涵、挑战及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(2):416−426

ZOU Caineng,PAN Songqi,ZHAO Qun. On the connotation,challenge and significance of China’s “energy independence” strategy[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(2):416−426

[5] CURTIS J B,MONTGOMERY S L. Recoverable natural gas resource of the United States:Summary of recent estimates[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(10):1671−1678.

[6] U S Energy Information Administration(EIA). Review of emerging resources：U. S. shale gas and shale oil plays[R]. Washington D C：U. S. Department of Energy，2011.

[7] 谢军. 关键技术进步促进页岩气产业快速发展:以长宁–威远国家级页岩气示范区为例[J]. 天然气工业,2017,37(12):1−10

XIE Jun. Rapid shale gas development accelerated by the progress in key technologies:A case study of the Changning–Weiyuan national shale gas demonstration zone[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(12):1−10

[8] 马新华. 四川盆地南部页岩气富集规律与规模有效开发探索[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(10):1−10

MA Xinhua. Enrichment laws and scale effective development of shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(10):1−10

[9] 董大忠,施振生,管全中,等. 四川盆地五峰组–龙马溪组页岩气勘探进展、挑战与前景[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(4):67−76

DONG Dazhong,SHI Zhensheng,GUAN Quanzhong,et al. Progress,challenges and prospects of shale gas exploration in the Wufeng–Longmaxi reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(4):67−76

[10] 姜振学,宋岩,唐相路,等. 中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(3):617−628

JIANG Zhenxue,SONG Yan,TANG Xianglu,et al. Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(3):617−628

[11] 马新华,谢军,雍锐,等. 四川盆地南部龙马溪组页岩气储集层地质特征及高产控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(5):841−855

MA Xinhua,XIE Jun,YONG Rui,et al. Geological characteristics and high production control factors of shale gas reservoirs in Silurian Longmaxi Formation,southern Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(5):841−855

[12] 梁兴,徐政语,张朝,等. 昭通太阳背斜区浅层页岩气勘探突破及其资源开发意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):11−28

LIANG Xing,XU Zhengyu,ZHANG Zhao,et al. Breakthrough of shallow shale gas exploration in Taiyang anticline area and its significance for resource development in Zhaotong,Yunnan Province,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):11−28

[13] 周守为,姜伟,张春阳,等. 美国Eagle Ford页岩气开发对我国页岩气勘探开发的启示[J]. 中国工程科学,2012,14(6):16−21

ZHOU Shouwei,JIANG Wei,ZHANG Chunyang,et al. The enlightenment on shale gas exploration and development in China getting from Eagle Ford in America[J]. Strategic Study of CAE,2012,14(6):16−21

[14] 岳江河,肖乔刚. 美国德州Eagle Ford组页岩油气水平井钻井关键技术措施及其实施效果[J]. 中国海上油气,2014,26(1):78−81

YUE Jianghe,XIAO Qiaogang. Key horizontal drilling technology and operation effect for Texas Eagle Ford shale oil and gas in US[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2014,26(1):78−81

[15] 刘新,张玉玮,钟显东,等. 美国典型页岩油气藏水平井压裂技术[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2014,33(6):160−164

LIU Xin,ZHANG Yuwei,ZHONG Xiandong,et al. Fracturing techniques by the horizontal wells in USA typical shale oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2014,33(6):160−164

[16] 崔景伟,朱如凯,杨智,等. 国外页岩层系石油勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 非常规油气,2015,2(4):68−82

CUI Jingwei,ZHU Rukai,YANG Zhi,et al. Progresses and enlightenment of overseas shale oil exploration and development[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2015,2(4):68−82

[17] 余杰,秦瑞宝,刘春成,等. 页岩气储层测井评价与产量“甜点”识别:以美国鹰潭页岩气储层为例[J]. 中国石油勘探,2017,22(3):104−112

YU Jie,QIN Ruibao,LIU Chuncheng,et al. Logging evaluation and production “sweet spot” identification of shale play:A case study on Eagle Ford shale play in the USA[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2017,22(3):104−112

[18] 李彦尊,白玉湖,陈桂华,等. 基于人工神经网络方法的页岩油气产量预测新技术:以美国Eagle Ford页岩油气田为例[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(4):104−110

LI Yanzun,BAI Yuhu,CHEN Guihua,et al. ANN method based on novel technology for production prediction of shale oil and gas:A case study in Eagle Ford[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2020,32(4):104−110

[19] 杜玉宝,朱磊. 美国Eagle Ford区块页岩气水平井钻井液技术[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版),2017,14(19):53−56

DU Yubao,ZHU Lei. The technology of drilling fluid for shale gas horizontal well drilling in Eagle Ford block of USA[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition),2017,14(19):53−56

[20] TRAUGOTT M. Rock mechanics,petrophysics,and stratigraphy of the Tuscaloosa trend[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology,1982,34(2):428−432.

[21] GONG Xinglai，TIAN Yao，MCVAY D A，et al. Assessment of Eagle Ford Shale oil and gas resources[C]//SPE Unconventional Resources Conference. Canada，Calgary，Alberta，2013，SPE 167421.

[22] MULLEN J. Petrophysical characterization of the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas[C]//SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference. Canada，Alberta，Calgary：2010，SPE 138145.

[23] MULLEN J，LOWRY J C C，NWABUOKU K C C. Lessons learned developing the Eagle Ford Shale[C]//SPE Tight Gas Completions Conference. USA，Texas，San Antonio：2010，SPE 138446.

[24] TIAN Yao，AYERS W B，MCCAIN W D. The Eagle Ford Shale play，South Texas：Regional variations in fluid types，hydrocarbon production and reservoir properties[C]//International Petroleum Technology Conference. China，Beijing：2013，IPTC 16808.

[25] SULIMAN B，MEEK R，HULL R，et al. Variable stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) simulation：Eagle Ford Shale case study [C]//SPE Unconventional Resources Conference–USA，Texas，the Woodlands：2013，SPE 164546.

[26] ROBISON C R. Hydrocarbon source rock variability within the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford Shale(Upper Cretaceous),East Texas,U S A[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,1997,34(3/4):287−305.

[27] GHERABATI S A,BROWNING J,MALE F,et al. The impact of pressure and fluid property variation on well performance of liquid–rich Eagle Ford Shale[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016,33:1056−1068.

[28] GHERABATI S A,HAMMES U,MALE F,et al. Assessment of hydrocarbon in place and recovery factors in the Eagle Ford Shale play[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2018,21(2):291−306.

[29] GUO Quanxin，JI Lujun，RAJABOV V，et al. Shale gas drilling experience and lessons learned from Eagle Ford[C]//SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference. USA，Pennsylvania，Pittsburgh：2012，SPE 155542.

[30] COOK D，DOWNING K，BAYER S，et al. Unconventional asset development work flow in the Eagle Ford Shale[C]//SPE Unconventional Resources Conference. USA，Texas，the Woodlands：2014，SPE 168973.

[31] ZHANG Tongwei,SUN Xun,MILLIKEN K L,et al. Empirical relationship between gas composition and thermal maturity in Eagle Ford Shale,South Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2017,101(8):1277−1307.

[32] NEJAD A M，SHELUDKO S，SHELLEY R F，et al. A case history：Evaluating well completions in Eagle Ford Shale using a data–driven approach[C]//SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. USA，Texas，the Woodlands：2015，SPE 173336.

[33] GUO Xuyang,WU Kan,KILLOUGH J,et al. Understanding the mechanism of interwell fracturing interference based on reservoir–geomechanics–fracturing modeling in Eagle Ford Shale[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2019,22:842−860.

[34] SWINDELL G S. Eagle Ford Shale–An early look at ultimate recovery[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. USA，Texas，San Antonio：2012，SPE 158207.

[35] KUSKE S,HORSFIELD B,JWEDA J,et al. Geochemical factors controlling the phase behavior of Eagle Ford Shale petroleum fluids[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2019,103(4):835−870.

[36] LIANG Yu，ZHAO Peidong. A machine learning analysis based on big data for Eagle Ford Shale formation[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Canada，Alberta，Calgary：2019，SPE 196158.