Research on redevelopment model of abandoned mining land from the perspective of property right policy

Authors

DENG Yuanyuan, College of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, ChinaFollow
CHANG Jiang, College of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, ChinaFollow
FENG Shanshan, College of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
ZHOU Xue, College of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

Abstract

The reuse of abandoned mines has become the main path for resource-based cities to realize functional transformation. The redevelopment of mining land belongs to the renewal of urban stock industrial land, which is a spatial transformation process accompanied by property right transfer. The research on the evolution of the relationship between relevant property rights policies and abandoned mine redevelopment model is helpful to understand the impact of the policy and put forward suggestions for future policies. This paper combs the national and local property rights policies since 1990, takes the redevelopment practice in different times of this period as an example, discusses the differences of redevelopment and utilization modes under the background of different property rights policies, and explains the effectiveness of the policy from the perspective of financial balance. The research shows that China’s property right policy-making has developed from “regulatory” to “guiding” to continuously create an institutional guarantee to achieve financial balance for the redevelopment of abandoned mining land. However, the current policy focuses on reducing the transaction cost of property right transfer and insufficient guarantee for the later operation income. In the future, local policies should strengthen the institutional guarantee for the financial gap of non-profit projects, so as to further enhance the public value of redevelopment projects. Combined with the adjustment of property rights policy, the redevelopment model of abandoned mines will also move towards a comprehensive model with multiple subjects and values.

Keywords

abandoned mining land, redevelopment mode, property right policy

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.08.0429

Recommended Citation

DENG Yuanyuan, CHANG Jiang, FENG Shanshan, et al. (2022) "Research on redevelopment model of abandoned mining land from the perspective of property right policy," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 50: Iss. 4, Article 4.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.08.0429
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol50/iss4/4

Reference

[1] 秦容军,任世华,陈茜. 我国关闭(废弃)矿井开发利用途径研究[J]. 煤炭经济研究,2017,37(7):31−35. QIN Rongjun,REN Shihua,CHEN Qian. Study on development and utilization path of closed(abandoned) coal mines in China[J]. Coal Economic Research,2017,37(7):31−35.

[2] 韩运,刘钦节,吴犇牛,等. 废弃矿井地下空间旅游资源开发利用模式研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(4):79−85. HAN Yun,LIU Qinjie,WU Benniu,et al. Study on exploitation and utilization mode of tourism resources of the underground space in abandoned mines[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(4):79−85.

[3] 浦海,卞正富,张吉雄,等. 一种废弃矿井地热资源再利用系统研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(2):677−687. PU Hai,BIAN Zhengfu,ZHANG Jixiong,et al. Research on a reuse mode of geothermal resources in abandoned coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(2):677−687.

[4] 卞正富,周跃进,曾春林,等. 废弃矿井抽水蓄能地下水库构建的基础问题探索[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(10):3308−3318. BIAN Zhengfu,ZHOU Yuejin,ZENG Chunlin,et al. Discussion of the basic problems for the construction of underground pumped storage reservoir in abandoned coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(10):3308−3318.

[5] 何鹤鸣,张京祥. 产权交易的政策干预:城市存量用地再开发的新制度经济学解析[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(2):7−14. HE Heming,ZHANG Jingxiang. Policy intervention on property rights transaction:New institutional economic analysis of urban inventory land redevelopment[J]. Economic Geography,2017,37(2):7−14.

[6] 冯立,唐子来. 产权制度视角下的划拨工业用地更新:以上海市虹口区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊,2013(5):23−29. FENG Li,TANG Zilai. The renewal of allocated industrial land in the perspective of property right system:The case of Hongkou district,Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum,2013(5):23−29.

[7] 徐苏斌,彭飞,张旭. 城市土地政策对工业遗产保护与再利用的影响分析[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(5):385−390. XU Subin,PENG Fei,ZHANG Xu. Analysis of the impact of urban land policy on the protection and reuse of industrial heritage[J]. Journal of Tianjin University(Social Sciences),2015,17(5):385−390.

[8] 黄莉,宋劲松. 实现和分配土地开发权的公共政策:城乡规划体系的核心要义和创新方向[J]. 城市规划,2008,32(12):16−21. HUANG Li,SONG Jinsong. Public policies to realize and distribute land development rights:Key concepts and innovation orientation of urban and rural planning system[J]. City Planning Review,2008,32(12):16−21.

[9] 邹兵. 存量发展模式的实践、成效与挑战:深圳城市更新实施的评估及延伸思考[J]. 城市规划,2017,41(1):89−94. ZOU Bing. Practices,effects,and challenges of the inventory development pattern:The assessments and extended thoughts of urban renewal implementation in Shenzhen[J]. City Planning Review,2017,41(1):89−94.

[10] 林强. 城市更新的制度安排与政策反思:以深圳为例[J]. 城市规划,2017,41(11):52−55. LIN Qiang. Institutional arrangement and policy reflections of urban renewal:A case study of Shenzhen[J]. City Planning Review,2017,41(11):52−55.

[11] 郭旭,严雅琦,田莉. 产权重构、土地租金与珠三角存量建设用地再开发:一个理论分析框架与实证[J]. 城市规划,2020,44(6):98−105. GUO Xu,YAN Yaqi,TIAN Li. Property right reconfiguration,land rent,and redevelopment of stock construction land in the pearl river delta:A theoretical framework and an empirical test[J]. City Planning Review,2020,44(6):98−105.

[12] 李永平,段建南. 城市边缘区工业用地集约利用的现存问题与调控策略[J]. 湖北农业科学,2013,52(8):1796−1799. LI Yongping,DUAN Jiannan. Major problems and regulating strategy on the intensive use of industrial land in urban fringe[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2013,52(8):1796−1799.

[13] 田莉,姚之浩,郭旭,等. 基于产权重构的土地再开发:新型城镇化背景下的地方实践与启示[J]. 城市规划,2015,39(1):22−29. TIAN Li,YAO Zhihao,GUO Xu,et al. Land redevelopment based on property right configuration:Local practice and implications in the context of new urbanization[J]. City Planning Review,2015,39(1):22−29.

[14] 洪国城,邱爽,赵燕菁. 制度设计视角下的城市存量规划与管理[J]. 上海城市规划,2015(3):16−19. HONG Guocheng,QIU Shuang,ZHAO Yanjing. Stock urban planning and management in the perspective of institution design[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review,2015(3):16−19.

[15] 赵燕菁,宋涛. 城市更新的财务平衡分析:模式与实践[J]. 城市规划,2021,45(9):53−61. ZHAO Yanjing,SONG Tao. An analysis on the financial balance of urban renewal:Patterns and practice[J]. City Planning Review,2021,45(9):53−61.

[16] 赵燕菁. 城市化2.0与规划转型:一个两阶段模型的解释[J]. 城市规划,2017,41(3):84−93. ZHAO Yanjing. Urbanization 2.0 and transition of planning:Explanation based on a two−phase model[J]. City Planning Review,2017,41(3):84−93.

[17] 赵民,王理. 城市存量工业用地转型的理论分析与制度变革研究:以上海为例[J]. 城市规划学刊,2018(5):29−36. ZHAO Min,WANG Li. Theoretical analysis and institutional review of industrial land transformation:A case study of Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum,2018(5):29−36.

[18] 刘天乔,饶映雪. 城市低效工业用地退出的模式对比与政策选择[J]. 学习与实践,2017(9):33−39. LIU Tianqiao,RAO Yingxue. Mode comparison and policy choice of urban inefficient industrial land exit[J]. Study and Practice,2017(9):33−39.

[19] 高荆民. 基于制度分析与发展框架的城市更新用地混合利用研究框架[J]. 上海房地,2020(9):24−26. GAO Jingmin. Research framework of mixed utilization of urban renewal land based on institutional analysis and development framework[J]. Shanghai Real Estate,2020(9):24−26.

[20] 曾鹏,李晋轩. 存量工业用地更新与政策演进的时空响应研究:以天津市中心城区为例[J]. 城市规划,2020,44(4):43−52. ZENG Peng,LI Jinxuan. Spatiotemporal responses between urban regeneration and policy change of stock industrial land:A case study of Tianjin downtown area[J]. City Planning Review,2020,44(4):43−52.

[21] 周士园,常江,罗萍嘉,等. 资源型城市转型中的规划引导研究:以徐州市为例[J]. 中国矿业,2016,25(11):88−92. ZHOU Shiyuan,CHANG Jiang,LUO Pingjia,et al. Research into planning guidance during the transformation of resource−based cities:A case study of Xuzhou City[J]. China Mining Magazine,2016,25(11):88−92.

[22] 常江,冯姗姗,张先州,等. 矿区工业废弃地再开发研究:以徐州夏桥井废弃地改造为例[J]. 中国矿业,2007,16(6):49−52. CHANG Jiang,FENG Shanshan,ZHANG Xianzhou,et al. Redevelopment of industrial wasteland of mining area:A case study of Xiaqiao industrial wasteland in Xuzhou[J]. China Mining Magazine,2007,16(6):49−52.