Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
In order to expand the resource utilization of fly ash, research was conducted based on the fly ash of Yuanyang Lake Power Plant in the Ningdong Energy Chemical Industry Base. Specifically, the physical and chemical properties of fly ash were characterized and analyzed by means of scanning electron microscope, energy spectrum analysis and X-ray diffraction. Besides, the total amount, effective state and content in different forms of Pb, Cr, Ni, Cu, Cd and As in fly ash were determined through acid digestion, DTPA extraction and 5-step Tessier sequential extraction. In addition, the ecological risk of heavy metals in fly ash was assessed with the risk assessment coding method (RAC), the ratio of secondary phase and primary phase (RSP) and the potential ecological risk index. The results show that: (1) The fly ash is in good microstructure at small density, with rich contents of rapidly available potassium and phosphorus. (2) The total average value of the six heavy metal elements in fly ash is higher than the background value of soil environment in Ningxia, but less than the screening value of soil pollution risk of other agricultural land (the basic items). The times of out-of-limit is ranked as Pb, Cu, Cr, As, Cd and Ni in order. The available contents of the six heavy metals do not exceed the background value of soil environment in Ningxia and the screening value of soil pollution risk of other agricultural land. (3) According to the RAC assessment results, the ecological risk is high for As, medium and high for Cd, Cu and Ni, low for Cr and zero for Pb. Meanwhile, the heavy metal As is slightly polluting, while Pb, Cr, Ni, Cu and Cd are non-polluting in accordance with the RSP assessment results. Moreover, the results of potential ecological risk index method show that the total amount and effective RI index of the six elements in fly ash are at grade I, with slight ecological hazard. Especially, Cd is the main contributing element of ecological risk. Therefore, fly ash could be used as the cemented filling material in coal mines for large-scale resource utilization.
Keywords
Ningdong Energy Chemical Industry Base,fly ash,heavy metal,occurrence form,ecological risk assessment
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.05.0364
Recommended Citation
ZHANG Zhiguo, TAN Yuning, HU Youbiao,
et al.
(2022)
"Occurrence characteristics and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in fly ash of Ningdong Energy Chemical Industry Base,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 50:
Iss.
11, Article 16.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.05.0364
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol50/iss11/16
Reference
[1] 李树志,李学良,尹大伟. 碳中和背景下煤炭矿山生态修复的几个基本问题[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(1):286−292
LI Shuzhi,LI Xueliang,YIN Dawei. Several basic issues of ecological restoration of coal mines under background of Carbon Neutrality[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(1):286−292
[2] 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2021年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R]. 2022.
[3] 严博文. 白泥改性粉煤灰微珠的除氟性能及机理研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2019.
YAN Bowen. Study on mechanisms of fluride removal from aqueous solution using fly ash cenosperes modified with paper mill lime mud[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2019.
[4] PANDEY S K,BHATTACHARYA T. Mobility,ecological risk and change in surface morphology during sequential chemical extraction of heavy metals in fly ash:A case study[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation,2019,13:373−382.
[5] KOSTOVA I,VASSILEVA C,DAI Shifeng,et al. Mineralogy,geochemistry and mercury content characterization of fly ashes from the Maritza 3 and Varna thermoelectric power plants,Bulgaria[J]. Fuel,2016,186:674−684.
[6] 王小玲. 低热值煤综合利用发电节能技术的应用研究:以永陇矿区低热值煤发电项目为例[J]. 中国煤炭,2019,45(6):82−86
WANG Xiaoling. Research on comprehensive power generation utilization of energy–saving technology application for low calorific value coal based upon the low calorific value coal power generation project in Yonglong mining area[J]. China Coal,2019,45(6):82−86
[7] 池朋,吴小文,赵海卿,等. 煤矸石基免烧砖制备工艺及力学性能研究[J]. 矿产保护与利用,2020,40(3):95−99
CHI Peng,WU Xiaowen,ZHAO Haiqing,et al. Preparation and mechanical properties of non–burning bricks with coal gangue as main raw materials[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources,2020,40(3):95−99
[8] 张斌斌,秦原,谢刚. 煤矸石混凝土的抗渗性能和力学性能分析[J]. 江西建材,2020(6):5−6
ZHANG Binbin,QIN Yuan,XIE Gang. Analysis of impermeability and mechanical properties of coal gangue concrete[J]. Jiangxi Building Materials,2020(6):5−6
[9] SINGH M,CHOUDHARY K,SRIVASTAVA A,et al. A study on environmental and economic impacts of using waste marble powder in concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2017,13:87−95.
[10] 程有坤,祖发金,史梁. 水泥粉煤灰浆液充填法在采空区公路路基治理中的应用[J]. 建筑技术,2022,53(2):220−223
CHENG Youkun,ZU Fajin,SHI Liang. Application of cement−flying ash slurry filling method in highway subgrade treatment in goaf[J]. Architecture Technology,2022,53(2):220−223
[11] 段德丹,廖洪强,候昱灼,等. 粉煤灰、钢渣基腻子粉的性能对比研究[J]. 粉煤灰综合利用,2020,34(4):50−54
DUAN Dedan,LIAO Hongqiang,HOU Yuzhuo,et al. Comparative study on properties of putty powder prepared from fly ash and steel slag[J]. Fly Ash Comprehensive Utilization,2020,34(4):50−54
[12] VARADHARAJAN S. Determination of mechanical properties and environmental impact due to inclusion of flyash and marble waste powder in concrete[J]. Structures,2020,25:613−630.
[13] 杨科,赵新元,何祥,等. 煤基固废充填材料配比试验研究[J]. 山西煤炭,2021,41(4):2−6
YANG Ke,ZHAO Xinyuan,HE Xiang,et al. Experimental study on proportion of coal−based solid waste backfill materials[J]. Shanxi Coal,2021,41(4):2−6
[14] 韦寒波,巴蕾,高谦. 粉煤灰掺量对胶结充填体强度影响规律研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发,2020,40(12):28−32
WEI Hanbo,BA Lei,GAO Qian. Study on the influence law of fly ash content on the strength of cemented backfill[J]. Mining Research and Development,2020,40(12):28−32
[15] 王乐,郭小平,韩祖光,等. 基于废弃物的潞安煤矿废弃地改良土壤基质配比研究[J]. 土壤,2020,52(1):145−152
WANG Le,GUO Xiaoping,HAN Zuguang,et al. Study on formula of soil substrates for improving abandoned lands in Lu’an Coal Mine[J]. Soils,2020,52(1):145−152
[16] KAUR R,GOYAL D. Mineralogical studies of coal fly ash for soil application in agriculture[J]. Particulate Science and Technology,2015,33(1):76−80.
[17] HU Xiongfei,HUANG Xunrong,ZHAO Hanghang,et al. Possibility of using modified fly ash and organic fertilizers for remediation of heavy−metal−contaminated soils[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,284:124713.
[18] RAJA R,NAYAK A K,SHUKLA A K,et al. Impairment of soil health due to fly ash−fugitive dust deposition from coal−fired thermal power plants[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2015,187:679.
[19] RAJU N J,PATEL P,GURUNG D,et al. Geochemical assessment of groundwater quality in the Dun valley of central Nepal using chemometric method and geochemical modeling[J]. Groundwater for Sustainable Development,2015,1(1/2):135–145.
[20] OLSON L H,MISENHEIMER J C,NELSON C M,et al. Influences of coal ash leachates and emergent macrophytes on water quality in wetland microcosms[J]. Water Air & Soil Pollution,2017,228:344.
[21] MTARFI N H,RAIS Z,TALEB M,et al. Effect of fly ash and grading agent on the properties of mortar using response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2017,9:109−116.
[22] AMEH A E,FATOBA O O,MUSYOKA N M,et al. Influence of aluminium source on the crystal structure and framework coordination of Al and Si in fly ash–based zeolite NaA[J]. Powder Technology,2017,306:17−25.
[23] LUO Yang,MA Shuhua,ZHAO Zhenqing,et al. Preparation and characterization of whisker−reinforced ceramics from coal fly ash[J]. Ceramics International,2017,43(1):1−11.
[24] 刘恒凤,张吉雄,周楠,等. 矸石基胶结充填材料重金属浸出及其固化机制[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2021,50(3):523−531
LIU Hengfeng,ZHANG Jixiong,ZHOU Nan,et al. Study of the leaching and solidification mechanism of heavy metals from gangue–based cemented paste backfilling materials[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2021,50(3):523−531
[25] 杜芳鹏,雒铮,乔军伟,等. 宁东煤田侏罗纪煤岩煤质特征及清洁高效利用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(2):71−77
DU Fangpeng,LUO Zheng,QIAO Junwei,et al. Petrographic,quality characteristics and clean & efficient use of Jurassic coal in Ningdong Coalfield[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(2):71−77
[26] 魏迎春,贾煦,刘志飞,等. 鸳鸯湖矿区延安组煤岩煤质特征及成煤环境研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2018,46(7):197−204
WEI Yingchun,JIA Xu,LIU Zhifei,et al. Study on lithology and coal quality features and coal forming environment of Yan’an Formation in Yuanyanghu mining area[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(7):197−204
[27] 赵宇星,马凯. 浅析宁夏鸳鸯湖矿区2煤煤质特征及洁净等级划分[J]. 煤炭科技,2020,41(5):121−124
ZHAO Yuxing,MA Kai. Analysis on coal quality characteristics and cleanliness classification of No.2 coal seam in Yuanyanghu mining area of Ningxia[J]. Coal Science & Technology Magazine,2020,41(5):121−124
[28] 孙瑞瑞,陈华清,李杜康. 基于土壤中铅化学形态的生态风险评价方法比较[J]. 安全与环境工程,2015,22(5):47−51
SUN Ruirui,CHEN Huaqing,LI Dukang. Comparison of ecological risk assessment methods based on the chemical forms of lead in soil[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2015,22(5):47−51
[29] 贾赵恒,罗瑶,沈友刚,等. 大冶龙角山矿区农田土壤重金属形态分布及其来源[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2017,36(2):264−271
JIA Zhaoheng,LUO Yao,SHEN Yougang,et al. Speciation,distribution and sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils from the mining area of Longjiao Mountain in Daye City[J]. Journal of Agro–Environment Science,2017,36(2):264−271
[30] PERIN G,CRABOLEDDA L,LUCCHESE M,et al. Heavy metal speciation in the sediments of northern Adriatic Sea. A new approach for environmental toxicity determination[C]//International Conference:Heavy Metals in the Environment. Edinburgh:CEP Consultants,1985:454–456.
[31] HAKANSON L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control:A sedimentological approach[J]. Water Research,1980,14(8):975−1001.
[32] 钱庆腾,方淑波,乔亚军,等. 盐城海岸带土壤重金属污染风险评价比较研究[J]. 环境污染与防治,2016,38(12):43−48
QIAN Qingteng,FANG Shubo,QIAO Yajun,et al. Comparison of soil heavy metals pollution assessment result of Yancheng coastal zone[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control,2016,38(12):43−48
[33] 徐争启,倪师军,庹先国,等. 潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J]. 环境科学与技术,2008,31(2):112−115
XU Zhengqi,NI Shijun,TUO Xianguo,et al. Calculation of heavy metals’ toxicity coefficient in the evaluation of potential ecological risk index[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2008,31(2):112−115
[34] 郑永红,张治国,姚多喜,等. 煤矸石充填复垦对土壤特性影响研究[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,33(4):7−11
ZHENG Yonghong,ZHANG Zhiguo,YAO Duoxi,et al. Study on influence of gangue on reclaimed soil properties[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Natural Science),2013,33(4):7−11
[35] 夏子书,白一茹,王幼奇,等. 基于PMF模型的宁南山区小流域土壤重金属空间分布及来源解析[J]. 环境科学,2022,43(1):432−441
XIA Zishu,BAI Yiru,WANG Youqi,et al. Spatial distribution and source analysis of soil heavy metals in a small watershed in the mountainous area of southern Ningxia based on PMF model[J]. Environmental Science,2022,43(1):432−441
[36] 生态环境部,国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 15618—2018[S]. 北京:中国环境出版集团,2019.
[37] 陈国杰. 循环流化床粉煤灰物化特性及重金属浸出影响研究[D]. 太原:太原理工大学,2021.
CHEN Guojie. Study on physicochemical properties and contributing factors of heavy metals leaching of circulating fluidized bed fly ash[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2021.
[38] 项玮,韩宝平,朱雪强. 燃煤电厂脱硫粉煤灰理化特性及排放特征[J]. 环境科技,2011,24(6):22−25
XIANG Wei,HAN Baoping,ZHU Xueqiang. Physicochemical and emission properties of desulfurized fly ash from coal fired power plant[J]. Environmental Science and Technology,2011,24(6):22−25
[39] 王卫华,雷龙海. 毛坪铅锌矿区农耕地土壤重金属空间分布、污染与生态评估[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2016,34(11):979−989
WANG Weihua,LEI Longhai. Spatial distribution,contamination and potential ecological risk evaluation of heavy metals in farmlands around Maoping lead–zinc mining area[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2016,34(11):979−989
[40] 陈江军,刘波,蔡烈刚,等. 基于多种方法的土壤重金属污染风险评价对比:以江汉平原典型场区为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2018,45(6):164−172
CHEN Jiangjun,LIU Bo,CAI Liegang,et al. Comparison of risk assessment based on the various methods of heavy metals in soil:A case study for the typical field areas in the Jianghan Plain[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(6):164−172
[41] 陈东东,童士唐. 2种分步浸提方法对土壤种Cr形态提取效果的比较[J]. 环境工程学报,2014,8(9):4022−4026
CHEN Dongdong,TONG Shitang. Comparative assessment of two sequential chemical extraction schemes for fractionation of chromium in polluted soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2014,8(9):4022−4026
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons