Prediction model of water inrush from coal floor based on GA-BP neural network optimized by SSA and its application

Authors

YIN Huiyong, College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
ZHOU Xinlong, College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
LANG Ning, College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
ZHANG Lifeng, Binhu Coal Mine, Zaozhuang Mining(Group) Co., LTD., Zaozhuang 277599, China
WANG Mingli, Qingdao Eco-Environment Monitoring Center of Shandong Province, Qingdao 266003, China
WU Tao, Binhu Coal Mine, Zaozhuang Mining(Group) Co., LTD., Zaozhuang 277599, China
LI Xin, Ningxia Coal Science and Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Yinchuan 750021, China

Abstract

With the increase of coal mining depth, coal production process is faced with complex water inrush mechanism and variable water inrush main control factors, and the uncertainties among the factors make the prediction of floor water inrush more difficult. In order to accurately predict the risk of floor water inrush, aiming at the small sample and non-linear problem of floor water inrush, firstly, genetic Algorithm is used to optimize the initial weights and thresholds of network random assignment, and then Sparrow Search Algorithm with strong search ability and good stability is selected to optimize the weights and thresholds for the second time, so as to establish the SSA-GA-BP neural network floor water inrush prediction model. Based on the analysis of geological and hydrological data of Binhu Coal Mine in Shandong Province, 8 factors including water pressure of aquifer, aquifer thickness, aquiclude thickness, fault density, fractal dimension value of fault, permeability coefficient, unit water inflow and floor failure depth are selected as the main control factors to predict floor water inrush, mapping the main controlling factors of 3D surface map projection. The Kriging interpolation method in surfer software is used to extract 50 data points as the input samples of the model(including 40 training sets and 10 test sets). The model is trained and studied. After the training error accuracy meets the requirements, the water inrush risk of 12 data points of 3 unmined working faces in Binhu Coal Mine is predicted. To verify the accuracy of the model, BP, GA-BP and SSA-GA-BP models are used to predict the test set; to avoid the one-sideness of comparing the model only with the prediction of BP network, the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method, which determines the weight by Entropy Weight Method, is selected to predict the test set. The prediction results of each network model and method are compared with the actual values for analysis. The results show that the water inrush prediction error of GA-BP neural network model optimized by sparrow search algorithm is smaller, and the prediction accuracy is higher, which provides a scientific theoretical basis for mine water disaster prediction.

Keywords

prediction of water inrush from floor, Sparrow Search Algorithm, Genetic Algorithm, BP neural network, Entropy Weight Method, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

DOI

10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.06.021

Recommended Citation

YIN Huiyong, ZHOU Xinlong, LANG Ning, et al. (2021) "Prediction model of water inrush from coal floor based on GA-BP neural network optimized by SSA and its application," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 49: Iss. 6, Article 22.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.06.021
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol49/iss6/22

Reference

[1] WU Qiang. Progress, problems and prospects of prevention and control technology of mine water and reutilization in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(5): 795–805. 武强. 我国矿井水防控与资源化利用的研究进展、问题和展望[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(5): 795–805.

[2] WANG Hao, DONG Shuning, QIAO Wei, et al. Construction and application of remote service cloud platform for mine water hazard prevention and control[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(1): 208–216. 王皓, 董书宁, 乔伟, 等. 矿井水害防控远程服务云平台构建与应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(1): 208–216.

[3] JIN Dewu. New development of water disaster prevention and control technology in China coal mine and consideration on methodology[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2017, 45(5): 141–147. 靳德武. 我国煤矿水害防治技术新进展及其方法论思考[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(5): 141–147.

[4] HU Weiyue, TIAN Gan. Mine water disaster type and prevention and control counter measures in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2010, 38(1): 92–96. 虎维岳, 田干. 我国煤矿水害类型及其防治对策[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2010, 38(1): 92–96.

[5] XIAO Jianyu, TONG Minming, JIANG Chunlu. Prediction of water inrush quantity from coal floor based on fuzzy evidence theory[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(Sup. 1): 131–137. 肖建于, 童敏明, 姜春露. 基于模糊证据理论的煤层底板突水量预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(增刊1): 131–137.

[6] LIU Jing, FENG Guangjun, WU Xiaojun, et al. Prediction of water rich area based on AHP and its role in risk assessment of roof water inrush[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(5): 204–208. 刘景, 冯光俊, 吴晓军, 等. 基于层次分析法的富水区预测及其在顶板突水危险性评价中的作用[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(5): 204–208.

[7] YIN Huiyong, WEI Jiuchuan, LIU Tongbin, et al. Evaluation of water inrush in seam floor based on multi-originated information complex[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2008, 27(2): 6–9. 尹会永, 魏久传, 刘同彬, 等. 基于多源信息复合的煤层底板突水评价[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 27(2): 6–9.

[8] HAN Chenghao, WEI Jiuchuan, XIE Daolei, et al. Water-richness evaluation of sandstone aquifer based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy set coupling method: A case from Jurassic Zhiluo Formation of Jinjiaqu coal mine in Ningdong mining area[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(7): 2432–2443. 韩承豪, 魏久传, 谢道雷, 等. 基于集对分析–可变模糊集耦合法的砂岩含水层富水性评价: 以宁东矿区金家渠井田侏罗系直罗组含水层为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(7): 2432–2443.

[9] LI Yanmin, ZHOU Chenyang, LI Fenglian. Multi-decision tree prediction model for coal seam floor water inrush based on cost-sensitive theory[J]. Industry and Mine Automation, 2020, 46(12): 76–83. 李彦民, 周晨阳, 李凤莲. 基于代价敏感理论的多决策树煤层底板突水预测模型[J]. 工矿自动化, 2020, 46(12): 76–83.

[10] ZHANG Xiaoliang. Application of entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process in evaluation of water inrush from coal seam floor[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2017, 45(3): 91–95. 张晓亮. 熵权耦合层次分析赋权在煤层底板突水评价中的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017, 45(3): 91–95.

[11] LIU Weitao, LIAO Shanghui, LIU Shiliang, et al. Principal component logistic regression analysis in application of water outbursts from coal seam floor[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Natural Science), 2015, 34(8): 905–909. 刘伟韬, 廖尚辉, 刘士亮, 等. 主成分logistic回归分析在底板突水预测中的应用[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 34(8): 905–909.

[12] YIN Huiyong, ZHOU Wanfang, LAMOREAUX J W, et al. Water inrush conceptual site models for coal mines of China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77(22): 746.

[13] ZHAO Linlin, WEN Guofeng, SHAO Liangshan. GSPCA-LSSVM model for evaluating risk of coal floor groundwater bursting[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(2): 128–133. 赵琳琳, 温国锋, 邵良杉. 煤层底板突水危险性GSPCA-LSSVM评价模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 128–133.

[14] LIU Chenyu, WEI Jiuchuan, WANG Jie, et al. Prediction of floor water inrush risk based on AHP-TFN model[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2019, 28(8): 124–129. 刘晨雨, 魏久传, 王杰, 等. 基于AHP-TFN模型的底板突水危险性预测[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(8): 124–129.

[15] SHI Longqing, QU Xingyue, HAN Jin, et al. Multi-model fusion for assessing the risk of inrush of limestone karst water through mine floor[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(8): 2484–2493. 施龙青, 曲兴玥, 韩进, 等. 多模型融合评价煤层底板灰岩岩溶突水危险性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(8): 2484–2493.

[16] YU Xiaoge, HAN Jin, SHI Longqing, et al. Forecast of destroyed floor depth based on BP neural networks[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(6): 731–736. 于小鸽, 韩进, 施龙青, 等. 基于BP神经网络的底板破坏深度预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(6): 731–736.

[17] CHEN Jianping, WANG Chunlei, WANG Xuedong. Coal mine floor water inrush prediction based on CNN neural network[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(1): 50–57. 陈建平, 王春雷, 王雪冬. 基于CNN神经网络的煤层底板突水预测[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(1): 50–57.

[18] SHI Longqing, ZHANG Rongao, XU Dongjing, et al. Prediction of water inrush from floor based on GWO-Elman neural network[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(7): 2455–2463. 施龙青, 张荣遨, 徐东晶, 等. 基于GWO-Elman神经网络的底板突水预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(7): 2455–2463.

[19] XUE Jiankai. Research and application of a novel swarm intelligence optimization technique: Sparrow search algorithm[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2020. 薛建凯. 一种新型的群智能优化技术的研究与应用: 麻雀搜索算法[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2020.

[20] QI Chunyan, QIU Guoqing, ZHANG Hairong. Influencing factors analysis of floor water invasion prediction model[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2013, 38(2): 153–156. 祁春燕, 邱国庆, 张海荣. 底板突水预测模型的影响因素分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2013, 38(2): 153–156.

[21] YIN Huiyong, SHI Yongli, NIU Huigong, et al. A GIS-based model of potential groundwater yield zonation for a sandstone aquifer in the Juye coalfield, Shangdong, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 557: 434–447.

[22] LYU Xin, MU Xiaodong, ZHANG Jun, et al. Chaos sparrow search optimization algorithm[J/OL]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020: 1–10. [2020-08-31]. https://doi.org/10.137001j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0298 吕鑫, 慕晓冬, 张钧, 等. 混沌麻雀搜索优化算法[J/OL]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020: 1–10. [0-08-31]. https://doi.org/10.137001j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0298

[23] WANG Rongbing, XU Hongyan, LI Bo, et al. Research on method of determining hidden layer nodes in BP neural network[J]. Computer Technology and Development, 2018, 28(4): 31–35. 王嵘冰, 徐红艳, 李波, 等. BP神经网络隐含层节点数确定方法研究[J]. 计算机技术与发展, 2018, 28(4): 31–35.

[24] YIN Huiyong, ZHAO Han, XU Lin, et al. Classification of rock mass in mine based on improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Metal Mine, 2020(7): 53–58. 尹会永, 赵涵, 徐琳, 等. 岩体质量分级的改进模糊综合评价法[J]. 金属矿山, 2020(7): 53–58.

[25] LI Jingying, LIU Qimeng, LIU Yu, et al. Risk assessment of water inrush from coal seam roof based on GIS and entropy method[J]. Coal Engineering, 2019, 51(8): 115–119. 李竞赢, 刘启蒙, 刘瑜, 等. 基于GIS与熵值法的煤层顶板突水危险性评价[J]. 煤炭工程, 2019, 51(8): 115–119.