Method and application of diagnosis of low productivity damage of CBM wells

Authors

FENG Qing, Oilfield Production Optimization Institution, China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin 300450, China

Abstract

Coal reservoirs differ from conventional reservoirs, are easily damaged and the damage factors are complex. Massive papers focus on CBM damage mechanism, but fewer studies on pollution types and stimulating measures. This paper studied various factors influencing CBM and water production in a block of Qinshui basin from angle of geology, engineering and drainage, and established the typical production curve model to determine reservoir judgement method of damage types of low production wells, layer and well selection standards for reservoir with big yield-increasing potential to carry out second reconstruction. The results proved that factors influencing CBM wells productivity such as geology, engineering and drainage can't be ignored because their damages are huge, factors such as collapse column, fracturing fluid soaking time, abnormal fracturing operation, drainage time interval, production efficiency and liquid drop speed have big damage to coal reservoirs. Determination of major factors of reservoir damage and establishment of typical curves offer references for reservoir diagnosis, and have important guiding significance for reconstruction of selected wells and layers with low productivity and low efficiency.

Keywords

CBM wells, productivity, reservoir damage, typical curves

DOI

10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.01.012

Recommended Citation

F. (2019) "Method and application of diagnosis of low productivity damage of CBM wells," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 47: Iss. 1, Article 13.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.01.012
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol47/iss1/13

Reference

[1] 李梦溪,刘庆昌,张建国,等. 构造模式与煤层气井产能的关系:以晋城煤区为例[J]. 天然气工业,2010,30(11):10-15. LI Mengxi,LIU Qingchang,ZHANG Jianguo,et al. Relationship between structural style and CBM well productivity:A case study of Jincheng coalfield[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2010, 30(11):10-15.

[2] 赵庆波,张公明. 煤层气评价重要参数及选区原则[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1999,26(2):23-26. ZHAO Qingbo,ZHANG Gongming. Important parameters in the evaluation of coalbed gas and principles for screening exploration target[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1999, 26(2):23-26.

[3] 万金彬,李素娟,黄科,等. 沁水盆地樊庄区块煤层含气量影响因素分析[J]. 石油天然气学报,2012,34(9):83-88. WAN Jinbin,LI Sujuan,HUANG Ke,et al. Influential factor analysis on coalbed gas content in Fanzhuang block of Qinshui basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2012,34(9):83-88.

[4] 王丹. 临汾区块煤层气富集及产能影响因素研究[D]. 北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2015:56-78.

[5] 刘世奇,桑树勋,李梦溪,等. 樊庄区块煤层气井产能差异的关键地质影响因素及其控制机理[J]. 煤炭学报,2013,38(2):278-283. LIU Shiqi,SANG Shuxun,LI Mengxi,et al. Key geologic factors and control mechanisms of water production and gas production divergences between CBM wells in Fanzhuang block[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(2):278-283.

[6] 胡友林,乌效鸣. 煤层气储层水锁损害机理及防水锁剂的研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(6):1108-1111. HU Youlin,WU Xiaoming. Research on coalbed methane reservoir water blocking damage mechanism and anti-water blocking[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(6):1108-1111.

[7] 秦建中,贾蓉芬,郭爱明,等. 华北地区煤系烃源层油气生成、运移、评价[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2000:125-132.

[8] 杨秀春,李明宅. 煤层气排采动态参数及其相互关系[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2008,36(2):21-24. YANG Xiuchun,LI Mingzhai. Dynamic parameters of CBM well drainage and relationship among them[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2008,36(2):21-24.

[9] 王兴隆,赵益忠,吴桐. 沁南高煤阶煤层气井排采机理与生产特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2009,37(5):5-9. WANG Xinglong,ZHAO Yizhong,WU Tong. Analysis of typical production mechanism and characteristics of coalbed methane wells for high rank coal in south Qinshui basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2009,37(5):5-9.