•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

Objective Deep coal seams in the Yichuan block of the Ordos Basin are characterized by small thicknesses, vertical multi-layer superimposition, and strong vertical and horizontal heterogeneities. When used to develop these coal seams, multi-stage horizontal well fracturing faces challenges such as uneven fracture propagation across various stages in the horizontal direction and a low production degree of multiple coal seams in the vertical direction, complicating commercial exploitation. To address these issues, this study proposes a multi-round diverting fracturing technology based on a vertical cluster well group. In this technology, vertical layered fracturing using vertical cluster wells is employed to achieve the commingled exploitation of multiple layers; intra-layer multi-round fracturing facilitates fracture network diversion to form uniform and dense fracture networks, while the well factory pattern of the well group contributes to expanded fracture network coverage, reduced costs, and enhanced efficiency. Methods This study investigated the G3-1 well group in the Yichuan block. Using fluid-solid coupling and the iteration of fracture propagation dynamics, multiple parameters, including pore pressure, induced stress, and fracture geometry, were updated in each fracturing round, with the stress field evolution, fracture diversion, and inter-well fracture network propagation patterns during multi-round fracturing being analyzed. Based on this, multiple parameters were optimized, encompassing well and row spacings, fracturing fluid combination, proppant ratio, fracturing sequence, and pump-off time between two adjacent fracturing rounds. Consequently, a reservoir stimulation scheme was developed. This scheme, with the synergistic fracturing of a vertical cluster well group as the core, facilitates uniform inter-well fracture propagation horizontally and enhances the joint production of multiple coal seams vertically. Results Field application results indicate that after multi-round synergistic fracturing using a diamond-shaped well pattern with a well spacing of 400 m and a row spacing of 200 m, the fracture length and stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) of the No. 8 coal seam increased from 320 m in the first round to 480 m and from 15.0 × 104 m3 to 36.6 × 104 m3, respectively. In contrast, the No. 5 coal seam exhibited an average fracture length of 412 m and an average SRV of 13.9 × 104 m3 in various fracturing rounds. The SRV utilization rate of the G3-1 well group increased from 65% to 89%. Compared to wells subjected to conventional single-round fracturing in adjacent areas, the cumulative gas production of the well group increased by 42%. Conclusions The dynamic stress induced by multi-round fracturing can alter the subsequent fracture propagation direction. This promotes the interconnection of fractures created in different fracturing rounds across varying coal seams and wells, thereby enhancing both the coverage of inter-well fracture networks and effective SRV. For deep-seated thin coal seams and strongly heterogeneous blocks, it is advisable to comprehensively determine well pattern deployment, fracturing sequence, and the interval between two fracturing rounds based on the dynamic evolution of in situ stress. Furthermore, subsequent fracturing parameters should be adjusted in time as per the fracture propagation results of previous rounds. These efforts will help transform local reservoir stimulation via a single well into overall synergistic stimulation using a well group. The results of this study will provide a reference for the development of blocks with multiple thin coal seams.

Keywords

deep-seated thin coal seam, vertical-clustered well group, synergistic fracturing, multi-round fracturing, fracturing parameter optimization

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.26.04.0220

Reference

[1] 周立宏,熊先钺,李勇,等. 深层煤层(岩)气革命性突破及关键理论与技术[J]. 天然气工业,2025,45(5):17−30. ZHOU Lihong,XIONG Xianyue,LI Yong,et al. Revolutionary breakthroughs and key theories and technologies in deep coalbed methane development[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2025,45(5):17−30.

[2] 周立宏,李勇,丁蓉,等. 煤层(岩)气"同生异构"控藏特征及开发实践:以鄂尔多斯盆地大吉区块石炭系本溪组8号煤为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2025,52(4):772−781. ZHOU Lihong,LI Yong,DING Rong,et al. Differential accumulation characteristics and production of coalbed methane/coal–rock gas: A case study of the No. 8 coal seam of the Carboniferous Benxi Formation in the Daji Block,Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2025,52(4):772−781.

[3] 周立宏,闫霞,熊先钺,等. 深部煤层气超临界状态下赋存特征及分配规律[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):73−90. ZHOU Lihong,YAN Xia,XIONG Xianyue,et al. Characteristics of occurrence and distribution rule of deep coalbed methane in supercritical state[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):73−90.

[4] 周立宏,熊先钺,丁蓉,等. 煤岩气内涵、富集机理及实践意义[J]. 天然气工业,2025,45(3):1−15. ZHOU Lihong,XIONG Xianyue,DING Rong,et al. Connotation,enrichment mechanism and practical significance of coal–rock gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2025,45(3):1−15.

[5] 徐凤银,聂志宏,孙伟,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气高效开发理论技术体系[J]. 煤炭学报,2024,49(1):528−544. XU Fengyin,NIE Zhihong,SUN Wei,et al. Theoretical and technological system for highly efficient development of deep coalbed methane in the eastern edge of Erdos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(1):528−544.

[6] 徐凤银,甄怀宾,李曙光,等. 深部煤层气储层改造技术迭代升级历史与发展方向:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大吉区块为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):1−18. XU Fengyin,ZHEN Huaibin,LI Shuguang,et al. History and development direction of iterative upgrading of deep coalbed methane reservoir reconstruction technology: Taking the Daji Block in the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):1−18.

[7] TANG Xuanhe,YANG Haixin,ZHU Haiyan,et al. Investigation on well interferences of infill well fracturing in shale gas reservoirs across Sichuan Basin[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2025,58(1):145−164.

[8] NASROLLAHZADEH B,ALI AKHLAGHI AMIRI H,GHABEZLOO S. Field–scale fully coupled simulation of fluid flow and geomechanics: Gas storage/recovery process in a depleted sandstone reservoir[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,200:108423.

[9] GUPTA J K,ZIELONKA M G,ALBERT R A,et al. Integrated methodology for optimizing development of unconventional gas resources[C]//SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. The Woodlands: Society of Petroleum Engineers,2012: SPE–152224–MS.

[10] ROUSSEL N P,SHARMA M M. Strategies to minimize frac spacing and stimulate natural fractures in horizontal completions[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Denver: Society of Petroleum Engineers,2011: SPE–146104–MS.

[11] 朱传华,王伟锋,王青振,等. 非均质储层三维构造应力场模拟方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(5):1580−1588. ZHU Chuanhua,WANG Weifeng,WANG Qingzhen,et al. Numerical simulation of structural strain for turbidite sands reservoirs of low permeability[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2016,46(5):1580−1588.

[12] 熊先钺,甄怀宾,李曙光,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气多轮次转向压裂技术及应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):147−160. XIONG Xianyue,ZHEN Huaibin,LI Shuguang,et al. Multi–round diverting fracturing technology and its application in deep coalbed methane in the Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):147−160.

[13] 赵海峰,王成旺,席悦,等. 深层煤层水平井压裂动态应力场研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2025,15(2):310−323. ZHAO Haifeng,WANG Chengwang,XI Yue,et al. Study on dynamic stress field of fracturing in horizontal wells of deep coal seams: A case study of Daning–Jixian Block in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2025,15(2):310−323.

[14] 王成旺,陈怡羽,高德利,等. 深层煤层气四维应力场研究与实践:以大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2026,54(7):53−68. WANG Chengwang,CHEN Yiyu,GAO Deli,et al. Research and practice of four–dimensional in-situ stress fields for deep coalbed methane production: A case study of the Daning–Jixian Block,Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2026,54(7):53−68.

[15] 赵海峰,王腾飞,李忠百,等. 页岩油水平井组压裂动态应力场研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2024,14(3):352−363. ZHAO Haifeng,WANG Tengfei,LI Zhongbai,et al. Study on dynamic stress field for fracturing in horizontal well group of shale oil[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2024,14(3):352−363.

[16] 赵海峰,杨昌增,冯堃,等. 韩城区块西北部三维地应力场反演分析[J]. 煤矿安全,2023,54(10):16−23. ZHAO Haifeng,YANG Changzeng,FENG Kun,et al. Inversion analysis of three–dimensional geostress field in northwest Hancheng Block[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2023,54(10):16−23.

[17] 李倩,李童,蔡益栋,等. 煤层气储层水力裂缝扩展特征与控因研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(12):4443−4460. LI Qian,LI Tong,CAI Yidong,et al. Research progress on hydraulic fracture characteristics and controlling factors of coalbed methane reservoirs[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(12):4443−4460.

[18] 马兴莹,成小雨,程成. 煤岩层分段水力压裂裂缝扩展与应力演化特征实验研究[J]. 实验技术与管理,2024,41(9):47−53. MA Xingying,CHENG Xiaoyu,CHENG Cheng. Experimental study on fracture propagation and stress evolution characteristics of segmented hydraulic fracturing in coal strata[J]. Experimental Technology and Management,2024,41(9):47−53.

[19] 吕帅锋,王生维,刘洪太,等. 煤储层天然裂隙系统对水力压裂裂缝扩展形态的影响分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(7):2590−2601. LYU Shuaifeng,WANG Shengwei,LIU Hongtai,et al. Analysis of the influence of natural fracture system on hydraulic fracture propagation morphology in coal reservoir[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(7):2590−2601.

[20] 马平华,霍梦颖,何俊,等. 煤层气井压裂影响因素分析与技术优化:以鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘韩城矿区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学,2017,28(2):296−304. MA Pinghua,HUO Mengying,HE Jun,et al. Influencing factors and technology optimization of coalbed methane well fracturing: Taking Hancheng mining area as an example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(2):296−304.

[21] 李成成,潘一山. 不同地应力作用下煤体水力压裂起裂压力与裂缝扩展数值模拟[C]//煤矿冲击地压防治的创新与实践:全国防治煤矿冲击地压高端论坛论文汇编. 2013: 53−57.

[22] 田博凡,康永尚,邓泽,等. 煤岩抗压强度和弹性模量对不同煤阶区煤层气开发的影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(6):245−253. TIAN Bofan,KANG Yongshang,DENG Ze,et al. Variation law of compressive strength and Young's modulus of coal rock with coal rank and their significance for CBM development[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(6):245−253.

[23] 樊世星. 液态CO2压裂煤岩增透及裂缝形成机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(8):1728. FAN Shixing. Study on the mechanism of fractures propagation and permeability enhancements induced by liquid CO2 fracturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2021,40(8):1728.

[24] 李浩哲,姜在炳,舒建生,等. 水力裂缝在煤岩界面处穿层扩展规律的数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(2):106−113. LI Haozhe,JIANG Zaibing,SHU Jiansheng,et al. Numerical simulation of layer–crossing propagation behavior of hydraulic fractures at coal–rock interface[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(2):106−113.

[25] 李志刚,付胜利,乌效鸣,等. 煤岩力学特性测试与煤层气井水力压裂力学机理研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2000,28(3):10−13. LI Zhigang,FU Shengli,WU Xiaoming,et al. Research on mechanical property test and mechanism of hydraulic fracture of gas well in coal beds[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2000,28(3):10−13.

[26] 陈勉,周健,金衍,等. 随机裂缝性储层压裂特征实验研究[J]. 石油学报,2008,29(3):431−434. CHEN Mian,ZHOU Jian,JIN Yan,et al. Experimental study on fracturing features in naturally fractured reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(3):431−434.

[27] 王永辉,刘玉章,丁云宏,等. 页岩层理对压裂裂缝垂向扩展机制研究[J]. 钻采工艺,2017,40(5):39−42. WANG Yonghui,LIU Yuzhang,DING Yunhong,et al. Research on influence of shale bedding to vertical extension mechanism of hydraulic fracture[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2017,40(5):39−42.

[28] 孟召平,卢易新. 高煤阶煤样水力压裂前后应力–渗透率试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2023,51(1):353−360. MENG Zhaoping,LU Yixin. Experimental study on stress–permeability of high rank coal samples before and after hydraulic fracturing[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(1):353−360.

[29] 陈立超,王生维,张典坤. 压裂液浸泡对高阶煤力学性质的软化机理[J]. 中国煤炭,2021,47(12):38−44. CHEN Lichao,WANG Shengwei,ZHANG Diankun. Softening mechanism of fracturing fluid immersion on mechanical properties of high–rank coal[J]. China Coal,2021,47(12):38−44.

[30] 倪小明,李哲远,王延斌. 煤储层水力压裂后渗透率预测模型建立及应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2014,42(6):92−95. NI Xiaoming,LI Zheyuan,WANG Yanbin. Establish and application on prediction model about permeability of coal reservoir after hydraulic fracture[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2014,42(6):92−95.

[31] 位云生,王军磊,齐亚东,等. 页岩气井网井距优化[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(4):129−137. WEI Yunsheng,WANG Junlei,QI Yadong,et al. Optimization of shale gas well pattern and spacing[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(4):129−137.

[32] LIANG Baosheng,DU Meilin,YANEZ P P. Subsurface well spacing optimization in the Permian Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,174:235−243.

[33] WU Xiaotian,LI Yingchun,TANG Chun'an. Fracture spacing in horizontal well multi–perforation fracturing optimized by heat extraction[J]. Geothermics,2022,101:102376.

[34] WANG Zhiyuan,ZHAO Xinli,XIONG Shengchun,et al. Semi–analytical model–based research on influencing factors of the spacing of volume fracturing horizontal well in tight oil reservoirs via consideration of imbibition[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,198:108167.

[35] CHEN Jingyuan,WEI Yunsheng,WANG Junlei,et al. Inter–well interference and well spacing optimization for shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,6(5):301−312.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.