Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
Background Influenced by multi-stage compression from the North Tianshan and Bogda mountains, the southern margin of the Junggar Basin in Xinjiang exhibits the widespread development of steeply dipping coal seams. The extreme stratigraphic occurrence, combined with complex structural superimposition styles, poses significant challenges to the fine-scale characterization of these coal seams. Correspondingly, the planar and regional distribution patterns of gas content in these coal seams remain poorly understood, rendering it difficult to effectively determine the sweet spots of coalbed methane (CBM). Methods Focusing on the Miquan area, Xinjiang, this study investigated the methodology for 3D geological modeling of representative steeply dipping coal seams, aiming to achieve the fine-scale characterization of the coal seam distribution, coal macrolithotypes, gas content, coal-body structures, and in situ stress in a complex structural setting. Results and Conclusions Following the topological processing strategy of faults first and then strata, the precise cutting of complex fault networks was achieved using surface-to-surface Boolean operations. Then, the 3D modeling of coal seams with dip angles approaching 90° was achieved. By addressing challenges encountered by conventional modeling, namely stratigraphic interpenetration and automatic grid dispersion and distortion under formation dip angles of greater than 60°, a 3D geological model with a planar grid size of 20 m × 20 m and a vertical resolution of 2 m was successfully constructed. The modeling results indicate that the Badaowan syncline in the study area exhibits a south-dipping axial plane and an axial direction of approximately 60°. The dip angles of its northern limb range from 45° to 65° and above, while those of its southern limb generally measure 55°-75° and above. In contrast, the Northern monocline in the study area exhibits dip angles ranging from 78° to 86°. Across the study area, the Nos. 42 and 43 coal seams are primarily composed of semi-bright and semi-dull coals, while the No. 45 coal seam is dominated by bright and semi-bright coals in the Badaowan syncline and consists primarily of semi-dull and dull coals in the eastern segment of the Northern monocline. The gas content in the coal seams varies between 2 m3/t and 12 m3/t, increasing with burial depth vertically. In terms of coal-body structures, the coal seams in the study area are dominated by fractured to granulated coals. In the Northern monocline, which is governed by faults, fractured to granulated coal belts occur around faults. In contrast, in the Badaowan syncline, the core exhibits relatively intact coal-body structures, while fractured to granulated coal structures predominate near both limbs. The maximum horizontal principal stress in the study area ranges from 5.28 MPa to 38.61 MPa, striking NEE generally, whereas the minimum horizontal principal stress ranges from 4.58 MPa to 25.00 MPa. In the Badaowan syncline, the in situ stress regime transitions from strike-slip to normal faulting stress state with an increase in burial depth. In contrast, the in situ stress in the Northern monocline primarily displays a strike-slip stress state across varying burial depths. The proposed modeling methodology effectively addresses the challenge of the fine-scale characterization of steeply dipping coal seams, holding great theoretical and practical significance for the geological modeling and fine-scale CBM reservoir characterization of structurally complex areas.
Keywords
coalbed methane (CBM), steeply dipping coal seam, reservoir physical property, gas-bearing property, Miquan area, southern margin of the Junggar Basin
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.11.0856
Recommended Citation
WU Luofei, LI Yong, ZHANG Weiqi,
et al.
(2026)
"3D geological modeling and its application for steeply dipping coal seams in the Miquan area, Xinjiang,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54:
Iss.
8, Article 6.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.11.0856
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss8/6
Reference
[1] 于兴河. 油气储层表征与随机建模的发展历程及展望[J]. 地学前缘,2008,15(1):1−15 YU Xinghe. A review of development course and prospect of petroleum reservoir characterization and stochastic modeling[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15(1):1−15
[2] 李勇,李军辉,李永臣,等. 地质建模和数值模拟在煤层气微幅构造控藏控产中的实践[J]. 天然气工业,2025,45(3):54−67 LI Yong,LI Junhui,LI Yongchen,et al. Application of geological modeling and numerical simulation in coalbed methane reservoirs and production control micro–structure[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2025,45(3):54−67
[3] 李青元,张洛宜,曹代勇,等. 三维地质建模的用途、现状、问题、趋势与建议[J]. 地质与勘探,2016,52(4):759−767 LI Qingyuan,ZHANG Luoyi,CAO Daiyong,et al. Usage,status,problems,trends and suggestions of 3D geological modeling[J]. Geology and Exploration,2016,52(4):759−767
[4] PAN Mao,LI Zhaoliang,GAO Zhongbo,et al. 3–D geological modeling–concept,methods and key techniques[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition),2012,86(4):1031−1036.
[5] 周为喜,陈玉华,杨永国,等. 基于角点网格的煤层三维建模与可视化研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(5):53−57 ZHOU Weixi,CHEN Yuhua,YANG Yongguo,et al. 3D modeling and visualization of coal reservoir based on corner–point grid[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2016,44(5):53−57
[6] 王晓辉,刘再斌,张东亮,等. 基于TIN–GTP算法的煤矿三维地质建模技术研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(9):41−48 WANG Xiaohui,LIU Zaibin,ZHANG Dongliang,et al. A TIN–GTP algorithm–based technique for 3D geological modeling of coal mines[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(9):41−48
[7] 刘再斌,董书宁,李鹏,等. 智能开采透明工作面技术架构与展望[J]. 智能矿山,2020,1(1):46–51.
[8] 程建远,刘文明,朱梦博,等. 智能开采透明工作面地质模型梯级优化试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2020,48(7):118−126 CHENG Jianyuan,LIU Wenming,ZHU Mengbo,et al. Experimental study on cascade optimization of geological models in intelligent mining transparency working face[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2020,48(7):118−126
[9] 刘再斌,刘程,刘文明,等. 透明工作面多属性动态建模技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(7):2628−2635 LIU Zaibin,LIU Cheng,LIU Wenming,et al. Multi–attribute dynamic modeling technique for transparent working face[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(7):2628−2635
[10] 谷保泽,代振华,李明星,等. 透明地质保障技术构建方法:以乌海矿区为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(1):136−143 GU Baoze,DAI Zhenhua,LI Mingxing,et al. Construction method on transparent geological guarantee technologies:A case study of Wuhai mining area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(1):136−143
[11] 李勇,曹代勇,魏迎春,等. 准噶尔盆地南缘中低煤阶煤层气富集成藏规律[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(12):1472−1482 LI Yong,CAO Daiyong,WEI Yingchun,et al. Middle to low rank coalbed methane accumulation and reservoiring in the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(12):1472−1482
[12] 马平华,邵先杰,霍梦颖,等. 煤储层地质建模思路与方法:以鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘韩城矿区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(3):601−610 MA Pinghua,SHAO Xianjie,HUO Mengying,et al. Concepts and methods for coalbed geology modeling:A case study in the Hancheng mining area,southeastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(3):601−610
[13] 郭福钟,郑博文,祁生文,等. 三维地质建模技术与方法综述[J]. 工程地质学报,2024,32(3):1143−1153 GUO Fuzhong,ZHENG Bowen,QI Shengwen,et al. A review of 3D geological modeling technology and methods[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2024,32(3):1143−1153
[14] 陈更新,赵凡,曹正林,等. 地震反演、地质协同约束储层精细建模研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2014,25(11):1839−1846 CHEN Gengxin,ZHAO Fan,CAO Zhenglin,et al. Integrated reservoir modeling based on seismic inversion and geological data[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(11):1839−1846
[15] 刘晓宁,罗金辉,马晓理,等. 基于3DMine软件的煤炭资源数据建模与分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(2):72−78 LIU Xiaoning,LUO Jinhui,MA Xiaoli,et al. Data modeling and analysis of coal resources based on 3DMine software[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(2):72−78
[16] 武强,徐华. 三维地质建模与可视化方法研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2004,34(1):54–60.
[17] 孙月成,李永飞,孙守亮. 高精度三维地质建模新方法与关键技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(9):241−248 SUN Yuecheng,LI Yongfei,SUN Shouliang. Research on key technologies and new method of high precision 3D geological modeling[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(9):241−248
[18] 李青元,张威,周顺,等. “平、剖面三维联动编辑”的实现途径[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2014,26(1):67−72 LI Qingyuan,ZHANG Wei,ZHOU Shun,et al. Implementation ways to plan and section 3D interaction editing[J]. Coal Geology of China,2014,26(1):67−72
[19] 吴志春,郭福生,姜勇彪,等. 基于地质剖面构建三维地质模型的方法研究[J]. 地质与勘探,2016,52(2):363−375 WU Zhichun,GUO Fusheng,JIANG Yongbiao,et al. Methods of three–dimensional geological modeling based on geological sections[J]. Geology and Exploration,2016,52(2):363−375
[20] 国家能源局. 煤层气数值模拟技术规范:NB/T 11105—2023[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2023.
[21] 李勇,熊先钺,徐立富,等. 中国煤层气商业开发典型案例及启示[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):31−46 LI Yong,XIONG Xianyue,XU Lifu,et al. Inspirations of typical commercially developed coalbed methane cases in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):31−46
[22] HOULDING S. 3D geoscience modeling[M]. Berlin:Springer Heidelberg,1994.
[23] MALLET J L. Discrete smooth interpolation in geometric modelling[J]. Computer–Aided Design,1992,24(4):178−191.
[24] 张村,贾胜,华埜,等. 矿山三维地质建模研究进展:原理、方法与应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(2):222−238 ZHANG Cun,JIA Sheng,HUA Ye,et al. Research progress of mine 3D geological modeling:Principle,method and application[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(2):222−238
[25] 李勇,郭涛,刘欣妍,等. 中国低煤阶煤层气资源潜力及发展方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2024,45(6):1537−1554 LI Yong,GUO Tao,LIU Xinyan,et al. Resource potential and exploration targets of low–rank coalbed methane in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2024,45(6):1537−1554
[26] 张奥博. 准噶尔盆地南缘西山窑组煤系气系统及其成藏效应研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2023. ZHANG Aobo. Study on the coal measure gas system of Xishanyao Formation and its accumulation effect in southern margin of Junggar Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2023.
[27] 吴嘉伟,张健,吕玉民,等. 新疆米东高陡煤系天然裂缝与地应力特征及工程影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):226−237 WU Jiawei,ZHANG Jian,LYU Yumin,et al. Characterization of natural fractures and in– situ stress in high–steep coal–bearing strata in the Midong area in Xinjiang and influence on engineering[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):226−237
[28] 宋力,宋慧莹. 复杂断块油藏精细地质研究中几项关键技术的应用:以王家岗油田王43断块区为例[J]. 石油地质与工程,2015,29(3):90−94 SONG Li,SONG Huiying. Application of several key technology in fine geologic research of complex fault block reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2015,29(3):90−94
[29] 王俊,肖立新,刘翔,等. 准噶尔盆地南缘齐古背斜复杂构造建模技术应用[J]. 新疆地质,2019,37(2):237−241 WANG Jun,XIAO Lixin,LIU Xiang,et al. Modeling technology application for complex Qigu anticline formation on south edge of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology,2019,37(2):237−241
[30] HOEK E,KAISER P K,BAWDEN W F. Support of underground excavations in hard rock[M]. London:CRC Press,1995.
[31] 翟勤. 三维复杂地质体有限元网格建模方法研究[D]. 西安:西安石油大学,2023. ZHAI Qin. Three–dimensional geological body finite element mesh modeling method research[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an Shiyou University,2023.
[32] BROWN E T,HOEK E. Trends in relationships between measured in– situ stresses and depth[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1978,15(4):211−215.
[33] JU Wei,SHEN Jian,QIN Yong,et al. In– situ stress distribution and coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the Linxing area,eastern Ordos Basin,China[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science,2018,12(3):545−554.
[34] 魏永恒,葛燕燕,王刚,等. 新疆库拜煤田铁列克矿区地应力分布及其对煤层气开发的影响[J]. 现代地质,2022,36(5):1324−1332 WEI Yongheng,GE Yanyan,WANG Gang,et al. In– situ stress distribution and its influence on coalbed methane development in Tielieke mining area,Kubai coalfield,Xinjiang[J]. Geoscience,2022,36(5):1324−1332
[35] HOPKINS C W,FRANTZ J H,FLUMERFELT R W,et al. Pitfalls of injection/falloff testing in coalbed methane reservoirs[C]//SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference. Midland:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1998:SPE–39772–MS.
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons