Coal Geology & Exploration
Abstract
Objective Existing dynamic-to-static elastic parameter conversion models for coals fail to fully account for the actual in situ pressure and temperature conditions of deep reservoirs. This leads to significant deviations in directly evaluating the mechanical properties of reservoirs using log-derived dynamic parameters. To address this challenge, this study investigated dynamic-to-static elastic parameter conversion under the in situ stress and geotemperature conditions of strata. Accordingly, high-precision parameter conversion models were established. Methods This study examined coal samples from the No. 8 coal seam at a burial depth of approximately 1200 m in the Daning-Jixian block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin. Using a high-temperature and high-pressure triaxial test system, this study simultaneously determined the dynamic and static elastic parameters of the coal samples under varying confining pressure and temperature conditions. Among these, the dynamic elastic parameters were determined in real time using the ultrasonic transmission method, whereas the static parameters were derived from the elastic regions of stress-strain curves. Using experiments, the impacts of temperature (30-70 ℃) and confining pressure (0-37.5 MPa) on both dynamic and static elastic moduli and Poisson's ratios of the coal samples were examined. Results and Conclusions The results indicate that both P- and S-wave velocities increased with confining pressure but decreased with increasing temperature. Notably, the S-wave velocity was more sensitive to temperature variations. Both dynamic and static elastic moduli exhibited distinct responses to temperature-pressure coupling. These elastic moduli increased with confining pressure but decreased with rising temperature, while the static elastic modulus was more sensitive to temperature and pressure variations. The static Poisson's ratio increased significantly with temperature, whereas the impact of confining pressure on Poisson's ratio was temperature-dependent. Notably, the dynamic and static elastic parameters differed the most significantly under low temperature and confining pressure conditions, while the differences gradually decreased with increasing temperature and confining pressure. Based on these observations, nonlinear, logarithm-based conversion models were established. These models enable high-precision conversion from log-derived dynamic parameters to in situ static parameters, overcoming the limitation of conventional methods, which tend to overestimate formation stiffness. In combination with energy evolution analysis, it can be inferred that the brittleness index of coals vaies nonlinearly with increasing depth. Specifically, the brittleness index increases slightly in shallow to moderately shallow parts (400-1200 m) but initially increases and then decreases in moderately deep parts (1200-2 000 m). Practically, the results of this study can provide a quantitative basis for static pressure optimization, drainage flow rate control, and in situ stress evaluation for the fracturing of deep coal reservoirs. Therefore, these results serve as a guide for efficient coalbed methane (CBM) exploitation under similar temperature and pressure conditions.
Keywords
coalbed methane (CBM), dynamic-to-static elastic parameter conversion, temperature-pressure coupling effect, elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, Daning-Jixian block
DOI
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.12.0922
Recommended Citation
ZHANG Wei, WU Peng, LIU Conghui,
et al.
(2026)
"Dynamic-to-static elastic parameter conversion models for coals under temperature-pressure coupling: A case study of the No. 8 coal seam in the Daning-Jixian block,"
Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54:
Iss.
8, Article 10.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.12.0922
Available at:
https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss8/10
Reference
[1] 余琪祥. 开发前景广阔的深层煤层气[J]. 石油知识,2023(3):12−14
[2] 黎丁源. 人工页岩矿物对动静态弹性参数及各向异性的影响[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京),2019. LI Dingyuan. Influence of artificial shale minerals on dynamic and static elastic parameters and anisotropy[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2019.
[3] 国家能源局. 中国天然气发展报告(2025)[R]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2025.
[4] 李琼,何建军,陈杰. 地层压力条件下沁水盆地煤岩动静态弹性参数同步超声实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2017,60(7):2897−2903 LI Qiong,HE Jianjun,CHEN Jie. Simultaneous ultrasonic experiment of dynamic and static elastic parameters of coal under formation pressure conditions in Qinshui Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2017,60(7):2897−2903
[5] 秦勇,申建. 论深部煤层气基本地质问题[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(1):125−136 QIN Yong,SHEN Jian. On the fundamental issues of deep coalbed methane geology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):125−136
[6] 王成旺,甄怀宾,陈高杰,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部8号煤储层特征及可压裂性评价[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2022,34(2):1−5 WANG Chengwang,ZHEN Huaibin,CHEN Gaojie,et al. Assessment of coal No. 8 reservoir features and fracturability in Daning–Jixian Block deep part[J]. Coal Geology of China,2022,34(2):1−5
[7] 孟召平,张吉昌,TIEDEMANN J. 煤系岩石物理力学参数与声波速度之间的关系[J]. 地球物理学报,2006,49(5):1505−1510 MENG Zhaoping,ZHANG Jichang,TIEDEMANN J. Relationship between physical and mechanical parameters and acoustic wave velocity of coal measures rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2006,49(5):1505−1510
[8] 皇甫展鸿,吕文雅,唐英航,等. 深层煤层气储层现今地应力测井计算方法:以大宁–吉县地区本溪组煤层为例[J]. 地质科学,2024,59(6):1662−1674 HUANGFU Zhanhong,LYU Wenya,TANG Yinghang,et al. Present–day in–situ stress calculation by conventional logs of deep coalbed methane reservoirs:A case study in the deep coal reservoir of the Benxi Formation in Daning–Jixian area,Ordos Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology,2024,59(6):1662−1674
[9] 聂志宏,徐凤银,时小松,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气开发先导试验效果与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):1−12 NIE Zhihong,XU Fengyin,SHI Xiaosong,et al. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):1−12
[10] 姜波,汪吉林,屈争辉,等. 大宁–吉县地区地应力特征及其对煤储层渗透性的影响[J]. 地学前缘,2016,23(3):17−23 JIANG Bo,WANG Jilin,QU Zhenghui,et al. The stress characteristics of the Daning–Jixian area and its influence on the permeability of the coal reservoir[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(3):17−23
[11] BLAKE O O,RAMSOOK R,FAULKNER D R,et al. The effect of effective pressure on the relationship between static and dynamic Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratio of Naparima Hill Formation mudstones[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2020,53(8):3761−3778.
[12] SHEN Shijie,GAO Yanfang,JIA Lichun. A comparison of the relationship between dynamic and static rock mechanical parameters[J]. Applied Sciences,2024,14(11):4487.
[13] 徐凤银,聂志宏,孙伟,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气高效开发理论技术体系[J/OL]. 煤炭学报,2023:1–17 [2023-11-22]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YH23.1290. XU Fengyin,NIE Zhihong,SUN Wei,et al. Theoretical and technological system for highly efficient development of deep coalbed methane in Daning–Jixian Block[J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023:1–17 [2023-11-22]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YH23.1290.
[14] 孟召平,彭苏萍,傅继彤. 含煤岩系岩石力学性质控制因素探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(1):102−106 MENG Zhaoping,PENG Suping,FU Jitong. Study on control factors of rock mechanics properties of coal–bearing formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2002,21(1):102−106
[15] LI Hui,DONG Chi,YU Hongwei,et al. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of organic–rich gas shale[J]. Geofluids,2021,2021(1):6695975.
[16] SHARIFI J. Dynamic–to–static modeling[J]. Geophysics,2022,87(2):MR63−MR72.
[17] 葛洪魁,陈颙,林英松. 岩石动态与静态弹性参数差别的微观机理[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(4):34−36 GE Hongkui,CHEN Yong,LIN Yingsong. Microscopic mechanism of difference between static and dynamic elastic parameters of rock[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,2001,25(4):34−36
[18] 刘卫华,王洋,陈祖庆,等. 侏罗系陆相页岩各向异性动静态弹性参数建模[J]. 地球物理学报,2025,68(1):213−228 LIU Weihua,WANG Yang,CHEN Zuqing,et al. Anisotropic dynamic–static elastic parameter correlations for Jurassic lacustrine shales[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2025,68(1):213−228
[19] 王飞,边会媛,张永浩,等. 不同温压下页岩动态与静态弹性模量转换研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(5):1048−1055 WANG Fei,BIAN Huiyuan,ZHANG Yonghao,et al. Experimental study on dynamic and static elastic modulus conversion for shale under different temperatures and pressures[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(5):1048−1055
[20] 陈飞宇,张广智,周游,等. 基于致密砂岩岩石物理模型的静态模量预测方法[J]. 石油物探,2023,62(5):952−961 CHEN Feiyu,ZHANG Guangzhi,ZHOU You,et al. Prediction method for static modulus based on a rock physical model for dense sandstone[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2023,62(5):952−961
[21] SALUNKHE J S,PAWAR D. Relationship between dynamic and static Young’s modulus,Poisson’s ratio and other engineering properties with triaxial on granite and basalt[J]. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research,2021,8(10):365−371.
[22] 边会媛,王飞,张永浩,等. 储层条件下致密砂岩动静态弹性力学参数实验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(增刊1):3045−3054 BIAN Huiyuan,WANG Fei,ZHANG Yonghao,et al. Experimental study of dynamic and static elastic parameters of tight sandstones under reservoir conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2015,34(Sup.1):3045−3054
[23] 林英松,葛洪魁,王顺昌. 岩石动静力学参数的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(2):216−222 LIN Yingsong,GE Hongkui,WANG Shunchang. Testing study on dynamic and static elastic parameters of rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1998,17(2):216−222
[24] 熊先钺,甄怀宾,李曙光,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气多轮次转向压裂技术及应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):147−160 XIONG Xianyue,ZHEN Huaibin,LI Shuguang,et al. Multi-round diverting fracturing technology and its application in deep coalbed methane in the Daning-Jixian block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):147−160
[25] 何东博,马立民,丛彭,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘佳县地区石炭系本溪组8号煤储层脆性评价及开发有利区预测[J]. 现代地质,2026,40(1):128−139 HE Dongbo,MA Liming,CONG Peng,et al. Brittleness Evaluation and Favorable Development Zone Prediction of the No. 8 Coal Reservoir in the Carboniferous Benxi Formation,Jiaxian Area,Eastern Margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience,2026,40(1):128−139
[26] ZHANG Hewei,SHEN Jian,LI Kexin,et al. Acoustic response characteristics and sensitivity of briquette and raw coal under temperature and pressure control[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science,2023,17(1):170−179.
[27] 谢和平,彭瑞东,鞠杨. 岩石变形破坏过程中的能量耗散分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(21):3565−3570 XIE Heping,PENG Ruidong,JU Yang. Energy dissipation of rock deformation and fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(21):3565−3570
[28] XUE Yi,WANG Linchao,LIU Yong,et al. Brittleness evaluation of gas–bearing coal based on statistical damage constitution model and energy evolution mechanism[J]. Journal of Central South University,2025,32(2):566−581.
[29] LI Ning,ZOU Yushi,ZHANG Shicheng,et al. Rock brittleness evaluation based on energy dissipation under triaxial compression[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,183:106349.
[30] ZHANG Hewei,SHEN Jian,LI Kexin,et al. Precise distinction of mechanical behavior stages of coal under temperature–pressure constraints and its permeability and energy consumption characteristics[J]. Fuel,2022,325:124826.
[31] 高亚楠,高峰,谢晶,等. 温度–围压–瓦斯压力作用下煤岩力学性质及有限变形行为[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(3):898−911 GAO Yanan,GAO Feng,XIE Jing,et al. Mechanical properties and finite deformation behavior of coal under temperature,confining pressure and gas pressure[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(3):898−911
[32] 李祥春,聂百胜,杨春丽,等. 煤岩体声波波速随温度变化规律试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2016,44(5):140−144 LI Xiangchun,NIE Baisheng,YANG Chunli,et al. Experiment study on acoustic wave velocity law with temperature variation in coal and rock mass[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2016,44(5):140−144
[33] LI Wei,SHEN Jian,MA Zhuang,et al. The migration and deposition patterns of coal fines and their initiation mechanisms during the gas–water two–phase flow stage in coalbed methane wells[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2025,12:83.
Included in
Earth Sciences Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons