Research and practice of four-dimensional in-situ stress fields for deep coalbed methane production: A case study of the Daning-Jixian block, Ordos Basin

Authors

• WANG Chengwang, College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;Coalbed Methane Company Limited, PetroChina, Beijing 100020, ChinaFollow
• CHEN Yiyu, Coalbed Methane Company Limited, PetroChina, Beijing 100020, China
• GAO Deli, College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
• ZHAO Haifeng, College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
• CHEN Gaojie, Coalbed Methane Company Limited, PetroChina, Beijing 100020, China

Abstract

Background Deep coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs are characterized by well-developed microstructures and natural fractures, along with highly heterogeneous rock mechanical properties and in-situ stress field distribution. The CBM production of the reservoirs tends to cause constantly evolving formation pressure and in-situ stress within the control ranges of CBM wells, further enhancing the complexity of stress distribution. Additionally, severe fracturing channeling can be observed between new and old wells. This phenomenon is primarily triggered by in-situ stress variations induced by large-scale fracturing and CBM production. Therefore, accurately assessing the dynamic evolutionary patterns of in-situ stresses in reservoirs after fracturing and during CBM production holds great significance for new well placement, fracturing design optimization, and anti-channeling during fracturing.Methods This study investigated the Daning-Jixian block in the Ordos Basin as an example. Based on the geological characteristics of the study area, this study established a model for predicting the evolution of four-dimensional in-situ stresses in deep CBM reservoirs during long-term CBM production. Specifically, models for initial three-dimensional geomechanical characteristics, post-fracturing stress fields, and production-induced stress fields were established first, collectively enabling the dynamic, fine-scale characterization of stress fields from the initial stage to long-term CBEM production. The accuracy of the proposed four-dimensional model was verified using data from field microseismic and production monitoring. Results and Conclusions In the target well block, the difference between the maximum and minimum principal stresses decreased after fracturing and then gradually increased as CBM production proceeded. Over 24 months of CBM production, the minimum horizontal in situ stress in the vicinity of the well group decreased by 2.10−5.75 MPa, accompanied by significant variation in the in-situ stress direction (average: 4.12°). A greater stress drop corresponded to higher connectivity of the fracture network, a larger range of formation energy supply, and greater production potential. The simulation results indicate that the optimal reservoir stimulation performance can be obtained under angles between the horizontal well trajectory direction and the maximum principal stress direction measuring from 70° to 110°, combined with a well spacing of 400 m. This helps maximize the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). The construction approaches for zipper fracturing are determined. For zipper fracturing of two adjacent wells in zones with imbalanced stresses, the well in the low-stress zone should be fractured first. After the post-fracturing stress balance, the well in the high-stress zone should be fractured. This approach facilitates the adequate coalescence of the fracture network. For zipper fracturing in three wells, for instance, in zones with similar stress levels, two lateral wells should be fractured first to allow the stress differences on both sides of the middle well to vary consistently, contributing to stress balance. Then, the fracturing parameters of the middle well should be optimized to achieve adequate coalescence of the fracture network. Additionally, a method for fine-scale division of fracturing stages and perforation clusters is proposed based on stress magnitudes, providing robust technical support for the fracturing and development of deep CBM wells.

Keywords

deep coalbed methane (CBM), four-dimensional in-situ stress field, geological-engineering integration, numerical simulation

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.11.0838

Recommended Citation

WANG Chengwang, CHEN Yiyu, GAO Deli, et al. (2026) "Research and practice of four-dimensional in-situ stress fields for deep coalbed methane production: A case study of the Daning-Jixian block, Ordos Basin," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54: Iss. 7, Article 6.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.11.0838
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss7/6

Reference

[1] 金之钧,张金川,唐玄. 非常规天然气成藏体系[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(8):58−68 JIN Zhijun,ZHANG Jinchuan,TANG Xuan. Unconventional natural gas accumulation system[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(8):58−68

[2] 姚红生,杨松,刘晓,等. 低效煤层气井多次压裂增效开发技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(9):121−129 YAO Hongsheng,YANG Song,LIU Xiao,et al. Research on efficiency–enhancing development technology of multiple fracturing in low–efficiency CBM wells[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(9):121−129

[3] 张懿,朱光辉,郑求根,等. 中国煤层气资源分布特征及勘探研究建议[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(4):1−8 ZHANG Yi,ZHU Guanghui,ZHENG Qiugen,et al. Distribution characteristics of coalbed methane resources in China and recommendations for exploration research[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(4):1−8

[4] 熊先钺,甄怀宾,李曙光,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气多轮次转向压裂技术及应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):147−160 XIONG Xianyue,ZHEN Huaibin,LI Shuguang,et al. Multi–round diverting fracturing technology and its application in deep coalbed methane in the Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):147−160

[5] 杨帆,李斌,王昆剑,等. 深部煤层气水平井大规模极限体积压裂技术:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2024,51(2):389−398 YANG Fan,LI Bin,WANG Kunjian,et al. Extreme massive hydraulic fracturing in deep coalbed methane horizontal wells:A case study of the Linxing Block,eastern Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2024,51(2):389−398

[6] HATCHELL P,BOURNE S. Rocks under strain:Strain–induced time–lapse time shifts are observed for depleting reservoirs[J]. The Leading Edge,2005,24(12):1222−1225.

[7] HERWANGER J. Ebook–seismic geomechanics：How to build and calibrate geomechanical models using 3D and 4D seismic data (EET 5)[M]. Houten：EAGE Publications B. v. ，2014.

[8] 张滨海,陈峥嵘,艾传志,等. 四维动态地应力建模方法及其在寿阳区块煤层气开发中的应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2018,30(4):144−151 ZHANG Binhai,CHEN Zhengrong,AI Chuanzhi,et al. 4D geomechanical modeling technique and its application in the coalbed methane development of Shouyang Block[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2018,30(4):144−151

[9] 刘英君,朱海燕,唐煊赫,等. 基于地质工程一体化的煤层气储层四维地应力演化模型及规律[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(2):82−92 LIU Yingjun,ZHU Haiyan,TANG Xuanhe,et al. Four–dimensional in– situ stress model of CBM reservoirs based on geology–engineering integration[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(2):82−92

[10] 朱海燕,宋宇家,胥云,等. 页岩气储层四维地应力演化及加密井复杂裂缝扩展规律[J]. 石油学报,2021,42(9):1224−1236 ZHU Haiyan,SONG Yujia,XU Yun,et al. Four–dimensional in– situ stress evolution of shale gas reservoirs and its impact on infill well complex fractures propagation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(9):1224−1236

[11] 李奎东. 涪陵页岩气藏开采动态地应力演化规律研究[J]. 钻采工艺,2023,46(1):97−102 LI Kuidong. Study on dynamic geostress evolution law during Fuling shale gas extraction[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2023,46(1):97−102

[12] MENG Leifeng，YIN Bangguo，FAN Qinghu，et al. The study on 4D geomechanical modeling improves horizontal well production performance：A case study from China[C]//SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition. Abu Dhabi：Society of Petroleum Engineers，2023：SPE–212703–MS.

[13] ZHOU Jun，DING S D，JIANG T X，et al. Research on reservoir geostress characteristics of ultra–deep carbonate rocks with multiple fault zones[C]//54th U. S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. Golden：American Rock Mechanics Association，2020：ARMA–2020–1798.

[14] FU Qiang,LIU Qinjie,YANG Ke. Optimization inversion analysis of a geo–stress field in a deep mine area:A case study[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2021,14(6):489.

[15] 周鹏,姜海申,李绍鹏,等. 基于渗流−应力耦合的水平井井壁稳定性分析:以贵州黔北地区安场向斜泥页岩为例[J]. 非常规油气,2025,12(6):94−102 ZHOU Peng,JIANG Haishen,LI Shaopeng,et al. Wellbore stability analysis of horizontal wells based on seepage-stresscoupling:A case study of Anchang syncline mud shale in northern Guizhou Province[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2025,12(6):94−102

[16] 朱海燕,徐凤银,侯大力,等. 页岩储层CO₂压裂–驱替–埋存全生命周期地质力学研究进展[J]. 天然气工业,2025,45(9):138−157 ZHU Haiyan,XU Fengyin,HOU Dali,et al. Research progress of the full life cycle geomechanics of CO₂ fracturing,displacement and storage in shale reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2025,45(9):138−157

[17] 吕琦,吕晶,程紫燕,等. 基于力学时变性的页岩油藏四维地应力演化规律研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2024,31(5):56−65 LYU Qi,LYU Jing,CHENG Ziyan,et al. Four–dimensional in– situ stress evolution law of shale reservoirs based on mechanical time–varying characteristics[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2024,31(5):56−65

[18] 王成旺,刘新伟,李曙光,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气富集主控因素分析及地质工程甜点区评价[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,39(4):1−9 WANG Chengwang,LIU Xinwei,LI Shuguang,et al. Analysis of main controlling factors of deep coalbed methane enrichment and evaluation of geological and engineering sweet areas in Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2024,39(4):1−9

[19] 李曙光,王成旺,王红娜,等. 大宁–吉县区块深层煤层气成藏特征及有利区评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(9):59−67 LI Shuguang,WANG Chengwang,WANG Hongna,et al. Reservoir forming characteristics and favorable area evaluation of deep coalbed methane in Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(9):59−67

[20] 聂志宏,徐凤银,时小松,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气开发先导试验效果与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):1−12 NIE Zhihong,XU Fengyin,SHI Xiaosong,et al. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):1−12

[21] 徐凤银,闫霞,李曙光,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部(层)煤层气勘探开发理论技术难点与对策[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):115−130 XU Fengyin,YAN Xia,LI Shuguang,et al. Theoretical and technological difficulties and countermeasures of deep CBM exploration and development in the eastern edge of Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(1):115−130

[22] 徐凤银,王成旺,熊先钺,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(11):1764−1780 XU Fengyin,WANG Chengwang,XIONG Xianyue,et al. Evolution law of deep coalbed methane reservoir formation and exploration and development practice in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(11):1764−1780

[23] 徐凤银,甄怀宾,李曙光,等. 深部煤层气储层改造技术迭代升级历史与发展方向:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大吉区块为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):1−18 XU Fengyin,ZHEN Huaibin,LI Shuguang,et al. History and development direction of iterative upgrading of deep coalbed methane reservoir reconstruction technology:Taking the Daji Block in the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):1−18

[24] 曾雯婷,徐凤银,张雷,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气排采工艺技术进展与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):23−32 ZENG Wenting,XU Fengyin,ZHANG Lei,et al. Deep coalbed methane production technology for the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin:Advances and their implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):23−32

[25] 巢海燕,李泽,甄怀宾,等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气水平井压裂干扰行为及其机理[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2025,53(3):328−339 CHAO Haiyan,LI Ze,ZHEN Huaibin,et al. Fracturing interference behavior and mechanism of deep coalbed methane horizontal wells in the Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2025,53(3):328−339

[26] CIPOLLA C，WENG X，MACK M，et al. Integrating microseismic mapping and complex fracture modeling to characterize fracture complexity[C]//SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. The Woodlands：Society of Petroleum Engineers，2011：SPE–140185–MS.

[27] WU Kan,OLSON J E. Simultaneous multifracture treatments:Fully coupled fluid flow and fracture mechanics for horizontal wells[J]. SPE Journal,2015,20(2):337−346.

[28] WENG X,KRESSE O,COHEN C,et al. Modeling of hydraulic–fracture–network propagation in a naturally fractured formation[J]. SPE Production & Operations,2011,26(4):368−380.

[29] 李越,牟建业,张士诚,等. 塔河缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层裂缝扩展规律数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(6):135−142 LI Yue,MOU Jianye,ZHANG Shicheng,et al. Numerical simulation of fracture propagation in Tahe fracture–vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),2022,46(6):135−142

[30] 周治东,程万,魏子俊,等. 基于BEM的水力裂缝起裂与扩展数值模拟[J]. 地球物理学进展,2020,35(2):807−814 ZHOU Zhidong,CHENG Wan,WEI Zijun,et al. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation based on BEM[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2020,35(2):807−814

[31] 石军太,曹敬添,徐凤银,等. 深部煤层气游离气饱和度计算模型及其应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):134−146 SHI Juntai,CAO Jingtian,XU Fengyin,et al. A calculation model of free gas saturation in deep coalbed methane reservoirs and its application[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):134−146

[32] 赵泓超,赵鹏翔,许永刚,等. 倾斜厚煤层覆岩瓦斯高渗区应力场−渗流场联动演化采高效应[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2024,44(5):866−879 ZHAO HonChao,ZHAO Pengxiang,XU Yonggang,et al. Mining height effect of stress field-seepage field linkage evolution in gas high permeability zone of overlying strata in inclined thick coalseam[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2024,44(5):866−879

[33] 石钰,赵佳蕊,詹可亮,等. 远距离上被保护煤层应力变化与瓦斯渗流耦合机制研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2025,52(1):47−54 SHI Yu,ZHAO Jiarui,ZHAN Keliang,et al. Study on coupling mechanism of gas seepage and stress variation in long-distance upper protected coal seam[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2025,52(1):47−54

[34] 赵海峰,王成旺,席悦,等. 深层煤层水平井压裂动态应力场研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地大宁–吉县区块为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2025,15(2):310−323 ZHAO Haifeng,WANG Chengwang,XI Yue,et al. Study on dynamic stress field of fracturing in horizontal wells of deep coal seams:A case study of Daning–Jixian Block in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2025,15(2):310−323