Enhanced adaptive Smith predictor control for underground coal gasification with long time delays

Authors

• TANG Yang, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, ChinaFollow
• WU Qiong, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
• ZHANG Lei, Southwest Company, China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corporation, Chengdu 610041, China
• ZHOU Mingjun, Southwest Company, China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corporation, Chengdu 610041, China
• WAN Min, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
• LIAO Zhuodong, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Abstract

Background Underground coal gasification (UCG) represents an in situ conversion technology used to convert solid coals into gaseous fuel. However, the reaction process during UCG exhibits significant time delays. Such a limitation will reduce the response capability of the UCG system and is prone to induce overshoot and oscillation, thereby increasing the system’s control difficulty and reducing its stability and dynamic performance. Method To address these issues, this study proposed an enhanced Smith predictor control algorithm based on a genetic algorithm and established a semi-physical experimental platform integrating a physical distributed control system DCS-Matlab for modeling. Using the platform, experiments on the enhanced Smith predictor control algorithm were carried out under time delays ranging from 500 s to 2000 s and CO₂ volume fractions varying between 25% and 40%. Results The results indicate that the time delay emerged as a key factor influencing the UCG control performance. Compared to proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and Smith predictor control, the proposed enhanced Smith predictor control algorithm performed the best in dealing with long time delays. Specifically, under PID control, the time required for CO₂ concentration to stabilize increased by 30.77 times in the case of a prolonged time delay of 1500 s. Under model match (τ=1 500 s), Smith predictor control reduced the time from approximately 400 min to 38 min compared to PID control, representing a 90.5% improvement. However, in the case of 40% model mismatch, Smith predictor control increased the time by 4.37 times, suggesting limited robustness. In contrast, under identical conditions of model mismatch, the enhanced Smith predictor control algorithm reduced the time by 36%–59% and demonstrated smoother responses and a lower percentage overshoot than the Smith predictor control. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed enhanced Smith predictor control algorithm, which exhibits high adaptability to UCG systems with long time delays under model uncertainty. This study provides a theoretical and practical engineering reference for UCG with long time delays.

Keywords

underground coal gasification (UCG), long time delay, enhanced Smith predictor control algorithm, semi-physical experimental platform integrating practical DCS and Matlab for modeling, model mismatch

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.09.0714

Recommended Citation

TANG Yang, WU Qiong, ZHANG Lei, et al. (2026) "Enhanced adaptive Smith predictor control for underground coal gasification with long time delays," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 54: Iss. 7, Article 4.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.09.0714
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol54/iss7/4

Reference

[1] 东振,陈艳鹏,孔令峰,等. 煤炭地下气化试验综述与产业化发展建议[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(2):180−196 DONG Zhen,CHEN Yanpeng,KONG Lingfeng,et al. Underground coal gasification:Overview of field tests and suggestions for industrialization[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(2):180−196

[2] 王峰,喻岳钰,方惠军,等. 中国石油中–深层煤炭地下气化理论与技术研究进展[J]. 石油学报,2024,45(12):1863−1876 WANG Feng,YU Yueyu,FANG Huijun,et al. Research progress in the theory and technology of middle–deep coal underground gasification in CNPC[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(12):1863−1876

[3] 秦勇,易同生,汪凌霞. 2023–2024年煤炭地下气化技术研究进展述评[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(4):1−17 QIN Yong,YI Tongsheng,WANG Lingxia. Research on underground coal gasification from 2023 to 2024:A systematic review[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(4):1−17

[4] 唐洋,谢娜,熊浩宇,等. 煤炭地下气化高温喷淋井筒温度应力场研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(11):13−23 TANG Yang,XIE Na,XIONG Haoyu,et al. Stress field of high–temperature wellbore under spray cooling for underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(11):13−23

[5] AHMED A,UPPAL A A,JAVED S B. Nonlinear–control–oriented modeling of the multi–variable underground coal gasification process for UCG project thar:A machine learning perspective[J]. Journal of Process Control,2023,131:103090.

[6] XIAO Yuteng,YIN Jihang,HU Yifan,et al. Monitoring and control in underground coal gasification:Current research status and future perspective[J]. Sustainability,2019,11(1):217.

[7] 晋能控股装备制造集团有限公司. 一种煤炭地下气化的气化剂智能调控与复杂煤层模拟装置及方法与流程：CN120599911A[P]. 2025-09-05.

[8] CHAUDHRY A M,UPPAL A A,BRAM S. Model predictive control and adaptive Kalman filter design for an underground coal gasification process[J]. IEEE Access,2021,9:130737−130750.

[9] KAČUR J,LACIAK M,DURDÁN M,et al. Model–free control of UCG based on continual optimization of operating variables:An experimental study[J]. Energies,2021,14(14):4323.

[10] JAVED S B,UTKIN V I,UPPAL A A,et al. Data–driven modeling and design of multivariable dynamic sliding mode control for the underground coal gasification project thar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,2022,30(1):153−165.

[11] 唐明峰,秦琳琳,刘鹏,等. 基于改进BP–PID干煤粉气化炉控制系统的研究[J]. 计算机仿真,2021,38(9):276−280 TANG Mingfeng,QIN Linlin,LIU Peng,et al. Research on control system of dry pulverized coal gasifier based on improved BP–PID[J]. Computer Simulation,2021,38(9):276−280

[12] KHATTAK M,UPPAL A A,KHAN Q,et al. Neuro–adaptive sliding mode control for underground coal gasification energy conversion process[J]. International Journal of Control,2022,95(9):2337−2348.

[13] MANDAL R,MAITY T. Operational process parameters of underground coal gasification technique and its control[J]. Journal of Process Control,2023,129:103031.

[14] 陈飞,侯汶甫,陈朝刚,等. 国内外煤炭地下气化(UCG)技术调研综述[J]. 四川化工,2024,27(5):35−39 CHEN Fei,HOU Wenfu,CHEN Chaogang,et al. Overview of research on underground coal gasification (UCG) technology at home and abroad[J]. Sichuan Chemical Industry,2024,27(5):35−39

[15] 梁杰,王喆,梁鲲,等. 煤炭地下气化技术进展与工程科技[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(1):393−402 LIANG Jie,WANG Zhe,LIANG Kun,et al. Progress and technology of underground coal gasification[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(1):393−402

[16] 韩军,方惠军,喻岳钰,等. 煤炭地下气化产业与技术发展的主要问题及对策[J]. 石油科技论坛,2020,39(3):50−59 HAN Jun,FANG Huijun,YU Yueyu,et al. Main problems and countermeasures of underground coal gasification industrial and technological development[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum,2020,39(3):50−59

[17] 辛林. 煤炭地下气化热弹性基础梁理论模型及应用[M]. 北京：应急管理出版社，2019.

[18] RANADE V V，MAHAJANI S M，SAMDANI G A. Computational modeling of underground coal gasification[M]. Boca Raton：CRC Press，2019.

[19] 王兴刚,范谭广,焦立新,等. 三塘湖盆地煤炭地下气化地质评价与有利区域[J]. 新疆石油地质,2023,44(3):307−313 WANG Xinggang,FAN Tanguang,JIAO Lixin,et al. Geological Evaluation and Favorable Areas of Underground Coal Gasification in Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2023,44(3):307−313

[20] 尹凯,马雯静,崔文娟,等. ADS堆功率控制研究及其在DCS系统的实施[J]. 原子核物理评论,2022,39(1):121−126 YIN Kai,MA Wenjing,CUI Wenjuan,et al. Study of power control for ADS system and its implementation in DCS control system[J]. Nuclear Physics Review,2022,39(1):121−126

[21] 韦日祯. PLC型DCS控制系统在自动化生产线电子控制系统中的应用[J]. 时代汽车,2023(1):13−15 WEI Rizhen. Application of PLC DCS control system in electronic control system of automatic production line[J]. Auto Time,2023(1):13−15

[22] 张志华,白金锋,刘洋,等. 煤炭气化过程数学模型构建的研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(11):196−205 ZHANG Zhihua,BAI Jinfeng,LIU Yang,et al. Progress on mathematical models construction in coal gasification process[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(11):196−205

[23] 刘青震. 大时滞系统下的内模控制方法研究[D]. 大连：大连海事大学，2021. LIU Qingzhen. Research on internal model control method in large time delay system[D]. Dalian：Dalian Maritime University，2021.

[24] 尹成强,高洁,孙群,等. 基于改进Smith预估控制结构的二自由度PID控制[J]. 自动化学报,2020,46(6):1274−1282 YIN Chengqiang,GAO Jie,SUN Qun,et al. Two degree of freedom PID control based on modified Smith predictor control structure[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica,2020,46(6):1274−1282

[25] 李向阳,高志强,田森平,等. 高阶不确定系统的线性串级自抗扰控制[J]. 控制理论与应用,2023,40(5):856−864 LI Xiangyang,GAO Zhiqiang,TIAN Senping,et al. Linear cascade disturbance rejection control for higher order system with uncertainties[J]. Control Theory & Applications,2023,40(5):856−864

[26] 沈清波，宋云东，杨静. 控制系统MATLAB仿真[M]. 北京：北京理工大学出版社，2021.

[27] BREZAK D,KOVAČ A,FIRAK M. MATLAB/Simulink simulation of low–pressure PEM electrolyzer stack[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2023,48(16):6158−6173.

[28] TEO J H，YONG J C E，MUHIELDEEN M W，et al. Simulated performance of an improved district cooling system (DCS) in Tronoh，Perak，Malaysia[M]//ISMAIL M Y，SANI M S M，KUMARASAMY S，et al. Technological advancement in mechanical and automotive engineering. Singapore：Springer Nature Singapore，2022：669–684.

[29] 吴杰,汤伟. 基于OPC和MATLAB的模糊PID在DCS中的应用[J]. 计算机测量与控制,2010,18(10):2275−2277 WU Jie,TANG Wei. Application of fuzzy–PID based on OPC and MATLAB in DCS[J]. Computer Measurement & Control,2010,18(10):2275−2277

[30] KARADÖL H,AYBEK A. A developed control system by using OPC communication between MATLAB and PLC for determination of weeds in corn field[J]. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty,2017,14(2):129−137.

[31] CHEN Run,LYU Fengrong,BAO Yunxia,et al. A discussion on CO₂ sequestration in the UCG space based upon the review of the UCG residue physicochemical properties[J]. Minerals,2023,13(5):616.