Dynamic gas supply mechanism and theoretical production modes of free gas-rich deep coal reservoirs

Authors

CHEN Shida, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, ChinaFollow
ZHANG Taiyuan, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, China
TANG Dazhen, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, China
XU Hao, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, China
TAO Shu, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, China
LI Song, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, China
TANG Shuling, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development & Utilization, Beijing 100083, China

Abstract

Objective and Methods The production processes of adsorbed and free gases and the dynamic partitioning mechanism behind the production efficiency of both gas types are critical scientific issues to be addressed urgently in the exploration and production of deep coalbed methane (CBM). Based on the test and assay data of cores from exploration wells, this study systematically analyzed the theoretical production of deep CBM resources. By integrating the building of mathematical and numerical models, carbon isotope monitoring of methane, and the analysis of production curves, this study revealed the spatiotemporal evolutionary processes of production-induced pressure drop expansion, adsorbed gas desorption, and free gas seepage, as well as their production effects. Finally, this study determined the synergistic gas supply mechanism and theoretical production modes of methane with multiple occurrence states in free gas-rich deep coal reservoirs.Results and Conclusions During the production of a deep CBM well, free and adsorbed gases exhibited a continuous, synergistic gas supply characteristic and a partitioning relationship characterized by competitive production, with the produced gas identified as a mixture of both gas types at any given time. The dynamic partitioning ratios of methane with varying occurrence states depended on the superposition of free gas mass transfer efficiency and adsorbed gas desorption efficiency within the pressure propagation domain in varying production stages, with the efficiencies centering on pressure drop-induced desorption and differential pressure-driven seepage. Deep coal reservoirs would experience an entire desorption process, with substantial pressure drop required to reach critical desorption nodes. It is challenging to resolve the inherent contradiction between the high reservoir pressure and low desorption efficiency in the early stage and the high desorption efficiency and limited pressure drop in the late stage. The pressure drop funnel, adsorbed gas exhibited a relatively low average desorption rate, with gas supply units concentrated primarily in high-permeability stimulated zones. Free gas showed a continuously expanding supply radius and a consistently high production proportion. High-density well group co-production or the heterogeneity of gas-water distribution can lead to adjustments in the adsorbed and free gas proportion, and the adjustment process depend on the dynamic matching relationship between gas supply unit expansion and fluid supply capacity. Free and adsorbed gases demonstrated the production characteristics of sharp increase - gentle decline (or sharp increase - sharp decline - gentle decline) and gentle increase - stability - gentle decline, respectively. Their overall production capacity can be divided into three stages primarily: rapid addition, relative stability, and slow decline. The morphologies of production curves were influenced by free gas volume, in-situ permeability, reservoir stimulation performance, and pressure drop system. For some wells, the relatively stable production stage can be further divided into two substages: sharp production decline followed by stable production. The core strategies for production growth include increasing the stimulated reservoir volume, extending the horizontal sections of wells, and pinpointing free gas-rich zones with high porosity and permeability. Meanwhile, the key to an increase in the exploration depths of deep CBM is to explore technologies for enhancing both the desorption efficiency of adsorbed gas and the overall influential depth of pressure drop. Constructing a “dynamic regulation system for drainage and production” that balances gas well lifecycle and fluid production efficiency forms the critical foundation for fully releasing production potential. Furthermore, the first priority for commercial production capacity construction of deep CBM is determining rational production capacity targets and required well-controlled areas for varying deep geological units and synergistically optimizing well completion methods, well pattern density, fracturing parameters, production allocation rates, and production cycles under the guidance of geological and engineering integration.

Keywords

deep coalbed methane (CBM), adsorbed gas, free gas, production mechanism, production mode

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0135

Recommended Citation

CHEN Shida, ZHANG Taiyuan, TANG Dazhen, et al. (2025) "Dynamic gas supply mechanism and theoretical production modes of free gas-rich deep coal reservoirs," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 4, Article 6.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0135
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss4/6

Reference

[1] 秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1791−1811.

QIN Yong. Progress on geological research of deep coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1791−1811.

[2] 康永尚，闫霞，皇甫玉慧，等. 深部超饱和煤层气藏概念及主要特点[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1781−1790.

KANG Yongshang，YAN Xia，HUANGFU Yuhui，et al. Concept and main characteristics of deep oversaturated coalbed methane reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1781−1790.

[3] 徐凤银，闫霞，李曙光，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部(层)煤层气勘探开发理论技术难点与对策[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(1)：115−130.

XU Fengyin，YAN Xia，LI Shuguang，et al. Theoretical and technological difficulties and countermeasures of deep CBM exploration and development in the eastern edge of Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(1)：115−130.

[4] 陈世达，侯伟，汤达祯，等. 煤储层含气性深度效应与成藏过程耦合关系[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：52−59.

CHEN Shida，HOU Wei，TANG Dazhen，et al. Effects of depth on gas–bearing properties of coal reservoirs and their coupling relationships with coalbed methane accumulation[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：52−59.

[5] 李国欣，张水昌，何海清，等. 煤岩气：概念、内涵与分类标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2024，51(4)：783−795.

LI Guoxin，ZHANG Shuichang，HE Haiqing，et al. Coal–rock gas：Concept，connotation and classification criteria[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2024，51(4)：783−795.

[6] 熊先钺，闫霞，徐凤银，等. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1812−1826.

XIONG Xianyue，YAN Xia，XU Fengyin，et al. Analysis of multi–factor coupling control mechanism，desorption law and development effect of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1812−1826.

[7] 聂志宏，徐凤银，时小松，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气开发先导试验效果与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：1−12.

NIE Zhihong，XU Fengyin，SHI Xiaosong，et al. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：1−12.

[8] 陈世达，汤达祯，侯伟，等. 深部煤层气地质条件特殊性与储层工程响应[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1993−2006.

CHEN Shida，TANG Dazhen，HOU Wei，et al. Geological particularity and reservoir engineering response of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1993−2006.

[9] 张政，秦勇，WANG Guoxiong，等. 基于等温吸附实验的煤层气解吸阶段数值描述[J]. 中国科学：地球科学，2013，43(8)：1352−1358.

ZHANG Zheng，QIN Yong，WANG Guoxiong，et al. Numerical description of coalbed methane desorption stages based on isothermal adsorption experiment[J]. Science China：Earth Sciences，2013，43(8)：1352−1358.

[10] 孟艳军，汤达祯，许浩，等. 煤层气解吸阶段划分方法及其意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2014，41(5)：612−617.

MENG Yanjun，TANG Dazhen，XU Hao，et al. Division of coalbed methane desorption stages and its significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2014，41(5)：612−617.

[11] 石军太，徐凤银，曹运兴，等. 基于煤储层改造背景下深部煤层气藏物质平衡方程的建立与应用[J/OL]. 煤炭科学技术，2025：1–19 [2025-03-19]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.TD.20250318.1319.002.html.

SHI Juntai，XU Fengyin，CAO Yunxing，et al. Establishment and application of material balance equation for deep coalbed methane reservoirs based on coal formation stimulation background[J/OL]. Coal Science and Technology，2025：1–19 [2025-03-19]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.TD.20250318.1319.002.html.

[12] 陈明，王大猛，余莉珠，等. 大宁–吉县区块深部煤层气井排采制度研究与实践[J/OL]. 煤炭学报，2024：1–11 [2025-03-19]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2024.0318

CHEN Ming，WANG Dameng，YU Lizhu，et al. Drainage system research and application of deep coalbed methane gas reservoirs in the Daning–Jixian Block[J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024：1–11 [2025-03-19]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2024.0318.

[13] 李曙光，王成旺，王红娜，等. 大宁–吉县区块深层煤层气成藏特征及有利区评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(9)：59−67.

LI Shuguang，WANG Chengwang，WANG Hongna，et al. Reservoir forming characteristics and favorable area evaluation of deep coalbed methane in Daning–Jixian Block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(9)：59−67.

[14] 江同文，熊先钺，金亦秋. 深部煤层气地质特征与开发对策[J]. 石油学报，2023，44(11)：1918−1930.

JIANG Tongwen，XIONG Xianyue，JIN Yiqiu. Geological characteristics and development countermeasures of deep coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2023，44(11)：1918−1930.

[15] 王振至，傅雪海，潘结南，等. 深部储层煤层气产出影响因素[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2025，53(2)：84−98.

WANG Zhenzhi，FU Xuehai，PAN Jienan，et al. Factors influencing the production of coalbed methane from deep reservoirs[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2025，53(2)：84−98.

[16] 康永尚，王金，姜杉钰，等. 量化指标在煤层气开发潜力定量评价中的应用[J]. 石油学报，2017，38(6)：677−686.

KANG Yongshang，WANG Jin，JIANG Shanyu，et al. Application of quantitative indexes in quantitative evaluation of coalbed methane development potential[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2017，38(6)：677−686.

[17] 秦勇，郑长东，王博洋，等. 基于等温吸附曲线的煤储层产气潜力定量评价：以黔北地区长岗矿区为例[J]. 天然气工业，2018，38(9)：40−47.

QIN Yong，ZHENG Changdong，WANG Boyang，et al. Quantitative evaluation on the gas production potential of coal reservoirs based on isothermal adsorption curves：A case study of the Changgang Field，northern Guizhou，China[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2018，38(9)：40−47.

[18] 陈世达，汤达祯，侯伟，等. 煤储层流体特征、聚气主控因素及富气模式：以鄂尔多斯盆地中东部上古生界为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2025，52(2)：1−10.

CHEN Shida，TANG Dazhen，HOU Wei，et al. Fluid characteristics，gas accumulation control factors and gas enrichment modes in coal reservoirs：A case study of the Upper Paleozoic in the central–eastern Ordos Basin，NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2025，52(2)：1−10.

[19] 李站伟，陈世达，陶树，等. 黔西–滇东地区煤岩吸附–解吸特征及其对多层合采的指示意义[J]. 油气地质与采收率，2021，28(1)：125−131.

LI Zhanwei，CHEN Shida，TAO Shu，et al. CBM adsorption–desorption characteristics of coal in western Guizhou–eastern Yunnan region and its significance to commingled production[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency，2021，28(1)：125−131.

[20] 李勇，徐立富，张守仁，等. 深煤层含气系统差异及开发对策[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(2)：900−917.

LI Yong，XU Lifu，ZHANG Shouren，et al. Gas bearing system difference in deep coal seams and corresponded development strategy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(2)：900−917.

[21] 康永尚，邓泽，皇甫玉慧，等. 中煤阶煤层气高饱和–超饱和带的成藏模式和勘探方向[J]. 石油学报，2020，41(12)：1555−1566.

KANG Yongshang，DENG Ze，HUANGFU Yuhui，et al. Accumulation model and exploration direction of high–to over–saturation zone of the medium–rank coalbed methane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2020，41(12)：1555−1566.

[22] 傅雪海，秦勇，韦重韬. 煤层气地质学[M]. 徐州：中国矿业大学出版社，2007.

[23] 郭建春，张涛，武玺，等. 煤层气压裂水平井生产动态分析及其渗透率协同演化机制[J]. 煤炭学报，2025，50(1)：516−531.

GUO Jianchun，ZHANG Tao，WU Xi，et al. Production analysis and permeability evolution of fractured horizontal wells of coalbed methane reservoir[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2025，50(1)：516−531.

[24] LANGMUIR I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute，1917，183(1)：102−105.

[25] 石军太，李相方，徐兵祥，等. 煤层气解吸扩散渗流模型研究进展[J]. 中国科学：物理学 力学 天文学，2013，43(12)：1548–1557.

SHI Juntai，LI Xiangfang，XU Bingxiang，et al. Review on desorption–diffusion–flow model of coal–bed methane[J]. Science China：Physics，Mechanics & Astronomy，2013，43(12)：1548–1557.

[26] 董骏. 基于等效物理结构的煤体瓦斯扩散特性及应用[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2018.

DONG Jun. Gas diffusion properties of coal mass based on equivalent physical structure and its application[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2018.

[27] ZHANG Taiyuan，CHEN Shida，TANG Dazhen. Anisotropic evolution of effective stress and pore pressure during coalbed methane drainage[J]. SPE Journal，2023，28(5)：2534−2546.

[28] 张泰源. 倾角制约下储层流体传质机理及煤层气产出效应[D]. 北京：中国地质大学(北京)，2024.

ZHANG Taiyuan. Mechanism of reservoir fluid mass transfer and effect of coalbed methane production under dip angle constraint[D]. Beijing：China University of Geosciences (Beijing)，2024.

[29] 史锐，边利恒，张伟，等. 基于有效孔隙度的深部煤层游离气含量预测模型[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，2025，54(1)：161−171.

SHI Rui，BIAN Liheng，ZHANG Wei，et al. Prediction model for free gas content in deep coal seams based on effective porosity[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology，2025，54(1)：161−171.

[30] 孔祥言. 高等渗流力学(第3版)[M]. 合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社，2020.

[31] HENRY D. Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon[M]. Paris，1856.

[32] PAN Zhejun，CONNELL L D. Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs：A review of analytical models and testing data[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology，2012，92：1−44.

[33] ZHANG Taiyuan，TANG Shuling，TANG Dazhen，et al. Measurement of pore distribution and compression anisotropy by nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Natural Resources Research，2023，32(2)：755−770.

[34] REISABADI M Z，HAGHIGHI M，SAYYAFZADEH M，et al. Stress distribution and permeability modelling in coalbed methane reservoirs by considering desorption radius expansion[J]. Fuel，2021，289：119951.

[35] MEN Xinyang，TAO Shu，LIU Zhenxing，et al. Experimental study on gas mass transfer process in a heterogeneous coal reservoir[J]. Fuel Processing Technology，2021，216：106779.

[36] 胡秋嘉，毛崇昊，石斌，等. 沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气井“变速排采–低恒套压”管控方法[J]. 煤炭学报，2019，44(6)：1795−1803.

HU Qiujia，MAO Chonghao，SHI Bin，et al. “Variable speed drainage–low casing pressure” control method of high rank CBM wells in south Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2019，44(6)：1795−1803.

[37] 李文镖，卢双舫，李俊乾，等. 页岩气/煤层气运移过程中的同位素分馏研究进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2022，49(5)：929−942.

LI Wenbiao，LU Shuangfang，LI Junqian，et al. Research progress on isotopic fractionation in the process of shale gas/coalbed methane migration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2022，49(5)：929−942.

[38] 李文镖，卢双舫，李俊乾，等. 页岩气运移过程中的碳同位素分馏：机理、表征及意义[J]. 中国科学：地球科学，2020，50(4)：553−569.

LI Wenbiao，LU Shuangfang，LI Junqian，et al. Carbon isotope fractionation during shale gas transport：Mechanism，characterization and significance[J]. Science China：Earth Sciences，2020，50(4)：553−569.

[39] 张道锋，孟康，黄有根，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组煤岩解析气甲烷碳同位素特征及其地质意义[J/OL]. 天然气地球科学，2025：1–24 [2025-03-19]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1177.te.20250225.1906.006.html.

ZHANG Daofeng，MENG Kang，HUANG Yougen，et al. Characteristics and geological significance of methane carbon isotope of released gas from Carboniferous Benxi coal rock in Ordos Basin[J/OL]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2025：1–24 [2025-03-19]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1177.te.20250225.1906.006.html.

[40] 刘洪林，王红岩，赵国良，等. 稳定碳同位素δ¹³C₁在煤层气田勘探中的应用[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2004，24(4)：442−446.

LIU Honglin，WANG Hongyan，ZHAO Guoliang，et al. Application of coal bed methane stable carbon isotope in exploration of coal bed methane field[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2004，24(4)：442−446.

[41] 胡国艺，李谨，马成华，等. 沁水煤层气田高阶煤解吸气碳同位素分馏特征及其意义[J]. 地学前缘，2007，14(6)：267−272.

HU Guoyi，LI Jin，MA Chenghua，et al. Characteristics and implications of the carbon isotope fractionation of desorbed coalbed methane in Qinshui coalbed methane field[J]. Earth Science Frontiers，2007，14(6)：267−272.

[42] GAO Li，WU Sheng，DEEV A，et al. The gas isotope interpretation tool：A novel method to better predict production decline[J]. AAPG Bulletin，2017，101(8)：1263−1275.

[43] ZHANG Mingjie，TANG Qingyan，CAO Chunhui，et al. Molecular and carbon isotopic variation in 3. 5 years shale gas production from Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin，China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology，2018，89：27–37.

[44] SHI Wenrui，WANG Xingzhi，ZHANG Chaomo，et al. Experimental study on gas content of adsorption and desorption in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2019，180：1069−1076.

[45] 黄道军，周国晓，杨兆彪，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地深部煤岩气井产出气–水地球化学特征及其地质响应[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2024，45(6)：1617−1627.

HUANG Daojun，ZHOU Guoxiao，YANG Zhaobiao，et al. Geochemical characterization of gas–water output from deep coalrock methane wells in the Ordos Basin and its geological responses[J]. Oil & Gas Geology，2024，45(6)：1617−1627.