Research on underground coal gasification from 2023 to 2024: A systematic review

Authors

QIN Yong, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Fluidized Coal Mining of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 551400, ChinaFollow
YI Tongsheng, Guizhou Provincial Coalfield Bureau, Guiyang 550081, China; Key Laboratory of Fluidized Coal Mining of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 551400, China
WANG Lingxia, Guizhou Provincial Coalfield Bureau, Guiyang 550081, China; Key Laboratory of Fluidized Coal Mining of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 551400, China

Abstract

Background The industrialization of underground coal gasification (UCG) technology presents a potential solution for securing the supply of clean energy. The latest wave of exploration into UCG is currently gaining momentum. Methods This review systematically organizes domestic and international literature, expatiates the advances in research on UCG from 2023 to 2024, analyzes the primary challenges in its development, and proposes key areas for future exploration. Advances Transformative technological advancements in the development and utilization of coal energy based on UCG have been proposed. The development of an integrated, synergistic UCG – coalbed methane – carbon capture, utilization, and storage (UCG–CBM–CCUS) process has been identified as a critical pathway for promoting UCG industrialization. Research on the production dynamics and process control of UCG has expanded, refining heat and mass transfer models, as well as relevant simulation methodologies, and establishing mathematical models for key parameters governing UCG cavity growth. Researchers have explored the characteristics of the responses of UCG production behavior to the temperature and pressure within gasifiers, gasification agent formulation, and gas injection processes, as well as the laws of changes in these characteristics. Furthermore, they have demonstrated the inherent advantages and cost benefits of UCG in producing hydrogen-rich gas and have revealed the potential multiple functions of acoustic emission positioning technology for real-time UCG production monitoring. Studies on UCG safety focus on four aspects: operational safety, groundwater protection, land subsidence prevention, and carbon emission reduction. Researchers have investigated the syngas explosion characteristics of UCG, cooling strategies via wellbore spray systems, and the hydrogen corrosion resistance of pipeline materials. Furthermore, high-temperature-resistant new materials for backfill have been preliminarily developed, multiple groundwater pollution prevention techniques have been devised, and various predictive methods for land and residual subsidence have been formed. Additionally, basic strategies for carbon emission reduction via UCG and carbon regulation and reduction (CRR)—an active strategy for carbon active emission reduction—have been proposed. Significant progress has been made in research on the geological constraints and siting assessments, critical underground equipment and tools, and techno-economic assessments of UCG. For geological assessments, highly focused attention is directed to the responses of UCG engineering activities to stratigraphic conditions. Novel concepts have been proposed and validated, involving the catalyst injection process, innovative ignition methods, heating under stimulation of external electromagnetic fields, and improvements in the injection modes and processes of gasification agents. Key equipment and tools, such as combustible casings and coiled tubing, have been successfully created. Many novel concepts of processes and technologies prove innovative and exhibit promising potential for practical application. Studies have demonstrated the economic competitiveness of UCG syngas production and utilization. Moreover, the first on-site technical verification of UCG-enhanced coalbed methane (UCG-ECBM), an efficient integrated extraction process, has been successfully conducted. Prospects In response to critical issues identified in recent UCG field practices, this study proposes three key areas for future exploration, namely geological-engineering integration, the enhancement of construction techniques, and the research and development of critical equipment and tools.

Keywords

underground coal gasification (UCG), technical strategy, control and safety, field experiment, progress, future exploration

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.01.0051

Recommended Citation

QIN Yong, YI Tongsheng, WANG Lingxia, et al. (2025) "Research on underground coal gasification from 2023 to 2024: A systematic review," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 53: Iss. 4, Article 2.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.01.0051
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol53/iss4/2

Reference

[1] 俞大为. 煤炭地下气化研究[J]. 化学世界，1947，2(8)：12−14.

[2] UPPALAKKAL V，JHARKHANDE J，HAKKIM A，et al. Strategic utilization of geo–resources in India：Integrated machine learning and kinetic modeling of lignite for underground coal gasification assessment[J]. Natural Resources Research，2024，33(4)：1491−1528.

[3] 秦勇，易同生，杨磊，等. 中国煤炭地下气化现场试验探索历程与前景展望[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(7)：17−25.

QIN Yong，YI Tongsheng，YANG Lei，et al. Underground coal gasification field tests in China：History and prospects[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(7)：17−25.

[4] 孔维敏，周永峰，易同生，等. 苏联煤炭地下气化产业化历史回顾与评述[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(7)：26−33.

KONG Weimin，ZHOU Yongfeng，YI Tongsheng，et al. UCG industrialization in the Soviet Union： History and comments[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(7)：26−33.

[5] 黄婉，王军，汪凌霞，等. 美国煤炭地下气化先导试验及其对现代UCG技术的贡献[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(7)：34−42.

HUANG Wan，WANG Jun，WANG Lingxia，et al. UCG pilot tests in the United States and their contributions to modern UCG technologies[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(7)：34−42.

[6] 金黎黎，杨磊，吴亚荣，等. 欧盟国家煤炭地下气化先导试验历程与进展述评[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(7)：43−51.

JIN Lili，YANG Lei，WU Yarong，et al. UCG pilot tests in EU countries：A review of history and progress[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(7)：43−51.

[7] 周泽，汪凌霞，秦勇，等. 澳大利亚UCG工程示范历程与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(7)：52−60.

ZHOU Ze，WANG Lingxia，QIN Yong，et al. UCG engineering demonstrations in Australia：History and its implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(7)：52−60.

[8] BLINDERMAN M S，KLIMENKO A Y. Underground coal gasification and combustion[M]. Amsterdam：Woodhead Publishing，2017.

[9] 东振，陈艳鹏，孔令峰，等. 煤炭地下气化试验综述与产业化发展建议[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2024，52(2)：180−196.

DONG Zhen，CHEN Yanpeng，KONG Lingfeng，et al. Underground coal gasification：Overview of field tests and suggestions for industrialization[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(2)：180−196.

[10] 陈新军，刘曾勤，陈刚，等. 全球煤炭地下气化发展态势及展望：基于专利分析[J]. 中国国土资源经济，2024(3)：18−24.

CHEN Xinjun，LIU Zengqin，CHEN Gang，et al. Global development trend and prospect of underground coal gasification：Based on patent analysis[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China，2024(3)：18−24.

[11] TAKYI S A，ZHANG Yindi，SI Mengting，et al. Current status and technology development in implementing low carbon emission energy on underground coal gasification (UCG)[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research，2023，10：1051417.

[12] MANDAL R，MAITY T. Operational process parameters of underground coal gasification technique and its control[J]. Journal of Process Control，2023，129：103031.

[13] GIWA S O，TAZIWA R T. Adoption of advanced coal gasification：A panacea to carbon footprint reduction and hydrogen economy transition in South Africa[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2024，77：301−323.

[14] LOZYNSKYI V，FALSHTYNSKYI V，KOZHANTOV A，et al. Increasing the underground coal gasification efficiency using preliminary electromagnetic coal mass heating[J]. Earth and Environmental Science，2024，1348(1)：012045.

[15] AFANASEV P，ASKAROVA A，ALEKHINA T，et al. An overview of hydrogen production methods：Focus on hydrocarbon feedstock[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2024，78：805−828.

[16] WIDERA M，URBAŃSKI P，MAZUREK S，et al. Polish lignite resources，mining and energy industries：What is next?[J]. Mineral Resources Management，2024，40(2)：5−28.

[17] SALMACHI A，ZEINIJAHROMI A，PARKER H M，et al. Experimental investigation of alterations in coal fracture network induced by thermal treatment：Implications for CO₂ geo–sequestration[J]. Energy，2024，308：132893.

[18] SMITH E K，BARAKAT S M，AKANDE O，et al. Subsurface combustion and gasification for hydrogen production：Reaction mechanism，techno–economic and lifecycle assessment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal，2024，480：148095.

[19] HAMANAKA A，ISHII Y，ITAKURA K，et al. Monitoring the gasification area and its behavior in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission technique instead of temperature measurement[J]. Scientific Reports，2023，13：9757.

[20] SHAHBAZI M，NAJAFI M，MARJI M F，et al. Lattice numerical modeling of the effects of synthetic gas flow rate and pre–existing cleat dimensions on the crack propagation and cavity growth in UCG process[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering，2024，46：348.

[21] SAKIZ U. Investigation of the thermo physico–mechanical and drilling characteristics of sandstone in Zonguldak hard coal basin[J]. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo–Energy and Geo–Resources，2023，9：141.

[22] 葛世荣，樊静丽，刘淑琴，等. 低碳化现代煤基能源技术体系及开发战略[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(1)：203−223.

GE Shirong，FAN Jingli，LIU Shuqin，et al. Low carbon modern coal–based energy technology system and development strategy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(1)：203−223.

[23] 葛世荣，刘淑琴，樊静丽，等. 低碳化现代煤基能源开发关键技术体系[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(7)：2949−2972.

GE Shirong，LIU Shuqin，FAN Jingli，et al. Key technologies for low–carbon modern coal–based energy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(7)：2949−2972.

[24] KAČUR J，LACIAK M，DURDÁN M，et al. A review of research on advanced control methods for underground coal gasification processes[J]. Energies，2023，16(8)：3458.

[25] 井冲霄. 多孔介质内高温气体流动及传热特性研究[D]. 西安：西安石油大学，2023.

JING Chongxiao. Research on flow and heat transfer characteristics of high temperature gas in porous media[D]. Xi’an：Xi’an Shiyou University，2023.

[26] ZHANG Zixiang，ZHAO Yangsheng，FENG Zijun. Numerical simulation of solid–fluid–thermal coupling in the heating stage of in–situ injection of supercritical water for hydrogen production from coal[J]. Energy Sources，Part A：Recovery，Utilization and Environmental Effects，2023，45(3)：7509−7528.

[27] ZHANG Haoyu，XIAO Yi，LUO Guangqian，et al. Numerical simulation study on chemical ignition process of underground coal gasification[J]. Energy，2024，298：131350.

[28] AHMED A，JAVED S B，UPPAL A A，et al. Development of CAVLAB：A control–oriented MATLAB based simulator for an underground coal gasification process[J]. Mathematics，2023，11(11)：2493.

[29] 杨萧. 煤炭地下气化过程的热–流–固–化(THMC)耦合模型与特征场演变规律[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2023.

YANG Xiao. A thermal–hydrological–mechanical–chemical (THMC) coupled mathematical model and evolution law of the characteristic field in underground coal gasification[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2023.

[30] 张磊，于建林，周明军，等. 一种模型不确定的煤炭地下气化控制算法研究[J]. 天然气与石油，2023，41(1)：141−146.

ZHANG Lei，YU Jianlin，ZHOU Mingjun，et al. Study on control algorithm of underground coal gasification process with model uncertainty[J]. Natural Gas and Oil，2023，41(1)：141−146.

[31] 张庆贺，王晓蕊，袁亮. 煤炭地下气化多场耦合数值模拟程序开发及多场演化规律[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(6)：2506−2518.

ZHANG Qinghe，WANG Xiaorui，YUAN Liang. Development of a multi–field coupled numerical simulation program for underground coal gasification and multi–field evolution laws[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(6)：2506−2518.

[32] PERKINS G. Underground coal gasification Part I：Field demonstrations and process performance[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science，2018，67：158−187.

[33] SU Faqiang，HE Xiaolong，DAI Mengjia，et al. Estimation of the cavity volume in the gasification zone for underground coal gasification under different oxygen flow conditions[J]. Energy，2023，285：129309.

[34] 武俊博. 水平同轴型煤炭地下气化空腔扩展及能量回收评价研究[D]. 焦作：河南理工大学，2023.

WU Junbo. Study on cavity expansion and energy recovery evaluation of horizontal coaxial underground coal gasification[D]. Jiaozuo：Henan Polytechnic University，2023.

[35] PILECKI Z，HILDEBRANDT R，KRAWIEC K，et al. Assessment of combustion cavern geometry in underground coal gasification process with the use of borehole ground–penetrating radar[J]. Energies，2023，16(18)：6734.

[36] 向富果，葛叶子，台俊茹，等. 煤炭地下气化技术腔体生长规律探索[J]. 煤化工，2023，51(6)：113−116.

XIANG Fuguo，GE Yezi，TAI Junru，et al. Cavity growth law exploration of coal underground gasification technology[J]. Coal Chemical Industry，2023，51(6)：113−116.

[37] SONG Chang，CHEN Shanshan，CHEN Yanpeng，et al. An experimental study of convective flow in a bottom heated cavity with ventilation duct：Laboratory modeling of convective flow in under coal gasification cavity[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer，2023，206：123967.

[38] 王田多奕. 煤炭地下气化水气运移及压力变化特征研究[D]. 北京：中国石油大学(北京)，2023.

WANGTIAN Duoyi. Study on characteristics of water influx，gasified gas transport and pressure change for underground coal gasification[D]. Beijing：China University of Petroleum (Beijing)，2023.

[39] XIN Lin，WANG Bowei，LI Jian，et al. Modeling test of combustion cavity growth during underground coal gasification in the early stage of ignition[J]. ACS Omega，2024，9(3)：3691−3700.

[40] SU Faqiang，YANG Junnan，HE Xiaolong，et al. Influences of removable gas injection methods on the temperature field and gas composition of the underground coal gasification process[J]. Fuel，2024，363：130953.

[41] 秦勇，王作棠，韩磊. 煤炭地下气化中的地质问题[J]. 煤炭学报，2019，44(8)：2516−2530.

QIN Yong，WANG Zuotang，HAN Lei. Geological problems in underground coal gasification[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2019，44(8)：2516−2530.

[42] PERKINS G. Underground coal gasification Part Ⅱ：Fundamental phenomena and modeling[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science，2018，67：234−274.

[43] WU Fangjie，HUANG Siyuan，JIANG Qi，et al. Effects of pressure and heating rate on coal pyrolysis：A study in simulated underground coal gasification[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis，2023，175：106179.

[44] 张涛. 富氧空气/CO₂煤炭地下气化产物及温度场变化规律研究[D]. 焦作：河南理工大学，2023.

ZHANG Tao. Study on the product and temperature field variation of oxygen–rich air /CO₂ coal underground gasification[D]. Jiaozuo：Henan Polytechnic University，2023.

[45] 张友军，杨鹏飞，刘家炜，等. 煤炭地下气化注入井压力控制[J]. 科学技术与工程，2023，23(35)：15036−15043.

ZHANG Youjun，YANG Pengfei，LIU Jiawei，et al. Pressure control of underground coal gasification injection well[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2023，23(35)：15036−15043.

[46] WIATOWSKI M，KAPUSTA K，STRUGALA–WILCZEK A，et al. Large–scale experimental simulations of in situ coal gasification in terms of process efficiency and physicochemical properties of process by–products[J]. Energies，2023，16(11)：4455.

[47] CHEN Hao，QIN Yong，CHEN Yanpeng，et al. Quantitative evaluation of underground coal gasification based on a CO₂ gasification agent[J]. Energies，2023，16(19)：6993.

[48] FANG Huijun，LI Sen，GE Tengze，et al. Effects of the steam–to–oxygen ratio and the equivalence ratio on underground coal gasification[J]. Combustion Science and Technology，2024，196(15)：3514−3526.

[49] 苏发强，代孟佳，何小龙，等. 煤炭地下气化注气方式与能量回收效率[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(3)：1636−1646.

SU Faqiang，DAI Mengjia，HE Xiaolong，et al. Gas injection methods and energy recovery efficiency in underground coal gasification[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(3)：1636−1646.

[50] FENG Lele，DONG Maifan，WANG Binhao，et al. Gas production performance of underground coal gasification with continuously moving injection：Effect of direction and speed[J]. Fuel，2023，347：128425.

[51] 陈贞龙，王运海，李清，等. 延川南2^#煤层地下气化制氢工艺研究[J]. 煤炭技术，2024，43(3)：42−46.

CHEN Zhenlong，WANG Yunhai，LI Qing，et al. Underground gasification process for hydrogen production in Yanchuan South No. 2 Coal Seam[J]. Coal Technology，2024，43(3)：42−46.

[52] 刘淑琴，戚川，纪雨彤，等. 煤炭地下气化制氢技术路径[J]. 洁净煤技术，2023，29(8)：1−10.

LIU Shuqin，QI Chuan，JI Yutong，et al. Research on hydrogen production pathway by underground coal gasification[J]. Clean Coal Technology，2023，29(8)：1−10.

[53] 刘淑琴，刘欢，郭巍，等. 深部煤炭地下气化制氢先进能效分析[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(2)：1138−1147.

LIU Shuqin，LIU Huan，GUO Wei，et al. Advanced exergy analysis of deep UCG to hydrogen production[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(2)：1138−1147.

[54] SU Faqiang，ITAKURA K，DEGUCHI G，et al. Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques[J]. Applied Energy，2017，189：142−156.

[55] 邓启超. 实验室条件下煤炭地下气化区扩展活动规律研究[D]. 焦作：河南理工大学，2023.

DENG Qichao. Study on the expansion and activity of underground coal gasification area under laboratory conditions[D]. Jiaozuo：Henan Polytechnic University，2023.

[56] 秦勇，易同生，周永锋，等. 煤炭地下气化产业政策建设困境与破局对策[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(6)：2498−2505.

QIN Yong，YI Tongsheng，ZHOU Yongfeng，et al. Dilemma and countermeasure of policy construction of UCG industry[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(6)：2498−2505.

[57] 秦勇，易同生，周永锋，等. 煤炭地下气化碳减排技术研究进展与未来探索[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(1)：495−512.

QIN Yong，YI Tongsheng，ZHOU Yongfeng，et al. Research progress and future study of carbon emission reduction for UCG[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(1)：495−512.

[58] KRAUSE E，KRZEMIEŃA，SMOLIŃSKI A. Analysis and assessment of a critical event during an underground coal gasification experiment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries，2015，33：173−182.

[59] HUANG Wengang，DUAN Tianhong，WANG Zuotang，et al. Characteristic analysis and risk control of syngas explosion during underground coal gasification[J]. ACS Omega，2024，9(19)：21307−21321.

[60] 赵桓祯. 地下煤炭气化超高温环境下生产井套管柱安全性分析[D]. 西安：西安石油大学，2023.

ZHAO Huanzhen. Safety analysis of casing strings in production wells under ultrahigh temperature environment of underground coal gasification[D]. Xi’an：Xi’an Shiyou University，2023.

[61] 唐洋，谢娜，熊浩宇，等. 煤炭地下气化高温喷淋井筒温度应力场研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(11)：13−23.

TANG Yang，XIE Na，XIONG Haoyu，et al. Stress field of high–temperature wellbore under spray cooling for underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(11)：13−23.

[62] 石贵元. 粗煤气及高含氢条件下氢腐蚀规律实验研究[D]. 北京：中国石油大学(北京)，2023.

[63] ŠKVAREKOVÁE，TOMAŠKOVÁM，GABRIEL W，et al. Analysis of risk factors for underground coal gasification[J]. Management Systems in Production Engineering，2019，27(4)：227−235.

[64] 王凡，徐冰，谌伦建，等. 煤炭地下气化对地下水的污染及其防控研究进展[J]. 当代化工研究，2023，24：11−13.

WANG Fan，XU Bing，CHEN Lunjian，et al. Research progress on groundwater pollution by underground coal gasification and its prevention and control[J]. Modern Chemical Research，2023，24：11−13.

[65] WANG Fan，CHEN Lunjian，XU Bing，et al. Characterization of the migration of organic contaminants in laboratory–scale groundwater polluted by underground coal gasification[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research，2024，31(23)：34446−34458.

[66] 王凡，徐冰，谌伦建，等. 煤炭地下气化污染物苯酚在渗透反应墙中的穿透行为及数值反演[J/OL]. 洁净煤技术，2024：1–8 [2025-02-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3676.TD.20240131.0955.002.html.

WANG Fan，XU Bing，CHEN Lunjian，et al. Breakthrough behavior and numerical inversion of underground coal gasification organic pollutant phenol through permeable reaction barrier[J/OL]. Clean Coal Technology，2024：1–8 [2025-02-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3676.TD.20240131.0955.002.html.

[67] ZHAI Guangqing，DOU Longhui，PANG Jiabao，et al. Experimental study on coagulation and adsorption treatment of wastewater in combustion cavity for underground coal gasification[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection，2024，188：1280−1291.

[68] 秦勇，易同生，汪凌霞，等. 面向项目风险控制的煤炭地下气化地质条件分析[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(1)：290−306.

QIN Yong，YI Tongsheng，WANG Lingxia，et al. Analysis of geological conditions for risk control of UCG project[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(1)：290−306.

[69] LIU Xiaopeng，XU Liangji，ZHANG Kun. Strata movement characteristics in underground coal gasification (UCG) under thermal coupling and surface subsidence prediction methods[J]. Applied Sciences，2023，13(8)：5192.

[70] 董京楠，何爱国，刘奕衫，等. 煤炭地下气化腔体稳定性研究[J]. 石油科学通报，2024，9(4)：690−698.

DONG Jingnan，HE Aiguo，LIU Yishan，et al. Study of stability of underground coal gasification caverns[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin，2024，9(4)：690−698.

[71] 东振，任博，陈艳鹏，等. 中深层煤炭地下气化的气化腔安全宽度计算方法[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2024，52(2)：183−193.

DONG Zhen，REN Bo，CHEN Yanpeng，et al. Calculation method of safe width of gasification cavity for medium–deep underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2024，52(2)：183−193.

[72] TANG Chao，LI Huaizhan，GUO Guangli，et al. Stability evaluation method of gasification coal pillar under thermal coupling condition for prevention of environment secondary pollution[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2024，954：176265.

[73] JIANG Yuan，CHEN Bingbing，TENG Lin，et al. Surface subsidence modelling induced by formation of cavities in underground coal gasification[J]. Applied Sciences，2024，14(13)：5733.

[74] TANG Chao，LI Huaizhan，GUO Guangli，et al. Prediction method of surface residual subsidence for land resource reuse after low–carbon underground coal gasification[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences，2023，82：490.

[75] CHEN Fu，LI Huaizhan，DAI Guangli，et al. The new way for realizing carbon neutrality of coal and analysis of bearing characteristics and stability of coal pillar in production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production，2023，415：137766.

[76] LI Jian，BAI Jinwen，FENG Guorui，et al. A high temperature resistance backfilling material for underground coal gasification：Microstructure，physical and mechanical characteristics[J]. Construction and Building Materials，2024，441：137557.

[77] 葛世荣，王兵，冯豪豪，等. 煤基能源动态碳中和模式及其保供降碳效益评估[J]. 中国工程科学，2023，25(5)：122−135.

GE Shirong，WANG Bing，FENG Haohao，et al. Dynamic carbon neutrality mode for coal–based energy systems and effectiveness assessment thereof[J]. Strategic Study of CAE，2023，25(5)：122−135.

[78] LI Wei，LI Huaizhan，CHEN Yanpeng，et al. Risk analysis and production safety design of supercritical carbon dioxide storage in gasification combustion cavity[J]. Energy，2024，293：130757.

[79] CHEN Run，LYU Fengrong，BAO Yunxia，et al. A discussion on CO₂ sequestration in the UCG space based upon the review of the UCG residue physicochemical properties[J]. Minerals，2023，13(5)：616.

[80] 刘淑琴，周蓉，潘佳，等. 煤炭地下气化选址决策及地下水污染防控[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2013，41(5)：23−27.

LIU Shuqin，ZHOU Rong，PAN Jia，et al. Location selection and groundwater pollution prevention & control regarding underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2013，41(5)：23−27.

[81] PEI Peng，NASAH J，SOLC J，et al. Investigation of the feasibility of underground coal gasification in North Dakota，United States[J]. Energy Conversion and Management，2016，113：95−103.

[82] 周泽，易同生，秦勇，等. 贵州无井式UCG 选址选层“四性”地质评价模式与资源类型划分[J]. 煤炭学报，2024，49(5)：2414−2425.

ZHOU Ze，YI Tongsheng，QIN Yong，et al. “Four properties” geological evaluation model and resource type classification of non–well type UCG site and layer selection in Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024，49(5)：2414−2425.

[83] HUANG Wengang，ZHANG Shaowei，WANG Guozhi，et al. Modeling methodology for site selection evaluation of underground coal gasification based on combination weighting method with game theory[J]. ACS Omega，2023，8(12)：11544−11555.

[84] 崔义，陶树，王志珩，等. 扎赉诺尔煤田煤炭地下气化地质评价与有利区优选[J/OL]. 煤炭学报，2024：1–17 [2025-02-10]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2024.0569.

CUI Yi，TAO Shu，WANG Zhiheng，et al. Geological evaluation and favorable area optimization for underground coal gasification in Zhalainuoer Coalfield[J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society，2024：1–17 [2025-02-10]. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2024.0569.

[85] 赵泽乾. 延川南煤炭地下气化地质风险评价[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2023.

ZHAO Zeqian. Geological risk assessment of underground coal gasification in South Yanchuan[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2023.

[86] BISWAS A K，ISLAM M R，HABIB M A. An analytical investigation of critical factors to prioritize coalfields for Underground Coal Gasification–Bangladesh case[J]. Heliyon，2023，9(7)：e18416.

[87] 王锦昌，刘刚，张辉，等. 深部煤层地下气化选址研究：以东胜气田J148地区为例[J]. 矿业科学学报，2024，9(2)：156−166.

WANG Jinchang，LIU Gang，ZHANG Hui，et al. Study on site selection of underground gasification in deep coal seam：A case study of J148 area in Dongsheng Gas Field[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology，2024，9(2)：156−166.

[88] 王兴刚，范谭广，焦立新，等. 三塘湖盆地煤炭地下气化地质评价与有利区域[J]. 新疆石油地质，2023，44(3)：307−313.

WANG Xinggang，FAN Tanguang，JIAO Lixin，et al. Geological evaluation and favorable areas of underground coal gasification in Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2023，44(3)：307−313.

[89] 易同生，秦勇，汪凌霞，等. 贵州省煤炭地下气化资源评价及现场先导性试验选址[R]. 贵阳：贵州省煤田地质局，2023.

[90] YIN Zhenyong，XU Hao，CHEN Yanpeng，et al. Experimental simulate on hydrogen production of different coals in underground coal gasification[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy，2023，48(19)：6975−6985.

[91] WIATOWSKI M，BASA W，PANKIEWICZ–SPERKA M，et al. Experimental study on tar formation during underground coal gasification：Effect of coal rank and gasification pressure on tar yield and chemical composition[J]. Fuel，2024，357：130034.

[92] 袁淑霞，江琪彬，王嘉杰，等. 煤炭地下气化系统的催化剂注入工艺研究[J/OL]. 洁净煤技术，2023：1–9 [2025-02-10]. https://doi.org/10.13226/j.issn.1006–6772.23080203.

YUAN Shuxia，JIANG Qibin，WANG Jiajie，et al. Research on catalyst injection technology based on underground coal gasification system[J/OL]. Clean Coal Technology，2023：1–9 [2025-02-10]. https://doi.org/10.13226/j.issn.1006–6772.23080203.

[93] DONG Maifan，FENG Lele，QIN Botao，et al. A novel gas injection method with swirl flow in underground gasification for improving gas production and controlling pollution yields[J]. Energy，2024，297：131351.

[94] FENG Lele，DONG Maifan，QIN Botao，et al. H₂ production enhancement in underground coal gasification with steam addition：Effect of injection conditions[J]. Energy，2024，291：130379.

[95] 葛腾泽，王创业，刘猛，等. 耦合大功率微波加热的煤炭地下气化CRIP工艺研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2024，52(5)：324−334.

GE Tengze，WANG Chuangye，LIU Meng，et al. Study on CRIP process of underground coal gasification coupled with high–power microwave heating[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2024，52(5)：324−334.

[96] DONG Maifan，FENG Lele，QIN Botao. Characteristics of coal gasification with CO₂ after microwave irradiation based on TGA，FTIR and DFT theory[J]. Energy，2023，267：126619.

[97] XIAO Yi，ZHANG Haoyu，LUO Guangqian，et al. Simulation of underground coal gasification ignition in deep coal seam based on transitional diffusion mechanism：Influence of inlet temperature and O₂[J]. Energy，2024，288：129735.

[98] LI Yulong，LIANG Jie，ZHAO Ze，et al. Pure oxygen condition forced oxidation ignition process of underground coal gasification[J]. Asia–Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering，2023，18(3)：e2881.

[99] 国家能源局. 国内首次实现地下千米煤层原位气化[EB/OL]. (2024-02-28) [2024-10-26]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1792133568170956479&wfr=spider&for=pc.

[100] 张友军，张浩宇，张正，等. 煤炭地下气化点火阶段正庚烷着火及燃烧数值模拟研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报，2024，44(14)：5659−5666.

ZHANG Youjun，ZHANG Haoyu，ZHANG Zheng，et al. Numerical simulation of N–heptane ignition and combustion in the ignition stage of underground coal gasification[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE，2024，44(14)：5659−5666.

[101] REN Xiangyi，WU Jianjun，WANG Cankun，et al. Research on property and burning behavior of flammable casing for underground coal gasification[J]. Heliyon，2023，9(12)：e22232.

[102] 潘志勇，王建军，刘蕊祎，等. 煤炭地下气化多通道连续管结构设计[J]. 石油管材与仪器，2023，9(1)：44−47.

PAN Zhiyong，WANG Jianjun，LIU Ruiyi，et al. Structural design of multi–channel coiled tubing for underground coal gasification[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments，2023，9(1)：44−47.

[103] 李宛嵘，杨宏智. 国内最长流体注入与测温一体化多通道连续管研制成功[EB/OL]. (2023-07-11) [2024-10-26]. https://esb.sxdaily.com.cn/pad/content/202307/11/content_813110.html.

[104] 易同生，秦勇，周永峰，等. 煤炭地下气化项目技术经济评价研究进展述评[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2023，51(7)：1−16.

YI Tongsheng，QIN Yong，ZHOU Yongfeng，et al. Research advances on the techno–economic evaluation of UCG projects[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2023，51(7)：1−16.

[105] 易同生，梁杰，秦勇，等. 贵州省无井式煤炭地下气化关键技术工艺与工程示范[R]. 贵阳：贵州省煤田地质局，2024.

[106] 新疆维吾尔自治区自然资源厅. 新疆实现“双气共采”[EB/OL]. (2024-02-28) [2024-10-26]. https://zrzyt.xinjiang.gov.cn/xjgtzy/mtxc/202403/06af2b3609ec4e1c90d2c6a99ee5f274.shtml.