Geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane in the Linxing-Shenfu block

Authors

WU Peng, China United Coalbed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, ChinaFollow
HU Weiqiang, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, ChinaFollow
LI Yangbing, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
MA Litao, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
LI Yong, School of Geosciences and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
ZHAO Fei, China United Coalbed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
NIU Yanwei, China United Coalbed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
CHEN Jianqi, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
LI Panpan, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
LIU Zaizhen, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
LI Chenchen, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
CAO Di, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China
LIU Cheng, CNOOC Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin 300452, China;CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited Key Laboratory for Exploration & Development of Unconventional Resources, Tianjin 300452, China

Abstract

Identifying the origin and geochemical characteristics of deep coalbed methane (CBM) is critical for its exploration and production. This study examined the desorbed gas from deep-CBM parameter wells in the Linxing-Shenfu block on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin. It systematically tested the composition, content, and carbon isotopes of CBM in coal seams Nos. 8 and 9. In combination with the degree of thermal evolution, gas-bearing properties, coal seam burial depths, geological structures, and hydrogeologic conditions, it delved into the geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep CBM. The results show that the deep CBM in the study area consists primarily of CH₄, CO₂, N₂, ethane, propane, isobutane, n-butane, isopentane, and n-pentane. Among them, CH₄ exhibits the highest content, with volume fractions ranging from 75.98% to 96.20% (average: 86.49%), succeeded by ethane (average: 5.97%), CO₂ (average: 5.18%), and propane (average: 1.24%), exhibiting subtle differences in gas content compared to shallow CBM. The deep CBM manifests δ¹³C₁ (CH₄), δ¹³C_CO2, δ¹³C₂, and δ¹³C₃ values ranging from −51.9‰ to −38.2‰ (average: −42.84‰), from −8.6‰ to −0.63‰ (average: −4.66‰), from −27.36‰ to −18.70‰ (average: −25.27‰), and from −25.96‰ to −14.69‰ (average: −22.93‰), respectively. It predominantly proves to be thermogenic gas, displaying lower δ¹³C1 (CH₄) values and higher δ¹³C_CO2 values compared to shallow CBM. On a horizontal plane, its δ¹³C₁ values show a growing trend from southeast to northwest in the Linxing area. The study area kept subsiding from the Carboniferous to the end of the Triassic, with the Middle Jurassic and the Early Cretaceous identified as the primary hydrocarbon-generating phases. Specifically, the Middle Jurassic witnessed a prolonged duration, a low average rate, and moderate hydrocarbon yield of hydrocarbon generation. In contrast, the hydrocarbon generation during the Early Cretaceous featured a higher rate, a significantly increased yield, and a peak intensity, establishing the e Early Cretaceous as a dominant hydrocarbon-generating stage. Due to the controlling effects of gas fractionation, the characteristics of reservoir pores and fractures, reservoir pressure, and the roof and floor tightness of coal seams, the δ¹³C₁ values increase with the increasing maximum vitrinite reflectance (R_max), gas content, and burial depth. They are relatively high in synclinal cores, the stress concentration zones of faults, and fold flanks. However, they are lower in the stress release zones of faults and anticlinal cores, suggesting inferior CBM storage conditions, unfavorable for gas accumulation, in these zones. Influenced by groundwater dissolution, the δ¹³C₁ values are relatively low in areas with strong hydrodynamic conditions, while showing an insignificant downward trend in zones with weak fluid dynamics or fluid stagnation. The comprehensive investigation into the geochemical indicators of CBM leads to the conclusion that the Linxing and southeastern Shenfu areas are enriched in CBM, especially the former. This study can serve as a reference for target area selection and well placement in future CBM exploration and exploitation in the study area.

Keywords

deep coalbed methane, geochemistry, carbon isotope, coalbed methane composition, coalbed methane origin, thermal evolution

DOI

10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0632

Recommended Citation

WU Peng, HU Weiqiang, LI Yangbing, et al. (2024) "Geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane in the Linxing-Shenfu block," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 52: Iss. 5, Article 7.
DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0632
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol52/iss5/7

Reference

[1] 秦勇，申建，李小刚. 中国煤层气资源控制程度及可靠性分析[J]. 天然气工业，2022，42(6)：19−32.

QIN Yong，SHEN Jian，LI Xiaogang. Control degree and reliability of CBM resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2022，42(6)：19−32.

[2] 李勇，徐立富，张守仁，等. 深煤层含气系统差异及开发对策[J]. 煤炭学报，2023，48(2)：900−917.

LI Yong，XU Lifu，ZHANG Shouren，et al. Gas bearing system difference in deep coal seams and corresponded development strategy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2023，48(2)：900−917.

[3] 秦勇，申建. 论深部煤层气基本地质问题[J]. 石油学报，2016，37(1)：125−136.

QIN Yong，SHEN Jian. On the fundamental issues of deep coalbed methane geology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2016，37(1)：125−136.

[4] 李文镖，卢双舫，李俊乾，等. 页岩气/煤层气运移过程中的同位素分馏研究进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2022，49(5)：929−942.

LI Wenbiao，LU Shuangfang，LI Junqian，et al. Research progress on isotopic fractionation in the process of shale gas/ coalbed methane migration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2022，49(5)：929−942.

[5] 秦勇，唐修义，叶建平，等. 中国煤层甲烷稳定碳同位素分布与成因探讨[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，2000，29(2)：113−119.

QIN Yong，TANG Xiuyi，YE Jianping，et al. Characteristics and origins of stable carbon isotope in coalbed methane of China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology，2000，29(2)：113−119.

[6] 宋岩，柳少波，洪峰，等. 中国煤层气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油学报，2012，33(增刊1)：99−106.

SONG Yan，LIU Shaobo，HONG Feng，et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2012，33(Sup.1)：99−106.

[7] 王相业，孙保平. 鄂尔多斯盆地兴县地区煤层气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2020，48(4)：156−164.

WANG Xiangye，SUN Baoping. Geochemical characteristics and their origin of CBM in Xingxian Area，Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2020，48(4)：156−164.

[8] 鲍园，胡宜亮，李丹，等. 煤层甲烷碳同位素偏轻机理研究进展[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2021，41(6)：1040−1049.

BAO Yuan，HU Yiliang，LI Dan，et al. Advance on the genetic mechanism of lighter carbon isotopic composition in coalbed methane[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2021，41(6)：1040−1049.

[9] 郭智栋，王玉斌，鲍园，等. 韩城地区煤层气成因类型及微生物开发潜力[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2023，43(3)：539−548.

GUO Zhidong，WANG Yubin，BAO Yuan，et al. Coalbed methane generation and microbial–development potential in Hancheng Block[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2023，43(3)：539−548.

[10] DUAN Yi，ZHANG Xiaoli，SUN Tao，et al. Carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions and their evolutions of gases generated by herbaceous swamp peat at different thermal maturity stages[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin，2011，56(13)：1383−1389.

[11] 琚宜文，李清光，颜志丰，等. 煤层气成因类型及其地球化学研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报，2014，39(5)：806−815.

JU Yiwen，LI Qingguang，YAN Zhifeng，et al. Origin types of CBM and their geochemical research progress[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2014，39(5)：806−815.

[12] MENG Zhaoping，YAN Jiwei，LI Guoqing. Controls on gas content and carbon isotopic abundance of methane in Qinnan–East coal bed methane block，Qinshui Basin，China[J]. Energy & Fuels，2017，31(2)：1502−1511.

[13] LI Yong，TANG Dazhen，FANG Yi，et al. Distribution of stable carbon isotope in coalbed methane from the east margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Science China Earth Sciences，2014，57(8)：1741−1748.

[14] 李跃国，姚程鹏，杨曙光，等. 准南米泉地区煤层气成因及其富集成藏机理研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2021，49(4)：220−226.

LI Yueguo，YAO Chengpeng，YANG Shuguang，et al. Study on origin and accumulation mechanism of coalbed methane in Miquan Area of southern margin of Zhunggar Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2021，49(4)：220−226.

[15] 唐淑玲，汤达祯，孙斌，等. 富(含)CO₂煤层气多源多阶成因研究进展及勘探开发启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(3)：58−68.

TANG Shuling，TANG Dazhen，SUN Bin，et al. Research progress of multi–source and multi–stage genesis of CO₂–enriched CBM and the enlightenments for its exploration and development[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(3)：58−68.

[16] 杜世涛，赵明，廖方兴，等. 高倾角和“通天”双重特征煤层气勘探思考：以新疆煤层气储层为例[J]. 非常规油气，2024，11(2)：1−8.

DU Shitao，ZHAO Ming，LIAO Fangxing，et al. Thinking of CBM exploration with high dip angle and “open air” dual characteristics：A case of Xinjiang CBM reservoir[J]. Unconventional oil & Gas，2024，11(2)：1−8.

[17] 刘会虎，兰天贺，胡宝林，等. 淮南潘集外围深部煤层气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 煤炭学报，2018，43(2)：498−506.

LIU Huihu，LAN Tianhe，HU Baolin，et al. Geochemical characteristics and its origins of CBM in deep–seated coal seam around Panji mining area of Huainan[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2018，43(2)：498−506.

[18] 汤磊鑫，周虎，殷磊磊. 淮北地区含煤岩系有机地球化学特征及生烃潜力分析[J]. 非常规油气，2022，9(6)：51–60.

TANG Leixin，ZHOU Hu，YIN Leilei. Analysis on organic geochemistry characteristics and hydrocarbon-generating[J]. Unconventional oil & Gas，2018，43(2)：498–506.

[19] 马晓强，邹婧芸，祝彦贺. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘临兴东区断阶带致密气富集规律研究[J]. 非常规油气，2023，10(3)：1−7.

MA Xiaoqiang，ZOU Jingyun，ZHU Yanhe. Study on enrichment law of tight gas in the fault step zone of Linxing east block，northeast margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2023，10(3)：1−7.

[20] 李勇，吴鹏，高计县，等. 煤成气多层系富集机制与全含气系统模式：以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块为例[J]. 天然气工业，2022，42(6)：52−64.

LI Yong，WU Peng，GAO Jixian，et al. Multilayer coal–derived gas enrichment mechanism and whole gas bearing system model：A case study on the Linxing Block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2022，42(6)：52−64.

[21] 朱光辉，李本亮，李忠城，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘非常规天然气勘探实践及发展方向：以临兴–神府气田为例[J]. 中国海上油气，2022，34(4)：16−29.

ZHU Guanghui，LI Benliang，LI Zhongcheng，et al. Practices and development trend of unconventional natural gas exploration in eastern margin of Ordos Basin：Taking Linxing–Shenfu gas field as an example[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas，2022，34(4)：16−29.

[22] 戴金星. 各类天然气的成因鉴别[J]. 中国海上油气(地质)，1992，6(1)：11−19.

DAI Jinxing. Identification of various genetic natural gases[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology)，1992，6(1)：11−19.

[23] 熊小峰，郭潇潇，朱继田，等. 南海西部深水区气田天然气地球化学特征差异及其成因[J]. 天然气地球科学，2019，30(7)：1053−1062.

XIONG Xiaofeng，GUO Xiaoxiao，ZHU Jitian，et al. Causes of natural gas geochemical differences in the deep water area gas field，western South China Sea[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2019，30(7)：1053−1062.

[24] 李勇，许卫凯，高计县，等. “源–储–输导系统”联控煤系气富集成藏机制：以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘为例[J]. 煤炭学报，2021，46(8)：2440−2453.

LI Yong，XU Weikai，GAO Jixian，et al. Mechanism of coal measure gas accumulation under integrated control of “source reservoir–transport system”：A case study from east margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2021，46(8)：2440−2453.

[25] 陶传奇，李勇，倪小明，等. 临兴地区上石炭统本溪组煤成熟度演化过程研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，2022，51(2)：344−353.

TAO Chuanqi，LI Yong，NI Xiaoming，et al. Study of the evolution process of coal maturity in upper Carboniferous Benxi Formation，Linxing Area[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology，2022，51(2)：344−353.

[26] SHEN Jian，LI Kexin，ZHANG Hewei，et al. The geochemical characteristics，origin，migration and accumulation modes of deep coal–measure gas in the west of Linxing Block at the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2021，91：103965.

[27] 魏强，刘家乐，童家颖，等. 淮南潘集深部11–2煤层含气量与地球化学特征及其地质条件影响因素分析[J]. 宿州学院学报，2022，37(9)：33−38.

WEI Qiang，LIU Jiale，TONG Jiaying，et al. Analysis of gas content，geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of geological conditions of No. 11–2 coal seam from the Panji deep area in Huainan[J]. Journal of Suzhou University，2022，37(9)：33−38.

[28] 刘恺德，姚凯文，陈能远，等. 黄陇煤田大佛寺井田煤层气成因机制研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2022，50(11)：115−124.

LIU Kaide，YAO Kaiwen，CHEN Nengyuan，et al. Formation mechanism of coalbed methane in Dafosi Mine Field，Huanglong Coalfield[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2022，50(11)：115−124.

[29] 李洋冰，曾磊，胡维强，等. 保德地区煤层气地球化学特征及成因探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2021，49(2)：133−141.

LI Yangbing，ZENG Lei，HU Weiqiang，et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of coalbed methane in Baode Area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2021，49(2)：133−141.

[30] 汤磊鑫，周虎，殷磊磊. 淮北地区含煤岩系有机地球化学特征及生烃潜力分析[J]. 非常规油气，2022，9(6)：51−60.

TANG Leixin，ZHOU Hu，YIN Leilei. Analysis on organic geochemistry characteristics and hydrocarbon–generating potential of coal–bearing strata in Huaibei Area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas，2022，9(6)：51−60.