Beneficial CBM area prediction based on structural elemental quantitative cluster classification

Authors

LIU Jing, Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Key Lab of Geology of Coal and Coal Measure Gas, Taiyuan 030024, China
CHANG Suoliang, Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Key Lab of Geology of Coal and Coal Measure Gas, Taiyuan 030024, ChinaFollow
LIU Zuiliang, Yangquan Coal Industry(Group) Co., Yangquan 045000, China
ZHANG Sheng, Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Key Lab of Geology of Coal and Coal Measure Gas, Taiyuan 030024, China
CHEN Qiang, Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Key Lab of Geology of Coal and Coal Measure Gas, Taiyuan 030024, China
LIU Bo, Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Key Lab of Geology of Coal and Coal Measure Gas, Taiyuan 030024, China

Abstract

In order to select optimally the CBM-enriched area of structural elements and delicately divide the advantageous blocks of CBM structural control under the development scale, this paper takes the Yongle south block in the southwest of Qinshui Basin as an example, subdivides the structural characterization elements and quantifies the indicators of structural elements, and puts forward the method of trend surface iteration to characterize different degrees of structural deformation, fuzzy clustering classification and element dichotomy to optimize the favorable area of CBM structural control. Based on the comprehensive interpretation results of seismic geology, the quantitative characterization of structural elements of No.2 and No.(9+10) coal seams in the study area is carried out from three aspects of structural deformation, fault system and burial depth. The quantitative classification of structural elements is carried out by Q-type clustering method. On this basis, the single element is divided by using factor dichotomy method under the guidance of the structural geological law affecting the enrichment and preservation of coalbed methane. The favorable and disadvantageous areas for gas control are finally synthesized into four types: the most favorable, the more favorable, the more disadvantageous and the disadvantageous under the influence of CBM enrichment structure, which are verified by the gas content data of coal drilling holes.

Keywords

coalbed methane, geological structure, favorable area, fuzzy clustering, Qinshui Basin, Yongle south block

DOI

10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.02.027

Recommended Citation

LIU Jing, CHANG Suoliang, LIU Zuiliang, et al. (2021) "Beneficial CBM area prediction based on structural elemental quantitative cluster classification," Coal Geology & Exploration: Vol. 49: Iss. 2, Article 28.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.02.027
Available at: https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol49/iss2/28

Reference

[1] 宋岩,秦胜飞,赵孟军.中国煤层气成藏的两大关键地质因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2007,18(4):545-553. SONG Yan,QIN Shengfei,ZHAO Mengjun. Two key geological factors controlling the coalbed methane reservoirs in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(4):545-553.

[2] 樊生利. 沁水盆地南部煤层气勘探成果与地质分析[J]. 天然气工业,2001,21(4):35-38. FAN Shengli. Exploration result and geological analysis of coalbed gas in the south part of Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2001,21(4):35-38.

[3] 叶建平,唐书恒. 中国煤层气资源[J]. 中国煤层气,1998(2):25-28. YE Jianping,TANG Shuheng. Coalbed methane resources of China[J]. China Coalbed Methane,1998(2):25-28.

[4] 苏现波,刘保民. 煤层气的赋存状态及其影响因素[J]. 焦作工学院学报,1999,18(3):157-160. SU Xianbo,LIU Baomin. Occurrence of coalbed methane in coal-seam and it's controls[J]. Journal of Jiaozuo Institute of Technology,1999,18(3):157-160.

[5] 张建博,王红岩,赵庆波. 中国煤层气地质[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2000. ZHANG Jianbo,WANG Hongyan,ZHAO Qingbo. Coalbed methane geology in China[J]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2000.

[6] 宋岩,赵孟军,柳少波,等. 构造演化对煤层气富集程度的影响[J]. 科学通报,2005,50(增刊1):1-5. SONG Yan,ZHAO Mengjun,LIU Shaobo,et al. The influence of structural evolution on the enrichment degree of coalbed methane[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2005,50(Sup.1):1-5.

[7] 魏书宏,韩少明. 沁水煤田南部煤层气构造控气特征研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2003,31(3):30-31. WEI Shuhong,HAN Shaoming. Study of characteristics of structure-controlled coalbed gas in southern Qinshui coalfield[J]. Coal Geology and Exploration,2003,31(3):30-31.

[8] 王凤国,李兰杰,徐德红. 华北地区煤层含气性影响因素探讨[J]. 焦作工学院学报(自然科学版),2003,22(2):88-90. WANG Fengguo,LI Lanjie,XU Dehong. A discussion on factors relating to coalbed methane content of coal seam in the area of north China[J]. Journal of Jiaozuo Institute of Technology (Natural Science),2003,22(2):88-90.

[9] 张振文,高永利,代凤红,等. 影响晓南矿未开采煤层瓦斯赋存的地质因素[J]. 煤炭学报,2007,32(9):950-954. ZHANG Zhenwen,GAO Yongli,DAI Fenghong,et al. The geologic agent affecting the gas occurrence of the coal seam unmined in Xiaonan coalmine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2007,32(9):950-954.

[10] 方爱民,侯泉林,琚宜文,等. 不同层次构造活动对煤层气成藏的控制作用[J]. 中国煤田地质,2005,17(4):15-20. FANG Aimin,HOU Quanlin,JU Yiwen,et al. A study on control action of tectonic activity on CBM pool various hierarchies[J]. Coal Geology of China,2005,17(4):15-20.

[11] 陈贵武,董守华,吴海波,等. 高丰度煤层气富集区地球物理定量识别技术研究与应用[J]. 地球物理学进展,2014,29(5):2151-2156. CHEN Guiwu,DONG Shouhua,WU Haibo,et al. Research and application of quantitative geophysics recognition in high abundance of coalbed methane-rich region[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2014,29(5):2151-2156.

[12] 魏建平,郝天轩,刘明举. 基于构造复杂程度定量评价的瓦斯含量预测BP模型[J]. 煤炭学报,2009,34(8):1090-1094. WEI Jianping,HAO Tianxuan,LIU Mingju. BP model of gas content prediction based on quantitative assessment of geological structure complexity[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2009,34(8):1090-1094.

[13] 常锁亮,陈强,刘东娜,等.煤层气封存单元及其地震-地质综合识别方法初探[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(1):57-66. CHANG Suoliang,CHEN Qiang,LIU Dongna,et al. Preliminary discussion on coal bed methane storage unit and its seismic geology comprehensive identification method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):57-66.

[14] 赵一民,陈强,常锁亮,等. 基于边界要素二分的煤层气封存单元分类与评估[J]. 天然气地球科学,2018,29(1):130-139. ZHAO Yimin,CHEN Qiang,CHANG Suoliang,et al. Classifiable and evaluative method of coal-bed methane storage unit based on binary elements dichotomy[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2018,29(1):130-139.

[15] BACHU S,MICHAEL K. Possible controls of hydrogeological and stress regimes on the producibility of coalbed methane in upper cretaceous-tertiary strata of the Alberta Basin,Canada[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(11):1729-1754.

[16] PASHIN J C. Variable gas saturation in coalbed methane reservoirs of the Black Warrior Basin:Implications for exploration and production[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2010,82(3/4):135-146.

[17] 李家宏,朱炎铭,唐鑫,等. 唐山矿西南区构造复杂程度的熵函数评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(3):6-11. LI Jiahong,ZHU Yanming,TANG Xin,et al. Entropy function evaluation of geological structure complexity of southwest section in Tangshan mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2015,43(3):6-11.

[18] 方家虎,李志,张洋,等. 芦岭煤矿8煤层地质构造复杂程度综合评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(1):22-26. FANG Jiahu,LI Zhi,ZHANG Yang,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of geological structure complexity of 8^th seam in Luling mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2016,44(1):22-26.

[19] 舒建生,贾建称,王跃忠,等. 地质构造复杂程度定量化评价:以涡北煤矿为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2010,38(6):22-26. SHU Jiansheng,JIA Jiancheng,WANG Yaozhong,et al. Quantitative evaluation of geological structure complexity:With Guobei coal mine as example[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2010,38(6):22-26.

[20] 王献虎. 澄合二矿构造发育规律及复杂程度定量评价[D]. 西安:西安科技大学,2012. WANG Xianhu. The structural development regularity and quantitative evaluation of the complexity in Cheng-He-Second coal mine[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2012.

[21] 袁崇孚,张子戌,张光德. 褶皱变形系数的探讨及其应用[J].煤炭学报,1992,17(3):11-18. YUAN Chongfu,ZHANG Zixu,ZHANG Guangde. Discussion and application of deformation coefficients of fold[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,1992,17(3):11-18.

[22] 曾勇,阎小卫. 煤层构造变形的综合定量分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2000,28(6):13-16. ZENG Yong,YAN Xiaowei. Comprehensive and quantitative analysis on tectonic deformation of coalbed[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2000,28(6):13-16.

[23] 张艳伟,屠世浩,王沉,等. 基于趋势面分析的煤层厚度变化规律研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2015,35(1):21-27. ZHANG Yanwei,TU Shihao,WANG Chen,et al. Research on coal seam thickness changing law based on trend surface analysis[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2015,35(1):21-27.

[24] 管仁荣. 趋势面分析在地球物理勘探中的应用研究[J]. 中国矿业,2012,21(增刊1):474-478. GUAN Renrong. The study of trend surface analysis[J]. China Mining Magazine,2012,21(Sup.1):474-478.

[25] CALINSKI T,HARABASZ J A. A dendrite method for cluster analysis[J]. Communications in Statistics,1974,3(1):1-27.

[26] 傅德印. Q型系统聚类分析中的统计检验问题[J]. 统计与信息论坛,2007,22(3):10-14. FU Deyin. Discussion on statistical test system of Q-mode hierarchical cluster analysis[J]. Statistics & Information Forum,2007,22(3):10-14.

[27] FAIZ M,SAGHAFI A,SHERWOOD N,et al. The influence of petrological properties and burial history on coal seam methane reservoir characterisation,Sydney Basin,Australia[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2007,70(1/2/3):193-208.

[28] CAI Yidong,LIU Dameng,ZHANG Keming,et al. Preliminaryevaluation of gas content of the No.2 coal seam in the Yan chuannan area,southeast Ordos Basin,China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2014,122:675-689.

[29] 夏鹏. 西山煤田古交矿区煤层气富集规律及产能主控因素研究[D]. 太原:太原理工大学,2017. XIA Peng. The study of coalbed methane enrichment rule and productivity dominating parameters in the Gujiao area,Xishan coalfield[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2017.

[30] 王红岩. 山西沁水盆地高煤阶煤层气成藏特征及构造控制作用[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005. WANG Hongyan. The reservoir characteristics and tectonic influence of high rank coalbed methane in Qinshui Basin,Shanxi Province[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2005.