•  
  •  
 

Coal Geology & Exploration

Abstract

Based on the 4 factors such as exploration status, coal seam, coal quality and hydrological conditions, using the secondary fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the geological evaluation model without well was built. In order to verify the applicability of the model, the material balance by law of conservation of mass was carried out and the results compared with the test results of indoor model was got. This research suggests that the weight of geological conditions affecting underground coal gasification without well is exploration status > conditions of coal seam > hydrological conditions > coal quality, the area with comprehensive score higher than 70 is the more suitable area, the area with score 60~70 is the suitable area and the area with score less than 60 is the unsuitable area. In the Jinghai coal-bearing area, the comprehensive score of the No.5 coal seam is 78.89 which belongs to more suitable area of underground coal gasification without well, and the buried depth, CO2 reactivity(900℃), the poor cohesiveness and suitability made the score deducted. The gas components obtained from material balance and laboratory simulation tests have the relative error within 15% of the allowable error, and the relative error of useful components(H2 +CO +CH4) is 2.63%, which not only proves the applicability of the system, but also has certain guiding significance for the later production scale design and field production.

Keywords

underground coal gasification without well, geological conditions, evaluation system, Jinghai of Tianjin, material balance, simulation test

DOI

10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.03.008

Reference

[1] 谢和平,高峰,鞠杨,等. 深地煤炭资源流态化开采理论与技术构想[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(3):547-556. XIE Heping,GAO Feng,JU Yang,et al. Theoretical and technological conception of the fluidization mining for deep coal resources[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(3):547-556.

[2] 刘淑琴,张尚军,牛茂斐,等. 煤炭地下气化技术及其应用前景[J]. 地学前缘,2016,23(3):97-102. LIU Shuqin,ZHANG Shangjun,NIU Maofei,et al. Technology process and application prospect of underground coal gasification[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(3):97-102.

[3] 梁杰. 煤炭地下气化技术进展[J]. 煤炭工程,2017,49(8):1-8. LIANG Jie. Development overview of underground coal gasification technology[J]. Coal Engineering,2017,49(8):1-8.

[4] KHADSE A,QAYYUMI M,MAHAJAI S,et al. Underground coal gasification:A new clean coal utilization technique for India[J]. Energy,2007,32(11):2061-2071.

[5] BHASKARAN S,GANESH A,MAHAJANI S,et al. Comparison between two types of Indian coals for the feasibility of underground coal gasification through laboratory scale experiments[J]. Fuel,2013,113:837-843.

[6] HUANG W G,WANG Z T,XIN L,et al. Feasibility study on underground coal gasification of No.15 seam in Fenghuangshan mine[J]. Journal-South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy,2012,112(10):897-903.

[7] 赵理中. 煤炭地下气化的地质条件[J]. 中国煤炭,1995(7):67-68. ZHAO Lizhong. Geological conditions of coal underground gasification[J]. China Coal,1995(7):67-68.

[8] 王志刚,付小锦,江胜国. 煤炭地下气化技术在天津地区的应用研究[J]. 煤炭与化工,2015,38(9):31-34. WANG Zhigang,FU Xiaojin,JIANG Shengguo. Application of underground coal gasification technology in Tianjin area[J]. Coal and Chemical Industry,2015,38(9):31-34.

[9] 翟培合,王敏,王磊. 煤炭地下气化可行性评价分析[J]. 煤炭经济研究,2013,33(10):55-58. ZHAI Peihe,WANG Min,WANG Lei. Feasibility evaluation of coal underground gasification[J]. Coal Economic Research,2013,33(10):55-58.

[10] 刘淑琴,周蓉,潘佳,等. 煤炭地下气化选址决策及地下水污染防控[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2013,41(5):23-27. LIU Shuqin,ZHOU Rong,PAN Jia,et al. Location selection and groundwater pollution prevention & control regarding underground coal gasification[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2013,41(5):23-27.

[11] 赵岳,黄温钢,徐强,等. 煤炭地下气化地质条件评价研究:以江苏省朱寨井田为例[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2018,37(3):1-11. ZHAO Yue,HUANG Wengang,XU Qiang,et al. Study on evaluation of geological conditions for underground coal gasification:Taking Zhuzhai minefield of Jiangsu Province as an example[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science),2018,37(3):1-11.

[12] 王志刚,曹健,江胜国,等. 天津市煤炭地下气化可行性研究[R]. 天津:天津华北地质勘查局地质研究所,2017.

[13] 张晓亮. 熵权耦合层次分析赋权在煤层底板突水评价中的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2017,45(3):91-95. ZHANG Xiaoliang. Application of entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process in evaluation of water inrush from coal seam floor[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2017,45(3):91-95.

[14] 杨永国,秦勇,张冬明,等. 层次分析法及其在煤层气项目经济评价中的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2001,29(4):19-21. YANG Yongguo,QIN Yong,ZHANG Dongming,et al. Analytic hiearchy process and its application in economic evaluation of coalbed methane project[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2001,29(4):19-21.

[15] 许树柏. 层次分析法原理[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社,1988.

[16] 陈峰,潘霞,刘洪涛,等. O2/CO2煤炭地下气化模型实验[J]. 煤炭学报,2015,38(增刊2):495-500. CHEN Feng,PAN Xia,LIU Hongtao,et al. O2/CO2 underground coal gasification model test[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2015,38(S2):495-500.

[17] 梁杰,席建奋,孙加亮,等. 鄂庄薄煤层富氧地下气化模型实验[J]. 煤炭学报,2007,32(10):1032-1034. LIANG Jie,XI Jianfen,SUN Jialiang,et al. Experiment on underground coal gasification of the thin coal seam in Ezhuang[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2007,32(10):1032-1034.

[18] 柳迎红,梁新星,梁杰,等. 影响煤炭地下气化稳定性生产因素[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2006,34(11):79-82. LIU Yinghong,LIANG Xinxing,LIANG Jie,et al. Factors influenced to stability of coal underground gasification[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2006,34(11):79-82.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.